connecting Monet to pseudoscience is quite easy, as listed above some individuals will use peoples beliefs to profit by selling reading material ( books, magazines, articals) as well as items like preventive measures, "spiritual" artifacts or wards, untested an checked health goods or procedures.

it is quite easy to connect appealing to peoples emotions to pseudoscience as well, coming from a pseudo scientists perspective by tailoring what you say, the way you say it, and the "evidence" or examples you should can usually bring the ideal emotion you were looking for out in a person or group of people's when you get a taste of the kind of crowd you are speaking to for your benefit or your corporations benefit which is not necessarily in the greatest interest or benefit of the person(s) your are with.

by creating mystery among people it encourages them to attempt and look into the topic or matter more in depth and it keeps people more intrigued into the idea of pseudoscience and what it offers or can prove, solve and define rather than usual practices .

with some practices they are truly just fake and not real but are marketed and pushed as such for profit, believers, to gain more "belivability " but these inaccurate process, whatever they may be, depending on what they are and the circumstances can be endangering to the other people involved or you yourself.

now I don't know to much how to connect this but with not progressing it can lead to people not being as involved or intrigued as they were at the beginning as well as it can cause doubt and non believers because of the fact it makes it seem like the practice is unreliable and outdated or inaccurate.

using the leverage of time when it comes to legends, treatments or ideas in pseudoscience can be manipulative. In order to convince people your ideas or methods are correct, trustworthy and effective enlisting the fact that it may have been around for hundreds of even thousands of years just to reinforce your beliefs is manipulative to your own benefit and not the other person's.

employing mystical energy as one of your strong back ups or evidence in your claims in a flawed and unreliable practices many people will not believe you and take it as a joke or its just that facts that majority of claims with '' mystical energy'' supports cannot be proven.

relying on someone in a higher or respected position who have people that look up to them or follow their every move and word to make sure your point or practice is believed and trusted among the people is a unfair representation to the pseudoscience community.

defending your claims with your own beliefs to prove or disprove, enforce your claim is not ethical comparing your own beliefs to actual facts and evidence rather than just utilizing said facts and evidence is also a reasoning some skeptics ma y have for their arguments against pseudoscience being a real science and being believable and practiced.

believing the unexplained can sometimes be comforting to people when the unexplained can actually explain their situation or problem while regular, tested and explained sciences cannot or don't believe them. sometimes the unexplained aspects of life are actually the most important or impactful ones.

when emotions get involved it does indeed become a tricky situation but when situations or practices have a lot of emotion behind them or are expressed as such for prolonged periods of time or intensely it can provide an easier and more common route for believers to develop a strong emotional connection to whatever the topic at hand may be.