Remake of CCOT of the US Supreme Court by Madelyn Kimball https://padlet.com/20mkimball/3agd7ij6oau6 Working with your group you will create a "timeline" of significant court cases. Using the cases you have to choose from in class, research them, add them to the proper category with a summary. en-us 2019-05-13 17:47:45 UTC 2019-05-14 17:53:39 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/icons/Balance.png FCC v. AT&T 20ekerchner https://padlet.com/20mkimball/3agd7ij6oau6/wish/359603280 1. 2011 decided
2. May corporations assert personal privacy interests to prevent the government from releasing documents about them?
3. Corporations do not have a right of personal privacy that would protect them from the disclosure of public records that have been handed over to federal agencies.
4.  8 majority 1 descending]]> 2019-05-13 17:54:54 UTC https://padlet.com/20mkimball/3agd7ij6oau6/wish/359603280 National Aeronautics and space Administration(NASA) v. Nelson 20ekerchner https://padlet.com/20mkimball/3agd7ij6oau6/wish/359603506 1. 2011 decided
2. Does the government violate a federal contract employee's constitutional right to privacy by asking her whether she has received counseling or treatment for recent illegal drug use in the past year, or by asking her references if they have any reason to believe she is unsuited to work in a federal facility?
3. The court reversed the lower court decision and upheld the background checks that NASA uses for employees of companies working under contract in an opinion by Justice Samuel Alito.
4. 8 majority 1 descending]]> 2019-05-13 17:55:18 UTC https://padlet.com/20mkimball/3agd7ij6oau6/wish/359603506 Ablington School District v. Schempp 20ebaum https://padlet.com/20mkimball/3agd7ij6oau6/wish/359873988 1. 1963 decided
2. Did the Pennsylvania law requiring public school students to participate in classroom religious exercises violate the religious freedom of students as protected by the First and Fourteenth Amendments?
3. Public schools cannot sponsor Bible readings and recitations of the Lord’s Prayer under the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause. 
4. 8 majority, 1 dissenting
]]> 2019-05-14 12:57:23 UTC https://padlet.com/20mkimball/3agd7ij6oau6/wish/359873988 Engel v. Vitale 20ebaum https://padlet.com/20mkimball/3agd7ij6oau6/wish/360013026 1. 1962 decided
2. Does the reading of a nondenominational prayer at the start of the school day violate the "establishment of religion" clause of the First Amendment?
3. The state cannot hold prayers in public schools, even if participation is not required and the prayer is not tied to a particular religion. 
4. 6 majority 1 dissenting]]> 2019-05-14 17:15:06 UTC https://padlet.com/20mkimball/3agd7ij6oau6/wish/360013026 Wade v roe 20lreeder2 https://padlet.com/20mkimball/3agd7ij6oau6/wish/360017072 1. 1973
2. Does the Constitution embrace a woman's right to terminate her pregnancy by abortion?
3. The decision gave a woman total autonomy over the pregnancy during the first trimester and defined different levels of state interest for the second and third trimesters.
4. 7 majority 2 descending ]]> 2019-05-14 17:23:02 UTC https://padlet.com/20mkimball/3agd7ij6oau6/wish/360017072 Santa Fe School District v. Doe 20ebaum https://padlet.com/20mkimball/3agd7ij6oau6/wish/360022587 1. 2000 decided
2. Does the Santa Fe Independent School District's policy permitting student-led, student-initiated prayer at football games violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment?
3. Yes. The Court concluded that the football game prayers were public speech authorized by a government policy and taking place on government property at government-sponsored school-related events and that the District's policy involved both perceived and actual government endorsement of the delivery of prayer at important school events. Such speech is not properly characterized as "private," wrote Justice Stevens for the majority.
4.  6 majority 3 dissenting]]> 2019-05-14 17:33:43 UTC https://padlet.com/20mkimball/3agd7ij6oau6/wish/360022587 Washington v Glucksberg 20lreeder2 https://padlet.com/20mkimball/3agd7ij6oau6/wish/360024559 1. 1997
2. Did Washington's ban on physician assisted-suicide violate the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause by denying competent terminally ill adults the liberty to choose death over life?
3. The Court held that the right to assisted suicide is not a fundamental liberty interest protected by the Due Process Clause since its practice has been, and continues to be, offensive to our national traditions and practices. 
4. 9 majority


]]> 2019-05-14 17:37:49 UTC https://padlet.com/20mkimball/3agd7ij6oau6/wish/360024559 Tinker v. Des Moines 20mkimball https://padlet.com/20mkimball/3agd7ij6oau6/wish/360024946 1. 1969 decided 
2. Does a prohibition against the wearing of armbands in public school, as a form of symbolic protest, violate the students' freedom of speech protections guaranteed by the First Amendment?
3. the armbands represented pure speech that is entirely separate from the actions or conduct of those participating in it.
4. 7 majority, 2 dissenting  
]]> 2019-05-14 17:38:40 UTC https://padlet.com/20mkimball/3agd7ij6oau6/wish/360024946 Continuity and Change 20ebaum https://padlet.com/20mkimball/3agd7ij6oau6/wish/360028470 Continuity: it remained true that self prayer for any religious beliefs is protected by the first amendment
Change: in schools and related activities, more was described on what violates others' religious rights--for example, schools cannot impose religious prayer, mandatory or not, unless it is in private by the will of the students involved.]]> 2019-05-14 17:45:37 UTC https://padlet.com/20mkimball/3agd7ij6oau6/wish/360028470