Timeline for HSS Class NIshant Nepal by Nishant Nepal https://padlet.com/nishantnepalnn/38727m8k8rmvy9xj en-us 2023-11-01 05:53:56 UTC 2023-12-15 11:44:59 UTC hello@padlet.com Idea nishantnepalnn https://padlet.com/nishantnepalnn/38727m8k8rmvy9xj/wish/2777437833 Main Keywords:

  1. AI and Law

  2. How will Law and AI co exist?


]]> 2023-11-06 05:41:26 UTC https://padlet.com/nishantnepalnn/38727m8k8rmvy9xj/wish/2777437833 Research Quesiton nishantnepalnn https://padlet.com/nishantnepalnn/38727m8k8rmvy9xj/wish/2777438157 "AI and Authorship in the context of generated writing"


Research Will answer (or attempt to answer): Who owns the creative rights to the content created using GEN AI?

]]> 2023-11-06 05:41:47 UTC https://padlet.com/nishantnepalnn/38727m8k8rmvy9xj/wish/2777438157 List of Reading nishantnepalnn https://padlet.com/nishantnepalnn/38727m8k8rmvy9xj/wish/2777440792

  • https://osf.io/7uy63/download

  • https://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/culture/2023/11/135_362478.html

  • https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2023/08/books3-ai-meta-llama-pirated-books/675063/

  • https://law.nus.edu.sg/trail/generative_ai_and_authorship_in_copyright_law/

  • https://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2017/05/article_0003.html

  • https://openai.com/policies/terms-of-use


    • ]]>     2023-11-06 05:44:33 UTC https://padlet.com/nishantnepalnn/38727m8k8rmvy9xj/wish/2777440792     Summary of Reading nishantnepalnn https://padlet.com/nishantnepalnn/38727m8k8rmvy9xj/wish/2777441063 2023-11-06 05:44:48 UTC https://padlet.com/nishantnepalnn/38727m8k8rmvy9xj/wish/2777441063 Formatting of the paper: nishantnepalnn https://padlet.com/nishantnepalnn/38727m8k8rmvy9xj/wish/2802951966

  • Introduction:

    1. Introduction of the problem.

    2. Introduction the research goal of the paper

  • NLP and Chatbot

    1. Introduction of LLMs

    2. NLP in literature

    3. Contribution in writing (AI generated Literature)

  • What is an authorship?

    1. Legal Definition of an Authorship

  • Answering the main question

    1. How do legal and ethical frameworks define ownership of AI-generated content?

    2. What are the perceptions of creators whose work has been used during training of Gen AI view authorship?

    3. What are creators, consumers, and legal experts' perceptions regarding ownership of GEN AI's content?

  • Conclusion

    • ]]>     2023-11-26 15:43:41 UTC https://padlet.com/nishantnepalnn/38727m8k8rmvy9xj/wish/2802951966     Proposal: nishantnepalnn https://padlet.com/nishantnepalnn/38727m8k8rmvy9xj/wish/2803048612 Introduction:

    The surge in AI-generated content poses intriguing questions about authorship and ownership rights. This research aims to identify the landscape of creative rights regarding content produced by Gen AI tools. The research aims to objectively define authorship in the context of AI-generated writing.

    Research Questions:

    1. What constitutes authorship in the context of content generated by AI?

    2. How do legal and ethical frameworks define ownership of AI-generated content?

    3. What are the perceptions of creators whose work has been used during training of Gen

      AI view authorship?

    4. What are creators, consumers, and legal experts' perceptions regarding ownership of

      GEN AI's content?

    Objectives:

    1. To identify an objective guideline on what an authorship imply in the context of Gen AI-created literature.

    2. To analyse the legal and ethical implications surrounding authorship and ownership of GEN AI-generated content.

    3. To understand the perspectives and attitudes of creators, consumers, and legal experts towards ownership of AI-generated content.

    4. To propose guidelines or frameworks for defining authorship and ownership of AI-generated content.

    Methodology:

    1. Literature Review: Survey existing legal precedents, ethical theories, and scholarly works discussing ownership in AI-generated content.

    2. Case Studies: Analyze notable cases of disputes or agreements concerning ownership of content generated by AI.

    3. Surveys and Interviews: Conduct surveys among creators, consumers, and legal experts to gauge their opinions on authorship and ownership in GEN AI content.

    4. Legal Analysis: Collaborate with legal experts to dissect current laws and regulations surrounding ownership of AI-generated content.

    Expected Outcomes:

    1. A comprehensive understanding of the legal and ethical dimensions concerning authorship and ownership in GEN AI-generated content.

    2. Insights into the varying perceptions and attitudes towards ownership of AI-generated content.

    3. Recommendations or frameworks to navigate and establish ownership rights in AI-generated content.

    Conclusion:
    By examining the complexities of authorship and ownership in AI-generated content, this study seeks to provide an objective framework on the rights and responsibilities entailed in creating and using GEN AI-generated materials.

