<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Scenario 1: Adrian Financial Services (Nadia&#39;s seminar) by Nadia Amin</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/aminn/3jg5xpmle3jj</link>
      <description>Is DSDM a suitable approach? Explain why</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2019-09-29 12:46:35 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2023-10-14 06:30:06 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Adrian Financial Services</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/aminn/3jg5xpmle3jj/wish/391825733</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The group understand that Scenario 1 is not suitable from DSDM approach. <br>This because the project objective (deliver text messages to pagers) can only be achieved if all previous steps are done, tested and completed. <br>On this Scenario 1, a waterfall approach would probably be the best - a big bang delivery at the end of the project.<br><br>Existing level of Complexity within AFS project and it's Product Requirment Functions are is low as it portrays  little change, requiring, few or no iterations. <br><br>AFS has at all any budget or  Time constraints.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-01 12:37:59 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/aminn/3jg5xpmle3jj/wish/391825733</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/aminn/3jg5xpmle3jj/wish/391826909</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong><em>It could be suitable, but it isn’t </em></strong></div><div><strong><em> </em></strong></div><div><strong><em>Traditional-Waterfall</em></strong></div><div>Over detailed requirements</div><div>No clear timeframe </div><div>Prioritizes features</div><div>No clear budget </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-01 12:40:00 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/aminn/3jg5xpmle3jj/wish/391826909</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/aminn/3jg5xpmle3jj/wish/391828849</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Financial Services - traditional. <br> - already adaptable to change <br> - experienced <br> - information readily available <br> - good timing <br> - good plans, they have a clear vision<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <pubDate>2019-10-01 12:43:02 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/aminn/3jg5xpmle3jj/wish/391828849</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/aminn/3jg5xpmle3jj/wish/391829561</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br> Scenario 1.<br> <br> DSDM is suitable because it prioritises time, quality and time. For example: messages should be sent to the pagers at the most cost-effective time. Features are not so much of a priority due to the system operating in real-time. For example: stocks can change rapidly in a short peiod of time. Users need to be knowledgeable </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-01 12:44:09 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/aminn/3jg5xpmle3jj/wish/391829561</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/aminn/3jg5xpmle3jj/wish/391833661</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1. no room for delivering prototypes<br>2. big bang delivery is more suitable<br>3. no time frame<br>4. no budget</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-01 12:50:30 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/aminn/3jg5xpmle3jj/wish/391833661</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/aminn/3jg5xpmle3jj/wish/391864821</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/414361342/c909e2b7bbe470a09f91e27f9bd8e508/15699368161049010047682103618614.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-01 13:34:30 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/aminn/3jg5xpmle3jj/wish/391864821</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Update based on my current understanding. </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/aminn/3jg5xpmle3jj/wish/394088181</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>This project prioritizes the requirements and has not presented any constraints as it relates to time or budget which means that time and budget could be flexible in order to meet the requirements. This is because the functionality of the software is based on all the features being developed first before the product is released so that it can operate accurately and in real time. Therefore features cannot be compromised and so the DSDM approach which favors time and budget over fixed features would not be a suitable method. <br><br>by Jan</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-06 11:20:44 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/aminn/3jg5xpmle3jj/wish/394088181</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
