Remake of Remake of Source Credibility Practice - 32370 by Christen McGaughey

Source 1

cmcgaughey3 — 2025-10-06 23:45:57 UTC

Source 2

cmcgaughey3 — 2025-10-06 23:45:57 UTC

Source 3

cmcgaughey3 — 2025-10-06 23:45:57 UTC

Source 4

cmcgaughey3 — 2025-10-06 23:45:57 UTC

Source 6

cmcgaughey3 — 2025-10-06 23:45:57 UTC

Source 5

cmcgaughey3 — 2025-10-06 23:45:57 UTC

Group 6

2025-10-13 21:04:36 UTC

We rated it an 8 because the article provides statistics that make the text more objective. The reason it didn’t rank higher was because it’s not an .edu domain, meaning it doesn’t have academic credibility.

group 2

2025-10-13 21:07:03 UTC

we rated a 6 since the article was ridden from a .com and and it was relevant. She's a contributor but reviewing her other works her main focus is politics , some of her work shows bias.

Group 6

2025-10-13 21:10:15 UTC

We rated it a 3.5 because of the large bias the article had. We noticed the article used subjective language to exaggerate certain points. It also is a .org website, which takes away from the credibility since anyone can have a .org.

Group 1

2025-10-13 21:11:06 UTC

We give it a rating of 9/10 for credibility. We think this is because the author goes to a university which is in the same area as where the event is taking place. She gives statistics multiple times throughout the article. She majors in Multimedia Journalism, and is interested in joining the journalism field.

Group 2

2025-10-13 21:12:38 UTC

We rate it a 2 since the information is important to spread its very bias. The publication is from a political organization.

Group 6

2025-10-13 21:15:47 UTC

We rated this article an 8 because of the amount of statistics and facts that were presented. The information given was also from credible sources, such as ICE and the Biden administration. One thing that does take away some credibility is the fact that is is a .org.

Group 1

2025-10-13 21:17:04 UTC

We give it a rating of a 5. There's not much information about the Author, they don't list too much evidence. They are also a very biased non-profit organization.

Group 2

2025-10-13 21:20:07 UTC

We give this one a 8. The name was worrisome but the article context was factual and satistic based. Also had lots of words from the locals.

Group 1

2025-10-13 21:23:56 UTC

We give it a rating of 7. The Author has written multiple other articles. The organization itself isn't too biased, and they state they have fact based information.

Group 6

2025-10-13 21:24:55 UTC

We rated this a 10 because the information is coming from credible sources. Although the information is biased coming from fox news, which is known to be very conservative leaning, it is all accurate verifiable information.

Group 2

2025-10-13 21:25:52 UTC

We rate this a 4. This article had a bias and the author has a clear political stance.

Group 1

2025-10-13 21:27:14 UTC

We give it a rating of 3. The website is filled with pop-up ads, the organization is known to be heavily biased.

Group 6

2025-10-13 21:29:26 UTC

We rated this article a 10 because it is very centered around data and statistics. The author is also a scholar who is very knowledgeable in the subject.

Group 1

2025-10-13 21:29:54 UTC

We give it a rating of a 10. The Author has been to a university and is a Research Scholar of Economics with a Ph.D The website itself isn't filled with ads. They also have a great use of research and data.

Group 2

2025-10-13 21:30:29 UTC

We give this article a 10. It has trustworthy sources and the conversation is funded by the University.

Group 2

2025-10-13 21:33:41 UTC

We give it an 8 since its community based opinion but their information is from other organizations.

Group 6

2025-10-13 21:34:54 UTC

We rated this article a 9, because although it’s very biased, the information is credible and informative. The only reason it isn’t a ten is because it’s a .org, meaning it doesn’t much have academic discussion around it.

Group 1

2025-10-13 21:37:43 UTC

We give it a rating of an 8. The organization itself seems trustworthy. They state they prefer to share the bold truth and facts rather than make profit off advertisements. They also include a good amount of research.