In an interiew given lateron by Putin he praised Trump's efforts to end the war. He also said that "long-term conditions of peace betweeen our countries, and in Europe, and in the world as a whole. could be reached under an agreeement wit the U.S. on nuclear arm control. This gives me curiosity, because if we recall, the U.S. has been invovled in many wars, even if they weren't abouth them, in my opinion they arekind of the noseay lady. However, it always endsup participating in wars, to solve them, but a large percentage of U.S. economy comes from weapons. So, in a matter of speaking war benefits U.S's economy. Which takes me to think, is this agreemen with the U.S. on nuclear weapons control really benefitial, or is it a cover up, for something that benefits the U.S?

I do think that it is not good when this situation happen, it will ocassionate resentment, and division in the senate, which will probabl affect the desion making. It's like when parents fight, the tensio between them, passes on to the children, generating an uncomfortable environment.

I think this shows a quite agressive plan of action from the U.S., quite in contrast with the "american dream", which is a mere idealization and romantization of life in the U.S. , even though this idea was born a long time ago, I believe that most people think that licing in the U.S. is great. However, with this kind of decision and other recent events, at least I start to question myself if it is really that great to live inthe U.S. Since I always looked at people in the U.S. as "perfect", because that was what they showed in their book, movies,etc. But, with recent actions I'm starting to have amore critical perspective about them.

Still I don't thinknhe should be glorifica for the way in which he died, what matters is how one loves, not how one dies.

The increasing deportación made by the U.S. President Caludia Sheinbaum announced the new measures that'lle be taken to provude support to the migrants. In this program president Sheinbqum asssured that all deported people will have access to "Bientestar" program benefits.

To me, although her intiative isngood I think the real way to solve thismproblem is by improving the working conditions here in Mexico, like the salaries, loans, paid vacations and working hours among others. I also don't like the concept of the government giving away money that is not really theirs, because that money is gathered by the rest of the people, and they are giving it away.

I also agree with Sheinbaum when she said that Mexicans form an important part of the US economy, nad that the USA will experience a crisis if they deport all migrants, because the USA is made by migrants.

Mexico has never been the most secure country, but we have reqched measuresnin which the levels of insecurity are just inaceptable. Nowadays, even innkcent cirizens can be affected.

I don't know much about the war between Palestine and Israel, although I would like to understand it better. Although I do think this: Donald Trump is definitely a very influential character in global politics.

I support the motion of this protest really, but I don't think the entire responsibility relies on Sheinbaum's shoulders it is the government as an institution, morena more than anything, I don't agree with their ideals. As a President I think Sheinbaum has dealt with some of the toughest times, in our country. But still I don't support her. She has humillated herself and women. When she said "...porque patria empieza con a de mujer." yes, it is funny, I laughed, but before being a president she was a respectful women of science. Now she's a joke, and the image of countles memes. How is it that Mexico's first women president is a joke? When she said all women got to presidency, I say, please don't. You are humillating women up there, she does not represent us.