1. What is your name?

2. Where are you from, and where do you live?

3. What 2-3 activities or tasks do you complete daily for your professional, personal, and academic lives?

4. What is your favorite television/ streaming show or series, website, phone application, or game that you most often enjoy and why?

5. What is one aspect of the COIL experience that excites you?

Click the plus sign (+) above to add your post.

(This website is originally in Spanish but can be translated into English using Yandex (https://translate.yandex.com/en/translate).

UCA Students: Watch TEDx Talks (2023), IA en educación: Del miedo a la oportunidad [AI in Education: From Fear to Opportunity] (12 min, 51 sec) (Spanish audio with English subtitles)

UADY Students: Watch TEDx Talks (2023), Generative A.I. in Education [IA generativa en educación] (7 min, 5 sec) (English audio with Spanish subtitles)

UADY & UCA students: Based on your previous research, the reading Digital Anthropology Could Help Build a Safe and Fair Metaverse, and the video TEDx Talks (2023), write two paragraphs about your perceptions regarding the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) by citizens in the partnering country in their daily lives and educational system. Consider the following key elements:

• First paragraph:

  • Usage in daily life: For UADY students, how do you think people in the U.S. use GAI in everyday activities? For UCA students, how do you think this is the case in Mexico? (Examples: virtual assistants, content creation, task automation, online shopping, entertainment).

  • Impact on education: How is GAI used in the other country's educational system? (Examples: support for personalized learning, text generation, research assistance, tutoring tools).

• Second paragraph:

  • Advantages and challenges: What do you think are the benefits and potential problems of using GAI in these areas?

  • Your personal opinion: For UADY students, do you believe the impact of GAI in the U.S. is mostly positive or negative? For UCA students, do you believe the impact of GAI in Mexico is mostly positive or negative? Briefly explain your stance.

Once you have written your response, use any AI tool to translate it into the other language. Submit your two paragraphs in your original language, followed by the same to paragraphs translated in the other language (English or Spanish).

By fully participating in this COIL experience, students will…

1. develop and share their own introduction in English to showcase their individual life-career journey while discovering different perspectives from domestic and international peers.

   
   

2. engage in cross-cultural dialogue to critically compare and contrast the perceptions, policies, and ethical considerations of Generative AI (GAI) in education between Mexico and the U.S., demonstrating openness, respect, and adaptability in an intercultural exchange.
   

3. analyze the educational, ethical, and legal implications of GAI by integrating scholarly sources, international policies, and best practices to develop informed arguments on its role in learning, teaching, and leadership.

   
   

4. develop research, critical thinking, and advocacy skills by composing well-supported letters and audio-visual responses that propose ethical and practical recommendations for AI integration in education.

   
   

5. reflect on the responsibilities of AI users and advocates, fostering a commitment to ethical, inclusive, and responsible AI adoption in education that prioritizes equity and academic integrity.

Tengo muchas ideas sobre la IA como concepto en general, y temo que se hayan filtrado en esta tarea...

In education, GAI is used by institutions and teachers for teaching and learning, adapting content that is tailored to the needs of students by searching for information, explaining content, and generating ideas for their work.

The use of GAI offers advantages such as improved efficiency, personalization, and access to information13, but I also think there is a risk of misuse, as well as the possibility that intensive use of GAI in activities such as writing may interfere with the development of critical thinking and autonomy.

In my opinion, the impact of GAI in the United States is mostly positive, as it offers numerous opportunities to improve daily life and education, as long as the challenges associated with its use are addressed responsibly

Si bien la IAG ofrece múltiples beneficios, como el ahorro de tiempo y la mejora en el acceso a la educación, también plantea desafíos significativos. La dependencia excesiva de estas herramientas podría afectar el desarrollo del pensamiento crítico y la creatividad, especialmente en los estudiantes, además de generar preocupaciones sobre la privacidad y la propagación de desinformación. A nivel social, su uso masivo puede mejorar la eficiencia, pero también profundizar la brecha digital entre quienes tienen acceso a estas tecnologías y quienes no. Considero que el impacto de la IAG en EE.UU. es mayormente positivo, ya que contribuye a la optimización de tareas diarias y al fortalecimiento del aprendizaje, siempre que se implementen regulaciones adecuadas para evitar riesgos asociados a su uso.

The use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) in the daily lives of American citizens has become increasingly common, facilitating activities in various fields. In entertainment, platforms like Netflix and Spotify use advanced algorithms to recommend personalized content, while in e-commerce, stores like Amazon leverage GAI to optimize online shopping through suggestions based on user habits. Additionally, virtual assistants such as ChatGPT and Alexa help automate daily tasks, from text writing to activity planning. In the educational field, GAI plays a key role in personalized learning, allowing students to access explanations tailored to their level, receive assistance in text generation, and optimize their research through advanced information analysis tools.

