Revolution is OVER!! Now What ??? by Erica Bardes

seanhowlin1 — 2024-01-26 14:13:29 UTC

No because that is a lot of work for one person we should make many rulers for our growing country

oliviakluz — 2024-01-26 14:13:43 UTC

To prevent more one of the things we could do is not make everything unfair for people like have so many unfair laws and listen to people and take their advice

ethanpugh1 — 2024-01-26 14:13:44 UTC

No. I don't think you should. I think this is because King george was a terrible king. Not only that but what if it doesn't work out? Then what?

ericchubet — 2024-01-26 14:14:27 UTC

we should not have a singular ruler we should have a few so that we can have both sides of the argument not just someone saying "yes" or just a straight "no"

owenalstrits — 2024-01-26 14:14:35 UTC

We should not elect a single person because with all of that responsibility they can crumble under pressure and they also may make so many wrong decisions that there is another revolution

austinmartella1 — 2024-01-26 14:14:36 UTC

I don't think that we should elect a King because if we do we'll be no better than Great Britain. We need to keep the power in the people.

ethanpugh1 — 2024-01-26 14:14:56 UTC

Depends. They should try both ways and see which one they like more. OR they could have there own laws and decide as a group.

rileykirk2 — 2024-01-26 14:15:03 UTC

we have to know what happened in the past and not make those mistakes anymore

seanhowlin1 — 2024-01-26 14:15:13 UTC

Yes because every state is different in some other ways so we should have different laws for each state

2024-01-26 14:15:15 UTC

I think that our country would be most benefited if we elected multiple rulers so not one king or one ruler so we have more than one persons opinion we can have multiple people to decide big decisions.

Brayden M

oliviakluz — 2024-01-26 14:15:34 UTC

No because if we get a single ruler and if they get a lot of stuff then they can feel stressed with everything

owenalstrits — 2024-01-26 14:15:49 UTC

No. We should unite together because if some laws are better than others any people can go to one state so now there is overcrowding. We should be united.

peytonbouchard1 — 2024-01-26 14:16:04 UTC

By having a public vote on who wants to be a ruler

ericchubet — 2024-01-26 14:16:07 UTC

we will prevent that by making things as fair as possible so they won't have an uprising but we can't make it perfect

rileykirk2 — 2024-01-26 14:16:36 UTC

by letting elections so the citizens can choose who can be our ruler

oliviakluz — 2024-01-26 14:16:41 UTC

No because if every state had different rules then it would be really hard and a little confusing for every one

owenalstrits — 2024-01-26 14:16:42 UTC

We should listen to the people and be willing to sacrifice most things for their happiness. If we lose them, we lose our country.

austinmartella1 — 2024-01-26 14:16:58 UTC

It depends what the laws are. If it is a small insignificant law it is fine if it varies between states. But if the law drastically affects a states way of life it should be decided by a government consisting of people from all states.

2024-01-26 14:17:09 UTC

no because they will feel stressed and that we wont have as much power

ethanpugh1 — 2024-01-26 14:17:28 UTC

We can prevent another revolution by not making the same mistakes in the past.

seanhowlin1 — 2024-01-26 14:17:42 UTC

we could make alliances with the countries bordering us so we do not fight

owenalstrits — 2024-01-26 14:17:51 UTC

I think every citizen should have the Unalienable rights. Alongside that, the ability to vote. We should be able to pick as a community.

ericchubet — 2024-01-26 14:17:51 UTC

yes they should so that our country can still move forward obviously not what the British did to us but maybe a little tax enough so we get some money but little enough so we won't have to pay a mini fortune

austinmartella1 — 2024-01-26 14:18:06 UTC

We should give more power to the people and give a little more freedom to what people can and can't do. We can pass fair laws and not make the same mistakes that Great Britain did.

