<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Comparing Two Paragraphs by jaybert cabanero</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u</link>
      <description>Look at the two paragraphs as posted in this padlet: which one seems more 
authoritative? Share your ideas using Participatory Learning through observing the following format: 
ADAH(Agree.... Disagree... In addition to... However)
I agree/ disagree with MR. DELA CRUZ (name of your classmates) that ___.
In addition to that/However, _________.</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2022-03-08 21:12:02 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2026-01-30 22:20:41 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>jaybertcabanero</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2084873870</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/1580525117/ce0c45c6272c21443d611e9c796000c9/Slide1.JPG" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-08 21:24:13 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2084873870</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085189346</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Maca, Maylene, D.<br>-The most authoritative &nbsp; is paragraph two because the statements are complete than paragraph one.&nbsp;<br><br>-In paragraph one there is no written or stated what year it is. (Incomplete)</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 02:22:26 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085189346</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Montemayor, Meriel V. STEM</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085248460</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1. I agree with Mylene D. Maca that ‘the more authoritative among the two paragraphs is the paragraph two because the statements are complete compared to paragraph one’. In addition to that, the two paragraphs are identical; except for the absence of citations from paragraph one.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 03:09:04 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085248460</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Dizon, Keana Angela D. TVL-HE</title>
         <author>dizonkeana13</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085282504</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The more authoritative paragraph is the paragraph two because it has broader explanation and there are citations unlike to the first paragraph. Although they are kinda similar, the absence of citation made it incomplete.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 03:38:21 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085282504</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Montemayor, Meriel V. STEM</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085313222</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>2. I disagree with Keana Angela D. Dizon that ‘the more authoritative paragraph is the paragraph two because the explanation is broader’. Both paragraph one and two has the same explanation. However, the absence of citations in paragraph one that requires you to show from where you have taken the ideas makes paragraph two more authoritative, it is more convincing.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 04:05:27 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085313222</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Gumangol, Blessie F. </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085369240</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I disagree with Meriel V. Montemayor in disagreeing with Ms. Dizon's statement that ' the more authoritative paragraph is paragraph two because the explanation is broader'. Indeed paragraph two have citations compared to paragraph one but Ms. Dizon's statement used the word 'explanation' which may or may not mean to include the citations, but in all actualities, can equally work. In addition to that, and in overall, it is quite true that the 'explanation' in paragraph two is BROADER than the 'explanation' in paragraph one.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 04:48:32 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085369240</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Tuliao, Jovelyn F.</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085389122</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Meriel Montemayor's statement that the two paragraph are quietly similar except for the abscence of citations from paragraph one.And by comparing the two paragraph. It is more likely that paragraph two is more authoritative because of the presence of citation unlike on the first which is lacking citations.And just like what she say's paragraph two is more convincing.In addition to this the presence of citation makes paragraph two more reliable and trustworthy than paragraph one.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 05:07:13 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085389122</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Ballesteros, Myra D. STEM</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085594699</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Meriel Montemayor's statement as well as to Jovelyn Tuliao's statement that the two paragraph are quietly similar except for the abscence of citations from paragraph one.And by comparing the two paragraph, it is more likely that paragraph two is more authoritative because of the presence of citation unlike on the first which is lack of citations.And just like what they say paragraph two is more convincing and the presence of citation makes paragraph two more reliable and trustworthy than paragraph one.&nbsp;<br>In addition using citations can gives proper credit to the authors of the words or ideas that you incorporated into your paper as well as it allows those who are reading your work to locate your sources, in order to learn more about the ideas that you include in your paper. Moreover, citing your sources consistently and accurately helps you avoid committing plagiarism in your writing.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 08:11:21 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085594699</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Rivera, Ivan Drexler S. - 12 ABM</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085730795</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>According to the University of Oxford (2022), plagiarism is presenting someone else’s work or ideas as your own, with or without their consent, by incorporating it into your work without full acknowledgement.<br>As plagiarism is a disciplinary offense, the process of referencing can be considered to avoid such. Referencing allows you to acknowledge the contribution of other writers and researchers in your work (UNSW Sydney, 2019).<br>With the two paragraphs presented,&nbsp;I believe the more authoritative is Paragraph 2. Because, sentences or contexts are well-cited and well-presented. The contents of the two paragraphs are similar, but, Paragraph 2 is more reliable and trustworthy as its reference is being presented.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 09:45:30 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085730795</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Salting, Reybie A.</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085731596</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I Agree with the statement of Myla Ballesteros and to others that the two paragraphs are quietly identical except for the absence of citations from the first paragraph and in comparing the two paragraphs, it is more likely that the second paragraph is more authoritative due to the presence of citation unlike the first paragraph which has a lack of citations. The paragraph two are more reliable and trustworthy than the first paragraph. The first paragraph may be as interesting as the second, but within the first paragraph there is a lack, a lack of source of the ideas contained in it and the second paragraph shows where the ideas got contained in it so it passed as authoritative. In addition to that citation is way to give credit to the writers from whom you have borrowed words and ideas. By citing the work of a particular scholar, you acknowledge and respect the intellectual property rights of that researcher, It should always be accurate, allowing your readers to trace the sources of information you have used.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 09:45:58 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085731596</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Bautista, Aileen G.  - 12 ABM</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085746574</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr. Rivera that paragraph 2 is more authoritative. In addition to that, the author used citations by giving credit to other people's work and citing protects you from plagiarising. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 09:55:12 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085746574</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Ora, Krizza Joyce Julliane F. ABM</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085771120</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I&nbsp;agree with Mr. Rivera's statement, Paragraph 2 is more authoritative because citations are well-presented in the said paragraph. Aside from helping avoid plagiarism, referencing also provide supporting evidences for the ideas, arguments and claims in the paragraph, thus, making the paragraph more authoritative.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 10:11:54 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085771120</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Camelle Faith U. Agustin, TVL-HE</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085783624</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with keana dizon. The reason being as to why I came to conclude and choose such is because the second paragraph is explained more thoroughly compared to the first. Not only does it cite important details, it also shows the dates that were entailed into the explanation. This then makes the reader understand more about the topic given, gaining additional knowledge of what is being talked about.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 10:19:55 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085783624</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Corriente, Christine Fiel R. - 12 ABM</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085796391</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1. I agree to MR. RIVERA, IVAN DREXLER that paragraph 2 is more authoritative. The presence of the citations increases the reliability of the claims. The references strengthen the perceived accuracy of the claims because it is acknowledged that they are studied and thus factual.<br><br>In addition to that, if compared to paragraph 1, the claims appears weaker than of paragraph 2 despite having the same text. Paragraph 1 looks like an opinion of accumulated observation without solid or strong evidences.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 10:28:42 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085796391</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085812954</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Gromeo, Roseline G.<br>-12 ABM<br><br></strong>1.I agree with Mr. Rivera that paragraph two is more authoritative.However, apart from the lack of citations in paragraph 1, the two paragraphs are quite similar. When comparing the two paragraphs, the second one is more authoritative because it is well-explained and provides additional supporting details. Paragraph 2 also gives credit to the owner to avoid plagiarism.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 10:41:00 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085812954</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Tomas, Shaira Mae R. - ABM</title>
         <author>tomasshairamae6</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085826684</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ivan Drexler Rivera's statement that Paragraph 2 is more authoritative than Paragraph 1. Proper citations and references help establish and strengthen the credibility of Paragraph 2. In addition to that, the presence of citations and references show that proper research was done.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 10:50:23 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085826684</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Agustin, Jessa Mae D. -ABM</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085829017</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1. I agree with Ms. Corriente as well as Ms. Ora that paragraph two is more authoritative and more reliable due to the presence of citations and it is well presented. In addition to that the two paragraphs are quite similar except for the presence of citation in paragraph two.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 10:52:06 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085829017</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Cabonitalla, Michelle Mae D. -12ABM</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085855975</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr. Rivera that paragraph 2 is more authoritative.In addition to that, broader and contexts are well-cited/ well-presented and provides additional supporting details. The presence of citation makes paragraph 2 more reliable and trustworthy.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 11:11:11 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085855975</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Calonge, Gilbert Jr.L </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085861604</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree to Ms. Corriente as well as to Ms. Jessa Mae Austin's statement that the two paragraphs are quite similar except for the absence of citations from paragraph two. Paragraph two is more authoritative and more reliable due to the presence of citations.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 11:16:01 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085861604</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>DULNUAN, JHONNY JR D. Tvl-EIM</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085874078</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Montemayor's statements as well as Tuliao that that two paragraph are quietly similar exept for the absence of citations in the first paragraph.<br>And by compairing the two paragraph,&nbsp; it is more likely that paragraph two is more authoritative because of the presence of citation unlike the first one which is not presented. And like what they say,&nbsp; presenting the citation gives proper credit to the authors of the words or ideas that are incorporated. It is also uphold intellectual honesty and to avoid plagarism.<br>In additional to this the presence of citations makes paragraph or a things more reliable and trustworthy.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 11:26:19 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085874078</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Raline Pagala G-12 I.C.T.                         I agree with Mr.Rivera  paragraph two is more authoritative.                               how ever the difference of two paragraph is that paragraph two is more convincing that paragraph one because paragraph two has it years and name of the owner proving to whom they belong and paragraph two is well explained and easy to understand paragraph one is obviously just copied and we know that plagiarism is easy for readers to find out.        </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085874797</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 11:26:49 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085874797</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Almera R. Pascual -ABM</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085875079</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr. Rivera that paragraph 2 is more authorative than paragraph 1 , references being present shows that paragraph 2 is being written with honor and being respectful of the author by giving credit to the rightful owner of the ideas.&nbsp;<br>In addition&nbsp;<br>When you use parts of someone else's work, it's legally and ethically important to give copyright credit. Giving proper credit is especially essential when you use copyrighted material, Whether you want to use a few words or a few pages of someone else’s work, you need to make sure you give the owner credit to avoid being accused of plagiarism and, potentially, sued for copyright infringement. Term papers, social media posts, and even images need to be credited properly. However the 2 paragraph presents same ideas.&nbsp; It is just that&nbsp; paragraph 2&nbsp; is cited properly.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 11:27:02 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085875079</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>CORPUZ, SAN-SAI P.  -12 ABM</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085881932</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I&nbsp;agree to Mr. Rivera statement that paragraph two is more authoritative . However, by contrasting the two paragraphs. Because of the presence of citations, paragraph two is more convincing than paragraph one which lacks of citations. In addition the presence of citations makes paragraph two more reliable because it is understood that they have been researched and hence true. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 11:32:56 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085881932</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Diana Jane A Rambac ABM</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085893224</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr. Ivan Rivera, in paragraph 2 it is more authoritative, more accurate and reliable because of the citations given to give credit to the owner. Aside from avoiding plagiarism it is also a way of providing additional information especially when readers didn't get satisfied in the information given, in order for the readers to be informed for the additional information.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 11:42:29 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085893224</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Sumido, Jamil Allen M. 12 HUMSs 1</title>
         <author>youngmaster00015</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085902919</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>I agree with Ms.Keana Dizon That the paragraph 1 has been lacking some proper citations and references. Paragraph 2 is more reliable and authoritative in addition to strengthen the credibility, paragraph 2 shows credit, explanation and to avoid plagiarism, to observe , it has a cite that show some details with a proper date, and to help the reader to gain knowledge. If&nbsp; we take a look and read it carefully, paragraph 1 is more like an opinion because it held no evidence, not because paragraph 1 and paragraph 2 has the same text, not because they are similar.<br>However, According to the University of Oxford (2022)&nbsp; when you take someone’s work without their permission or consent without a full acknowledgment of it will be lead into plagiarism. Some example of plagiarism are:&nbsp;<br>1.Turning in someone else's work as your own.<br></strong><br></div><div>2.<strong>Copying large pieces of text from a source without citing that source.<br></strong><br></div><div>3.<strong>Taking passages from multiple sources, piecing them together, and turning in the work as your own.<br></strong><br></div><div>4.<strong>Copying from a source but changing a few words and phrases to disguise plagiarism.<br></strong><br></div><div>5.<strong>Paraphrasing from a number of different sources without citing those sources.<br></strong><br></div><div>6.<strong>Turning in work that you did for another class without getting your professor's permission first.<br></strong><br></div><div>7.<strong>Buying an essay or paper and turning it in as your own work.<br></strong><br></div><div><strong>Most of the case of plagiarism is considered misdemeanors.<br></strong><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 11:49:36 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085902919</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Ridon, Thrissia Mae N.</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085910471</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms. Jovelyn Tuliao that paragraph two is more authoritative because of the presence of citation unlike on the first which is lacking citation. In addition, the main reason you use citations in school papers is to give credit to other people’s work. This avoids charges of plagiarism and separates your words and thoughts from the words of others and proper citation allows readers to locate the materials you used. Citations to sources helps readers expand their knowledge on a topic. One of the most effective strategies for locating authoritative, relevant sources about a topic is to review footnotes or references from known sources.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 11:55:32 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085910471</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Sacatani, Jenzelle C. (STEM)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085913557</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms. Agustin that the two paragraphs are quite similar even though the only difference between the two paragraphs is that paragraph 1 lacks citations.<br>The first paragraph may be equally intriguing, but in an academic setting, the second paragraph is more authoritative and reliable because its source is cited.<br><br>In addition to that, referencing is important in academic writing because it provides a lot of advantages, including adding value to the author, improves authenticity, stands as evidence, and preventing plagiarism.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 11:57:45 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085913557</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>CARIÑO, AYESSA MAE A. HUMSS 2</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085917708</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with MS. CORRIENTE that Paragraph 1 looks like an opinion of accumulated observation without solid or strong evidences.<br><br>In addition to that, paragraph 2 is more authoritative than paragraph 1 not just because of its length but because it is more accurate and reliable than the first one. You can see that the sources or references are even visible. Those citations are important to validate what you are writing, it is by referring to documented evidence. And it also enable the reader to consult the original source independently if they wanted to.&nbsp;<br><br>&nbsp;Furthermore, as cited on the module given by Sir. Cabanero; Referencing is also a way to provide evidence to support the assertions and claims in your own paperwork. The process of referencing should always be accurate, allowing your readers to trace the sources of information you have used.” therefore, I conclude that paragraph 2 is more authoritative than paragraph 1.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 12:00:54 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085917708</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Gasmin John Michael N. (HUMSS 1)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085936731</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I&nbsp;agree with the statement of Aileen Bautista that the paragraph 2 is more authoritative. In additional to that paragraph 2 giving proper credit especially essential when you use copyrighted material to avoid being accused of plagiarism. However the the two paragraph same ideas. It just that paragraph 2 is cited properly.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 12:15:55 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085936731</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Dela cruz,Merliel krisgay P.            Humss 5</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085938517</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with the statement of myleen maca.The first paragraph may be just as interesting as within an academic context ,a context that requires you to show from where you have taken ideas, the second has fun more authority,it is more persuasive. It shows that ideas you are discussing are matters that are important to your particular academic community.In addition the paragraph are identical except for the absence of cetaceans from paragraph 1.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 12:17:22 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085938517</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Ferrer,James A. HUMSS-4</title>