Although GAI offers multiple benefits, such as time savings and improved access to education, it also presents significant challenges. Excessive reliance on these tools could hinder the development of critical thinking and creativity, especially among students, while also raising concerns about privacy and the spread of misinformation. On a social level, its widespread use can enhance efficiency but also deepen the digital divide between those with access to these technologies and those without. I believe that the impact of GAI in the U.S. is mostly positive, as it contributes to task optimization and learning enhancement, provided that proper regulations are implemented to mitigate the risks associated with its use.

              Based on the TED talk there are advantages to GAI that I was completely unaware of and still don’t know how to use. I am all for making mundane tasks more efficient. I have a LOT to learn. I do worry if we are engineering creativity out of people. I barely even understand enough to grasp what the speaker was referring to about customizing learning for students with GAI. I’m not at all sure how that would work, but it seems brilliant if you can easily create learning that meets students where they are to achieve greater levels of equity regardless of where your starting point is. This could be a great tool both for Mexico and the U.S>, particularly for students that are behind because of socio-economic factors that can distract students from fully focusing on their education.

                                              Crecí en una época en la que las computadoras apenas empezaban a estar disponibles, justo cuando empecé la universidad. Apenas he empezado a comprender la IA. Supongo que la gente de mi edad, en general, no la usa a menos que tenga experiencia en el trabajo. Creo que el uso de la IA en la educación en México probablemente sería similar al de Estados Unidos. Parece tan nuevo que ahora mismo todo el mundo está intentando comprenderlo. Solo la he usado para crear contenido, e incluso entonces, siento que estoy haciendo trampa. Solo después de ver la charla TED me di cuenta por primera vez de que la palabra "chat" en ChatGPT significa literalmente que puedes hablar con la IA. Me di cuenta de que sé incluso menos de lo que creía. Hace poco, uno de mis profesores me mostró lo que puede hacer, introdujo los criterios para un trabajo que estaba escribiendo y compartió la respuesta conmigo. Sentí que estaba haciendo trampa. Las palabras que el programa creó eran mucho mejores que las mías. ¡Una vez que lo ves, no puedes dejar de verlo! Mi trabajo mejorará, pero me cuesta sentir que estoy haciendo trampa.

                                              Según la charla TED, la GAI tiene ventajas que desconocía por completo y que aún no sé cómo aprovechar. Estoy totalmente a favor de hacer que las tareas cotidianas sean más eficientes. Tengo mucho que aprender. Me preocupa que estemos ingeniando la creatividad de las personas. Apenas entiendo lo suficiente como para comprender a qué se refería el orador sobre la personalización del aprendizaje para estudiantes con GAI. No estoy del todo seguro de cómo funcionaría, pero me parece brillante si se puede crear fácilmente un aprendizaje que se adapte a las necesidades de los estudiantes para lograr una mayor equidad, independientemente de su punto de partida. Esta podría ser una gran herramienta tanto para México como para Estados Unidos, en particular para los estudiantes que están rezagados debido a factores socioeconómicos que pueden distraerlos y evitar que se concentren plenamente en su educación.

Saludos.

Currently, Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) represents a constant challenge in people's lifestyle and educational activities. Due to its versatile functionality, its field of application can range from entertainment to professional use. Its establishment in daily life represents a tool that facilitates day-to-day activities, from making online purchases to creating entertainment pages, and is also manifested in conducting research, completing tasks, creating programs, and the constant creation of new online services. In education, it represents a tool that facilitates the creation of schoolwork, making educational performance increase as it helps solve problems that could take days in just a few minutes.

Paragraph 2

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) has great advantages, such as allowing the creation of attractive content, with images and sounds, increasing efficiency and creativity, facilitating and improving each program or project. However, it also has disadvantages such as security issues, it can cause job loss and make us dependent on technology, in the educational field we can see a decline in the quality of learning in students because they do not take the trouble to review their work and only submit the first thing that AI produces. If we weigh the positives and negatives, in my opinion, Generative Artificial Intelligence is more beneficial; it just needs to be used properly.

Using GAI has many advantages, such as saving time, improving productivity, and offering more personalized experiences. But there are also challenges, such as data privacy, the risk of over-reliance on technology, and the misinformation that some algorithms can generate. In education, although these tools can be very helpful, it's also important that students don't become accustomed to relying on them for everything, as this could impair their ability to think critically and be independent. In my opinion, GIS is having a positive impact in the United States, provided it's used responsibly and its potential ethical and social risks are taken into account.