oliviakluz — 2024-01-26 14:18:10 UTC

Everyone should be able to have freedom as a right and be able to vote and also not have how king George treated everyone

peytonbouchard1 — 2024-01-26 14:18:26 UTC

No because there are lots of responsibilities when it comes to being a king or a single ruler

rileykirk2 — 2024-01-26 14:18:41 UTC

yes for just in cases but that could start more wars

owenalstrits — 2024-01-26 14:18:44 UTC

Yes. It does not have to be a very costly tax, but something that we could use to further develop things, or just extra money incase anything needs to be fixed across the nation.

seanhowlin1 — 2024-01-26 14:19:21 UTC

they should be able to do anything independently like build your own house and get money and stuff

austinmartella1 — 2024-01-26 14:19:43 UTC

Everyone should have their basic unalienable rights like the rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

(Including Slaves)

2024-01-26 14:19:53 UTC

by not having the rulers have their kids become after

oliviakluz — 2024-01-26 14:20:05 UTC

Yes, but it shouldn't be crazy taxes and it would help out the country and gain more money to build new stuff

rileykirk2 — 2024-01-26 14:20:16 UTC

single ruler because they are easy to make a new one

owenalstrits — 2024-01-26 14:20:19 UTC

I think people should be 21 to vote. And I think everyone should be able to vote. I think this because first of all rights of voting should be allowed for everyone. And when your 21, your way more matured

ethanpugh1 — 2024-01-26 14:20:24 UTC

I think the citizens should have Unalienable rights. THey should also be able to do pretty much whatever they want.

seanhowlin1 — 2024-01-26 14:20:30 UTC

we should tax them but very little so then we prevent another revolution

ericchubet — 2024-01-26 14:20:32 UTC

yes so that we can travel and still be able to use our money easily

2024-01-26 14:20:40 UTC

No because if they had different laws some states might have to many people

2024-01-26 14:20:49 UTC

I think we shouldn't have king George as the single ruler.I think it would be better of with multiple so you can get multiple opinions

oliviakluz — 2024-01-26 14:21:00 UTC

I think people should be able to vote, woman, and men but the right age should be 21 to vote

ethanpugh1 — 2024-01-26 14:21:11 UTC

Yes. But not alot. If you do tax, do little.

owenalstrits — 2024-01-26 14:21:16 UTC

Yes. If we do not have the same money system, there could be many problems. It would be simpler to have 1 currency instead of around 13 money systems.

austinmartella1 — 2024-01-26 14:21:26 UTC

I think that to some extent every government has to tax its citizens. It doesn't have to be a big tax but it will be enough to help fund the government and their endeavors.

peytonbouchard1 — 2024-01-26 14:21:27 UTC

Yes and No. I think they should have certain laws that there needs to be for every state. But there can be small laws in each state that don't have to be in other states.

ericchubet — 2024-01-26 14:21:38 UTC

we should just in case if others run into the same problem we just faced or we are under attack or a war is started

oliviakluz — 2024-01-26 14:21:46 UTC

Yes because if we didn't and a kind of war or battle happens then people wouldn't be safe

ethanpugh1 — 2024-01-26 14:21:51 UTC

All people 20 or older. Not kids because there too young. Women should have rights too.

seanhowlin1 — 2024-01-26 14:22:08 UTC

everyone 20 and over because under that there could be arguments and will cause children to have less friends

2024-01-26 14:22:13 UTC

yes because it would have a lot of people so just incase theres anouther war

rileykirk2 — 2024-01-26 14:22:17 UTC

yes becasue eaach state in different

ethanpugh1 — 2024-01-26 14:22:26 UTC

Yes. If we dont, there will be LOTS of probloms.

oliviakluz — 2024-01-26 14:22:32 UTC

Letting people vote on who should be the ruler

owenalstrits — 2024-01-26 14:22:46 UTC

No. We should have minute men. We have a really good relationship with France, one of the biggest country's. Plus, training would cost lots of money. Instead, we could focus on more important things, like earning money.

