https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1 Read about the Carey Vs. Musladin case, and how it relates to the first and 6th Amendments. Respond to each question below by putting your name as the "Title" and sharing your thoughts. en-us 2018-01-28 23:51:59 UTC 2018-02-02 01:14:47 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/icons/Balance.png msuarez7 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225600550 Blah blah ]]> 2018-01-29 13:27:33 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225600550 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225603254 The family are allowed to have the buttons because they are allowed to express themselves and morn.  ]]> 2018-01-29 13:33:51 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225603254 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225603466 I do feel asthough this violated his rights. On the other hand if people are swaying their descison based on a button they shouldn't be part of a jury.]]> 2018-01-29 13:34:18 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225603466 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225603507 Yes i do think that the family members choice to wear the buttons is protected because we have freedom of speech and that's what the buttons were.]]> 2018-01-29 13:34:23 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225603507 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225603541 No it is no protected because there are in a goverment  building meaning they have to follow thier policys and rules so only ammendments that have to do with the courtroom is applied here. look at it like this some goverment buldings dont allow guns inside like a school but thats not a violation of the 2nd ammendment ]]> 2018-01-29 13:34:28 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225603541 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225603656 I think that it should have an offset reaction because it applies to the first amendment but it is also violating the sixth amendments.  ]]> 2018-01-29 13:34:42 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225603656 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225604090 The first amendment relates to this case because the family has the right to wear the buttons. ]]> 2018-01-29 13:35:38 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225604090 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225604341 I think that is protected because there is no law that says "you should wear the uniform" when you are in court . ]]> 2018-01-29 13:36:09 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225604341 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225604404 I believe that the family should be allowed to wear the buttons. The first Amendment states that we are allowed to have Freedom of Speech and what they're doing is their own type of freedom of speech]]> 2018-01-29 13:36:18 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225604404 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225604431 Yes , I do think the family members choice to wear the buttons is protected due to our first amendment , what you wear has to do with freedom of speech.]]> 2018-01-29 13:36:20 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225604431 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225604698 Depending what on the buttons it could cause the jury to have sympathy for the victim and his family. ]]> 2018-01-29 13:36:52 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225604698 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225605668 He uses it to avoid imprisonment because he feel although he is being treated unlawfully with the deceased family wearing buttons. This violates the 6th amendment because the buttons lead to an impartial jury.]]> 2018-01-29 13:38:47 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225605668 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225605769 This relates to the 6th Amendment because it could be taken a certain way by the jury and the judge and they could change their minds because they feel bad due to the buttons.]]> 2018-01-29 13:38:59 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225605769 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225605796 It relates to the 6th amendment because by the family wearing the buttons the judge could feel guilty and make it a partial trial. ]]> 2018-01-29 13:39:02 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225605796 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225606027 I think that the family members choice to wear the buttons are protected by the 1st amendment because they have there freedom of speech.

]]> 2018-01-29 13:39:31 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225606027 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225606405 2018-01-29 13:40:15 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225606405 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225606844 as much as i dislike crime and murder this man does have the right to 100% fair trial no matter how many people he has murdered even tho i disagree with it his rights were violated.]]> 2018-01-29 13:41:09 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225606844 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225607046 It relates to the 6th amendment because the judge and jury might feel bad for the family and say that the defendant is guilty due to his emotions .]]> 2018-01-29 13:41:34 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225607046 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225607332 It's a petition that a prisoner fills out. He tries to use it as a way to not be put into jail. With the buttons he feels like the people of the jury will feel sympathy. ]]> 2018-01-29 13:42:13 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225607332 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225607635 The victims family wore buttons in honor of their fallen family member. But with them doing this it led to an impartial jury, a impartial jury is a violation of the 6th amendment. Therefore they should not have been aloud to wear the buttons in court.]]> 2018-01-29 13:42:53 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225607635 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225607761 The musladin"s  rights have been violated because ]]> 2018-01-29 13:43:09 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225607761 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225607840 The case relates to the 6th amendment because the people participating in the court case might feel a certain way because the family had the buttons on.]]> 2018-01-29 13:43:18 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225607840 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225607925 He uses this concept to his advantage by saying that his rights were violated and that the government is holding his body after violating them. ]]> 2018-01-29 13:43:29 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225607925 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225608568 The families first amendment rights is what protects them from wearing the buttons. It's their "Freedom of speech".]]> 2018-01-29 13:44:49 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225608568 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225609141 Musladin's rights have been violated because of the victims family members coming to the courtroom wearing buttons which affected the jury as well as the judge.]]> 2018-01-29 13:45:58 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225609141 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225609251 This case relates to the 6th amendment because the people in the case maybe bias during the case and that a violation.