El uso de Inteligencia Artificial Generativa ha aumentado exponencialmente desde el anuncio de Inteligencias de fácil acceso, como ChatGPT, o más recientemente Copilot y Gemini. Estás ayudan a resolver tareas de manera más rápida y directa, proporcionando respuestas estructuradas a cualquier pregunta. Es por eso que en Estados Unidos (y el resto del mundo) se han vuelto clave para el ámbito académico e incluso laboral. Ayudan al proceso creativo en actividades como redactar ensayos o resúmenes, revisar ortografía, crear y editar videos o imágenes (con herramientas como Midjourney), incluso es súper útil para el aprendizaje individual.

Párrafo 2

Uno de los mayores beneficios es la reducción de tiempo para tareas tediosas, aunado a la adaptabilidad de las IAs para proporcionar respuestas personalizadas que impulsan el aprendizaje individual. Una poderosa herramienta como lo es la IAG puede ser atractiva para usar excesivamente, incluso sin darse cuenta. Este abuso y dependencia de la IAG puede llevar a un retroceso en el aprendizaje. De igual forma, otra desventaja de su uso está en el desconocimiento del público en general al proporcionar datos privados y personales, los cuales, la IAG puede tomar para “aprender”, poniendo en vulnerabilidad estos datos. El auge de la IAG en Estados Unidos es inevitable, y desde mi perspectiva, creo que las personas están dependiendo mucho de ella. Por ello, creo que es importante empezar una campaña de concientización.

Paragraph 1

The use of Generative Artificial Intelligence has increased exponentially since the announcement of easily accessible Intelligences, such as ChatGPT, or more recently Copilot and Gemini. These help to solve tasks in a faster and more direct way, providing structured answers to any question. That is why in the United States (and the rest of the world) they have become key to the academic and even work environment. They help the creative process in activities such as writing essays or summaries, spell checking, creating and editing videos or images (with tools like Midjourney), and are even super useful for individual learning.

Paragraph 2

One of the biggest benefits is the reduction of time for tedious tasks, coupled with the adaptability of AIs to provide personalized responses that boost individual learning. A powerful tool such as IAG can be attractive to overuse, even without realizing it. This overuse and dependence on IAG can lead to learning setbacks. Similarly, another disadvantage of its use lies in the general public's ignorance of providing private and personal data, which the IAG can take to “learn,” making this data vulnerable. The rise of IAG in the United States is inevitable, and from my perspective, I think people are relying on it too much. Therefore, I think it is important to start an awareness campaign.

1. Taking as reference the information from the Branch company (2021), I consider that many Americans frequently use AI-powered virtual assistants in their daily lives for everyday tasks such as managing calendars, sending messages, controlling smart devices at home (lights, thermostats, etc.), obtaining information from the web or performing searches, such as, for example, online shopping on Amazon, where they use AI to recommend products based on the user's purchase history and preferences. Also, in entertainment consumption such as video games, Netflix, Spotify, YouTube.

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) has transformed the daily lives of U.S. citizens in various fields. At home, virtual assistants like Alexa and Siri facilitate everyday tasks such as calendar organization and online shopping. Additionally, entertainment platforms like Netflix and Spotify use GAI algorithms to personalize content recommendations. In the workplace, task automation enhances efficiency in sectors such as marketing and design. In the educational system, GAI has enabled personalized learning through tools such as educational chatbots and text generators, which help students with research and comprehension of academic materials.

The use of GAI brings both advantages and challenges. Among its benefits are time optimization, accessibility to quality information, and the strengthening of personalized learning. However, it also raises concerns related to misinformation, technological dependence, and user privacy. In my opinion, the impact of GAI in the U.S. is mostly positive, provided that proper regulations are implemented to mitigate its risks. The key is to promote responsible use of these technologies to maximize their benefits without compromising security and equity in society.

Enlace permanente

Students benefit from AI-powered tools such as Khan Academy's tutor Khanmigo and Grammarly, which assist in writing and text analysis, while AI-driven learning models offer personalized education. These technologies tailor content to each student's needs and learning pace, thus supporting distance education and expanding access to knowledge.

The use of GAI presents both benefits and challenges. Among its advantages are efficiency and accessibility, as it automates work, reduces time consumption, and directly enhances productivity across different sectors. It also democratizes access to information and learning, benefiting people in remote areas or those with physical disabilities. On the other hand, it raises concerns about algorithmic bias, data privacy, and technological dependence. AI models can unintentionally replicate social inequalities by reinforcing biases inherent in their training data. Additionally, the massive collection of data heightens concerns about information security and the potential misuse of personal data.

