I used to think the science of reading was....now I think it... by Elizabeth Stein

2023-11-07 16:03:12 UTC

It makes sense! We can easily be tricked to think a reader who decides has great comprehension, but looking further, that may not be the case.

2023-11-07 16:03:25 UTC

Was new now I know it is not

All of the essential components of reading.

2023-11-07 16:03:30 UTC

2023-11-07 16:03:34 UTC

Then… something trendy

Now… what we are already doing and helps the learner more holistically because everything is connected

Wow

2023-11-07 16:03:45 UTC

This was very informative and so helpful. I am going to incorporate so much of this into my reading instruction.

2023-11-07 16:04:04 UTC

I used to think SOR was a program. Now I understand it’s the scientific concepts on HOW learners develop reading skills.

2023-11-07 16:04:17 UTC

It’s a compilation of 50 years of research that expands across the world.

2023-11-07 16:04:19 UTC

we are already doing it, it just takes a bit of change to shift the balance

2023-11-07 16:05:03 UTC

we are on a good track!!

2023-11-07 16:05:03 UTC

Thanks for reminding us of how multi-dimensional reading instruction is!

ndamato — 2023-11-07 16:05:20 UTC

The SOR involves so many components. So relieved to see that we are already doing this!

2023-11-07 16:06:28 UTC

SOR is a passion…… OG, UFLI, Wilson, Fundations…….I love it all. Embracing SOR is not the issue. Time, planning, and execution of what is needed for struggling readers in a school day is what is the most difficult!!!!!!!!

2023-11-07 16:24:40 UTC

It was eye opening! Thank you