Year 12 Biology by Bec

I think there should be a limit, because it can have negative side affects on the thing being edited as well as the consumer of a product that has been modified.

2024-03-25 01:23:08 UTC

2024-03-25 01:24:13 UTC

I think there should be a limit because CRISPR can be used for harming organisms

I think there should be a limit so that CRISPR isn't used in the wrong way

moo0019 — 2024-03-25 01:24:43 UTC

2024-03-25 01:25:12 UTC

I believe that there should be a limit to when CRISPR should be used as it can pose a risk to the ecosystem if the genetically engineered organism were to be let out into the wild

2024-03-25 01:28:20 UTC

there should be a limit to crispr so that people cannot use it in the wrong way

I believe there should be a limit

2024-03-25 01:28:25 UTC

if there is free range on gene editing then the rich would have the power. Genetic engineering would create a Gattaca like scenario lead by the wealthy, leading to advantage between socioeconomic groups and a new breed of "perfected" humans.

2024-03-25 01:31:30 UTC

I think there should be a limit to CRISPR so it doesn't harm the environment

I believe that there should be limits

2024-03-25 01:32:00 UTC

I believe that there should be limits to the use of gene editing, because it is a very powerful tool and could have very strong repercussions to how we live our lives. I think that the strongest argument is the argument that who gets to decide what is considered a disease and what isn't.

2025-03-25 01:05:28 UTC

there should be because if it's unregulated what stops the rich from doing what they want while people without the same access can't

2025-03-25 01:05:57 UTC

I think there should be a limit to when CRISPR and other gene editing tools are used because there may be long term effects on offsprings when genome editing occurs especially in regard to designer babies when it is not used to save somebody's life rather it is for enhancement.

There should be no limit to CRISPR

2025-03-25 01:08:57 UTC

The use of CRISPR in furthering research is an endeavor most useful to society as a whole. With enough research, the amount of CRISPR in the market would decrease the value of it, allowing it to be used as an everyday commodity for low prices. #Science4Lyfe #R&DFTW

CRISPER

2025-03-25 01:09:06 UTC

i think there should be a limit as crisper could turn out to be a dangerous if put in the wrong hands of certain scientists

YES FOR A LIMIT

2025-03-25 01:15:20 UTC

THERE SHOULD BE A LIMIT TO PREVENT ANYTHING BAD COMIN FROM SOMEONE WHO HAS DECIDED TO USE IT AGAINST THE INNOCENT OR POOR.

CRISPIER

2025-03-25 01:28:31 UTC

FRIES