2024-01-26 14:22:51 UTC

we have to listen to people and try what they think

2024-01-26 14:22:52 UTC

yes so if you move the money will be the same

ethanpugh1 — 2024-01-26 14:23:12 UTC

YES. You never know when another war is coming. Your going to need to be prepared.

2024-01-26 14:23:18 UTC

as long as you old enough

seanhowlin1 — 2024-01-26 14:23:21 UTC

yes because it will make transactions 10x easier if everyone had the same type of money

ericchubet — 2024-01-26 14:23:21 UTC

we could have someone be elected by the citizens so we don't have a dictator as often as British will

owenalstrits — 2024-01-26 14:23:25 UTC

By giving the option to vote. If they don't want a monarchy, they can vote for others

austinmartella1 — 2024-01-26 14:23:31 UTC

I think that you should definitely be at least 21 to vote. I also think that men, women, and people of any race that reside in America should vote.

2024-01-26 14:23:39 UTC

yes but fair prices spoken about

oliviakluz — 2024-01-26 14:23:41 UTC

Yes because if you travel somewhere and the money is different then it would be hard to get money to pay for stuff but if everything was the same then it would be good

peytonbouchard1 — 2024-01-26 14:23:49 UTC

I think any can vote just they can only be 21+

2024-01-26 14:23:52 UTC

We could compromise the little things that broke into the American Revolution, such as lowering taxes but not getting rid of them fully.

Leah

ethanpugh1 — 2024-01-26 14:24:02 UTC

By electing a leader to help put citizens in there place and to help keep everything in good order.

seanhowlin1 — 2024-01-26 14:24:20 UTC

Yes for emergency purposes like if someone was invading us

2024-01-26 14:24:29 UTC

I think we shouldn't have king George as the single ruler.I think it would be better of with multiple so you can get multiple opinions.

Leah

peytonbouchard1 — 2024-01-26 14:24:41 UTC

Yes so every time they go into a new state they don't need to get the right money.

austinmartella1 — 2024-01-26 14:25:13 UTC

Yes, they definitely should have the same money system. A different currency and money system would discourage people from going into other states and America would feel less united.

2024-01-26 14:25:33 UTC

I think that every individual should control who they live with and take care of instead of being forced to take care of soldiers.

Leah

austinmartella1 — 2024-01-26 14:25:46 UTC

We should have a national army to help us unite in times of need.

rileykirk2 — 2024-01-26 14:25:47 UTC

to vote and get the rights we are born with

ericchubet — 2024-01-26 14:25:52 UTC

yes they should but there are a few exceptions to this killing and being a traitor will be the most hated crime and will be punished severely. then there will be others like stealing that will always be against the law

seanhowlin1 — 2024-01-26 14:26:05 UTC

by having a democracy where everyone can vote for a leader

austinmartella1 — 2024-01-26 14:26:18 UTC

We can make sure that one person doesn't have absolute power over the government.

trentonpagano — 2024-01-26 14:55:51 UTC

I dont think we should because it is a lot of responsibility for one person.

matthewarnold2 — 2024-01-26 14:56:49 UTC

I don't think we should because we barely started our country and we are low on money. We need more people. In the declaration of independence, a group of people worked together and it worked out well.

johnmihok — 2024-01-26 14:57:04 UTC

No, because we need a fair government instead of someone who can make all of the decisions without consulting anyone.

trentonpagano — 2024-01-26 14:57:29 UTC

It depends on what laws there going to make, and there needs to be certain laws for each state but some laws can be excessive

matthewarnold2 — 2024-01-26 14:58:19 UTC

Yea because some other people have different religions and different beliefs. It can also be more successful if they do what they want to do and if it works out it was a good choice.

andrewedick — 2024-01-26 14:58:20 UTC

We should elect a king because with a single person, they could just have one simple answer that everyone disagrees with, and then that causes more problems.

paigemasse — 2024-01-26 14:58:35 UTC

We should not have a single ruler because running a country especially a new one is a lot of work. Also if we have multiple they can work together to come up with ideas to better our country and not one person has to make these decisions all on their own.

