https://padlet.com/99031890/2o08pg89tnot Pamela Razalan en-us 2019-03-07 16:26:11 UTC 2019-03-14 00:32:16 UTC hello@padlet.com 99031890 https://padlet.com/99031890/2o08pg89tnot/wish/338953635 2019-03-07 16:39:51 UTC https://padlet.com/99031890/2o08pg89tnot/wish/338953635 99031890 https://padlet.com/99031890/2o08pg89tnot/wish/338954490 Bias: The article is neutral and does not contain bias. It includes information from  both Democrat and Republican side that are the truth.
Length of Article:  The article is long compared to Fox News. It goes in way more description  because it included many points that the parties have made.
Depth of Article: The article goes in depth to both sides of the parties. Republican Senator believes that the plan is unrealistic. Meanwhile, Democratic Senator Chuck Schumer believes the plan is an issue that demands progress. They provide both the pros and cons of the new deal and have evidence supporting each side. 

]]> 2019-03-07 16:40:46 UTC https://padlet.com/99031890/2o08pg89tnot/wish/338954490 99031890 https://padlet.com/99031890/2o08pg89tnot/wish/338963036 2019-03-07 16:53:45 UTC https://padlet.com/99031890/2o08pg89tnot/wish/338963036 99031890 https://padlet.com/99031890/2o08pg89tnot/wish/339175929 Bias: The article is biased because it only lists the reasons as to why the Green New Deal is a bad idea. It omits any pros of the the plan. It is also has bias by labeling because they make it seem like the  plan is a "suicide pact"
Length of Article: The article is short compared to ABC News. It only makes points about Patrick Moore's negative experience working as a President of Greenpeace Canada.
Depth of Article:  The article does not go into details about the positive side of the plan. However, it goes in depth about how bad the Green New Deal is. The article states that supporters of the plan are "using" children to push their policies and that getting rid of fossil fuels is a bad idea. 

]]> 2019-03-08 04:05:23 UTC https://padlet.com/99031890/2o08pg89tnot/wish/339175929 99031890 https://padlet.com/99031890/2o08pg89tnot/wish/339177566 https://insider.foxnews.com/2019/03/05/greenpeace-co-founder-patrick-moore-slams-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-green-new-deal]]> 2019-03-08 04:17:52 UTC https://padlet.com/99031890/2o08pg89tnot/wish/339177566 99031890 https://padlet.com/99031890/2o08pg89tnot/wish/339177613 https://abcnews.go.com/US/senators-bicker-green-deal-climate-change/story?id=61515159]]> 2019-03-08 04:18:26 UTC https://padlet.com/99031890/2o08pg89tnot/wish/339177613 99031890 https://padlet.com/99031890/2o08pg89tnot/wish/339177753 2019-03-08 04:19:53 UTC https://padlet.com/99031890/2o08pg89tnot/wish/339177753 99031890 https://padlet.com/99031890/2o08pg89tnot/wish/339177762 Bias: The article is biased because it mainly lists the pros of the Green New Deal. Although the article does talk about how costly and unpredictable the plan is, it counters that claim by providing numerous pros like, renewable energy, and stimulating
public health and jobs etc. Basically omitting the negatives.
Length of Article: The article is short compared to ABC News but longer than FOX News article. The reporter mostly makes points about the pros of the plan.