Overall, I believe GAI has a positive impact in the U.S., as it fosters innovation in multiple fields. However, without proper regulations and ethical frameworks, its adverse effects could go unchecked, potentially limiting fair and secure access for everyone.

Marylin Janet Cuevas Canto

Melissa Bland

Diosma Zapata Guzman

Holda Vianey Rodríguez Carvajal

Phoenix Smithey

Leonardo Emmanuel Uicab Quintal

Jesús Gerardo Sulu Cen

Anna Claire Pullman

Padilla Vela

Sue Cluck

Idalia Mercedes Leeder Uco

Tanner Williams

Karla Guadalupe Santos España

Shelly Palsa

Saludos.

Hola les presentamos nuestra carta.

Saludos

 English

This extends to different areas, from planning a calendar to organize daily activities, using voice commands to request personalized assistance, GPS for finding directions, to tools like ChatGPT for improving text writing, among others. All these technologies enable people to make decisions and solve problems with more objective information.

In educational terms, artificial intelligence has marked a significant advancement for American students, promoting continuous learning and allowing them to adapt to new data and changing circumstances. It also enhances personalized learning by adjusting educational content to the specific needs of each student. This is beneficial for students, teachers, and schools with limited resources. With this approach, students can progress at their own pace, engage in activities that match their learning style, and develop greater autonomy in their education. Additionally, the use of AI assistants helps differentiate tasks and create adaptive exercises based on data, improving the learning experience without significantly increasing teachers' workload.

That being said, while the benefits of AI are undeniably practical in students' lives, the challenges can be significant. One major issue is the excessive dependence on these tools, which sometimes limits the development of critical thinking skills necessary for problem-solving.

Personally, I believe that artificial intelligence in the United States and worldwide has a largely positive impact, as it fosters innovation and provides access to up-to-date information. However, it is essential to establish regulations that promote the responsible use of technology to ensure that its benefits are utilized ethically and equitably.

 Ariana B.

1) How does global learning--leading up to and during the COIL experience--play a role in the future of educational systems in the United States?

2) Share two similarities and two differences you found regarding technology in teaching and learning between the United States and at least two other countries.

3) Share how the COIL experience challenged or complicated your perspective on your global competencies. (Refer back to the first course assignment "Globalization in Action: Planning for Schooling and the Self" for inspiration.)

P.S.: You do not need to necessarily cite anything in your reflection. 😊

I’m worried that in today’s political climate global learning will not be something is seen as valuable to improve upon. There is an arrogance in the U.S. that we are better so that many people don’t see the benefit of looking at anything through a global lens. I think this is a huge mistake. There are many countries doing things better than we are while being more humble and empathetic while doing so. My experience has been that the teachers that value a global perspective are multi-talented educators that often find other better paying jobs, thereby depriving the educational system of their perspective and expertise.

2) Share two similarities and two differences you found regarding technology in teaching and learning between the United States and at least two other countries.

I’ve seen a lot of similarities around technology in education across multiple countries. In both Mexico and Northern Ireland digital literacy is something that is also valued and seen as imperative to raise students that are digital citizens of the future. All three countries also suffer from a lack of educator training. Professional development in technology is a critical piece that needs a solution sooner rather than later. With AI already here, there is even more training that needs to be done. As soon as training is actually created and delivered for a new technology, it becomes obsolete and there is another new technology to take its place.

In my readings and interactions since June 2024 in Northern Ireland to today, it seems that there are two very big differences between the U.S. and some other countries. In other countries, there seems to be corporate investment in digital literacy infrastructure and training in a way that I don’t hear about in the U.S. The almighty dollar is so valued here that no one wants to invest in digital technology. It seems to be the norm in other countries, so even the same company that might invest in say Northern Ireland, won’t make that investment in the U. S. Other countries like Mexico, Singapore, Germany, and Brazil understand that providing digital literacy training for the current workforce needs to be a priority. Only recently has this begun to be noticed in Arkansas. Even then, it seems like everyone wants a piece of the “pie” of funding to provide training, but little oversight is provided to ensure the training is appropriate, easily available, and relevant to today’s workers.

3) Share how the COIL experience challenged or complicated your perspective on your global competencies. (Refer back to the first course assignment "Globalization in Action: Planning for Schooling and the Self" for inspiration.)