         <author>jamesferrer0000</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085951553</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>i agree with Mr. Mendoza that The two paragraphs are the same text but the paragraph one is looks like an opinion without a solid evidence&nbsp; , paragraph two is include citation&nbsp; and the seems more<br>authoritative at the two paragraphs is paragraph two because paragraph two is include citation to give credits to the author's work and to avoid plagiarism.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 12:27:17 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085951553</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Lopez, Hannah Kyla Grace F. - STEM</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085957028</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr. Rivera that paragraph 2 is more authoritative. The references are well-cited and presented which gives the statements more reliable and trustworthy. However, the contents of the 2 paragraphs are similar except for the absence of citations in paragraph 1.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 12:31:12 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085957028</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>ANTONINO FAITH DYLEN R. HUMSS 2</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085961311</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms. Ayessa Mae A. Cariño that paragraph 1 is not eligible evidence. Appear to be incomplete and doesn't have a credit .<br><br>In addition to that when it comes to paragraph 2 we can see that the length of it is exactly to know that it is right and more accurate and accommodating. It also comes with citation as a represent for the legitimate owner. Putting the source name of it will be helpful for any reader.They can involve it for looking and realize more than whatever is written in the paragraph.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 12:34:25 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085961311</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Marquez Jay ar HUMSS 6</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085971775</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with the statement of Ms. Mylene Maca that the more authoritative of the two paragraphs is paragraph two because it is more complete than paragraph one . I like the statement in paragraph two because it has a good explanation.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 12:41:53 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085971775</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>DULNUAN, RAQUEL  HUMSS 2</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085980735</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with MS. CARINO&nbsp; that,<br>paragraph 2 is more authoritative than&nbsp;<br>than paragraph 1 not just because of its<br>length but because it is more accurate and reliable<br>than the first one.<br><br>In Addition to that I have noticed how important&nbsp;<br>if the paragraph has a reliable sources and references.<br>Those citations are important to validate what you are writing for a documented evidence or proof. However it is&nbsp;also<br>very important to prevent plagiarism.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 12:47:41 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085980735</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>LLAPITAN ROSELYN E. HUMSS 2</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085982688</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with the statement of Ms. Ayessa Cariño, paragraph 2 is more authoritative, it shows clear explanation that you can surely understand, if we focus in Paragraph 1, there is no evidence and a quotation from or reference to a book, paper, or author, and because of it, it looks like an opinion only.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 12:48:59 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085982688</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>RIVERA, DONA GAYLE DR.  (12-STEM)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085988573</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ivan Rivera's statement. When comparing the two paragraphs, you'll see that paragraph two has citations while paragraph one does not.<br>It is evident that the second paragraph appears to be more authoritative.&nbsp;<br><br>In addition to that citation is one of the most visible ways in which authority is communicated in an academic writing.<br>The degree to which we express our grasp of the literatures and indicate that our reading and interpretations are sound and believable is demonstrated by how we deal with other people's words and works.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 12:52:42 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2085988573</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Patiocan, Romebel A. HUMSS 6</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2086000501</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr. Jay ar Marquez that paragraph two is more authoritative than paragraph one. Because in paragraph one, there is no referencing, which means to say it can be plagiarism. The first paragraph borrowed the words and ideas and didn't give any recognition to the writer.</div><div><br>In addition, according to the University of Oxford (2022), plagiarism is presenting someone else’s work or ideas as your own, with or without their consent, by incorporating them into your work without full acknowledgement.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 12:59:29 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2086000501</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>RIVERA, DONA GAYLE DR. (12-STEM)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2086008520</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Roselyn Lapitan's statement. It may appear that an essay is only a viewpoint without the citation and may turn out as plagiarized. When writing an essay, it is important to remember to include sources in order to make it more credible.&nbsp;<br><br>In addition to that, taking words, ideas or information from others and presenting them as your own is an act of plagiarism. When you use someone else's work, you must properly and accurately acknowledge that content to signal that it isn't your own.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 13:04:35 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2086008520</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>RIVERA, DONA GAYLE DR. (12-STEM)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2086026975</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Krizza Ora's statement that the citations makes paragraph two more authoritative, which is important when writing an essay to avoid plagiarism, and referencing also gives supporting evidence for the ideas, arguments, and claims in the paragraph.&nbsp;<br><br>In addition to that, by<br>citing the work of a particular scholar, you acknowledge and respect the<br>intellectual property rights of that researcher (UNSW Sydney, 2019).</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 13:15:38 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2086026975</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Revadenera, Jan Laiza T. (12 ABM)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2086031665</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr. Rivera that paragraph two is more authoritative than paragraph one. With the proper citations being present, it makes the paragraph more reliable. In addition to that, the citations demonstrates that a proper and thorough research was conducted, and the fact that the act of citing sources is also the best defense against allegations of plagiarism.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 13:17:59 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2086031665</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Soriano, Christine Joy N. -HUMMS-2</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2086034281</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms. Ayessa Mae Carino, That paragraph 2 is more authoritative, accurate and reliable than paragraph 1, and that the sources or references in paragraph&nbsp; 2 are visible, and also according to Ms. Ayessa, those citations are important&nbsp; to validate what you are writing by referring to documented evidence, and enable the reader to consult the original source.<br>&nbsp;In short, in paragraph 2 referencing is present, while in paragraph 1, though a name appeared (Simon Frith suggest...)&nbsp; for me, referencing is absent.<br>&nbsp; In addition to that, Paragraph 2 shows how to take credit or give recognition to the writers from whom the borrowed words and ideas come from. According to UNSW Sydney, 2019, By citing the work of a particular scholar, you acknowledge and respect the intellectual&nbsp; property rights of that researcher.&nbsp;<br>  Therefore,  I must say that referencing is not just being accurate,  reliable and legitimate.Referencing also is a reminder that an idea or knowledge of others are thier property  you are allowed to borrow it, but in return you got to take credit and give recognition to the original owner, as a sign of respect.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 13:19:11 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2086034281</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>GABRIEL, JOHN KENNETH M.</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2086039164</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree to what ms Dizon's stand is. It is quite obvious that paragraph number two is more authoritative. In addition, we can clearly notice the absence of citation on the first paragraph, though, the content and the grammar is similar. Paragraph to is more reliable with the presence of citation, when we compare its paragraph one. With this we need to remember that we should be more careful on what we copy from other authors' work. The right use of citation is one way to prevent plagiarism.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 13:21:33 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2086039164</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>DOMINGO, XYRA G.</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2086051523</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>(HUMSS 1)<br><br>I AGREE with the statement of Ms. Sumido that the paragraph 1 has been lacking some proper citations and references while paragraph 2 is more reliable and authoritative because, plagiarism show some details with a proper date and to help the reader to gain knowledge.It is also considered fraud because the writer represents the ideas as her or his own.And lastly plagiarism also described as "the deliberate and knowing presentation of another person's original ideas or creative expressions as one's own".<br>If we take a look and read it carefully, paragraph 1 is more like an opinion because it held no evidence,not because paragraph 1 and paragraph 2 has the same text,not because they are similar.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 13:28:13 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2086051523</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Reygie Manzano </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2086070005</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Humss 2<br>I agree with ms.carino that the paragraph 2 is more authoritative than the 1 paragraph because in paragraph 1 there is no referencing and accumulated observation without strong or solid evidences.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 13:37:46 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2086070005</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Miguel, Jenshield Renee, Silapan (Humss 2)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2086076726</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms. Ayessa Cariño that the paragraph 2 is more authoritative than paragraph 1<br><br>In addition to that paragraph 2 is more authoritative than paragraph 1 because it has a strong evidences and references . Showing that the paragraph 2 is giving a credits and respect to the author of the sources . And of course the accuracy of facts that the paragraph 2 is reliable while, the paragraph 1 has been lacks of the proper attribution of the sources and there is no evidence or references. However citing your sources&nbsp; consistently helps you avoid plagiarism . It also allows individuals to learn more about the ideas you present by locating your sources.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 13:41:06 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2086076726</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Tumapang, Marglenda J. - ABM</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2086087665</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr. Rivera that with the two paragraphs presented, Paragraph 2 is more authoritative because sentences or contexts are well-cited and well-presented.&nbsp;<br>In addition, the citations and references used shows that the paragraph is credible and reliable. Providing accurate sources is necessary and is needed not just to avoid plagiarism but also to give credit to the respectful owner.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 13:46:14 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2086087665</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Aydinan, Genica L. HUMSS 5</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2086114656</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I&nbsp;agree with Ms. Maca's idea that the most authoritative paragraph is 2, it is not an act of plagiarism because all sentences has reference, it means the content acknowledged the writers of the borrowed words and ideas.&nbsp;<br><br>In addition, as plagiarism is a disciplinary offence, the process of referencing can be&nbsp;<br>considered to avoid such. Referencing allows you to acknowledge the&nbsp;<br>contribution of other writers and researchers in your work (UNSW Sydney,&nbsp;<br>2019).</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 13:59:08 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2086114656</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Tolosa, Michelle P. (ABM)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2086117048</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr. Rivera, Ivan Drexler that paragraph 2 is more authoritative than paragraph 1, in which sentences or contexts are well-cited or well presented. In addition to that, the sole difference between the two paragraphs is that paragraph 1 does not contain any citations (<em>Failure to properly credit sources may give the impression that the ideas, facts, and terminology you're employing are your own when they were actually copied from another author, which is regarded plagiarism and academically dishonest</em>). Although the first paragraph is just as compelling as the second, the second has substantially more authority and is more persuasive in an academic setting, where you must indicate where you acquired your ideas. It illustrates the importance of the concepts you're arguing in your academic community. Citation is also one of the most visible ways in which authority is signaled in paragraph 2.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 14:00:21 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2086117048</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Manaluto, Zabrina P.</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2086207543</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms. Revadenera that the citations demonstrates that a proper and thorough research was conducted, and the fact that the act of citing sources is also the best defense against allegations of plagiarism.<br><br>In addition, referencing provides the reader with an indication of the quality and authority of the material you are referencing. We should always provide references to any data or other information. After all, it is our responsibility as an individual to properly acknowledge the work of others.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 14:41:08 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2086207543</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>BAYANG, LESLIE A.  HUMSS 1</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2086224825</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree to Ms. Sumido that paragraph 2 is more authoritative. Because paragraph 1 has been lacking some proper citations and lack of source of the ideas contained in it.<br><br>In addition paragraph 2 is more reliable and trustworthy than the first paragraph. Because paragraph 2 is allowing the readers to trace the sources of information that have been used.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 14:47:52 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2086224825</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Prince jay A.Geneta TVL-ICT12</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2086245764</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br><br>I agree with ms.carino that the paragraph 2 is more authoritative than the 1 paragraph because in paragraph 1 there is no referencing and accumulated. observation without strong or solid evidences.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 14:57:05 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2086245764</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Seraspi, Daniella L.  Humss 1</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2086287920</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms. Sumido statement, the paragraph 2 is more authorative, however to strengthen the credibility, paragraph 2 shows the credit explanation to avoid plagiarism, to observed, it has a site that shows some details with the proper date that every reader would understand compared to the paragraph 1 that has no evidence or proper citations and references. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 15:15:32 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2086287920</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Alcaide, Angelica D. Humss 2 </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2086295061</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>&nbsp; I agree with Ms. Ballesteros that the second paragraphs are the same except for the absence of citations from the first paragraph, and in comparing the two paragraphs, it is more likely that the second paragraphs are more authoritative due to the presence of citations than the first paragraph, which has a lack of citations. The second paragraph is more reliable and trustworthy than the first paragraph. In the first paragraph, there is a lack of information about the ideas contained within it, and in the second paragraph, it shows where the ideas are contained within it, so it passed as authoritative.In addition, the citation used shows that the paragraph is credible or reliable. Providing accurate sources is necessary and needed,not just to avoid plagiarism and give respect to the owner.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-09 15:18:32 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2086295061</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Calingayan Jomar T. Humss 1</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087161461</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms. Allen sumido, in paragraph 2 is more authoritative. If you compare the two Paragraph, the paragraph 1 became an opinion due to its lack of citations, while in paragraph 2 it&nbsp; presented the citations clearly which represents credits to the owner. In addition to that, citations and references use to avoid plagiarism.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 00:41:37 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087161461</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>PAULA D JOSE TVL AGRI</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087190345</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I&nbsp;agree with Mr.Rivera's statement,that paragraph 2 is more authorative.In addition to that, paragraph 2 is more evidencial that paragraph 1 and. And the author have a permission to allowed other people's work to avoid plagiarism.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 00:57:53 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087190345</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Bartolay Paul Ace V. ABM</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087214178</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms. Tolosa that paragraph 2 is far more authoritative than paragraph 1, as it includes citations and references, making it credible and reputable, as well as giving credit to the original concept and avoiding plagiarism. At first sight, paragraph 1 appears to be a good paragraph, however due to the lack of citations or references, it has become weak and may include stolen ideas or words.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 01:10:24 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087214178</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Orendain, Gian Avrille A.  STEM</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087279526</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms. Montemayor that paragraph two is more authoritative because it has far more authority, it is more persuasive. It shows that the ideas you are discussing are matters that are important to your particular academic community.<br>However the first paragraph may be just as interesting as the second within an academic context, a context that requires you to show from where you have taken ideas.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 01:43:45 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087279526</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Lazaro,Mhar-Ezra M.- 12 ABM</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087315637</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr. Rivera statements that Paragraph 2 is more authoritative , because its context are well-cited and presented,that it has references that makes it reliable and trustworthy. In addition the author of Paragraph 2 is more likely did his research than the author of Paragraph 1 because,paragraph 1 has no citation and references to prove that the ideas in the paragraph is reliable.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 02:04:41 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087315637</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>FERRER, NICOLE C. -12 ABM                                       </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087316910</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with the statement of Mr. Rivera, paragraph two is more authoritative than paragraph one because sentences or contexts in paragraph two are well-cited and well-presented.<br>In addition to that, giving credits to the writers from whom you borrowed your words and ideas allows you to acknowledge their contribution to your content. Citation makes the paragraph more reliable and trustworthy because it stands as strong evidence.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 02:05:18 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087316910</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Sagao,Jacely A. STEM</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087381626</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Keana Angela D. Dizon's statement that paragraph 2 is more authoritative than paragraph 1. Evaluating the two paragraph they means the same thing but the second paragraph is more credible. Citations are presented very well. And because of this I can say that paragraph 2 is more reliable than paragraph 1, obviously.<br><br>In additon to that, it is important to give proper credits to the original author where you got the informations because otherwise it can be called plagiarism, which paragraph 1 lacks making it unreliable.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 02:41:34 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087381626</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Duque, Fevelyn B. HUMSS 6</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087385617</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br>I agree with Mr. Marquez as well as to Ms. Patiocan statement that paragraph two is more authoritative than paragraph one. Because in paragraph one there is no referencing, which means to say it can be plagiarism. The first paragraph borrowed the words and ideas and didn't give any recognition to the writer. In addition, citing your sources consistently and accurately helps you avoid committing plagiarism in your writing and It gives proper credit to the authors of the words or ideas that you incorporated into your paper.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 02:43:44 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087385617</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Braulio Princess Dianne -STEM</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087386267</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms. Ferrer statement, that citation makes the paragraph more reliable and trustworthy because it stands as strong evidence.<br>In addition to that,paragraph two is more presented of citations. it represents some ideas from the author than the paragraph one it looks like an opinion with no citations.&nbsp;<br>Because citing is important to show your reader you've done proper research by listing sources you used to get your information. It would make someone's statement more trustworthy.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 02:44:09 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087386267</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Sardeniola, Jaya T.</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087442638</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Most of us agreed that Paragraph Two is more authoritative than Paragraph One, because the absence of citations from Paragraph one.<br>I agree to Ms. Ferrer and Mr. Rivera, that citation makes the paragraph more reliable and trustworthy because it stands as a strong evidence.<br>Giving credits to the writer gets them to realize they are valued &amp; appreciated, and to avoid plagiarism.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 03:16:01 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087442638</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Eliseo B. Mendoza - Humss4</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087455966</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The more authoritative is paragraph 2 because the statements are complete than paragraph one because it has broader explanation, so I believe that the more authoritative is paragraph two because the sentences/context are well cited and well presented.yeah although they are kinda the similar, paragraph two is more convincing and reliable as its reference is being presented.