https://padlet.com/jasmineanderson2255/3apsr3vnh2bg Jasmine Anderson en-us 2018-02-22 17:27:42 UTC 2018-03-01 16:08:21 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet.com/jasmineanderson2255/3apsr3vnh2bg/wish/234362572

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances

It originated because people were being treated like less than human beings

]]> 2018-02-22 17:30:20 UTC https://padlet.com/jasmineanderson2255/3apsr3vnh2bg/wish/234362572 https://padlet.com/jasmineanderson2255/3apsr3vnh2bg/wish/234363718

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

When the Constitution was signed on September 17, 1787, federalists claimed the new government would only have limited powers expressly delegated to it. This wasn’t enough for anti-federalists like George Mason, who wanted explicit guarantees to certain rights in order to prevent any potential encroachment by the federal government

]]> 2018-02-22 17:32:09 UTC https://padlet.com/jasmineanderson2255/3apsr3vnh2bg/wish/234363718 https://padlet.com/jasmineanderson2255/3apsr3vnh2bg/wish/234364101

No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law

Constitution is the section of the Bill of Rights that prohibits soldiers from temporarily residing in private homes during peace time without getting the permission and consent of the owner.

]]> 2018-02-22 17:32:50 UTC https://padlet.com/jasmineanderson2255/3apsr3vnh2bg/wish/234364101 https://padlet.com/jasmineanderson2255/3apsr3vnh2bg/wish/234364434

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

It was added because people were getting searched for no reason 

]]> 2018-02-22 17:33:25 UTC https://padlet.com/jasmineanderson2255/3apsr3vnh2bg/wish/234364434 https://padlet.com/jasmineanderson2255/3apsr3vnh2bg/wish/234364815

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation

that articulates procedural safeguards designed to protect the rights of the criminally accused and to secure life, liberty, and property.

]]> 2018-02-22 17:34:08 UTC https://padlet.com/jasmineanderson2255/3apsr3vnh2bg/wish/234364815 https://padlet.com/jasmineanderson2255/3apsr3vnh2bg/wish/234365319

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

the right to a speedy trial

]]> 2018-02-22 17:34:54 UTC https://padlet.com/jasmineanderson2255/3apsr3vnh2bg/wish/234365319 https://padlet.com/jasmineanderson2255/3apsr3vnh2bg/wish/234365720

In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

Congress proposed a revised version of the Seventh Amendment to the states on September 28, 1789, and by December 15, 1791, the necessary three-quarters of the states had ratified it.

]]> 2018-02-22 17:35:29 UTC https://padlet.com/jasmineanderson2255/3apsr3vnh2bg/wish/234365720 https://padlet.com/jasmineanderson2255/3apsr3vnh2bg/wish/234366289

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted

This provision was written in because of a case where a man named Titus Oates lied and caused many innocent people because of it.

]]> 2018-02-22 17:36:25 UTC https://padlet.com/jasmineanderson2255/3apsr3vnh2bg/wish/234366289 https://padlet.com/jasmineanderson2255/3apsr3vnh2bg/wish/234368190

granted American women the right to vote-a right known as woman suffrage.

Case: Leser v. Garnett

My opinion on this is that I’m glad it in there cause it gives me the right to vote

]]> 2018-02-22 17:39:26 UTC https://padlet.com/jasmineanderson2255/3apsr3vnh2bg/wish/234368190 https://padlet.com/jasmineanderson2255/3apsr3vnh2bg/wish/234368421

No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of President more than once. But this Article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President when this Article was proposed by Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this Article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term

Case:Court Cases- Their haven't been many cases involving the 22nd amendment, for many are dismissed before entering the court room. One notable one is the U.S. term limits v. Thornton, 514 US 779 (1995). This case involved Arkansas adopted Amendment 73 which tried to set limits for Arizona representatives.

]]> 2018-02-22 17:39:48 UTC https://padlet.com/jasmineanderson2255/3apsr3vnh2bg/wish/234368421