Language Skill：5

Content ：4

Attitude/Presentation：3

My reason : 

From the perspective of language skill, I do really think  this interviewee has a  very strong language ability, his pronunciation and the verbal are both good, he can express his thoughts clearly. From the perspective of content, he analyzed teacher Lee's class style correctly and he gave some useful advice to help teacher Lee to improve the class, such as adding some group work…In that way, teacher Lee can better organize the class and make himself form 'a talker' into 'a listener' or we can say 'a helper'. From the perspective of attitude/presentation, it was good on the whole but I think the interviewee could do it better, because he wore a mask in the video, that’s really difficult to read his facial expressions and the voice also became a little blurred. 

I highly appreciate the part where he suggested some solutions by looking at the teacher's teaching method from the perspective of the student.

In addition, he specifically mentioned and proposed group activities or presentations as a way to improve teachers' teaching methods, and explain it accurately and logically.

Lastly, his argument that the teacher should answer the student's questions and also mentioning the effect of this enriched the content.

Content：3

Attitude：4

Reasons for my scores：First of all, in terms of language skills, the interviewer's speech was calm and very fluent. I was also able to understand what he meant. Secondly, in terms of content I think there are some shortcomings. He overstates the content of the material, and his own ideas and the advice he gives are not sufficient. For example, in terms of answering students' questions, he could suggest that Mr. Lee take the initiative to ask students more after class about what they don't understand and explain them. However, he also clearly articulates the strengths as well as the weaknesses of the teachers in the material. Lastly, with regard to attitude, I found his mood to be calm and poised, his voice to be moderate and his intonation to be very appropriate. However, his facial expression was low and lacked some infectiousness and vitality. To summarize, it was a good mock interview.

Content: 4

Attitude/Presentation: 5

   

Reasons for my scores: First of all, his language skill is very superior. When he is delivering a speech, it is very natural and fluent. Also, the speed is appropriate. Therefore, it is easy to understand what he is trying to say. Secondly, his content is abundant. He covered most of the questions asked. However, I think his answer does not strictly follow the condition of the given questions and not in order. This is because he said Teacher Lee is good at explaining, diligent and engaging with colleagues. According to Teacher competency development evaluation, students thought Teacher Lee was the only one speaking during class, and there was no time to listen to other students thoughts. In this respect, to solve this problem, he suggested that Teacher Lee should answer students' questions when they have any. There is no reply about core skills Teacher Lee should build, but Teacher Lee’s past efforts and solutions to improve teaching ability. Lastly, his attitude and presentation is excellent. He tried to make an eye contact with everyone. His voice tone is calm and stable, so it is easy to grasp and focus on his main points. All in all, I personally believe his speech was terrific in general.