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 03:24:20 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087455966</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Valdez,Diana Mae TVL-HE</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087464014</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Keana Dizon that the paragraph should be broad, with three sentences: a theme sentence, developing details, and a conclusion sentence. It is vital to thoroughly investigate and discuss your paragraph’s topic, and the paragraph must have a citation at the beginning, middle, or finish.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 03:29:28 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087464014</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Ganigan, Rea P. HUMSS-6 </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087464149</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr. Jay ar Marquez's statement that paragraph two is more authoritative than paragraph one. In addition citations assist readers to find your sources and learn more about ideas you mention in your paper, as well as provide proper credit to the authors of the words or concepts that you included in your paper.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 03:29:33 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087464149</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Giner F. Valenzuela STEM 12</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087468436</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms. Angelica D. Alcaide<br>That the second paragraph are the same except for the absence of citations from the first paragraph,<br>And comparing the two paragraphs. The presence of citations than the first paragraph which has a lack of citationsAs a result of our normative analysis, we suggest that what makes plagiarism reprehensible as such is that it distorts scientific credit. In addition, intentional plagiarism involves dishonesty. There are, furthermore, a number of potentially negative consequences of plagiarism.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 03:32:12 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087468436</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Rivera, Radharani Dhevi G. (12 - STEM)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087471556</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ivan Rivera's statement. When comparing the two paragraphs, you'll see that paragraph two has citations while paragraph one does not. With the proper citations being present, it makes the paragraph more reliable. It is evident that the second paragraph appears to be more authoritative.&nbsp;<br><br>In addition to the author used citations by giving credit to other people's work and citing protects you from plagiarizing, that citation is one of the most visible ways in which authority is communicated in an academic writing. The degree to which we express our grasp of the literature's and indicate that our reading and interpretations are sound and believable is demonstrated by how we deal with other people's words and works.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 03:34:17 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087471556</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>DULNUAN,ANGELLE D STEM 12</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087553060</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms. Cariño that paragraph 2 is more authoritative than the paragraph 1 .&nbsp;<br><br><br><br>In addition to that , In some ways plagiarism is simple dishonesty. &nbsp; Obviously everyone agreed that paragraph 2 is not an act of plagiarism and the sentences has references&nbsp; . The presence of citation or the author used citation by giving credit to other people's work is one of the most visible ways in which authority is communicated in academic writing . Paragraph 2&nbsp; showed the credits and respect to the author or/and&nbsp; source/s .<br>&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 04:32:43 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087553060</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Estela,Kristine Mae B.(12-HUMSS 4)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087562662</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree to Mr. Mendoza's statement that the most authorative in broader explanation is paragraph 2 than paragraph 1.<br>&nbsp;However, they are also the same but in reliable statement paragraph 2 is more qualified than the paragraph 1,where paragraph 2 has complete and strong evidences.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 04:39:46 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087562662</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Miguel, Jenshield Renee, Silapan (Humss 2)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087605432</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms. Angelica Alcaide that the two paragraph are the same except for the absence of citations from the paragraph 1.<br><br>In addition to that the two paragraphs is quietly have same ideas, but the paragraph 2 is more authoritative than the paragraph 1. Paragraph 2 holds a lot of advantages and proper informations that showing it is accurate and reliable due to its references. The paragraph 1 is also good, but it's lack of informations and&nbsp; there is no references. The readers will be confused if it is accurate or not because there is no strong evidences.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 05:07:30 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087605432</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>BODOMO,DHANIKA P.(HUMSS 4)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087621840</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr.Eliseo B. Mendoza that the paragraph 2 is more authoritative because the sentence/context are well cited and well presented.<br><br>In addition I see that the paragraph 1 became an opinion due to its lack of citation,but the paragraph 2 was presented with citations.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 05:17:39 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087621840</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Katimpo, Princess Dianne C. (STEM-12)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087633703</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Myra Ballesteros statement as well as to Jovelyn Tuliao's statement that the presence of citation makes paragraph 2 more reliable and trustworthy than paragraph 1.And using citations can gives proper credit to the authors of the words or ideas that you incorporated into your paper as well as it allows those who are reading your work to locate your sources,in order to learn more about the ideas that you include in your paper. Moreover, citing your sources consistently and accurately helps you avoid commiting plagiarism in your writing.<br>In addition to that, I truly believe that paragraph 1 is lack of citation which plagiarism can appear in a paper in the form of insufficient citations.The author is not giving the reader enough information to understand, compared to paragraph 2 which is well-cited and well presented. Moreover citing your sources is the main way to avoid plagiarism. In fact, citing is what separates a correctly written paper from an academically dishonest one.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 05:25:24 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087633703</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Carganilla,Darlilie C.(12-STEM)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087646577</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms. Jenshield&nbsp; that the paragraph 2 is more authoritative than paragraph 1.<br><br>In addition to that paragraph 2 is more authoritative than paragraph 1 because it has a references . And, of course, the paragraph 2 presents accurate facts, whereas the paragraph 1 lacks correct attribution of sources and no evidence or references. It is easier to avoid plagiarism if you constantly cite your sources. It also helps people to learn more about your thoughts by looking up your references.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 05:35:22 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087646577</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Gardoce , Jackielou C.                          (STEM-12)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087647422</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Meriel Montemayor's statement as well as Jovelyn Tuliao's statement&nbsp; that the two paragraph are quietly similar except for the absence of citations from paragraph one and by comparing the two paragraph , it is more likely that paragraph two is more authoritative because of the presence of citation unlike on the first is lack of citations and just like what they say's paragraph two is more convincing and the presence of citation makes paragraph two more reliable and trustworthy than paragraph one . In addition, citation represents the author’s effort as well as the detailed research work. An author puts his best in developing his writing and citation gives a space to him to show their attempt clearly and it gives scope to the author to get support from his readers.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 05:36:02 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087647422</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>BODOMO, DHANIKA P.(HUMSS-4)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087648583</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree to Ms.Ayessa Mae A. Cariño that the paragraph 2 is more authoritative than the paragraph 1 because it's not just about it's length but because it's about the accurate and reliable than the first paragraph.<br><br>In addition to that as plagiarism is a disciplinary offence and it must be considered to avoid.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 05:37:04 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087648583</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Marcos, Krislyn Joy P. (HUMSS 6)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087652578</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr. Jay ar Marquez as well as to Ms. Romebel Patiocan statement that paragraph two is more authoritative than paragraph one. Because in paragraph one there is no referencing, which means to say it can be plagiarism. The first paragraph borrowed the words and ideas and didn't give any recognition to the writer.<br><br>In addition, Plagiarism means using someone else’s work without giving them proper credit. In academic writing, plagiarizing involves using words, ideas, or information from a source without citing it correctly.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 05:40:20 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087652578</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Lopez,Mary Joy D.                            (HUMSS-2)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087667391</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms.Jovelyn Tuliao statement as well as to Meriel Montemayor's statement that the two paragraph are quietly similar expect for the absence of citations from paragraph one.And by comparing the two paragraph.It is more likely that paragraph two is authoritative because of the presence of citation unlike on the first which is lacking citations.<br><br>In addition to that referencing is important in a academic writing because it provides a lot of advantages including adding value to the author, improves authenticity stand as evidence,and preventing plaglarism.According to the University Of Oxford (2022) plagiarism is presenting someone else's work or ideas as your own with or without their consent.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 05:51:50 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087667391</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Braulio Princess Dianne A.</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087669111</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms. Sansai Corpuz statement that paragraph two is more convincing than paragraph one.<br><br>However paragraph one is just stating  without citation that makes a statement   unrealiable unlike paragraph two which have citations, it gives proper credit to the authors  words or ideas . It allows the readers  to locate the sources, in order to learn more about the ideas that it include in in the paragraph.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 05:53:21 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087669111</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Abragon, Karen Joy S. (ABM)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087708099</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1.) I agree with Christine Fiel Corriente,paragraph two is more authoritative than paragraph one. When you compare the two paragraph, paragraph two has citations and more convincing while paragraph one there is no referencing.<br><br>In addition to that, proper credits to the real authors&nbsp; can be acknowledge and respect.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 06:25:05 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087708099</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>BU-UCAN, KIMBERLY CLAIRE C. 12 HUMSS IV</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087730542</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr. Mendoza's statement that the paragraph 2 is more authoritative than paragraph 1 because the context are well explained and well presented.&nbsp;<br><br>In addition, I see that paragraph 1 and 2 are also the same but in most reliable and we'll cited statement , paragraph 2 is more qualified than paragraph 1 , where paragraph 2 has a strong and complete details and evidence. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 06:44:32 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087730542</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Pascual,Jay-Mai L.</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087750677</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms.Tuliao that paragraph two is more authoritative. However, with the exception of the lack of citations in paragraph one, the two paragraphs are very similar.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>When the two paragraphs are compared, the second one is more authoritative because it is well-explained and includes additional supporting details.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>To avoid plagiarism, paragraph 2 also gives credit to the owner.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 07:02:13 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087750677</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Valenzuela, Apple Mae D. STEM-12</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087849119</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mariel Montemayor's statement that the second paragraph is more realistic because it has a citation which is just based it on another article.<br>&nbsp;In addition, the first paragraph is plagiarism or theft has a corresponding penalty in law because it is an illegal activity. If the original writer discovers that others have copied his/her ideas and words, can sue the copier under "intellectual property rights". Causes self -harm and lack of respect or respect for others. Plagiarism is not just a simple dishonesty, it affects many things not only ourselves but also the society we live in.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 08:10:59 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087849119</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Juan, Sheena Mae P.</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087871874</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr. Rivera that "paragraph 2 is more authoritative because the sentences or contexts are well-cited and well-presented."&nbsp;<br><br>However, the two paragraphs are much alike; they explain the same idea, it's just that paragraph 2 explains it more thoroughly and the citations are more reliable.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 08:25:55 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2087871874</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2088070352</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>TOMAS, JENNYLYN MAY R.</strong><br>I agree with&nbsp; Ms. Rivera that the statement in paragraph two is more authoritative because it is significantly more compelling, in addition to the fact that the border and circumstances are well-cited/presented, and reliable.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>However, the first paragraph may be just as intriguing as the second because the author most likely completed his research.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 10:39:50 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2088070352</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Macaraeg, Florie May A. ABM</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2088089447</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr. Rivera that paragraph 2 is more authoritative. The availability of citations boosts the assertions' credibility. Because it is understood that the assertions have been examined and are thus factual, the references add to the perceived veracity of the claims.<br>In addition to that, despite having identical phrasing, the allegations in paragraph 2 appear to be weaker than those in paragraph 1. Paragraph 1 appears to be an opinion based on a body of evidence rather than solid or strong proof.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 10:53:29 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2088089447</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Gabriel, Rujilyn M. (ABM)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2088104977</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Karen Joy Abragon tha paragraph two is more authorative than the other paragraph. Composing the two paragraphs, paragraph two is more convincing and reliable because of the citations given. While paragraph one has a citation that readers can refer to.&nbsp;<br>In addition to that, it upholds intellectual honesty to avoid plagiarism and to allow readers track down sources.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 11:05:23 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2088104977</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Ugmad, Cristina A. HUMSS-4</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2088108473</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr. Eliseo Mendoza's statement, that the two paragraphs are quite similar but paragraph two is more authoritative than paragraph one. When you compare the two paragraphs,&nbsp; the paragraph two is more reliable and trustworthy because it has citations while the first paragraph has no citations which means to say it can be plagiarism.<br><br>In addition to that, using citations can give proper credit to the rightful owners of the words and ideas.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 11:07:54 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2088108473</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>WINNIE JOY W. GALANG STEM 12</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2088134282</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree to mrs.Princess Dianne Katimpo that&nbsp;statement, Paragraph 2 is more authoritative because citations are well-presented in the said paragraph. Aside from helping avoid plagiarism, referencing also provide supporting evidences for the ideas, arguments and claims in the paragraph, thus, making the paragraph more authoritative.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 11:27:44 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2088134282</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>LOPEZ, AIZA B.  HUMSS-1</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2088252202</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I  agree with Mr. Rivera that paragraph 2 is more authoritative because it explains better and have complete details.<br>In addition to that in paragraph 2, the author used citation from avoiding plagiarism and the context are presented very well. However the two paragraphs have the same thought, it is just the paragraph 2 are clearly and has a good explanation.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 12:52:34 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2088252202</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>LAGARTO KING Humss-2</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2088274330</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms.cariño that paragraph 2 is more authoritative than the paragraph 1 according to ms.cariño those citations are important to validate what you are writing, and it also enable the reader to consult the original source independent if they wanted to.<br><br>In additional to that A citation is a way of giving credit to individuals for their creative and intellectual works that you utilized to support your research. It can also be used to locate particular sources and combat plagiarism.<br><br>Citations are not all that matters in authoring but they can make quite a difference to how your readers sees your writing.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 13:06:34 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2088274330</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Uyan, Criszaril N.    G-12 ABM</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2088296545</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr.Ivan Drexler Rivera that paragraph 2 is more authorative than paragraph 1, because reference shows being respectful of the owner/author&nbsp; by giving credit to the original ideas of the owner.<br><br>In addition,When we use someone's work,it is important to write the name or credit to the owner to avoid plagiarism.<br><br>Additionally, referencing is important in academic because it provides more advantage, including adding value to the author as strong evidence to avoid plagiarism .The presence of citations makes paragraph more trustworthy.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 13:19:07 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2088296545</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Agustin, Jessa Mae D. ABM</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2088299161</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>2. I agree with Mr. Rivera that among the two paragraphs presented, paragraph two is trusthworthy and realistic because the refences add accuracy to the said statement. The paragraph one appears to be an opinion due to lack of evidences amd reference. In addition to that when you use someone else's work, give credits to the owner to avoid plagiarism.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 13:20:31 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2088299161</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Ponchupnan Angie B. - 12 HUMSS6</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2088357141</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree to Ms. Krislyn Marcos that the paragraph two is more authoritative than the paragraph one it means that paragraph one just borrowed the words and ideas in paragraph two just like ms. Marcos said in her padlet and in my observation the paragraph two is more detailed than the paragraph one which means it can be a plagiarism.<br><br>Therfore it is important to be more detailed in writing a sentence/paragraph and ask the permission of the owner/author of that article or sentence before using it to prevent a violation. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 13:50:03 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2088357141</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>CARIÑO, AYESSA MAE A.  HUMSS 2</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2088370269</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with MS. ALCAIDE that the citation used shows that the paragraph is credible or reliable. Providing accurate sources is necessary and needed, not just to avoid plagiarism but also to give respect to the owner.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>In addition to that, we can clearly notice that there’s a same content with paragraph 1 and 2; however, paragraph 2 had its credit which is not visible to paragraph 1. It’s the credentials that matters the most not the other way around.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 13:56:20 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2088370269</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>TUGUINAY DRINI QUEEN HUMSS 2</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2088400104</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms. Cariño that in paragraph two is more authoritative than paragraph one.&nbsp;<br><br>Paragraph one due to the lack of citations or references,It was become weak and may include stallen ideas or word. while in paragraph two showed the credits and respect to the author and sources&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 14:10:07 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2088400104</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>LAMAG MAY ANGEL C.  Humss 2</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2088400226</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms. Alcaide in agreeing with Ms. Ballesteros that the two paragraph are similar&nbsp; except for the absence of citation from the paragraph one.&nbsp;<br>In addition to that, I observe how important is the paragraph has a reliable sources and reference.Both paragraph are authoritative but they have also differences.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 14:10:10 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2088400226</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Ulep, Destiny Dawn A. (12-STEM)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2088444006</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr. Rivera's statement that the paragraph2 is more authoritative than paragraph 1 because contexts in paragraph 2 are well-presented.