https://padlet.com/bergerb1/2zrq7q0fyvfy en-us 2017-01-24 19:00:14 UTC 2017-01-27 14:01:13 UTC hello@padlet.com marleybrae33 https://padlet.com/bergerb1/2zrq7q0fyvfy/wish/149137342 People should be allowed to keep pit bulls as pets because they are very honorable. In Source 3, it says," Pit bulls became popular during the 1950s and 60s, as respected companies used pit bulls as mascots and in advertising." 
Discussion
Pit bulls used to be the "top dog" for companies, and they got to pose for many things. They used to be honored and special. They should stay that way.]]> 2017-01-24 19:08:16 UTC https://padlet.com/bergerb1/2zrq7q0fyvfy/wish/149137342 https://padlet.com/bergerb1/2zrq7q0fyvfy/wish/149137574 Pit bulls should be allowed to be kept kept as pets because they are very helpful dogs and they can be heros. "As working dogs they were kept as hunters and guardians, as well as herders and pets" (source 3)
Source three's point is that pit bulls can be really helpful. They can protect because they are so strong and tough. Pit bulls can be caring, hard working, and helpful dogs.

]]> 2017-01-24 19:08:45 UTC https://padlet.com/bergerb1/2zrq7q0fyvfy/wish/149137574 wildliferescue9 https://padlet.com/bergerb1/2zrq7q0fyvfy/wish/149430781 Pit bulls should be allowed to be pets because pit bulls get blamed for attacks that they don't do. Source four says "Despite the fact that other breeds of dogs can and do attack people, these incidents go unmentioned in the news even at a local level." Basically, source four is saying that other breeds attack people but no one finds out because the news doesn't report them. I think this is not fair because the pit bulls get all of the bad attention. Most Americans think that pit bulls are the only dangerous dogs.]]> 2017-01-25 18:58:06 UTC https://padlet.com/bergerb1/2zrq7q0fyvfy/wish/149430781 mackinsigner12_net https://padlet.com/bergerb1/2zrq7q0fyvfy/wish/149430997 Most people might think of a pit bull as a life-taker, not a life-saver. In many other times, pit bulls have saved the lives of many. Stubby was a dog in the U.S. Military's K-9 Corps. Source 3 states,"He once saved his entire platoon by warning them of a poison gas attack." The most surprising thing in this was that Stubby was a pit bull! You might hear on the news daily that a pit bull might have attacked a person, but in some cases, they might save a person instead.

]]> 2017-01-25 18:58:40 UTC https://padlet.com/bergerb1/2zrq7q0fyvfy/wish/149430997 helloimcaily https://padlet.com/bergerb1/2zrq7q0fyvfy/wish/149718569 People today tend to believe that pit bulls are dangerous, but they should be thanked because they are very honorable. In source 3, it says," Pit bulls became popular during the 1950s and 60s, as respected companies used pit bulls  as mascots and in advertising." Pit bulls used to be the "top dog" for companies, and they got to stand for many things.  They were adored by companies because of their brave, kind, loyal qualities. They are great pets, and they should stay that way.  ]]> 2017-01-26 18:52:52 UTC https://padlet.com/bergerb1/2zrq7q0fyvfy/wish/149718569 https://padlet.com/bergerb1/2zrq7q0fyvfy/wish/149727570 Pit bulls should be allowed as pets because they can save lives. Most people might think of a pit bull as a life-taker, not a life-saver, but pit bulls have saved the lives of many. Stubby was a dog in the Military's K-9 Corps. According to Source 3,"He once saved his entire platoon by warning them of a poison gas attack."You might think that this was normally a different type of dog, but Stubby was a pit bull! You hear on the news all the time that a pit bull might have attacked somebody, but in some cases, they might save the lives of someone instead.]]> 2017-01-26 19:12:58 UTC https://padlet.com/bergerb1/2zrq7q0fyvfy/wish/149727570 helloimcaily https://padlet.com/bergerb1/2zrq7q0fyvfy/wish/149863846 Parents should be punished with legal action if their child skips school too many times because they are responsible for taking their child to school, making sure they are healthy, and their child has all they need for school.
Many children are skipping school these days. This is not good for their education. Usually the parent doesn't wake their child up on time, or the child is secretly out with friends instead of going to their classes. Parents should be punished with legal action if their child skips school too many times because they are responsible for taking their child to school, making sure they are healthy, and their child has all they need for school.

 ]]> 2017-01-27 13:33:18 UTC https://padlet.com/bergerb1/2zrq7q0fyvfy/wish/149863846 noahsommerville https://padlet.com/bergerb1/2zrq7q0fyvfy/wish/149863952 Parents should be punished with legal actions if their child skips school to many times because the parents need to be responsible and the child needs to go to school to learn.
Sometimes children skip school for no reason. That is not good. The child needs to be at school so he/she can learn and grow. Kids have been skiping tons of school days. Parents should be punished with legal actions if their child skips school to many times because the parents need to be responsible and the child needs to go to school to learn.]]> 2017-01-27 13:33:43 UTC https://padlet.com/bergerb1/2zrq7q0fyvfy/wish/149863952 https://padlet.com/bergerb1/2zrq7q0fyvfy/wish/149864232 Parents shouldn't be punished with legal actions because they might not be aware of their child's actions and it wouldn't be fair.
          Parent's should not be punished with legal actions because they might not be aware of what there child is doing. Kids these days might skip school because it is boring, or maybe because their friends are, but why should the parent be the one going to jail if they don't even know about what their child is doing? 
                   Another reason why parent's shouldn't be punished with legal actions is because it is not fair. Parent's aren't at their child's school 24/7. That is because they don't have to stay and make sure that their child stays in class instead of running to the mall really quickly. Most parent's are not aware of their child going off of the school grounds, so why are they the ones punished for what there child does? The child should be punished not the parent because the child is the one doing the action It is not fair to go to jail for something you didn't do. If the parent's child doesn't go to school then why is the child not arrested? It doesn't make sense to let the parent go to jail because it wouldn't be fair to the parent for going to jail for something they didn't do.
               Parent's are responsible for their children's actions, but the parent may not know about what their child does everyday. If the parent ask, the child might lie to get out of trouble. It doesn't make sense to punish the parent for something they didn't do.

]]> 2017-01-27 13:34:47 UTC https://padlet.com/bergerb1/2zrq7q0fyvfy/wish/149864232