2024-01-26 14:59:12 UTC

I don't think we should elect a single ruler because we just escaped from one person ruling the entire nation. It would be better if we had multiple perspectives so we don't become corrupt like King George III did.

johnmihok — 2024-01-26 14:59:20 UTC

no, because some laws should be mandatory, and if each state had there own rules, the country would be divided

2024-01-26 14:59:34 UTC

We shouldn't elect a single ruler because people would like their own way of life, so they can make their own decisions and government. If we elected a single ruler, most likely a new war among the country would happen if they were just as controlling as KG3, and then that would tear the new found country apart.

andrewedick — 2024-01-26 14:59:56 UTC

Yes, because different states are different, so different laws would make since.

matthewarnold2 — 2024-01-26 15:00:07 UTC

I think unalienable rights are a good base and we should have a vote right and there would be some fair decisions between genders.

paigemasse — 2024-01-26 15:00:39 UTC

Yes they should because every state is different and the people of each state may want different things, but if you force the same rules on all of them it may cause them to have the same hatred toward the new government that so many had toward KG3.

ianceruti — 2024-01-26 15:00:44 UTC

No, there should be multiple people in power because giving so much power to one person usually ends in disaster

2024-01-26 15:00:50 UTC

Every state should be able to decide its own laws. Every state is different. No one knows what's better for them than themselves.

johnmihok — 2024-01-26 15:00:52 UTC

We need to have a government that includes the people instead of leaving them out.

andrewedick — 2024-01-26 15:01:03 UTC

I feel that every individual should have their unalienable rights, and the freedom to speak up when they don't feel something is right.

2024-01-26 15:01:13 UTC

No, I don't think we should because there is a lot of responsibilities for being a kind or a ruler. There will be a lot of stuff going on and everyone would be stressed out.

Elizabeth

2024-01-26 15:01:28 UTC

No, I believe we should not elect one singular person to be a ruler but instead have the Americans decide their own decisions and have freedom on what they want.

matthewarnold2 — 2024-01-26 15:01:30 UTC

By all coming to a conclusion and think about what state we are in (not ct or ny or ma) but like if we are in a positive or negative state it shouldn't be right

andrewedick — 2024-01-26 15:01:45 UTC

We will have to stay united, and to not make the mistakes we previously did.

paigemasse — 2024-01-26 15:02:00 UTC

Every citizen should have their unalienable right but they should also have the right to vote and voice their own opinion.

johnmihok — 2024-01-26 15:02:22 UTC

Everyone should have the freedom of voicing their opinions and have their Unalienable rights

2024-01-26 15:02:27 UTC

Yes because that ay it narrows down to a smaller group of people on what they want.

2024-01-26 15:02:31 UTC

All citizens should have the right to do what they want to do to some extent. All citizens have unalienable rights that should not and cannot be taken away from them.

trentonpagano — 2024-01-26 15:02:32 UTC

We know why it started in the past so we should try and not repeat those things

matthewarnold2 — 2024-01-26 15:02:34 UTC

yes, but not a ton, It would have to be done to keep the countries economy alive and the goverment to make houses/roads, etc

andrewedick — 2024-01-26 15:02:42 UTC

Yes, but not a really big tax like Britain did, and if a taxing is to much, instead of revolting against our own country we should talk to the leaders and try to compromise.

paigemasse — 2024-01-26 15:03:19 UTC

Every citizen should pay a tax but it should be a very small amount. Just enough to say that they are loyal to the government and enough so that the government can make their lives better.

oliviamiron — 2024-01-26 15:03:27 UTC

No we should not because if we have multiple sides to the argument, there is more of a chance better decisions will be made. George Washing was not the best as a single ruler because nobody else was there to tell him that his decisions he was making may not be the best. If he had more people to guide him, he may have made better choices and wouldn't have had so many people against him.

