https://padlet.com/usictech/3b8a7ez7jjaovo2c 1. What mark you will give to each section of this report? 2. What would you suggest for each part's improvement? en-us 2021-03-11 11:41:12 UTC 2021-03-20 11:39:53 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet.com/usictech/3b8a7ez7jjaovo2c/wish/1297621891 - the introduction is too long.
- don't mention the US market if not necessary.
- don't put information that is not relevant.
- add citations
- do not put recommendations and threats in the introduction.
- we will give it 3 - 4 marks.]]> 2021-03-11 12:28:12 UTC https://padlet.com/usictech/3b8a7ez7jjaovo2c/wish/1297621891 https://padlet.com/usictech/3b8a7ez7jjaovo2c/wish/1297624284 I would like to give 5.5 mark on this introduction.
- the first section gave useful information abour the background of HUAWEI in the article. But it seems quiet too long and need to shorten.
- without a in-text citation to support his claim.
- unneccesssary background informatiom of HUAWEI in the introduction such as US market.
- ]]> 2021-03-11 12:28:58 UTC https://padlet.com/usictech/3b8a7ez7jjaovo2c/wish/1297624284 https://padlet.com/usictech/3b8a7ez7jjaovo2c/wish/1297636369 - The paragraphs are not written in a PEE format therefore his/her ideas are all over the place
-Points are not fully developed i.e lacks proper explanation and evaluation are absent
-There is no proof to support claims
-The entire section is short
I would mark this a 3]]> 2021-03-11 12:32:52 UTC https://padlet.com/usictech/3b8a7ez7jjaovo2c/wish/1297636369 https://padlet.com/usictech/3b8a7ez7jjaovo2c/wish/1297638288 - Add in-text citations to support the arguments. 
- the points are too general.
- do not use PEEE format.
-do not explain or evaluate the points, just describe them
- we will give it 15 marks.]]> 2021-03-11 12:33:29 UTC https://padlet.com/usictech/3b8a7ez7jjaovo2c/wish/1297638288 wchen76 https://padlet.com/usictech/3b8a7ez7jjaovo2c/wish/1297640433 -I give this induction 5 marks.
- The induction isn't necessarily that long.
-The background should be in the UK and should not mention the US.]]> 2021-03-11 12:34:09 UTC https://padlet.com/usictech/3b8a7ez7jjaovo2c/wish/1297640433 https://padlet.com/usictech/3b8a7ez7jjaovo2c/wish/1297642227 The introudction we only give 6-7 mark to it.
And for reasons that, despite it possess the main competitor and history for development but it also lack of marlets share.]]> 2021-03-11 12:34:41 UTC https://padlet.com/usictech/3b8a7ez7jjaovo2c/wish/1297642227 https://padlet.com/usictech/3b8a7ez7jjaovo2c/wish/1297654139 I would like to give 6.5 marks on it.

- His conclusion is not based on the content of his article. and conclusion should be related to the information he wrote.
- should give some more detailed information on recomandation.
- the final section is not concise enough.]]> 2021-03-11 12:38:06 UTC https://padlet.com/usictech/3b8a7ez7jjaovo2c/wish/1297654139 https://padlet.com/usictech/3b8a7ez7jjaovo2c/wish/1297667865 The analysis does not write in a PEEE format,the points aren't in the first of the paragraph.]]> 2021-03-11 12:42:03 UTC https://padlet.com/usictech/3b8a7ez7jjaovo2c/wish/1297667865 https://padlet.com/usictech/3b8a7ez7jjaovo2c/wish/1297672789 -it's hard to identify the stakeholders because it is all mixed up in one paragraph.]]> 2021-03-11 12:43:25 UTC https://padlet.com/usictech/3b8a7ez7jjaovo2c/wish/1297672789 https://padlet.com/usictech/3b8a7ez7jjaovo2c/wish/1297687060 -need to put the references in APA style.
-needs to justification.]]> 2021-03-11 12:47:12 UTC https://padlet.com/usictech/3b8a7ez7jjaovo2c/wish/1297687060