<br>In addition to that, paragraph 2 is more evidential because the citations demonstrates that a proper and thorough research was conducted. And the fact that the act of citing sources is also the best defense against allegations of plagiarism.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 14:28:59 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2088444006</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>AMBOJNON JOHN MARK D.  HUMSS 2</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2088468849</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree to Ms. Cariño that the paragraph 2 is more authoritative than paragraph 1 because it's not just about its length but it is more accurate and reliable&nbsp;<br><br>In additional to that, it upholds intellectual honestly to avoid plagiarism<br><br>Paragraph 2 is more authoritative than paragraph 1 because it has references, and accurate facts</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 14:39:34 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2088468849</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>DURAN,SAM NATHANIEL S. STEM-12</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2088516329</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr. Rivera that paragraph 2 is more authoritative than paragraph 1 due to the fact that the contexts are well-presented in paragraph 2.<br><br>in addition to that, paragraph 2 is more convincing due to the fact that the sources show that competent and extensive research was carried out. Furthermore, citing sources is the most effective defense against plagiarism accusations.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 15:00:57 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2088516329</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>CARIÑO, AYESSA MAE A.  HUMSS 2</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2088574349</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms. Galang that Aside from helping avoid plagiarism, referencing also provide supporting evidences for the ideas, arguments and claims in the paragraph, thus, making the paragraph more authoritative.<br><br></div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>In addition to that, It is vital to provide authentic sources, not only to avoid plagiarism but also to provide acknowledgment to the respected owner.&nbsp;<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 15:27:06 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2088574349</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>VIDAL A. SIROY II  TVL-ICT 12 </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2088947263</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree in Ms.Montemayor's statement that the two are similar.<br>In addition to that, paragraph 1 appears to be their own statement, but it is a statement from the writers mentioned in paragraph 2.Paragraph 1 is plagiarized because they did not include a proper or any citation to know and respect the writers.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 18:38:19 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2088947263</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Batulan, Virginia  Humss 1</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089277272</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ayessa Mae<br><br>That aside from helping avoid plagiarism, referencing also provide supporting evidences for the ideas, thus, making the paragraph more authoritative.<br><br>In addition to this presence citation makes two more paragraph reliable and trustworthy than paragraph one.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-10 23:00:44 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089277272</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Ryan Ruzzel Uyami (STEM 12)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089350974</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr Ivan Drexler Rivera . The sentences or situations in paragraph 2 are carefully sourced and presented, making it more authoritative.<br><br>The two paragraphs, however, are really similar; they both express the same concept; the difference is that paragraph 2 goes into greater detail and the citations are more reliable.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 00:16:15 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089350974</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>BALDONADO, JENICO A. (STEM12)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089365699</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms. Jovelyn Tuliao's statement that paragraph two are quietly similar except for the absence of citations from paragraph one. And by comparing the two paragraph, it is more likely that paragraph two is more authoritative because it is more reliable and trustworthy as it's reference is being presented unlike on the first which is lacking citations. In addition, Citations is undoubtedly necessary as it gives the readers a proper guidance and allow them to know your ideas in-depth. In brief, it shows the source where your thoughts or ideas came from and citing your sources consistently and accurately helps you avoid committing plagiarism in your writing.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 00:25:26 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089365699</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Gumanab, Fanny B.</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089409160</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms. Ferrer statement , that citation makes the paragraph more reliable and trustworthy because it stands as a strong evidence. In addition it shows the source where your thoughts or ideas came from and citing your sources consistently and accurately helps you avoid committing plagiarism in your writing.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 00:47:55 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089409160</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>ANANAYO, ANGELICA M. 12 HUMSS 5</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089437289</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;I agree with Ms. Mylene Maca's idea that the most authoritive is paragraph two than paragraph one because paragraph two has a stated year or complete statement.<br><br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;However paragraph one has no written or stated year.(incomplete)<br><br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;In addition to that referencing is the most important in academic writing because it provides a lot of advantage to the reader.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 01:04:08 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089437289</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Patiocan, Romebel A. HUMSS-6</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089459626</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms. Aydinan's idea that paragraph 2 is not an act of plagiarism because all of the sentences has a citation/references to the writer. Because not referring to the original writer is a plagiarism.<br><br>&nbsp;In addition, according to the Module Referencing allows you to acknowledge the<br>contribution of other writers and researchers in your work (UNSW Sydney,<br>2019).</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 01:15:50 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089459626</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Marcelino Lyn V. (HUMSS 1)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089470432</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms. Sumido because as you can see the paragraph two has a complete statement that the reader gain knowledge because they know where to find it, who is the author or the other thing which the reader is usually looking for. Yes they have the same text but the paragraph one is lack of evidence or incomplete statement.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 01:21:20 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089470432</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Alcaide, Angelica D. (Humss 2)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089475652</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br>I agree with Ms. Miguel's statement as well as to Ms. Cariño's statement that the second paragraph is more authoritative than the first because the reference shows respect of the authors by giving them credit for the original ideas.<br>In addition, referencing is an important part of academic work. It puts your work in context and acknowledges other people's work. If you want to use someone else's work, you should include the author's name in the text to avoid plagiarism.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 01:23:50 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089475652</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Cayabyab, Villy Mae B. -ABM</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089494545</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr.Rivera that paragraph 2 is more authoritative and reliable because it has a strong evidences and references that paragraph 1.<br><br>In addition to that when alluding to an idea or wording that’s not your own, add a citation in your writing that identifies the full name of the source, the date it was published, and any other citation elements that’s required by the style guide you’re adhering to</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 01:32:41 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089494545</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Patiocan, Romebel A. HUMMS-6</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089497792</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms. Ponchupnan that paragraph one did borrow the words in paragraph two. But borrowing without consent and proper referencing is a plagiarism that has a disciplinary offence. That's why we need to avoid borrowing words without citation/referencing to avoid disciplinary offence.<br><br>In addition to the module given by our subject teacher, by citing the work of a particular scholar, you acknowledge and respect the intellectual property rights of that researcher (UNSW Sydney, 2019).</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 01:34:23 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089497792</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Ancheta, Ahlkquin S. (ABM)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089559130</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr. Ivan Drexler Rivera's statement that Paragraph 2 is more authoritive than Paragraph 1. Proper citations and references help establish and strengthen the credibility of Paragraph.&nbsp;<br><br>In addition to that, the presence of citations and references show that proper research was done.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 02:08:26 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089559130</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Pascua, Christian Mark T.</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089560155</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>(STEM-12)<br><br>I agree with Ms. Montemayor's statement that the second paragraph seems more authoritative and more convincing than the first paragraph because of its citations.<br><br>In addition, giving credit to the original author by citing sources is very important because it is the only way to use other people's work without plagiarizing, and citing sources actually helps your reader distiguish your ideas from those of your sources.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 02:08:59 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089560155</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Sausa,Rosefe S.ABM.          </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089563546</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with MS.VILLY MAE CAYABYAB that the paragraph two is more authoritative compare to a paragraph one<br><br>Paragraph two has a strong evidence,complete statements, and it shows the respect to the owner unlike in a paragraph one</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 02:10:51 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089563546</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089579740</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Gromeo,Roseline G<br>-12 ABM<br><br></strong>2.I agree with Ms. Cabonitalla's statement as well as Mr. Rivera that paragraph two is more authoritative.In addition to that,when copying someone's work, it is necessary to obtain permission from the original author in order to avoid being sued for plagiarism. Paragraph two is more authoritative because it provides complete details and gives credit to the author. It is also more trustworthy and believeable.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 02:19:20 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089579740</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Christine Fiel R. Corriente - 12 ABM</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089579803</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>2. I agree with MS. ULEP, DESTINY DAWN that paragraph 2 is more evidential because the citations demonstrates that a proper and thorough research was conducted.&nbsp;<br><br>In addition to that, as Ms. Ulep said, the act of citing sources is also the best defense against allegations of plagiarism. If we are to submit an academic writing and the information written is not common, citations are good for reference and evidence to deny falsehood or such allegations. Thus, the lack of proofs of paragraph 1 made it less authoritative.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 02:19:22 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089579803</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Ora, Krizza Joyce Julliane F. - ABM</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089602421</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Destiny Dawn Ulep's statement that paragraph 2 is more evidential because the citations demonstrate that a proper and thorough research was conducted.<br><br>In addition to that, the citations make paragraph 2 more reliable because in most academic journals, the majority of articles (except in the case of opinion cases and news stories) are reviewed by experts, this review process means that academic journals are usually reliable and authoritative sources.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 02:31:11 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089602421</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Althea DG. Ambrocio HUMSS 4</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089602829</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr.Mendoza as well as Ms.Ugmad’s statement, both paragraphs are very similar, but paragraph two is more authoritative than paragraph one.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>When comparing the two paragraphs, the second paragraph is more dependable and trustworthy because it has citations, but the first paragraph does not, implying that it could be plagiarized.&nbsp;</div><div><br><br></div><div>Furthermore, citations can be used to give correct credit to the original owners of the words and ideas.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 02:31:26 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089602829</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089607512</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Gromeo, Roseline G.<br>-12 ABM<br><br></strong>3.I agree with Ms. Corpuz statement that paragraph two is more authoritative.However, after reading and comparing the two paragraphs, it is clear that they are nearly identical, with the exception that paragraph 1 lacks citations and information. Paragraph two is more authoritative because it has strong and credible proof.<strong><br></strong><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 02:34:08 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089607512</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Obra, Carla Jane V. -ABM </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089633209</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr. Ivan Rivera's statement that paragraph 2 is more authoritative. There is evidence and references. Paragraph 2 has a strong evidence and it is more accurate, and it shows the respect to the real owner compare in Paragraph 1.<br><br><br>In addition to that, If you use their work give credits to the authors from borrowed their ideas. It shows respect and avoiding plagiarism. Aside from avoiding plagiarism it is also a way of providing additional information. <br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 02:48:24 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089633209</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Medina Jessa May B. HUMSS6</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089656100</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr. Marquez statement<br>that paragraph 2 is more authoritative,<br>In addition to that, the author used citation and well-presented in the said paragraph.<br>Bcause second paragraph&nbsp;<br>have a complete details that<br>making the paragraph more authoritative.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 03:02:03 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089656100</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Cabonitalla, Michelle Mae D. -12ABM</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089657024</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>2. I agree with Ms. Bautista that paragraph two is more trustworthy and authoritative, as well as bolstering credibility. Furthermore, citation is a method of acknowledging the authors from whom you stole words or ideas. Plagiarism is avoided by citing sources.<br><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 03:02:35 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089657024</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Corriente, Christine Fiel R.  - 12 ABM</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089657080</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>3. I agree to MR. LAZARO, MHAR-EZRA&nbsp; that paragraph 1 has no citation and references to prove that the ideas in the paragraph is reliable. That concludes that paragraph 2 is more authoritative.&nbsp;<br><br>However, what if paragraph 1 was an authoritative author's own knowledge and never other's? Wouldn't paragraph 1 became as reliable as paragraph 2? </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 03:02:35 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089657080</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Tomas, Shaira Mae R. - ABM</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089668811</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>2. I agree with Meriel Montemayor's statement that both paragraphs have the same context/explanation. It is the citation that makes Paragraph 2 broader than Paragraph 1. Citation is a form of acknowledgement to the author behind the idea of something. Furthermore, it is important to put citations or references to make the paragraph reliable and avoid cases of plagiarism.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 03:10:09 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089668811</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Santiago, Jonjahred E. - STEM </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089670916</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>&nbsp;1) I agree with Ivan Dexler Rivera that Pharagraph2 is more reliable in the presence of citations which means that Pharagraph2 is more trustworthy or authoritative.<br><br>&nbsp; &nbsp;In addition to that, even though paragraphs 1 and 2 say the same thing, paragraph 1 may appear as plagiarism on paper in the form of insufficient citations. &nbsp;<br><br>2) I agree with Maylene Maca that The most authoritative pharagraph is definitely 2. She stated as complete statement rather than pharagraph 1.&nbsp;<br><br>&nbsp; &nbsp;In addition to that, it's important to include references to make your statement stronger with the support of evidence and citations.&nbsp;<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;<br>&nbsp; &nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 03:11:29 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089670916</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089674414</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Guman Gedaliahmae A, - ABM<br><br>I agree with Mr. Ivan Rivera's statement that paragraph 2 is more authoritative than paragraph 1, also the two paragraphs are similar they present the same ideas and contents except for the absence of citations and reference in paragraph 1. We conclude that the paragraph two is more authoritative because the context is well presented unlike paragraph one . By comparing these two, paragraph 2 is more convincing and it comes from a reputable and reliable source. Paragraph 2 also present that anytime you directly quote, paraphrase or summarize someone else's idea in your work, an in-text citation should follow, so that you can't be accused for plagiarism</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 03:13:41 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089674414</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Cabonitalla, Michelle Mae D. -ABM</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089679084</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>3. I agree with Ms. Gromeo that the second paragraph is more authoritative than the first. However, paragraph 2 explains the lack of citation better and more thoroughly than paragraph 1 does. Plagiarism can appear in a paper in the form of insufficient citations and information. In addition to that, in paragraph 2, the background is provided extremely well, and there are powerful evidences and references.<br><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 03:16:40 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089679084</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Hernandez, Zyla Mariella, C STEM 12</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089679905</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms. Cabonitalla statement that the paragraph two is more authoritative than the paragraph one because it is significantly more compelling, or the context are well cited<br>Citing your sources accurately helps you avoid commiting plagiarism in your writing so that it would make the statement more trustworthy</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 03:17:13 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089679905</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Miguel, Jenshield Renee, Silapan (Humss 2)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089683640</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms. Princess Braulio that the paragraph 1 is just stating without citation that makes a statement unreliable unlike paragraph 2 which have citations.<br><br>In addition to that&nbsp; the paragraph 1 is just an opinion with no supporting evidence,while the paragraph 2 shows respect for the writers by including references. It holds a lot of advantages and proper informations which will allow the readers to know that it is correct and reliable.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 03:19:54 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089683640</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Tumapang, Marglenda J. - ABM</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089702776</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>2. I agree with Mr. Mhar-Ezra Lazaro that paragraph 1 has no citation and references to prove that the ideas in the paragraph is reliable.<br><br>However, if it's your own knowledge or experience, you do not have to put citation in it.&nbsp;<br><br>In this case,&nbsp;the information from the both paragraph is not a common knowledge but paragraph two makes it more reliable because the sources are cited. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 03:32:29 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089702776</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Tomas John Carlo-Stem</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089730750</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Meriel Montemayor that both paragraphs contain the same context/explanation. The citation is what makes paragraph 2 longer than paragraph 1. Citation is a type of acknowledgment given to the author of an idea. Furthermore, citations or references are required to make the paragraph credible and to avoid instances of plagiarism.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 03:52:05 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089730750</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Tomas, Shaira Mae R. - ABM</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089733918</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>3. I agree with Marglenda Tumapang's statement that if it's the author's own knowledge, you don't have to put citations in it. However, as both paragraphs have the same context, we already know that Paragraph 2 is more authoritative and reliable because it's well-cited and well-presented. Furthermore, this situation shows that citing your sources is really important. It holds a lot of advantages and can be used as an evidence to avoid cases of plagiarism.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 03:54:16 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089733918</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Ora, Krizza Joyce Julliane F. - ABM</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089758428</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms. Corriente agreeing to Mr. Lazaro that paragraph 1 has no citation and references to prove that the ideas in the paragraph is reliable.