Olivia Miron

2024-01-26 15:03:31 UTC

I think every citizen should have unalienable rights because these were right that they were born with

trentonpagano — 2024-01-26 15:03:34 UTC

everyone should have some Unalienable rights because everyone needs some rights that there are born with

andrewedick — 2024-01-26 15:03:35 UTC

I think anyone can vote from ages 21+ because they're grown, and they can make mature decisions.

matthewarnold2 — 2024-01-26 15:04:03 UTC

I think everyone should be able to vote. That is if you are at least 18. There is no point in having people under adults in. They may not be mature enough yet to vote.

johnmihok — 2024-01-26 15:04:08 UTC

It depends on the tax, if the tax is fair and applies to everyone, then yes. But if the tax is unfair and only applies to certain people

2024-01-26 15:04:09 UTC

To make sure everyone has freedom and has a say in what they have to do

andrewedick — 2024-01-26 15:04:19 UTC

Yes, so that it doesn't cause the little problems that a starting country doesn't need.

2024-01-26 15:04:23 UTC

I think we should have one person that is the overall ruler, however, there should be more people involved as well such as a vice president and more. The ruler should also make sure they are giving the people a say in laws and taxes.

trentonpagano — 2024-01-26 15:04:30 UTC

I think they need to pay tax only if it is needed like if they buy an apple or something its not needed

2024-01-26 15:04:40 UTC

We should have elections that let the people of our nation decide by vote what will happen to our country. If we keep the people happy, there will not be a revolution.

paigemasse — 2024-01-26 15:04:50 UTC

I think anyone over the age of 21 should be able to vote because by then they have a good idea of how the country works and how they want it to work and their brains are mostly developed so their choices will be better.

andrewedick — 2024-01-26 15:04:55 UTC

Yes, to be safe and to be more well trained for possible wars in the future.

trentonpagano — 2024-01-26 15:05:03 UTC

I think they need to be at least 21 but the minimum is 20 but the maximum is 21

matthewarnold2 — 2024-01-26 15:05:18 UTC

Yes because there would be no point in having to convert dollars into massachusetts money.

2024-01-26 15:05:55 UTC

I think people over 18 should vote because your an adult and are conscious to make your own decisions on what you think is good for you.

matthewarnold2 — 2024-01-26 15:05:58 UTC

Yes in case we are required to defend ourself in a life or death situation

oliviamiron — 2024-01-26 15:06:29 UTC

No because it may be too confusing if everyone has their own separate laws. I would say yes though if it's a small law that would cause much of a change.

Olivia Miron

2024-01-26 15:06:31 UTC

Citizens should not be taxed on every day items like paper. As long as we are smart and don't go into debt like England did, citizens shouldn't be taxed on everything.

johnmihok — 2024-01-26 15:06:54 UTC

I think that you should be at least 21 to vote because you need to be mature enough to vote.

paigemasse — 2024-01-26 15:07:05 UTC

Yes because that way if you are in another state but in the same country you don't have to exchange your money for a different currency also it makes it a lot less confusing.

2024-01-26 15:07:15 UTC

Some laws each state can make but there should still be some rules that apply to everyone. This is because each state is different, with different cities and towns.

ianceruti — 2024-01-26 15:07:37 UTC

No, if each state creates it's own laws their will be confusion if someone goes to another state

matthewarnold2 — 2024-01-26 15:07:39 UTC

I think by just making not 1 person have all authority. The point would be to not have 1 person be the only choice maker in the country.

2024-01-26 15:07:54 UTC

yes because if we everyone doesn't have the same money system it might get a little confusing with transporting good to other states.

