<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Livingston McLeod  by Livingston McLeod</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/livingstonmcleod01/HUMN330work</link>
      <description>HUMN 330 Assignments</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2017-10-23 06:33:49 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2017-11-16 03:33:56 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Livingston McLeod Mod 2 current event</title>
         <author>livingstonmcleod01</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/livingstonmcleod01/HUMN330work/wish/199455211</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<h1>Title of the article: NFL players: Behind 'take a knee' lies this racial injustice</h1><div><br><br></div><div><a href="http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2017/08/20/sotu-panel-8-20-part-2.cnn"><br></a>The setting in class this week revolves around unjust discrimination and oppression against people for how they look or who they chose to worship in a religion. The video down below is one of the many videos targeting viewers to take a conscious approach to that same problem in the united states. One of the articles are <a href="http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2017/08/20/sotu-panel-8-20-part-2.cnn">here</a> and the other is below. Enjoy!</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2017/08/13/sotu-gardner-trump-needs-to-condemn-white-supremacy.cnn" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-23 06:34:05 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/livingstonmcleod01/HUMN330work/wish/199455211</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Livingston McLeod Mod 3 Current Event</title>
         <author>livingstonmcleod01</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/livingstonmcleod01/HUMN330work/wish/200629561</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Title of the article: Justice Department scraps transgender workplace protections<br><br>Module three in class this week questions the ethics of individualism. More specifically what you choose to do with your body should come with no penalty against the law, if it proves no harm to society. The article titled in the beginning of this post deals with the law and transgender people in the workplace. <br><br>Both <a href="http://video.foxnews.com/v/5581887680001/?#sp=show-clips">This</a> and <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/09/05/transgender-students-find-open-door-at-more-womens-colleges.html">This</a> will lead you to articles that show both sides of ethical reasoning with transgender people in America. See ya next week!</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-25 21:53:26 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/livingstonmcleod01/HUMN330work/wish/200629561</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Livingston McLeod Mod 5 Current Event</title>
         <author>livingstonmcleod01</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/livingstonmcleod01/HUMN330work/wish/207509773</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Title of the article: Can we teach robots ethics?<br><br>Module five in class Describes utilitarianism and the act of sacrifice for the better good. In this week we discussed the rail scenario and what we would do in situations similar to that. I found this read on BBC's website and I felt that it fit perfectly with this weeks module. Still, the question stands, How do we teach robots ethics? We as humanity are 50/50 on some morals and what we feel is right or wrong. If we as humans cannot decide if one person is worth saving five people that would otherwise be dead, how can we program this into robots without setting it up to fail?<br><br>In relation to this week's ethics of Utilitarianism please follow <a href="https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/israels-occupation-is-mor_b_8771232.html">This link</a> and <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/20/learning/is-struggle-essential-to-happiness.html">this lin</a>k to other stories that are on a similar basis.<br><br>Until next time!&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-16 03:17:32 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/livingstonmcleod01/HUMN330work/wish/207509773</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Livingston McLeod Mod 1 Current Event</title>
         <author>livingstonmcleod01</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/livingstonmcleod01/HUMN330work/wish/207511524</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Title of the article: Federal court rules World War I memorial cross must be torn down<br><br>The constitution was put in place to promote order and simplify any motives and questions that would come up in spite of the changes in time and standards of the mind. As I read this story and notice that its a complete violation of the first amendment, it makes me think about where do we as a nation draw the line. Regardless if we as a nation promote religion or not my ethics scream that things were put in place for a reason, and by deviating from that system it could lead to failure and chaos. In a religious standpoint it could be deemed as unfair and in an atheist standpoint, this could be viewed as the change that we as a people need to grow into the new times of self-thought. I understand both sides, but I believe that there could be a better way of appealing to both sides.<br><br>Please<a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p05mtbw6"> read this </a>and <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p05m3fkj">this</a> article that will give you depth on what ethics are for in the first place, to determine what we think of as good and bad.<br><br>Au Revior!</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-16 03:29:52 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/livingstonmcleod01/HUMN330work/wish/207511524</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