<br><br>To answer Ms. Corriente's question, yes, it is possible that paragraph 1 might be the authoritative author's own knowledge. Personal knowledge generally do not need to be cited in an APA references page or within the body (in-text citation) of your paper (Rasmussen University, 2020). However, paragraph 1 being the author's own knowledge is still not as reliable as paragraph 2 because when you use personal knowledge the statements and claims you included in your paper might be questioned by the readers, then, in the end, you still need to find and cite reliable sources to back up your claims.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 04:12:13 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089758428</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Matute, KrystineCassandra V. - Humss 12</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089768449</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr. Rivera that paragraph 2 is more authoritative and reliable than paragraph 1<br><br>In addition to that , citation makes the paragraph more reliable and trustworthy because it stands as a solid evidence . Citing your sources consistently and accurately . Also paragraph 2 is more detailed than the first paragraph</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 04:19:58 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089768449</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Revadenera, Jan Laiza T.  (12 ABM)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089776351</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>2. I agree with Ms. Gromeo that both paragraphs are almost identical. Paragraphs one and two may contain the same contents, but the presence of citations and references in paragraph two makes it more authoritative, reliable and accurate than paragraph one.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 04:26:01 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089776351</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Revadenera, Jan Laiza T. (12 ABM)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089782214</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>3. I agree with Ms. Bautista that giving credits to other people's work protects you from plagiarizing. In addition to that,&nbsp;citations allows you to show respect to the property rights of that researcher and acknowledge the contributions of other writers and researchers in your work. Citing is also a way&nbsp; to provide evidence to support the claims in your work and it makes it more accurate and reliable.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 04:30:52 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089782214</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Tayaban, Eunice D. (ABM 12)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089791532</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>(2)I also agree with Ms. Criszaril Uyan that paragraph 2 is more authoritative because of the presence of in text citation that gives credit to the ideas or work of others. This is also a way of showing respect to other authors.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 04:38:38 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089791532</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Aydinan, Genica L. HUMSS 5</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089811766</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I&nbsp;agree with Mr. Rivera that the most authoritative paragraph is 2. Because sentences are well-cited and well-presented, it is more reliable and trustworthy as its reference is being presented.&nbsp;<br><br>Furthermore, referencing allows you to acknowledge the&nbsp; contribution of other writers and researchers in your work (UNSW Sydney, 
2019). Therefore, content of paragraph 2 acknowledged the words and ideas of the writers.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 04:54:50 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089811766</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Aydinan, Genica L. HUMSS 5</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089841505</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with the statement of Ms. Ferrer that giving credit to the writers from whom you borrowed your words and ideas allows you to acknowledge their contribution to your content.&nbsp;<br><br>Similarly to paragraph 2, all sentences has credits to the writers from whom they borrowed ideas and words. In addition, the citation makes the paragraph more reliable and trustworthy because it stands as strong evidence.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 05:18:54 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089841505</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>FERRER, NICOLE C. -12 ABM</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089855835</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms. Dona Gayle Rivera's statement that citation is one of the most visible ways in which authority is communicated in an academic writing.<br><br>In addition to that, citation also allows every reader to easily trace the main source of the paragraph when researching information for their assignment.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 05:31:34 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089855835</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Tumapang, Marglenda J. - ABM</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089865699</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>3. I disagree with Ms. Michelle Mae Cabonitalla that 'citation is a method of acknowledging the authors from whom you stole words or ideas' Citations are references to the sources that you use when you are writing your paper, giving credit to the authors and also to allow your reader to locate your sources to find out more about your topic (Schauffler Library, 2021).<br><br>Hence, saying that 'citation is a method of acknowledging the authors from whom you stole words or ideas' is wrong. It is better to say that citation is a method of acknowledging the author's words or ideas.&nbsp;<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 05:41:46 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089865699</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Tapo, Threcy Ann H. (HUMSS 6)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089880436</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms. Matute that essay written in paragraph 2 is more authoritative and reliable than paragraph 1.<br><br>Because it provided evidence to support the assertions and claims, sources also cited in the text appeared and recognized the writers from whom it borrowed word and ideas.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 05:56:38 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089880436</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>AMBOJNON JOHN MARK D.  HUMSS 2</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089911834</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br>I agree with Ms. Rivera's statement that citation is one of the visible ways in which authority is communicated in an academic writing.<br><br><br>In addition to that citation allows every reader to easily trace the main source of paragraph.<br><br>Further more referencing allows you to acknowledge the contribution of other writters and researchers.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 06:26:31 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089911834</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Ganado, Romel G. (Stem 12)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089930195</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms. Aydinan as well as Mr. Rivera that The second paragraph is the most reliable. When compared to paragraph 1, because the sentences are well sourced and presented, they are more reliable and trustworthy.<br><br>In addition to that, Give credit to the writers if you use their work and use their ideas. It demonstrates respect while also avoiding plagiarism. It is also a technique of presenting additional information in addition to avoiding plagiarism.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 06:44:23 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089930195</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Dulnuan Raquel Humss 2</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089933496</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>(2.) I also agree with Ms. Tayaban that citation gives credit to the ideas or works of others that this is also a way of showing respect to the other authors. That's why citing is very important to support the claims in your work and make it accurate and reliable.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 06:47:46 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089933496</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Reygie MANZANO HUMSS2</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089950518</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I disagree with MS.CARINO that the more authoritative among 2 paragraph is paragraph 1.<br>In addition to that why is paragraph 1 is more authoritative it's because of the presence of the citation unlike the second paragraph.<br>And just what i say paragraph 1 is more convincing<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 07:04:16 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089950518</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Dulnuan Raquel Humss 2</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089961609</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>(3.) I also agree with Ms. Gromeo that both paragraphs are almost identical. It is confusing but<br>through the presence of citation and references, The paragraph two makes it more authoritative, trustworthy and reliable than the paragraph one.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 07:15:07 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2089961609</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Enriquez, Mark John N. (STEM 12)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090020525</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I&nbsp;agree with Ms. Maca that paragraph 2 is more authoritative that paragraph 1 because the statements are more complete. In addition, the use of citation in paragraph 2 makes it more authentic and it give more credits to the rightful owners. However, paragraph 1 looks like more presentable.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 07:56:59 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090020525</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Lopez,Mary Joy D.                           HUMSS 2</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090020833</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I also agree to Ms.Ulep&nbsp; that paragraph 2 is more evidential because of the citations demonstrates that a proper and thorough research was conducted.<br><br>In addition to that,it upholds intellectual honesty to avoid plagiarism and to allow readers track down sources.Its important to include references to make your statement stronger with the support of evidence and citations.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 07:57:14 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090020833</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Soriano, Christine Joy N.  HUMMS-2 </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090029346</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>&nbsp;I disgree with Mr. Manzano, Reygie's statement, that between the two paragraphs, paragraph one is more authoritative. Why?  Simply because paragraph one is lacking factual evidence,so, how can you evaluate the data or sources? If the source of the data is absent? (referencing is absent) and so,  the information also is not efficient, In addition to that,  the information gathered in paragraph one doesn't even ethical and responsible,thus,it doesn't use the information lawfully (give proper credit to the rightful owner) and there's a probability that it will go to  plagiarism.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 08:04:00 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090029346</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>AQUEBAY, JHON MICHAEL H.</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090033626</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr. Mark John Enriquez that paragraph 2 is more authoritative than paragraph 1 because the statement in paragraph 1 is more complete than in paragraph 2. In addition to that, the use in citation in paragraph 2 is more authenic. However in paragraph 1 it is more presentable.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 08:07:42 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090033626</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Montemayor, Meriel V. STEM</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090045769</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>3. I agree with Paul Ace Bartolay that ‘at first sight, paragraph 1 appears to be a good paragraph. Due to the lack of citations or references in paragraph one; it become weak and may include stolen ideas or words’. In addition to that, in using citations it specifies what material is the work of another person or is from another source and to your own work. Most importantly it shows credibility and it prevents plagiarism.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 08:18:09 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090045769</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>GLYDELLE A. MANALUTO HUMSS-6</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090054492</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with the statement ofMs.Mylene Maca that the most authoritative is the paragraph 2 because the statements are complete than the other 1<br><br><br>In addition I can see that the paragraph one is like a opinion due to its lack of citation,and in paragraph 2 it has a citation </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 08:25:14 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090054492</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Soriano, Christine Joy N. HUMMS-2 </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090060035</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>&nbsp; I agree to Ms. Lopez, Mary Joy, that it is important to include references as a support of evidence.&nbsp;<br>&nbsp; &nbsp;However, Ms. Lopez said "to make your statement stronger"&nbsp; for me, it is to make the information useful, more efficient, ethical, responsible and lawfully,&nbsp; the information itself, just like that.&nbsp;<br> In addition to that, having a references is a big help to evaluate the data sources that can help also identify truth or factual evidence about a certain topic. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 08:29:41 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090060035</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Lopez,Mary Joy D.                             Humss 2</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090062363</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr.Rivera statement that paragraph two is more authoritative than paragraph one.The presence of the citations increases the reliability of the claims.The references strengthen the perceived accuracy of the claim because it is acknowledge that they are studied and thus factual.<br><br><br>I'n addition to that citation is way to give credit whom you have borrowed words and ideas.By citing the work of a particular scholar,you acknowledge and respect the intellectual property rights of that researcher.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 08:31:34 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090062363</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Abragon, Karen Joy S. (ABM)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090073818</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>2.) I agree with the statement of Ms. Nicole C. Ferrer, that the paragraph two is more authorative than paragraph one. Because paragraph two has citations and more convincing than paragraph one.<br><br>In addition to that plagiarism is presenting someone else's work or ideas as your own, with or without their consent, by incorporating it into your work without full acknowledgement.<br><br>Furthermore give credit to the real owner to avoid plagiarism.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 08:41:07 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090073818</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Wittawit, Shawie Jean B. (HUMSS 2) </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090079252</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with the statement of Ms. Tuliao, Jovelyn F. that the two paragraphs are quietly similar except for the absence of citations from paragraph one.<br>&nbsp;By comparing the two, it is more likely that the paragraph two is more authoritative because of the presence of citation unlike the first paragraph that lacks citation.<br>In addition to that a statement is more reliable when it comes from a fact finding rather than an opinion</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 08:46:02 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090079252</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Abragon, Karen Joy S. (ABM)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090101462</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>3.) I agree with the statement of Ms. Villy Mae Cayabyab, "that the paragraph two is more authorative and reliable because it has a strong evidences and references than paragraph one."<br><br>In addition to that using citations can give proper credits to the real owner can be acknowledge and respect.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 09:05:37 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090101462</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090111616</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>JOHN CARLO ANCHETA PARANGAN GRADE 12 HUMSS 4<br><br><br>I agree with Mr. ELISEO B. MENDOZA&nbsp; as well as MR. JAMES FERRER, that paragraph 2 is more authoritative than paragraph 1 , because the sentence/context of paragraph 2 is more accurate and well cited and also well presented.<br><br>In&nbsp;addition, the paragraph 2 are dependable and trustworthy because it has citations and giving an credit to the original author to avoid plagiarism.</strong></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 09:14:35 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090111616</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Agustin, Angie Prince C. HUMSS 1</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090121118</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr. Calingayan that paragraph 2 is more reliable and authoritative. Comparing the two paragraph, paragraph 1 looks like lack of citations while paragraph 2 represent the citations clearly and reliable. In addition to that, it has complete details than paragraph one.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 09:22:23 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090121118</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>RICHELL JAVAR PADIGOS HUMSS4</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090141636</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Eliseo's assertion because paragraph two is more trustworthy than paragraph one.<br>Furthermore, I discovered that two paragraphs have an impact on comprehension.<br>And it contains more information than the first paragraph.<br><br>However, while paragraphs 1 and 2 appear to be the same statement, they are not. Because paragraph 2 contains a citation and is more persuasive.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 09:39:00 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090141636</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>DACUMOS,CHARLOTTE B. G-12 HUMSS 1</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090157012</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms. Angie Prince Agustin statement<br>&nbsp;that paragraph 2 is&nbsp; more authoritative because the paragraph is well presented unlike&nbsp;<br>paragraph 1.<br>&nbsp;In addition to that , it has complete<br>&nbsp;statement than first paragraph.<br>&nbsp;The second paragraph&nbsp; have a complete details<br>&nbsp;making the paragraph more authoritative.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 09:50:54 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090157012</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Lizelle T Legaspi G 12 Humss 6</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090199027</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr. Jay ar Marquez's statement that paragraph two is more authoritative than paragraph one. In addition citations assist readers to find your sources and learn more about ideas you mention in your paper, as well as provide proper credit to the authors of the words or concepts that you included in your paper.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 10:25:24 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090199027</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Marinel V. Aquino Humss4</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090209744</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr. Eliseo<br>&nbsp;Mendoza's&nbsp;statement<br>that paragraph 2 is&nbsp;<br>More authoritative,<br>In addition to that , it has complete<br>statement<br>than first paragraph.<br>The second paragraph&nbsp;<br>have a complete details<br>making the paragraph<br>more authoritative.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 10:34:18 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090209744</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Salum,Janna Mae E. (Humss 1)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090210472</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr. Rivera that The second paragraph is the most reliable. When compared to paragraph 1, because the sentences are well sourced and presented, they are more reliable and trustworthy.<br><br>In addition to that, Give credit to the writers if you use their work and use their ideas. It demonstrates respect while also avoiding plagiarism. It is also a technique of presenting additional information in addition to avoiding plagiarism.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 10:34:54 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090210472</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Victoria Franzin S.                             ICT 12.                                                                           I agree with Ms. Karen Joy Abragon&#39;s statement that paragraph two is more authorative, has citations, and is more compelling than paragraph one; the first one appears to be good, but lacks citations or references, and may contain stolen ideas. It is critical to incorporate references as supporting evidence when evaluating data sources that can assist in the identification of factual information on a certain topic.   </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090215838</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 10:38:58 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090215838</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Corpuz, Axcel Jhaze M. (TVL-ICT 12)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090216829</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr. Rivera that paragraph 2 is more authorative than paragraph 1 citation. Reference help stablished and strengthen the credibility of paragraph. Rest of us agreed that Paragraph 2 is more authorative than paragraph 1, Because of the absence of citation from Paragraph 1.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 10:39:42 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090216829</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Lanuza, Glaizelle G. (STEM-12) </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090217772</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1.) I agree to Ms. Mylene D. Maca that, the most authoritative is paragraph 2 because the statements are complete than paragraph 1.<br><br>In addition to that, The citations are well presented. Using citation is to&nbsp; avoid plagiarism by quoting words and ideas used by other authors.<br><br>2.) I also agree to Ms. Charlotte Dacumos statement that, the paragraph 2 has complete statement than the first paragraph. And have a complete details making the paragraph more authoritative.&nbsp;<br><br>In addition to that, Give credits to the writers if you copy their ideas to avoid plagiarism and to show respect to them.&nbsp;<br><br>3.) I also agree with Ms. Tuliao and Ms. Montemayor statement that the paragraph two is more convincing. And the presence of citation makes paragraph two more reliable and trustworthy than paragraph one. In addition to that, I think the paragraph one is plagiarized. It looks like it's their own opinion and statement. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 10:40:35 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090217772</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Ugmad, Cristina A. HUMSS-4</title>