My experiences in Northern Ireland and the COIL experience with the students from Mexico have broadened my perspective, but I also was struck by how similar we all are. We are struggling with some of the same things in education across cultures. Some things that seem like the smallest of differences can have a large impact. One of my granddaughter’s friends is Mexican. She was dropped off for a birthday party an hour late. The party was only 1 ½ hours, so it was almost over when she got there. The friend was also often late for soccer practice. That’s when I first realized that time is more flexible in Mexico. Being late in the U.S. is almost seen as unforgivable. This seems like a small thing but can have a large impact on the Hispanic kids.

In our last COIl meeting, I loved how the Mexican students were so free and expressive in their comments. I feel like we are more reserved for the most part in what we say. We are afraid of saying the “wrong” thing. I particularly notice this in my own students. I loved “watching” Cludia talk. Her face was so animated and her gestures were mesmerizing. I had no clue what she was saying, but I enjoyed it! I feel like the COIL experience has subtlety shifted my entire framework for considering global perspectives. I’m going to try to not look through my own bias lens of “appropriate” behavior.

Global Learning and Educational Systems

My COIL experience revealed how crucial global collaboration is for the future of education in the United States. Working with international colleagues showed me that meaningful educational change, especially regarding AI integration. It requires diverse perspectives and cross-border partnerships. When educators from different countries shared their approaches to technology, I saw how we could learn from each other instead of struggling with the same challenges in isolation. I firmly believe that to utilize AI's potential to enhance teaching rather than replace educators, we need this global exchange of ideas and practices. My experience taught me that the most innovative solutions emerge when we combine insights from different educational systems and cultural contexts.

Technology Comparisons Across Borders

Through my COIL collaborations, I noticed striking similarities and differences in how various countries approach educational technology. In both the U.S. and partner countries, teachers share concerns about professional development. We all worry about developing adequate skills for successful AI implementation. Similarly, educators worldwide view technology as a tool to enhance teaching rather than replace human connection. Mexican educators emphasized culturally responsive technology integration in ways I rarely see in U.S. discussions (but it could just be my little bubble), particularly their focus on respecting indigenous communities where as I feel that the U.S. conversations about educational equity often remain theoretical and kind of capitalized. These differences made me reflect on how we might better address specific needs of underserved communities in American and global education.

Personal Growth and Challenges

My COIL experience challenged my self-perception of global competency. What humbled me most was discovering my Spanish language skills were far less developed than I'd believed (Element #7). Haha. Simple conversations became complex negotiations of meaning, requiring patience I didn't know I needed. This linguistic struggle gave me newfound empathy for English language learners in American classrooms and highlighted the enormous challenge of making education truly accessible across language barriers. Despite these communication hurdles, working toward our common goal of enhancing education through technology broke down barriers between us. The experience taught me that effective global collaboration isn't about erasing differences but leveraging diverse perspectives to create better solutions than any of us could develop alone. This lesson will forever change how I approach both technology integration and cross-cultural collaboration in my professional practice.

Global learning is perhaps the most vital educational journey United States citizens need to take, especially in today’s genuine nightmare of nationalism, extremism, and horrendous, vile leadership. Global learning allows citizens to interact with real people beyond the scope of their safe bubble of normality, and forces them to recognize that there are other people in the world living lives just as intricate and important as their own. It puts on display an irrefutable fact that other parts of the world can be similar to their own. That sometimes the differences are not glaring. That sometimes it can be better than what they know. If education was global from the earliest parts of a United state’s citizen’s educational experience, I think the world would be a better, more inclusive, honest place.

2) Share two similarities and two differences you found regarding technology in teaching and learning between the United States and at least two other countries.

Across multiple sources I used for this course and another course this semester, I found that the number one thing educators across the world want and feel the same about is training for whatever is going to be implemented. Teachers are happy, often excited to engage in new strategies and technologies in the United States or any country in the world…as long as they are trained how to use it/implement it. Without that, across the board teachers show apprehension and frustration, which leads to poor learning outcomes. Something that is different between the united states and other countries, namely Japan and China, is that some governments are taking a unified approach to integrate technology training into the foundational learning for teachers. Unfortunately I do not believe that this will happen in the united states anytime soon. Regardless of the ineptitude of the current national administration, the United States is too large and not homogeneous enough for this to work successfully. 

3) Share how the COIL experience challenged or complicated your perspective on your global competencies. (Refer back to the first course assignment "Globalization in Action: Planning for Schooling and the Self" for inspiration.)

The COIL experience did not really challenge my perspective of my global competencies. From a very early age, I have always been aware of other countries, different cultures, and that people can and do live different lives than me. I thank my parents and PBS, among other resources. It did make me want to learn a second language. I felt pretty helpless during the COIL interactions sometimes. Though I did learn enough to respond to a few things from Dr. Faidley when he spoke Spanish to me, so that was neat.