For this example, quantum mechanics uses the lowest form of analysis (at the absolute microscopic scale), looking at the interactions between individual atomic particles and elementary particles (including electrons, quarks…). Here, nothing is deterministic, and certainty is defined only by the numerical value of the probability of an event occurring.  However, to the contrary, general relativity – takes a more macroscopic perspective, analysing the interactions of objects containing billions of atoms, where everything is deterministic, such that if A then B. Here, we consider that these perspectives are not of the same scale nor way of interactions but analyse the same things in our universe. When applying relativistic principles upon a quantum scale, the answer is nonsensical, and vice versa for the application of quantum mechanics upon the macroscopic scale. As such, each model resides upon their own scale, such that the accepted paradigm differs in the same universe upon the same interactions based on scale. 

Human sciences share the induction and deduction methods of discovery with natural science. Yet, humanities are distinguished from science because they depend a lot on perspectives. The situation of each individual can vary from a very wide scheme. Also, human behaviours are constantly changing as they can be affected easily by the environment such as the cultural and social change in the society. Conditions supported by a large database are somewhat predictable. However, this also introduces the risk of the manipulation of data. Therefore, we argue that human behaviours can be discovered in a similar way as the laws of nature when the method and procedure are being looked at with caution and that the potential risks are taken into consideration.