         <author>jamesferrer0000</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090233363</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr. Eliseo Mendoza's statement, that the two paragraphs are quite similar but paragraph two is more authoritative than paragraph one. When you compare the two paragraphs,&nbsp; the paragraph two is more reliable and trustworthy because it has citations while the first paragraph has no citations which means to say it can be plagiarism.<br><br>In addition to that, using citations can give proper credit to the rightful owners of the words and ideas.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 10:54:22 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090233363</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Ramos, Jhesa Faye R. (TVL-ICT 12)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090250568</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr. Ivan Drexler Rivera that paragraph 2 is more authoritative than paragraph 1 because the latter&nbsp;lacks of references unlike the paragraph 2 which has complete details, more authoritative and it explains better.<br><br>In addition, when we use someone's work, it is important to write the name or credit to the owner to avoid plagiarism.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 11:09:31 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090250568</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Ma. Arianne Aguirre HUMSS 2</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090259186</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms. Angie Prince Agustin statement<br>that paragraph 2 is more authoritative in the content of this full detailed statement as compared to paragraph 1.<br><br>In addition to that, introduces your readers to your second example and Paragraph 2 supports the state point of paragraph 1.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 11:17:09 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090259186</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Blanco, Rosien Anne T. Humss 4 </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090269307</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree to Mr. Mendoza's statement that the most authoritative is paragraph two than the paragraph one because the sentences context are well cited and well presented.<br>In addition to that By&nbsp;<br>citing the work of a particular scholar, you acknowledge and respect the&nbsp;<br>intellectual property rights of that researcher (UNSW Sydney, 2019).</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 11:26:18 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090269307</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Naval Angelica C. (ABM)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090272106</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr. Rivera statements that Paragraph 2 is more authoritative , because its context are well-cited and presented,that it has references that makes it reliable and trustworthy. In addition the author 8 ideas in the paragraph is reliable.<br><br>In addition to that, Give credit to the writers if you use their work and use their ideas. It demonstrates respect while also avoiding plagiarism. It is also a technique of presenting additional information in addition to avoiding plagiarism.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 11:28:57 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090272106</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Ancheta, Ahlkquin S. (ABM)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090274496</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>(2) I agree with Ms. Rujilyn Gabriel's statement that paragraph 2 is more authoritive that the other paragraph. Composing the two paragraphs, Paragraph 2 is more convincing and reliable because of the citations given. While paragraph one has a citation that readers can refer to.&nbsp;<br><br>In addition to that, it upholds intellectual honesty to avoid plagiarism and to allow readers track down sources.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 11:31:00 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090274496</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Naval Angelica C. (ABM)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090279159</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>(2) I agree with Ms. Jenshield Renee Silapan Miguel that the paragraph 1 is just stating without citation that makes a statement unreliable unlike paragraph 2 which have citations.<br><br>In addition to that&nbsp; the paragraph 1 is just an opinion with no supporting evidence,while the paragraph 2 shows respect for the writers by including references. It holds a lot of advantages and proper informations which will allow the readers to know that it is correct and reliable</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 11:35:01 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090279159</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Ligud, Starlite jane (HUMSS-4)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090281464</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>i agree with Mr.Ferrer and Mr. Mendoza that the two paragraphs are very similar, because&nbsp; paragraph two is more authoritative than paragraph one. the second paragraph is more dependable and trustworthy because it has citations, but the first paragraph does not, implying that it could be plagiarized.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 11:37:07 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090281464</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Naval Angelica C. (ABM)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090282646</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>(3) I agree with Ms. Destiny Ulep that the paragraph2 is more authoritative than paragraph 1 because contexts in paragraph 2 are well-presented.<br>In addition to that, paragraph 2 is more evidential because the citations demonstrates that a proper and thorough research was conducted. And the fact that the act of citing sources is also the best defense against allegations of plagiarism.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 11:38:13 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090282646</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Almera Pascual - ABM </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090306606</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>2.)  I agree with Ms. Angelica Naval&nbsp; Paragraph 2 ,is more authorative and giving credit to the rightful owners are not&nbsp; just&nbsp; to avoid plagiarsm but to also emphasize to the reader that  the idea  has already walk through a lot of studies before written. </strong></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 11:58:18 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090306606</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>AMBOJNON JOHN MARK D.  HUMSS 2</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090326815</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br>I agree with Ms. Renee that the paragraph 1 is just stating without citation that make the statement unreliable unlike paragraph 2 which have citation<br><br><br>I addition to that, It holds a lot of advantage and more proper informations which allow the readers to that its reliable.<br><br>It upholds intellectual honestly to avoid plagiarism.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 12:16:25 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090326815</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Almera Pascual -ABM</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090327494</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>3.) <strong>I agree with Mr. Ahlkquin Ancheta&nbsp; paragraph 2 used references that makes it more authorative that the paragraph 1 and giving refences makes the reader track down sources.<br><br>&nbsp;In addition,&nbsp; adding references&nbsp; is also adding credibility to the worked done by the writer it is to prove that the idea&nbsp; has been discuss by&nbsp; some of researchers already.&nbsp;<br><br>However some of many readers do not mind those references and just focus on the ideas presented.&nbsp;</strong></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 12:17:01 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090327494</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Garnace Jerico B STEM12 </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090329195</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree<em> with Meriel Montemayor that the most authoritative paragraph is the paragraph no.&nbsp;2 compared to paragraph no.1. In addition in paragraph no.2 you can see the year to published and who can published.As you can see the paragraph no.1 is w/o citation unlike paragraph no.2 which you can see the citation.</em></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 12:18:38 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090329195</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Alcaide, Angelica D.(Humss2)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090333529</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms. Lopez that the citation is a way to give credit to whom you have Borrowed words and ideas allow you to acknowledge their contribution to your content. It's like the second paragraph, where all of the sentences have credit to the writers from borrowed ideas.&nbsp;<br>In addition, the second paragraph is trustworthy because it has citations and gives credit to the authors to avoid plagiarism.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 12:22:42 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090333529</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>JIMBOO S. DULDULAO G12 (TVL-ICT).                                                              I agree with Ms. Mylene Maca&#39;s statement that the most authoritative is paragraph two than paragraph one. And also paragraph 2 have a complete details and the citations are well presented.In addition to that, if you copy the ideas or the work of the author give credit to the writer to show them respect and to avoid plagiarism.</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090334658</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 12:23:47 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090334658</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090356835</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Malaque, Lyka Joy S. - 12 ABM<br><br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; I agree with the statement of Mr. Rivera that paragraph 2 is more authoritative, as he said "The context are well-cited and well-presented". Both paragraph are quite similar to each other but the second paragraph are more dependable and trusthworthy.&nbsp;<br><br>&nbsp; &nbsp; In addition You can show your reader that you did through study by stating the sources you consulted to get your information.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>Being a responsible scholar requires you to acknowledge other academics and their ideas.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>Plagiarism can be avoided by quoting words and ideas from other authors.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 12:41:57 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090356835</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Abad Kathrina D, (ICT)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090371391</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms.Angelica Naval that in paragraph 2 is more authoritative than paragraph 1,because the sentence/context are well cited and well presented.<br><br>In additional to that,it upholds intellectual honestly to avoid plagiarism.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 12:53:15 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090371391</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Villacillo, Patricia Ysabel O. (TVL-ICT)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090379897</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr. Ivan Drexler Rivera that paragraph 2 is more authoritative than paragraph 1 because of the absence of citation from paragraph 1. Paragraph 2 is more convincing and reliable because of the citations given.</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>In addition to that, If you use their work give credits to the authors from borrowed their ideas. It shows respect and avoiding plagiarism. Aside from avoiding plagiarism it is also a way of providing additional information.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 12:59:35 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090379897</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Lopez, Kathlane April C. (ABM)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090399265</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agreed to everyone who thinks paragraph two is more authoritive because it has citation. Authoritative means it has the power to make people listen; there is trust and convincing enough to make people believe. These characteristics can be seen on paragraph two. A simple citation of whom that the statement came from brought the trust and ten fold difference from the paragraph one which makes people listen thus brings out authoritive from the paragraph two.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 13:12:15 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090399265</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Aprilyn C. Cocoy(ABM 12)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090409922</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms. Jessica Mae Agustin statements that when you use someone else work putting proper credits is a safest way in making your research and you can assure that you're safe from any plagiarism crime.<br>In addition to that putting proper credits to your work will gives you a lot of benefits.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 13:18:55 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090409922</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Aprilyn C. Cocoy (ABM 12)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090416362</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br>I agree with Ms. Villy Mae Cayabyab statements as well as Ms. Rosefe Sausa that the paragraph two is more authoritative compared to the first paragraph.<br>In addition to that,the author of the second paragraph has shown fully respect in using others work. Putting proper credits when using others work helps you prevent from any plagiarism crime.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 13:22:25 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090416362</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Salting, Reybie (STEM-12)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090416664</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms. Marglenda Tumapang and Mr. Mhar-Ezra Lazaro that paragraph 1 has no citation and references to prove that the ideas in the paragraph is reliable. We can say a paragraph is reliable if you show where you get the ideas you used in paragraph to look more authoritative and more persuasive.<br><br>In addition to that, Citation means that you should indicate where the information that you're using came from. You should let the readers know what kind of sources you used, who created the source, and when the source was created. Basically, you are giving credit to the authors of the source that you used in your paper.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 13:22:33 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090416664</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Salting, Reybie (STEM-12)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090419878</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms. Zabrina Manaluto and Ms. Revadenera that the citations demonstrates that a proper and thorough research was conducted, and the fact that the act of citing sources is also the best defense against allegations of plagiarism. Citation contains only enough information for the reader to find the source in the reference list. Usually, this is the name of the source's author and the year the source was published which we can see in paragraph 2.<br><br>In addition to that, referencing correctly helps us to avoid plagiarism by making it clear which ideas are your own and which are someone else’s, it gives supporting evidence for your ideas, arguments and opinions, and allows others to identify the sources you have used.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 13:24:31 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090419878</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Andres Dianne Joy S.</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090422764</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr. Ahlkquin Ancheta that paragraph 2 is more authorative than the paragraph 1. Giving refferences&nbsp; help the readers to find all the sources fast and easy.<br><br>In addition giving or adding refferences is important in giving credits to the article owner.<br><br>However some readers just stick or focus to their needed information and did'nt mind it.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 13:26:09 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090422764</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Manaluto, Zabrina P. (STEM-12)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090428301</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>2.I agree with Ms. Shaira Tomas that it is important to put citations or references to make the paragraph reliable and avoid cases of plagiarism.<br><br>In addition, we must and should always do this to ensure that the work of other writers/authors is presented properly and fairly so as not to infringe on their rights.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 13:28:58 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090428301</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>LUMAYYONG SHAINA ROSE B. HUMSS 1 I agree to Miss. SUMIDO  that paragraph 2 is more authoritative. that paragraph 1 has been lacking of citations and references , paragraph 2 is more realable and authoritative.In addition to that  the 2 paragraph are similar but paragraph 1 has many absence of citations and lack of evidence that&#39;s why it is  not well compromise compared by paragraph 2 that is more athoritative ,with proper citations and references ot strengthens the credibility and support the details ,provides strong evidence that is way more convincing .</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090429858</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 13:29:53 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090429858</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Timbuloy Jericho F.</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090440111</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>They&nbsp;are both reliable but the thing is number 1 paragraph has a missing part making the paragraph unclear. It's luck for number 2 paragraph beacuse it is more reliable than number one as it has a very more understandable information and that is when and who the subject based on.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 13:36:14 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090440111</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Andres Dianne Joy S.</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090441219</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agre with Ms. Revadenera that in every article we used that are own by other, we should be giving credits or acknowledgement to them to avoid implications like the pliagiarism.<br><br>In addition giving credits to them will show that we respect them and their property rights. Making them feel appreciated for their work.<br><br>However many readers does'nt mind in giving it to them they just use it for their own good.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 13:36:56 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090441219</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Angieline C. Cocoy (ABM 12)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090453473</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms.Aprilyn Cocoy statements that putting proper credits to your work will benefited you a lot.<br>Everyone will going to appreciate your work specially the one you've mentioned in your research work.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 13:43:38 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090453473</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Lazo, Marjean Kate O. (STEM 12)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090456815</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr. Rivera&nbsp; that the second paragraph is the most reliable. Because they are well-sourced and presented, the phrases in this paragraph are more dependable and trustworthy than those in paragraph 1.<br><br>In addition, references should be used to strengthen your statement with proof and citations.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 13:45:31 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090456815</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>FERNANDEZ JENNIFER, T. HUMMS1</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090477709</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms. Lumayyong Shaina, that paragraph 2 is more authorative than paragraph 1.&nbsp;<br>Paragraph 2 has citations and references .<br>It is more reliable and it is also help us to identify where does an idea came from.<br><br>In addition, proper identification helps us prevent plagiarism by clarifying which ideas are yours and which are someone else’s, it provides supporting evidence for your ideas, arguments and opinions, and allows to others to identify the sources you used.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 13:56:39 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090477709</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Agustin, Jessa Mae D. ABM</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090484295</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>3. I agree with Ms. Shaira Mae Tomas' statement that if it is yoir own idea or knowledge you don't have to put citations and references to it because you are putting thoughts and words into your paper that are original to you.<br><br>However, among the paragraphs being presented which is quite similar to each other we knew that paragraph two is more realible as citation is presented. Paragraph one seems to be weaker as it appear as an opinion because of lack of citation.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 14:00:31 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090484295</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Panes,Ramon Brin II,D.(HUMSS-1)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090497938</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr. Rivera that the second paragraph is more reliable than the others. In comparison to paragraph 1, the sentences are more reliable because they are well presented and have a great source.<br><br>However, this does not imply that paragraph 1 is unimportant, it is still necessary for the entire paragraph.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 14:07:52 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090497938</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>VIADO, MICHAEL ANGELO (HUMSS-4)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090507040</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with MR.Ferrer and MR.Eliseo Mendoza that paragraph 2 is more authoritative than paragraph 1. The second paragraph contains a complete statement, making it more authoritative than paragraph 1.&nbsp;<br><br>In addition, paragraph 2 is dependable and trustworthy because it includes citations and gives credit to the original author to avoid plagiarism</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 14:12:51 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090507040</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Carganilla,Darlilie C.(STEM-12)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090516305</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms.Marinel Aquino that the<br>second paragraph have a complete details<br>making the paragraph more authoritative than the first paragraph.<br><br>In addition to that,Paragraph 2 has a strong evidence whereas the Paragraph 1 is just an opinion with no strong evidence.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 14:17:55 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090516305</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Manaluto, Zabrina P. (STEM -12)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090533395</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>3.I agree with Ms. Reybie Lyne Salting statement that referencing or citing give supporting evidence for your ideas, arguments, and opinions, and allows others to identify the sources you have used.&nbsp;<br><br>In addition, to cite means is to point to the evidences. And by identifying the source you have used, it allows a readers to understand and learn more information. It can also strengthens the work of others by providing outside support for research ideas.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 14:27:01 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090533395</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Ernelyn Esteban HUMSS 4</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090633829</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr. Eliseo Mendoza that paragraph two is more authoritative, because the context are well cited, and well presented than paragraph one.<br>In addition to that, the second paragraph have a complete details, more reliable and trustworthy because it has strong evidence than the first paragraph has not complete details and reference<br>&nbsp;<br>However, referencing is not only to avoid plagiarism but also a way to give recognition to the writers from whom you have borrowed words and ideas.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 15:22:20 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090633829</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>MANUEL,HAZEL MAE N.(HUMSS-4)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090645102</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr. Eliseo Mendoza statement that the two paragraphs are very similar, yet paragraph two is more authoritative than paragraph 1. When comparing the two paragraphs, the second paragraph is more dependable and trustworthy Because it has significant evidence, the opening paragraph does not contain all of the necessary details and references.