2024-01-26 15:07:59 UTC

We should not elect a king or single ruler because if something happens to that king or single ruler is going down hill our country would be going down hill with that ruler. we should make it so we change rulers every so often and the public gets to say who the ruler is.

trentonpagano — 2024-01-26 15:08:05 UTC

Yes so we dont have to have a money transfer person and so we dont have to go through that trouble

noahandreotta — 2024-01-26 15:08:07 UTC

I don't think you should select a king because you don't know how good of a king they will be and if they are a bad king what are we going to do we will have to go through a lot to get out of what ever we put ourselves in to then

2024-01-26 15:08:13 UTC

I think people should be at least 19 to vote. Anyone younger should not have a say in how our country operates.

johnmihok — 2024-01-26 15:08:15 UTC

yes, because if you are traveling through states, you shouldn't have to change your money.

2024-01-26 15:08:28 UTC

No, because if every state had different rules it will be so confusing for everyone.

Elizabeth

andrewedick — 2024-01-26 15:08:36 UTC

By letting elections happen, and a new ruler after a few years so that anyone's family member is the same ruler and qualities as their family members and so that we can allow new ideas.

ianceruti — 2024-01-26 15:08:38 UTC

To prevent another revolution we need to do what Britain didn't do, and listen to the citizens

2024-01-26 15:08:38 UTC

We will make sure the people have a say in laws, so everyone feels respected and heard. We will also study our past, so that history does not repeat itself.

persephondrown — 2024-01-26 15:08:40 UTC

Yes because each state has a different way of life and something different to bring to the table.

paigemasse — 2024-01-26 15:08:44 UTC

We should because if we ever have another problem we should have a trained military not just a militia and also for the safety of our country because they are there to protect the people.

bradleylopez1 — 2024-01-26 15:08:48 UTC

No, we should not since it could cause another war and the war just ended. Maybe a ruler for each colony, but not one for the whole colony

trentonpagano — 2024-01-26 15:08:54 UTC

Yes because we never know when someone try and to attack us

2024-01-26 15:09:23 UTC

by making sure everyone has their own say in things.

noahandreotta — 2024-01-26 15:09:30 UTC

I feel it depends on the laws we create so maybe i think it would be fine but we would have to vote on the law

trentonpagano — 2024-01-26 15:09:39 UTC

by doing a vote to see what the public wants as there leader

paigemasse — 2024-01-26 15:09:48 UTC

By changing the government every couple of years so that they don't get to happy with the power and make bad decisions because of it.

johnmihok — 2024-01-26 15:09:53 UTC

yes, because we need to b able to defend against invaders

2024-01-26 15:09:56 UTC

Each state should be able to make their own laws but to an extent. They shouldn't be able to rewrite the entire state works, there should be some base laws that states have to stay generally close to but the laws should be able to vary slightly if the state decides they should change it

2024-01-26 15:09:59 UTC

Every state in america should operate on the same money system. It would be too complex, and importing and exporting between states would be impossible.

2024-01-26 15:10:12 UTC

Everyone should have unalienable rights along with freedom and the right to vote.

johnmihok — 2024-01-26 15:10:34 UTC

we can elect a new president every few years

2024-01-26 15:10:35 UTC

We should listen to the say of the public so they are always pleased and so the stay happy.

2024-01-26 15:10:42 UTC

Just like our states should have the same money system we should all be protected by the same army.

oliviamiron — 2024-01-26 15:10:42 UTC

I would say that the ruler or rulers should let their people have a say and get advice from others so you have multiple opinions

Olivia Miron

bradleylopez1 — 2024-01-26 15:10:45 UTC

Maybe. If it is necessary, then yes. But it could cause another war

kianlord — 2024-01-26 17:51:59 UTC

Yes because the people can vote on the "Leader" and will we also have a little congress so when laws pass through the congress can say no but the "Leader" has the final say

evanmcintyre1 — 2024-01-26 17:52:27 UTC

no because there would only be one desicion to make Which is way to complicated so I think there should be not just one ruler but many leaders

2024-01-26 17:52:29 UTC

No we should have multiple leaders in case England wants to attack agian we can have multiple perspectives on what to do and how to do it

kianlord — 2024-01-26 17:54:01 UTC

Yes because different states have different people, bigger or smaller population, and different sizes of lands. But we should have a handful of laws every state has to agree to.