Depth of Article:  The article does go in depth about the Green New Deal but does not list the negatives of the plan and mainly focuses on providing evidence for the positives. The reporter provides an optimistic tone and makes it seem like the plan offers many benefits. ]]> 2019-03-08 04:19:59 UTC https://padlet.com/99031890/2o08pg89tnot/wish/339177762 99031890 https://padlet.com/99031890/2o08pg89tnot/wish/339179985 https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/07/politics/green-new-deal-details/index.html]]> 2019-03-08 04:40:07 UTC https://padlet.com/99031890/2o08pg89tnot/wish/339179985 99031890 https://padlet.com/99031890/2o08pg89tnot/wish/339180221 2019-03-08 04:43:07 UTC https://padlet.com/99031890/2o08pg89tnot/wish/339180221 99031890 https://padlet.com/99031890/2o08pg89tnot/wish/339180244 Bias: The article has bias by labeling. The headline makes it seem like the plan is a good idea. The article talks about some cons but shifts it to the many Democrats that support the new deal and their thoughts about it. ( Bias by Selection of Sources: includes quotes of Beto to fit their agenda)
Length of Article: The article is the same length as the article in FOX News. The article focuses  on Beto's support of the plan.
Depth of Article: The article does not really go in depth or give out that much evidence about the side that is against the plan. They only state that Nancy Pelosi and other Republicans are skeptical about the idea but not the reasons why. ]]> 2019-03-08 04:43:24 UTC https://padlet.com/99031890/2o08pg89tnot/wish/339180244 99031890 https://padlet.com/99031890/2o08pg89tnot/wish/339182610 https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/lissandravilla/beto-orourke-green-new-deal-el-paso]]> 2019-03-08 05:11:02 UTC https://padlet.com/99031890/2o08pg89tnot/wish/339182610 99031890 https://padlet.com/99031890/2o08pg89tnot/wish/339182968 2019-03-08 05:15:11 UTC https://padlet.com/99031890/2o08pg89tnot/wish/339182968 99031890 https://padlet.com/99031890/2o08pg89tnot/wish/339183009 Bias: The article includes bias by labeling. The title implies a negative outlook on the plan. The article also includes Bias by Spin. The reporter has many subjective comments saying that Ocasio-Cortez "badly botched" the Green New Deal and calling the "FAQ" page as laughable and silly.
Length of Article: The article is shorter than FOX News and does not make that much points about the Green New Deal.
Depth of Article: The article only focuses on the negative side of Ocasio Cortez's plan and her mistake of publishing the draft summary. It does not provide any evidence supporting the other side . The reporter also has a sarcastic tone. " Don't you just hate it when you mistakenly publish things on your own website"]]> 2019-03-08 05:15:46 UTC https://padlet.com/99031890/2o08pg89tnot/wish/339183009 99031890 https://padlet.com/99031890/2o08pg89tnot/wish/339184138 https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/the-new-york-times-is-trying-hard-to-clean-up-after-aocs-green-new-deal-mess]]> 2019-03-08 05:32:31 UTC https://padlet.com/99031890/2o08pg89tnot/wish/339184138 99031890 https://padlet.com/99031890/2o08pg89tnot/wish/339184359 2019-03-08 05:35:48 UTC https://padlet.com/99031890/2o08pg89tnot/wish/339184359 99031890 https://padlet.com/99031890/2o08pg89tnot/wish/339184430 Bias: The article includes Bias by Selection of Sources. The article includes more sources that support one view from another. ( With lots of doubt. Ernest Moniz, U.S. energy secretary, called the plan “impracticable” and “unrealizable.”) 
{The Economist called it “a deeply unserious proposal.) The article talked about how the plan is being received by others but only included sources that were negative.
Length of Article: The article is as long as CNN news but instead of writing down the pros it focuses on the negative aspects of the plan.
Depth of Article: The article goes into detail about the cons of the Green New Deal and does not highlight the pros. It mostly has a critical tone and disapproves of the plan. ]]> 2019-03-08 05:36:47 UTC https://padlet.com/99031890/2o08pg89tnot/wish/339184430 99031890 https://padlet.com/99031890/2o08pg89tnot/wish/339185124 https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/why-green-new-deal-has-washington-in-such-a-lather-quicktake/2019/02/17/5b1cb9a6-3279-11e9-8781-763619f12cb4_story.html?utm_term=.4ae44d2b038c]]> 2019-03-08 05:46:36 UTC https://padlet.com/99031890/2o08pg89tnot/wish/339185124