<br><br>However, I observe that the first paragraph became an opinion owing to the lack of citations, whereas the second paragraph had citations.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 15:28:49 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090645102</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Ortiz, Rhobelyn T.  (HUMSS 6)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090702714</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>(1) I agree with Mr. Jay are Marquez that the second paragraph is more authoritative that the first paragraph. The paragraph two shows citation which give credits to the real writer or owner despite of the same content to paragraph one.<br><br>     In addition, according to the UNSW Sydne, 2019, referencing is not only to avoid plagiarism but also a way to give recognition to the writers from whom you have borrowed words and ideas. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 16:04:11 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090702714</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Ortiz, Rhobelyn T.  (HUMSS 6)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090746826</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>(2) I agree with Ms. Romebel Patiocan that borrowing content without referencing is a plagiarism that has a disciplinary offense. The absence of citation in paragraph one made us think that it is a form of plagiarism. Using someone else's work without attribution is a plagiarism.<br><br>In addition, we can conclude that the paragraph two is the most convincing and accurate among the two.&nbsp; However, both paragraph have the same content less the citation.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 16:31:50 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090746826</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Ortiz, Rhobelyn T.  (HUMSS 6)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090783672</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>(3) I agree to Ms. Christine Joy Soriano&nbsp;that having a reference is a big help to evaluate data sources that can also help identity truth or factual evidence about a certain topic. Referencing is a way to acknowledge the authors and a way to present evidences.&nbsp;<br><br>In addition to that, having reference in paragraph two allow us to identify the used sources while the paragraph one doesn't.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 16:54:51 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090783672</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Zonio, Jeylowin V. - 12 ABM</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090811015</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr. Rivera, Ivan that with the two given paragraphs, paragraph 2 appears to be more authoritative compared with paragraph 1, despite having the same content. Adding references as well as citing proper credits to the rightful owner makes the said paragraph more reliable and trustworthy.&nbsp;<br>In addition to that, the presence of citations further reinforce the ideas being presented in paragraph 2, unlike in paragraph 1 wherein the  ideas presented seems to be just someone’s opinion making the claims weaker and implausible.&nbsp;<br>Moreover, most of us knew that citing references as well as putting proper credits means the said study or the ideas presented was done factually. It also helps the reader in locating the borrowed ideas, and an effective way to avoid plagiarism. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 17:13:02 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090811015</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Zonio, Jeylowin V. - 12 ABM</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090909368</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms. Revadenera's statement agreeing to Ms. Bautista that giving credits to the rightful owner protects you from plagiarizing aside from that citations allows you to show respect to the property rights of that researcher and acknowledge the contributions of other writers in your work.<br>In addition to that, citing references is something valuable in making your  work or ideas more factual and reliable, at the same time allowing your readers to locate where your borrowed ideas came from which contributes a lot in gaining further knowledge. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 18:19:10 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2090909368</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Zonio, Jeylowin V. - 12 ABM</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091002231</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms. Corriente, Christine Fiel's statement that paragraph 2 is more authoritative since citations increases the reliability of the claims and the references strengthen the accuracy of the claims because it is acknowledged that they are studied and thus factual.&nbsp;<br>In addition to that, as Ms. Corriente said, paragraph 1 looks like an opinion of accumulated observation without solid or strong evidences.&nbsp;<br>Both paragraphs contain the same ideas however, the main difference between the two is that paragraph 1 lacks of references and citations wherein claims appears to be weaker than in paragraph 2 that claims are more stronger and authoritative because of putting proper citations and references. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 19:23:54 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091002231</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Ganigan, Rea P. HUMSS-6 </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091256382</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>2. I agree with Ms. Rhobelyn Ortiz that paragraph two is more authoritative and dependable than paragraph one because it contains more proof and references.<br>In addition, the author included citations and presented the information well in the paragraph. Due to the second paragraph having a complete set of information Increasing the paragraph's authority.&nbsp;<br><br>&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-12 01:19:32 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091256382</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Garcia, Jezreel Bless A. - STEM 12</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091257036</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>With Ms. Gumangol, I also disagree with Ms. Montemayor on disagreeing with Ms. Dizon's statement saying that paragraph two is more authoritative than the first paragraph. Because, i agree with Ms. Dizon and everyone else saying that the second paragraph is more reliable and trustworthy for it provides enough citations or references that made the paragraph trustable than the first one.<br>In addition to that, providing accurate citations puts your work and ideas into an academic context. They tell your reader that you’ve done your research and know what others have said about your topic. Not only do citations provide context for your work but they also lend credibility and authority to your claims.<br>Moreover, citations are important to avoid plagiarism and maintain academic integrity. Misrepresenting your academic achievements by not giving credit to others indicates a lack of academic integrity. This is not only looked down upon by the scholarly community, but it is also punished. When you are a student this could mean a failing grade or even expulsion from the university.<br><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-12 01:20:36 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091257036</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Jay-ar  A. Marquez HUMSS 6 </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091258553</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>2.I agree with mr Ivan dexler Rivera that paragraph 2 is more authoritative than paragraph 1 because of the absence of citation from paragraph 1 paragraph 2 it is more convincing and reliable because of the citation given.<br><br>In addition to that ,if you&nbsp; use their work give credits to the authors from barrowed their ideas.<br>It shows respect and avoiding plagiarism. Aside from avoiding plagiarism it is also a way af providing additional information.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-12 01:23:06 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091258553</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Garcia, Jezreel Bless A. - STEM 12</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091258684</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr. Rivera's statement saying that in the given paragraphs, the second one is more authoritative than the first one. Because, the contexts in it are more reliable and trustworthy for the citations are given. Unlike the first one which didn't give citations and proper credit to the authors.<br>Referencing is an important part of academic work. It puts your work in context, demonstrates the breadth and depth of a research, and acknowledges other people's work. You should reference whenever you use someone else's idea.<br>In addition to that, the second paragraph is indeed stronger compared to the first one, for citations in a paragraph or statement would be more reliable or easier to trust than just a paragraph that lacks of references like the first paragraph.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-12 01:23:20 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091258684</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Garcia Jezreel Bless A. - STEM 12</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091259235</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms. Montemayor and Ms. Tuliao statement saying that the two paragraphs are quite similar, it's just the first one is lacking of citations or references which made the statement weaker than the second paragraph.&nbsp;<br>Moreover, all of us aspire towards that elegant paper in which the prose is as compelling as the content and good attribution habits build a strong foundation towards that goal. Citing specific sources for the various facts that we present removes the hallmarks of intellectual laziness, vague thinking, and sloppy writing as generalizations, clichés, and outright false claims, e.g., as when the phrases, “everyone knows” or “they say,” are replaced with specific sources.<br>When you cite sources properly, you leave no question in your readers’ minds regarding your point. Furthermore, by citing, you can easily use active language and avoid raising the dreaded red flag of passivity to journal editors and reviewers. Cite well, and you may forever expunge the phrase “It is said” from your academic paper.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-12 01:24:14 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091259235</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>3ls Rica Demas Humss 1 Grade12</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091259419</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with mr Rivera that paragraph 2<br>Is more authoritative inis more authoritative in addition to that the author complete sentense&nbsp;<br>Compare to the one paragraph is not complete sentense.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-12 01:24:37 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091259419</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Ganigan, Rea P.</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091264577</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>3. I agree with Ms. Romebel Patiocan that the paragraph two is more authorative than paragraph one.<br>Furthermore, citations indicate which information is the work of another person or comes from a different source, as well as how it relates to your own work. Most&nbsp;importantly, it establishes credibility and guards against&nbsp;plagiarism.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-12 01:33:27 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091264577</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Rica Eulalio Demas  Grade 12Humss 1 </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091265623</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr Rivera that paragraph 2&nbsp;<br>Is more authoritative in is more authoritative in addition to that  the author and  complete sentense     compare  to the one paragraph is not complete.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-12 01:35:09 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091265623</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Gabriel, Rujilyn M. (ABM)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091266176</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Nicole Ferrer's statement that paragraph 2 is more authoritative than the paragraph 1 because sentences or context in paragraph 2 are well-cited and well-presented.<br>In addition to that, paragraph 2 is more reliable compared to the other paragraph. The ideas are quiete similar but the second paragraph has the citations that makes it more trustworthy.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-12 01:36:08 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091266176</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Gabriel, Rujilyn M. (ABM)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091266430</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms. Michelle Mae Cabonitalla's statement daddy second paragraph is more authoritative than the first paragraph because the ideas shown are well-cited.<br>In addition to that, plagiarism can be avoided because of the acknowledgdment presented.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-12 01:36:39 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091266430</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>FERNANDEZ CHRISTINE A.         STEM</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091286672</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr. Rivera's statement that Paragraph 2 is more authoritative than Paragraph 1. Proper citations and references help establish and strengthen the credibility of Paragraph 2. In addition to that, the presence of citations and references show that proper research was done.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-12 02:08:07 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091286672</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Geronimo, Ryan Pol M.(HUMSS 2)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091306420</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree to Mr. Ambojnon that the paragraph 2 is more Authoritative than paragraph 1 because paragraph 1 lacks of evidences wherein we can say that the pragraph 1 is not reliable.<br><br>In addition to that, paragraph 2 have citations and references which cannot lead to plagiarism.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-12 02:41:21 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091306420</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Tuliao, Jovelyn F.</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091306856</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>2.)I am&nbsp;not totally disagreeing in Ms. Dizon Keana Angela's ideas, because we share common perception that paragraph two is more authoritative than paragraph one. However,just like Ms. Meriel, I also disagree with a part of what Keana said that 'the paragraph two is more authoritative because it has broader explanation' both paragraph is the same the only difference is the absence of citation in paragraph one. And I don't think that the lengthy or broader the paragraph is,the more authoritative it is. Because if it's the case then we could  conclude that the broader the paragraph, the more likely it is to be more authoritative.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-12 02:42:06 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091306856</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Geronimo, Ryan Pol M. (HUMSS 2)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091314763</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree to Ms. Lopez that the two paragraph are quietly similar to each other however, The difference between paragraph 1 to paragraph 2 is, Paragraph 1 doesn't have any references and citations which is needed while paragraph 2 is authoritative which is reliable.<br><br>In addition to that statement Referencing is an important part of academic work. <strong>It puts your work in context, demonstrates the breadth and depth of your research, and acknowledges other people's work</strong>. You should reference whenever you use someone else's idea.<br><br>Also to avoid plagiarism and to respect the person who write it.<br><br><br></div><div><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-12 02:55:36 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091314763</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Geronimo, Ryan Pol M.(HUMSS 2)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091321807</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree to Ms. Manaluto that we should always provide references to any data or other information. Why? because if we dont do that, were already disrespecting the original writer.<br><br>In addition to that were already doing plagiarism.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-12 03:07:16 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091321807</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Lapada,Bryan John Paul P. (Humss-6)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091340986</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br>I agree with Mr. Marquez&nbsp; statement that paragraph 2 is more authoritative&nbsp;<br>Than paragraph 1<br>In addition in the said paragraph 2 is more in details and its good to student have not properly good at defining information about the said paragraph and to know the information easily&nbsp;<br>Actually both of them are ok the second paragraph is most better in details than paragraph 1&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-12 03:40:51 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091340986</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Tuliao, Jovelyn F. (STEM-12)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091357144</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>We can say that the two paragraph is undeniably similar to each other but paragraph two is well cited and well presented making it more authoritative<br> I agree with Mr. Marquez that paragraph one could be just a plagiarize copy of paragraph two,because of it's absence of citation and references. Thus, in writing it is important to cite your sources where you get information to avoid committing plagiarism. In addition, citations and referencing are important to validate what you're writing and also serves as documented evidence for readers to consult the original sources.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-12 04:12:54 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091357144</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Malupeng, Abegail D. (HUMSS 6)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091365011</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1)&nbsp;I agree to Ms. Maylene Maca's statement that paragraph 2 is indeed more authoritative than the first one. Well-cited that makes the paragraph more authentic.<br><br>In addition to that, giving credits to the rightful owners of the words and ideas shows respect.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-12 04:30:24 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091365011</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Dellias, Clark  U.</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091369115</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>HUMSS-4<br><br>I agree with Ms. Ganigan that paragraph 2 is more authorative than paragraph 1. In addition to that paragraph 2 is more details and properly better at defining information about the said paragraph, so students know where to look for it.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-12 04:40:08 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091369115</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Dellias, Clark  U.</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091377060</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr. Mendoza that paragraph 2 is more complete and more authorative than paragraph 1. In addition to that citation makes the paragraph more trustworthy and detailed because it stands as strong evidence, However the first paragraph is not that bad but it is lack of information about the ideas contained in paragraph 2.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-12 04:58:00 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091377060</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Millo, Justine Fruz S. (Humss 2)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091382637</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms. Ayessa Mae that paragraph 2 is more authoritative than paragraph 1 because the phrases and context are well-cited and presented in paragraph 2.<br>In addition to that, when compared to the other paragraph, paragraph 2 is more trustworthy.&nbsp;<br>The ideas are nearly identical, but the second paragraph has citations, making it more reliable.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-12 05:11:50 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091382637</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Malupeng, Abegail D. (HUMSS 6)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091385900</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>2) I agree with Ms. Rea Ganigan's statement agreeing with Ms. Rhobelyn Ortiz that paragraph 2 appears to be more authoritative compared to paragraph 1 due to its complete details and contains references which shows concrete evidence that the said paragraph is trustworthy.&nbsp;<br><br>In addition, it is necessary to give credits to the real owner of the words and ideas being used to avoid plagiarism.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-12 05:20:07 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091385900</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Millo, Justine Fruz S. (Humss 2)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091386497</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms. Mary joy that paragraph 2 is more authoritative because the context is well-cited and presented, and it contains references, making it dependable and trustworthy.&nbsp;<br><br>Furthermore, the author of paragraph 2 is more likely to have conducted research than the author of paragraph 1 because paragraph 1 lacks citations and references to support the paragraph's views.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-12 05:21:32 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091386497</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Millo, Justine Fruz S. (Humss 2)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091388382</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr. Manzano that paragraph 2 is more authoritative than paragraph 1 because paragraph 1 lacks citations. Because of the citations provided, paragraph 2 is more convincing and reliable.<br>Furthermore, if you use their work, give acknowledgment to the authors from whom you borrowed ideas. It demonstrates respect while also avoiding plagiarism. It is also a technique of adding new information, in addition to preventing plagiarism.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-12 05:26:11 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091388382</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Malupeng, Abegail D. (HUMSS 6)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091390779</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>3) I agree with Mr. Bryan Lapada that with the two given paragraph, paragraph 2 appears to be more stronger than paragraph 1, which appears to be the weaker.<br><br>However, both paragraph is quite similar to each other, contains the same ideas and context, paragraph 1 lacks of references and citations while paragraph 2 contains proper citation.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-12 05:32:30 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091390779</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Dellias, Clark  U.</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091412038</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>HUMSS-4<br><br>I agree with Ms. Sardeniola's statement that many of us student agreed that paragraph 2 is more authorative than paragraph 1. It is because of the absence of citations contained in paragraph 2. In addition to that, it is important to give proper credits to the original author where you got informations, that can be called plagiarism which paragraph 1 looks unreliable.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-12 06:28:55 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091412038</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091418999</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Lodevico, Daniel A. HUMSS-4<br><br>I agree with Mr. Eliseo Mendoza.<br>Because the paragraphs are identical, except for the absence of citations from paragraph 1.<br>The first paragraph may be just as interesting as the second, but within an academic context, a context that requires you to show from where you have taken ideas, the second has far more authority, it is more persuasive. It shows that the ideas you are discussing are matters that are important to your particular academic community.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-12 06:47:14 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091418999</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Ponchupnan Angie B. (12 HUMSS6)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091447040</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree to Mr. Jay-ar Marquez that the paragraph 2 is more authoritative than the paragraph 1, because paragraph 2 is more convincing and detailed than paragraph 1.