https://padlet.com/sxmeerkxan/2atigyfd405f en-us 2018-11-14 20:31:50 UTC 2019-01-16 21:50:24 UTC hello@padlet.com sxmeerkxan https://padlet.com/sxmeerkxan/2atigyfd405f/wish/304541389 Study 1: Memory tested for words from shadowed prose message. A repeated word list in rejected prose message and control words were compared.

Study 2: Instructions were either preceded or not by the use of the participants name. Whether or not the participant heard the instruction was measured.

Study 3: Participants were listening to passages that had numbers within occasionally (experimental). Similar messages had no numbers (control). Participants heard either two experimental or one experimental and one control. Participants always shadowed an experimental message but one group was told before they'd be asked questions about content of shadowed message and other told to remember all numbers they could. Mean number of digits in the message and the mean number of digits reported were calculated]]> 2018-11-14 20:36:39 UTC https://padlet.com/sxmeerkxan/2atigyfd405f/wish/304541389 sxmeerkxan https://padlet.com/sxmeerkxan/2atigyfd405f/wish/304543966 To test factors that would enable an unattended, dichotic message to be noticed.]]> 2018-11-14 20:42:52 UTC https://padlet.com/sxmeerkxan/2atigyfd405f/wish/304543966 sxmeerkxan https://padlet.com/sxmeerkxan/2atigyfd405f/wish/304545066 Study 1 had 12 participants and Study 3 had two groups of 14. Number of study 1 was not recorded. All participants undergraduates or research workers. Males and females.]]> 2018-11-14 20:43:51 UTC https://padlet.com/sxmeerkxan/2atigyfd405f/wish/304545066 sxmeerkxan https://padlet.com/sxmeerkxan/2atigyfd405f/wish/304545439 Lab experiment. Two of the studies repeated measures and last independent measures.]]> 2018-11-14 20:44:49 UTC https://padlet.com/sxmeerkxan/2atigyfd405f/wish/304545439 sxmeerkxan https://padlet.com/sxmeerkxan/2atigyfd405f/wish/304546210 Study 1: No content of rejected message was remembered.
Study 2: Affective instructions were heard sometimes and could break through the attention barrier.
Study 3: Numbers not important enough to break through attention barrier and be noticed in rejected message]]> 2018-11-14 20:45:41 UTC https://padlet.com/sxmeerkxan/2atigyfd405f/wish/304546210 sxmeerkxan https://padlet.com/sxmeerkxan/2atigyfd405f/wish/304547525 2018-11-14 20:49:14 UTC https://padlet.com/sxmeerkxan/2atigyfd405f/wish/304547525 sxmeerkxan https://padlet.com/sxmeerkxan/2atigyfd405f/wish/304547801 When participant directs attention to message in one ear, rejecting the message in the other ear, almost all verbal content of rejected message is blocked.

Rejection apparent even when message is repeated multiple times. 

Subjectively important messages such as one's own name can penetrate the block, so we may hear instructions containing our own name even in the rejected message.

Very difficult to make neutral material important enough to penetrate the block

]]> 2018-11-14 20:50:07 UTC https://padlet.com/sxmeerkxan/2atigyfd405f/wish/304547801 sxmeerkxan https://padlet.com/sxmeerkxan/2atigyfd405f/wish/304549311 2018-11-14 20:53:13 UTC https://padlet.com/sxmeerkxan/2atigyfd405f/wish/304549311