]]> 2018-01-29 13:46:13 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225609251 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225609920 Habeus Corpus is a petition that is filled out by a prisoner, so they aren't thrown into jail. Musladin tried to use this concept to his advantage because he feels like he isn't being treated fairly or lawfully in during the case. ]]> 2018-01-29 13:47:19 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225609920 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225610252 I don't feel as though his rights were violated because they have their First Amendment rights and if the jury decides to change their mind then that's just something they decided to do.]]> 2018-01-29 13:47:34 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225610252 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225610422 I do feel asthough this violated his rights, because this might cause emotional attachment to the family. ]]> 2018-01-29 13:47:54 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225610422 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225610561 Habeus Corpus is a latin term for "you have the body " basically saying that the government is holding you illegaly Musladin tries to use this concept to his advantage by filing a habeas corpus suit in the appropriate U.S District Court . If the court agrees , it releases the defendant.]]> 2018-01-29 13:48:10 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225610561 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225611119 his rights are being violated hes allowed a fair public trial]]> 2018-01-29 13:49:15 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225611119 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225611623 I think that Muslandin has the right because people in the jury will feel sympathy for the family.]]> 2018-01-29 13:50:13 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225611623 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225611818 Habeus Corpus is having the right to be freed while being jailed illegally. He used it to his advantage by saying nothing.]]> 2018-01-29 13:50:35 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225611818 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225611992 I believe that they didn't violate his rights. ]]> 2018-01-29 13:50:58 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225611992 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225612286 Musladin tried to use this situation to accuse the judge of violating his sixth amendment.]]> 2018-01-29 13:51:33 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225612286 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225612635 i think that his due process was violated because emotions and bias was used during the case]]> 2018-01-29 13:52:12 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225612635 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225614005 I do think that the family should be able to wear the pin with their lost loved one on it.]]> 2018-01-29 13:54:24 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225614005 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225615137 I think the family does have the right to wear the buttons]]> 2018-01-29 13:56:23 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/225615137 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/226059209 I think the family members wearing the buttons are protected because they have the right to wear what the want. The only way they can say to take it off is if they have a certain uniform]]> 2018-01-30 13:31:39 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/226059209 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/226060896 everyone have freedom to wear and say what they want if there are specific rules.]]> 2018-01-30 13:35:41 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/226060896 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/226061970 they was trying to say the judge took away they sixth amendment]]> 2018-01-30 13:38:19 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/226061970 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/226062448 i think the family should be able to wear what they want because there are no specific rules.]]> 2018-01-30 13:39:13 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/226062448 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/227014829 The family has every right to be able to wear buttons to support Tom Strudder. It is how they coped, how they morned, how they expressed they were hurt.]]> 2018-02-01 13:26:48 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/227014829 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/227016223 Musladin's rights were violated due to him not having a fair trial. Yes the victim's family has a right to express themselves but they probably knew most of the jury]]> 2018-02-01 13:30:13 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/227016223 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/227017732 Habeas Corpus is a suit that'll allow the defendant to sue the government because they violated their rights. Musladin sent the suit to the appropriate U.S. District]]> 2018-02-01 13:33:34 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/227017732 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/227019526 The family can express themselves how ever they want but they need out of city or state people for the jury. The only reason i say this is because if the jury knows the family then they are going to take the family's side]]> 2018-02-01 13:37:11 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/227019526 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/227332103 I believe that the First Amendment does protect Tom Strudder’s family members to be able to wear a button with his picture on it. They have the freedom to wear whatever they please.]]> 2018-02-02 00:58:24 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/227332103 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/227333086 Musladin’s rights could have been violated in a way because the Jury could have seen the buttons and based their decision off of sympathy for the victims family.]]> 2018-02-02 01:05:09 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/227333086 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/227333372 A habeas corpus suit allows a defendant to sue the government, arguing that the government has violated the defendant’s rights, and is, in essence, illegally holding his body.]]> 2018-02-02 01:06:55 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/227333372 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/227334137 Musladin tried to use the suit to his advantage by claiming he was not given the rights of the Sixth Amendment.]]> 2018-02-02 01:11:32 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/227334137 https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/227334315 In my opinion, Musladin’s rights were taken away because the Judge did not follow the rights of the Sixth Amendment. Yes, the family has the right to wear what they please but if it’s violating another Amendment then they’re in the wrong.]]> 2018-02-02 01:12:48 UTC https://padlet.com/msuarez7/35pxzs5ecqr1/wish/227334315