<br><br>In addition, if you will use some article or any work you must ask first the permission to the author and give credits to the respective owner/author of that work. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-12 07:49:33 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091447040</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Ponchupnan, Angie B. (12 HUMSS6)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091453995</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>3. I agree to Mr. Lapada Bryan statement that they are both ok but the paragraph 2is more detailed and authoritative than paragraph 1.<br><br>In addition of that we must learn that copying other's work is illegal because you just like owned that work even tho you just copied and that is plagiarism if you copy it without the permission of the owner the owner or author can file case against you and give respect to the respective owner/author. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-12 08:05:36 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091453995</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091541068</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Quibin, Ildefonso lll L (HUMSS 4)<br>I agree to Mr. Eliseo mendoza that the most authorative in Boarder explanation is paragraph 2 than paragraph 1 .The first paragraph maybe just as interesting as the second,but within an academic context,a context that requires you to show from where you have taken ideas.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-12 10:55:33 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091541068</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>𝙲𝚛𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚎 𝙿𝚊𝚌𝚘𝚕𝚐𝚞𝚒𝚗 (𝚂𝚃𝙴𝙼 12)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091597244</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>𝚆𝚎 𝚊𝚕𝚕 𝚜𝚎𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚙𝚑𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚐𝚛𝚊𝚙𝚑 1 𝚊𝚗𝚍 2 𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚚𝚞𝚒𝚝𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚜𝚊𝚖𝚎. 𝚃𝚑𝚎 𝚘𝚗𝚕𝚢 𝚍𝚒𝚏𝚏𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚒𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 pharagraph 2 appears to be more authoritative compared with pharagraph 1. I agree with ms. Tuliao, saying that the both pharagraph is the same the only difference is the absence of citation in pharagraph 1. In addition, I also agree with ms. Ferrer saying that giving credit to the writer/owner from whom you borrowed your words and ideas allows you to acknowledge their contribution to your content. Always remember that "Original is much better that immitation"</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-12 12:47:40 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091597244</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>AGUSTIN, JACQUELINE D. (STEM) </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091681685</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree to Ms. Juan that the paragraph 2 is more authoritative than the paragraph 1 in the 2 given articles because the citation were presented not just like the other one. In addition, the 2nd article cannot be called as plagiarize unless the citation will be removed. However, both of the article's contents were the same the only difference is that the second one are more trustworthy that's why the 2nd one are more authoritative.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-12 15:01:50 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091681685</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Jasmin, Ynah Biangca - STEM 12</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091994687</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms. Garcia that the second paragraph is more authoritative than the first in the supplied paragraphs. Because the settings in which the citations are presented are more accurate and trustworthy. Unlike the earlier one, which lacked citations and proper author acknowledgment. Academic work necessitates the use of citations. It contextualizes your work, displays the breadth and depth of a study, and acknowledges the contributions of others. When you use someone else's concept, make sure to credit them.<br>Furthermore, the second paragraph is stronger than the first, because citations in a paragraph or statement are more reliable or easier to trust than a paragraph without references, like the first paragraph is.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-13 02:44:48 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2091994687</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Mateo Edween Leo G.(Humss 1)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2092029287</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I&nbsp;agree with Mr. Rivera that the second paragraph is more reliable than the first paragraph. Sentences in the second paragraph are well cited and well presented and more realiable and trustworthy. In addition to that, the author of second paragraph shows fully respect in using others work. Putting proper credits when using others work helps you prevent from any plagiarism crime. However both the first and second paragraph are the same, the second paragraph is just more reliable and has proper credits. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-13 04:15:43 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2092029287</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Bumanglag, Cheska Mae E. - ABM</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2092294869</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr. Bartolay's statement that ‘at first sight paragraph 1 appears to be a good paragraph’ because the first paragraph has complexity in a topic in favor of clarity that help me understand what the paragraph indicates while in the second paragraph, the author added citations that are irrelevant which makes it complicated and difficult to understand. And due to the lack of citations and references of the first paragraph, the more authoritative between the two is paragraph 2.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-13 12:51:31 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2092294869</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Bumanglag, Cheska Mae E. - ABM</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2092296304</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>2. I agree with Mr. Rivera's statement that citations and references avoid allegations of plagiarism. Citation and references illustrate your ability to support your original ideas and protect your works from being stolen by others.&nbsp;<br><br>In addition to that, although the content of the two paragraphs is similar, paragraph 2 cites credible sources which prove its accuracy and render it more reliable than the first paragraph. &nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-13 12:53:32 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2092296304</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Bumanglag, Cheska Mae E. - ABM</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2092299962</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>3. I agree with Ms. Rambac's statement that the second paragraph is more authoritative than the first and that citation not only prevent plagiarism, but also provide additional information to readers.&nbsp; You should acknowledge the identified sources to verify what information used to obtain more relevant data in order to help readers expand their knowledge on a topic.<br><br>&nbsp;In addition to that, whenever you use the idea of others, remember to cite the resources to ensure people that you do not claim to be the author of these words.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-13 12:58:39 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2092299962</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2092992757</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Dacanay,Jezarel R.<br>(HUMSS-1)<br><br>Both of the paragraph has the same perspective but&nbsp; I am Agree with ms.Fernandez Jennifer, the second paragraph is more reliable than the first one.In paragraph two you can see that the reference and citation are presented which can help the reader to understand the information more.&nbsp;<br><br>In addition to that,giving credit to the real author can help you to avoid un intentionally plagiarizing work.<br><br>However, some people does'nt give credits to the real owner,thats why many published works are plagiarized and that's not a good example of a good writer this must avoid.<br><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-14 03:04:52 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2092992757</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Sanidad, Karen Joy B.</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2093081991</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>(HUMSS 1)<br><br>For me the paragraph one is more authorative because for me I listen more to the word I hear from music. I am agree with Ms.Dacanay,the second paragraph that, giving credit to real author can help us avoid your intentionally plagiarizing work.<br><br>Because it's better to listen to the song when you understand it and so do most of them want to hear and it's better when used in a particular way.Because lyrics facilitate creative cirticulation for thereby they can protect the music and make the song to speak on political issues.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-14 04:20:02 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2093081991</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Roxanne Shanye B Nalliw (TVL-HE)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2093133936</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br>I agree to Ms. Keana Angela Dizon that the more authoritative is Tha paragraph 2 than paragraph 1 although they are likely similar but the paragraph 2 is more detailed that paragraph 1.<br>In addition of that we must give respect to the respective author or owner of that article.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-14 05:05:26 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2093133936</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>MARIE BEANCA MANUEL </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2095250808</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms. Shaira Mae Tomas that you do not need to provide citations and references if it is your own notion or knowledge because you are expressing your own thoughts and words in your work.<br><br>However, we noticed that of the three paragraphs offered paragraph two is more realistic in terms of citation. The first paragraph appears to be weaker because it lacks citations and appears to be an opinion.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-15 05:22:30 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2095250808</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2096103647</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>John Wayne P.&nbsp; Conde<br>HUMSS 5<br><br>I agree with Ms. Maca that the 2nd paragraph is authoritative because it is supported with broader explanations and citations. The two paragraphs seems identical, however, the first paragraph lacks on explanation unlike the 2nd paragraph</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-15 14:31:01 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2096103647</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Precious Joy A. Tobias (HUMSS 6)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2097004798</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms. Rea Ganigan's statement that paragraph two is more authoritative that other paragraph one. Because the paragraph one is no referencing not like the other paragraph, that is means to say it can be plagiarism.<br><br>In addition if we use some articles or any work we should ask permission first to the author if he is allowed you use ther articles. Also doing the credits to the real owner is important tp avoid plagiarism. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-16 01:00:35 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2097004798</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Vargas, Justine Jade A. - STEM</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2097129290</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with most of the people here that the 2nd paragraph is more authoritative than the the other one because it acknowledges the people and its references. It is important to give credits to prevent plagiarism and avoid the likes of receiving a lawsuit.&nbsp;<br><br>In addition, aside from having a good explanation, providing references are important as it helps a paragraph or an article to be legit. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-16 02:20:30 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2097129290</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>PR2</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2097925648</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Mark Cavin Napadawan<br>TVL-EIM<br><br>I agree with most of my classmates who looks paragraph 2 as more autoritative and detailed one,&nbsp; because giving citations and references to your statement helps you to avoid plagiarism.&nbsp;<br><br>For me,  paragraph 2 is a non bias statement as the author gave references and citations of his statement. Paragraph 2 is more detailed and understandable as it cited a lot from the topic</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-16 12:32:14 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2097925648</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>WAYET, ALTHEA ANGEL MAE (STEM)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2099149328</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with most of the people here, that the paragraph 2 is more authoritative than paragraph 1. Base in the two paragraphs that we have read we can see that they are likely similar, the only difference is that paragraph 2 has more citation and references.<br>In&nbsp;addition to that, we must know that copying someones idea can lead us to jail. I know that sometimes we can't deny the fact that we need someones idea to start. So, to prevent plagiarism and avoid receiving a lawsuit we must ask their permission and give credits to the rightful owner/author from whom we borrowed our ideas. It allows us to acknowledge their contribution to our content.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-17 02:08:31 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2099149328</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Dahunan, Dhenray C. (STEM 12)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2099179266</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I&nbsp;agree with Ms. Jasmin that the second paragraph is more authoritative than the first paragraph, the second paragraph have citations or statements that is more reliable or easier to trust than the first paragraph. It is better to give address to the owner to avoid plagiarism or copying without the credits.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-17 02:28:00 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2099179266</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Bautista, Marian R. (Stem 12)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2099634361</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with the majority of my classmates who prefer a modest authoritative and detailed paragraph since providing examples and references to your statement helps avoid plagiarism. Paragraph 2 is a non-bias statement in my opinion because the author provided references and citations for his assertion.&nbsp;<br>Paragraph 2 is also more extensive and intelligible because it quoted a lot of material from the issue.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-17 08:41:58 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2099634361</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>QUIMING , CHRISTINE E. HUMSS 2</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2102868517</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with MR. RIVERA's statement that the paragraph 2 is more authoritative because the statement showed was explained more truly and clearly compared to the first . Paragraph 2 shows the important details that the readers need to understand .<br><br>In addition to that , if compared to paragraph 1 we can see that it is weaker than paragraph 2 despite of their similarities in text . Paragraph 1 is lack of citations , strong ideas , and no strong evidences.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-19 09:47:48 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2102868517</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>STO.LOREN STEPHANIE  C.(STEM).                                         3.l agree with ms. Romebel patiocan that the paragraph two is more authorative than paragraph one. Furthermor, citations indicate which information is the work of another person or comes from a different source, as well as how it relates to your own work. Most importantly, It establishes credibility and guards against plagiarism. </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2103435547</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-20 05:59:09 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2103435547</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2103616510</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Binwag Precious Joy<br>(STEM)<br> Precious Joy&nbsp;<br>Grade 12 STEM<br><br>I agree with ms althea  that a paragraph to is more authoritative than the other paragraph. The two paragraph do is almost similar to each other but the only difference is the paragraph to is more authoritative because this has more reference and citation.<br>In addition to that,&nbsp; referencing is an important part of the work. It put your work in context, demonstrate the breadth and depth of your work and acknowledges to other people's work. We should refference whenever you use someone else's idea. Plagiarism is someone else's work or ideas as your own with or without the consent in incorporating it into your full work acknowledgement.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-20 11:23:29 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2103616510</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2105086811</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>BUNAO , ZJ&nbsp; H. &nbsp;<br>HUMSS 2&nbsp; &nbsp;<br>&nbsp;<br>I agree with MR. RIVERA'S statement that the paragraph 2 is shows the details clearly and has a strong evidences that the first one . It helps the readers understand the statement easily. In addition to that , if we compared the two paragraphs , the paragraph 1 is weaker because the statement was lack of explanations and it has no strong evidences compared to the paragraph 2 .</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-21 11:29:48 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2105086811</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Dulnuan, Kristle Ann N. Humss 5</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2109299906</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr. Rivera's statement that the 2nd paragraph shows more details and has a strong evidence than the 1st paragraph<br><br>In addition to that if we ever use other's article we should give credits to the author/owner so that other students can see the original article and avoid plagiarism</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-23 09:09:52 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2109299906</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Angel Mae B. Matias HUMSS-5</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2114522232</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In this statement we all know that plagiarism is a criminal crime so that in a statement we priorities first the link,references, the author, and ect. where we can get the one idea.<br>&nbsp;<br>The both paragraph are they have differences like paragraph one yes it says the information but it not tells the references where they get the information not unlike to the paragraph 2 that they tell all the information with correct details and have a refences.<br><br>In addition doing a Research paper we must know the true details to avoid plagiarism.&nbsp;<br><br>However we also know our limitation and citation in one Research work to do it in a good way.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-26 01:21:33 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2114522232</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Kestrel Lianne Aquino 12 STEM</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2133215759</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr. Rivera that paragraph 2 is more authorative than the other paragraph. Because, sentences or contexts were well cited and well presented.<br><br>However, these two paragraphs were both informative. But it came to the point&nbsp; that paragraph 2 has the upper-hand in terms of a paragraph’s completion to&nbsp; be more reliable than the other one. For example, we can observe in paragraph 2 that in every important information it states, there is an author or evidence that strengthens the statement more. By this, we can be assured that the informations that we had read were all in certainity.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-04-06 18:33:38 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2133215759</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Radango, Jamaica D. HUMSS 1</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2134497431</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Ms. Lopez that paragraph 2 is more authorative that paragraph 1. It is because of the presence of the citation, unlike the first paragraph that lacks citation. Also paragraph 2 are more evidential because of the citation. It makes the paragraph 2 more authentic and it gives more credit to the rightful owner.<br><br>In addition to that a statement is more reliable when it comes from a fact finding rather than opinion. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-04-07 12:40:17 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2134497431</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Navan, Geyser Jan A. ( TVL-ICT 12)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2140832627</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree that paragraph two seems more authoritative because it has more detailed than the other paragraph. It has references, which as the author's name and date that tell us when or where the information came from. Aside from this, references in paragraph two are also proof that guides us on whether the information in there was legitimate or just being made nonsense. Unlike paragraph one, it seems only just peace of idea about the topic, since it has no references, after all, there are circumstances this would be false information that is hard to believe.&nbsp;<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-04-12 13:35:31 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2140832627</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Navan, Geyser Jan A. (TVL-ICT 12)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2140834598</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>&nbsp;In addition, the references that have been cited in paragraph two also avoided plagiarism and give recognition to the writers from whom he or they have borrowed words and ideas. This is because citing the work of a particular scholar is an important and appropriate thing to do when you’re just basing the idea on another person, acknowledge and respect the intellectual property rights of that researcher allows us not get cheat or not even regulate the plagiarism law implemented since the decades ago.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-04-12 13:36:43 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2140834598</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Navan, Geyser Jan A. ( TVL-ICT 12)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2140839442</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>However, even if paragraph two is more authoritative than the other paragraph, we must still remember that citing the reference is not enough to avoid plagiarism we must also avoid copying all the information including the reference, and just paste it into the paperwork that just likes it. This is because a lot of people do that including me sometimes. Because the idea of the other people is the only basis for referencing evidence to support the assertions and claims in our paperwork. Also referencing should always be accurate, allowing your readers to trace the sources of information you have used. The best way to make sure you reference accurately is to keep a record of all the sources you used when reading and researching for an assignment using the Literature Review Form.</div><div>&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-04-12 13:39:48 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2140839442</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Buendia, Merry Grace S. (STEM 12)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2141570193</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with Mr. Rivera that the paragraph 2 is more authorative than the other paragraph because it has reference, which as the author's name and date that tell us which or where the imformation came from&nbsp;<br><br>In additon, we should put the details to avoid plagriarism</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-04-12 23:05:44 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jaybertcabanero/2codcdpjoaudax9u/wish/2141570193</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