    ]]>     2023-11-26 18:38:58 UTC https://padlet.com/nishantnepalnn/38727m8k8rmvy9xj/wish/2803048612     Proposal Feeback nishantnepalnn https://padlet.com/nishantnepalnn/38727m8k8rmvy9xj/wish/2803048942 Good work! Surveying the current discourses around this theme is a great way to start this research. One thing you might want to consider is that it might not be possible to present "an objective" framework. In fact, it would be more ideal if you offer your own interpretations of the current state of the conversation and offer a perspective that you think should be at the center of relevant discourses.



    ]]>     2023-11-26 18:39:46 UTC https://padlet.com/nishantnepalnn/38727m8k8rmvy9xj/wish/2803048942     Reflection on Feeback nishantnepalnn https://padlet.com/nishantnepalnn/38727m8k8rmvy9xj/wish/2803050219

  • Creating an objective framework is not actually possible since there are no concerete and defined laws.

  • Focus should change on the current status of situation.

  • Focus more on:

    1. "What is authorship"

    2. AI and Authorship

    3. My own perspective on what could be the solution


    • ]]>     2023-11-26 18:42:40 UTC https://padlet.com/nishantnepalnn/38727m8k8rmvy9xj/wish/2803050219     Feeback nishantnepalnn https://padlet.com/nishantnepalnn/38727m8k8rmvy9xj/wish/2803581766

  • Add experiment

  • Critically analyse the external sources. Give your opnions

    • ]]>     2023-11-27 06:22:35 UTC https://padlet.com/nishantnepalnn/38727m8k8rmvy9xj/wish/2803581766     Peer review jinho0201_ https://padlet.com/nishantnepalnn/38727m8k8rmvy9xj/wish/2803907506 2023-11-27 11:58:13 UTC https://padlet.com/nishantnepalnn/38727m8k8rmvy9xj/wish/2803907506 Peer review seongm0628_ https://padlet.com/nishantnepalnn/38727m8k8rmvy9xj/wish/2804187840 2023-11-27 15:22:53 UTC https://padlet.com/nishantnepalnn/38727m8k8rmvy9xj/wish/2804187840 External Papers nishantnepalnn https://padlet.com/nishantnepalnn/38727m8k8rmvy9xj/wish/2806686303 https://law.nus.edu.sg/trail/generative_ai_and_authorship_in_copyright_law/


    https://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2017/05/article_0003.html


    file:///Users/nishantnepal/Downloads/ChatGPT%20Author%20-%20Preprint.pdf


    https://legaltechcenter.net/files/sites/159/2020/05/Authorship-in-Works-Created-by-Artificial-Intelligence.pdf


    https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation.aspx?paperid=125721

    ]]>     2023-11-29 02:31:24 UTC https://padlet.com/nishantnepalnn/38727m8k8rmvy9xj/wish/2806686303     Feedback nishantnepalnn https://padlet.com/nishantnepalnn/38727m8k8rmvy9xj/wish/2824803353 2023-12-14 05:17:33 UTC https://padlet.com/nishantnepalnn/38727m8k8rmvy9xj/wish/2824803353 Comments nishantnepalnn https://padlet.com/nishantnepalnn/38727m8k8rmvy9xj/wish/2825197084

  • If the prompter is the "owner" of the ai work, then are they responsible for plagiarism?

  • The topic is a kind of philosophical thing, but how can we keep the authorship, is there any standard for the authorship?

  • What is to be protected and what is not?

  • I think copyright in writing is much easier and simpler than copyright issues in other artistic fields, such as painting. Even if it borrows a phrase or two from a long article, I think it is within the citation scope. In the end, I think what matters is the concept, and the concept itself is something that you have to come up with, so I think copyright issues are somewhat avoided.

  • own definition of ownership and originality

  • aspect the connection and impacts between AI generating literatures and author ownership

  • would be better if you explain more on how the current copyright law blocks the development of AI

  • I wonder what is your answer to your main question: Can AI make its own original work?

    • ]]>     2023-12-14 13:02:34 UTC https://padlet.com/nishantnepalnn/38727m8k8rmvy9xj/wish/2825197084     Reflection nishantnepalnn https://padlet.com/nishantnepalnn/38727m8k8rmvy9xj/wish/2825199275

  • Need to add the effect of assigning an "owner" to generated writing

    -> OpenAi's content policy answers this


  • My own definition (Maybe based on the paper, what Would i conclude)

  • Talk about citations and how it helps circumvent the issue of authorship

  • Impact on AI development due to current roadblocks in AI

  • What is the final answer.


    • ]]>     2023-12-14 13:04:46 UTC https://padlet.com/nishantnepalnn/38727m8k8rmvy9xj/wish/2825199275     AI and Authorship nishantnepalnn https://padlet.com/nishantnepalnn/38727m8k8rmvy9xj/wish/2826257290

  • No legal protection?

  • Minimal legal protection, but to whom?

  • What could be the requirements?

    • ]]>     2023-12-15 10:16:14 UTC https://padlet.com/nishantnepalnn/38727m8k8rmvy9xj/wish/2826257290