https://padlet.com/amy_patino/2a1fzzqoso4c6m0p en-us 2021-09-10 12:49:39 UTC 2021-09-10 13:32:44 UTC hello@padlet.com kiring0206 https://padlet.com/amy_patino/2a1fzzqoso4c6m0p/wish/1730892809 Des Las Casas was the most convincing because he provided evidence backing up his claim while Sepulveda was very opinionated without any other evidence besides himeself.]]> 2021-09-10 13:30:41 UTC https://padlet.com/amy_patino/2a1fzzqoso4c6m0p/wish/1730892809 ashmel0215 https://padlet.com/amy_patino/2a1fzzqoso4c6m0p/wish/1730892982 Casas makes the most convincing case because of the strong evidence he provides including how the Natives lived, how they thought, and their appreciation for the liberal arts. ]]> 2021-09-10 13:30:45 UTC https://padlet.com/amy_patino/2a1fzzqoso4c6m0p/wish/1730892982 greluz1221 https://padlet.com/amy_patino/2a1fzzqoso4c6m0p/wish/1730893004 Of the two, Las Casas makes a more convincing argument because of his use of evidence that directly counters Sepulveda's ideas.]]> 2021-09-10 13:30:45 UTC https://padlet.com/amy_patino/2a1fzzqoso4c6m0p/wish/1730893004 adaspa1129 https://padlet.com/amy_patino/2a1fzzqoso4c6m0p/wish/1730894890 De Las Casas is more convincing because the Natives developed mechanic art skills, governments, and laws showing that they are just as able as the Spaniards.]]> 2021-09-10 13:31:25 UTC https://padlet.com/amy_patino/2a1fzzqoso4c6m0p/wish/1730894890 adddub0912 https://padlet.com/amy_patino/2a1fzzqoso4c6m0p/wish/1730895013 Bartolome de Las Casas makes a better case because he uses evidence instead of theoretical statements, and he has more experience interacting with the Indians.]]> 2021-09-10 13:31:27 UTC https://padlet.com/amy_patino/2a1fzzqoso4c6m0p/wish/1730895013 jersto0305 https://padlet.com/amy_patino/2a1fzzqoso4c6m0p/wish/1730896089 Las Casas had the most convincing argument in showing that Native Americans were not savages and should not be prosecuted through the political structures preceding European arival, their ability to adopt new ideas, and he saw the Native American skills in mechanical art. ]]> 2021-09-10 13:31:49 UTC https://padlet.com/amy_patino/2a1fzzqoso4c6m0p/wish/1730896089 madeby0611 https://padlet.com/amy_patino/2a1fzzqoso4c6m0p/wish/1730897187 De Las Casas' argument was more convincing than Sepulveda's because of his thought-provoking nature of writing and historical parallels to what is being argued. ]]> 2021-09-10 13:32:13 UTC https://padlet.com/amy_patino/2a1fzzqoso4c6m0p/wish/1730897187 benqui09256 https://padlet.com/amy_patino/2a1fzzqoso4c6m0p/wish/1730899012 Bartolome de Las Casa was the most convincing because he provided evidence that the Native Americans aren't savages and inhuman but rather talented, skillful, and creative humans. 



]]> 2021-09-10 13:32:44 UTC https://padlet.com/amy_patino/2a1fzzqoso4c6m0p/wish/1730899012