2024-01-26 17:54:03 UTC

No because it would be hard having to choose something with two sides, but if there were multiple groups, then they could separate into what they believe in.

evanmcintyre1 — 2024-01-26 17:54:15 UTC

yes but I think it should be approved before the law is passed to that state since it isn't just making your own desicions it needs to have others thoughts on the goods and the bads of the law

2024-01-26 17:54:19 UTC

Yes because not every state may agree with a law so they should be able to come up with their own.

2024-01-26 17:55:24 UTC

I think we can prevent another war by making everything as fair as possible and selecting good leaders to guide us into the future

evanmcintyre1 — 2024-01-26 17:55:46 UTC

keep the morale up and also listening to others thoughts which could potentinaly boost morale and not have any revolution

2024-01-26 17:55:55 UTC

No, because when we had a king before it didn't work. I think it didn't work because when one person controls everything there is no one to tell them they went too far or to come up with different ideas.

Sydney

kianlord — 2024-01-26 17:56:11 UTC

We will have consequences for anybody that doesn't follow our rules. But not too harsh.

2024-01-26 17:56:53 UTC

I think every citizen should have the right of speech,the right to have thier own opinion,the right to have emotion,their right to appose a law, and many more rights.

kianlord — 2024-01-26 17:57:19 UTC

The ability to live, to go to school, to vote , unalienable rights, the right to buy something, and the right to graduate

evanmcintyre1 — 2024-01-26 17:57:22 UTC

people rights can vary and people should have, freedom of speech, freedom in general, and should be allowed to have unailienable rights since people should be able to vote.

2024-01-26 17:57:53 UTC

I think they should because everyone needs to play a part in keeping the economy stable,but I think the taxes should change for the more and less fortunate.

francescatassis — 2024-01-26 17:58:00 UTC

No because colonists have just gotten out of that sort of thing and it's not right to just have one person looking out for the entire country. Colonists were able to come together as a whole and fight in a war against the British so they can manage to come together again to be in charge of the colonies. One ruler isn't fair nor is it smart due to their past situations.

kianlord — 2024-01-26 17:58:08 UTC

Yes but it will only be a small chunk out of your paycheck. We should have this to balance the classes and so the country can keep moving on

2024-01-26 17:58:27 UTC

I think everyone who has the right knowledge should be able to vote but they have to be over 16.

liamscott5 — 2024-01-26 17:58:39 UTC

to add on to ethan pugh's statement, i think we should try both sides and if more people choose one side they do that but if not everyone agrees and it is even, there could be separate groups king of like the first question

2024-01-26 17:58:46 UTC

Yes, because each state is different. They are different in many ways to not just one, for example, they have different geographical features and different people.

Sydney

evanmcintyre1 — 2024-01-26 17:58:51 UTC

yes but also it could depend on which tax is happening like home tax yes there should be a tax for living and a home and that the US can be able to grow and make sure the US is a safe country

kianlord — 2024-01-26 17:58:57 UTC

15 and over because by then they can understand politics but there has to be a background check before if they are under 21

2024-01-26 17:59:21 UTC

Yes so that if you travel to another state you have the same currency so you can purchase your every day items.

kianlord — 2024-01-26 17:59:29 UTC

Yes so it will be easy when traveling to buy something from another state

kianlord — 2024-01-26 17:59:53 UTC

Yes because in case wars break out we can defend ourselves

evanmcintyre1 — 2024-01-26 17:59:56 UTC

people from all ages besides kids under teen age since they wouldn't know or should know about politics since older people will still know about political debates.

francescatassis — 2024-01-26 18:00:05 UTC

Each state can create their own laws but I think that they all should come together to discuss laws and maybe even convince other states and add or repeal laws. This will be a better way to communicate but still have independence from one another and they can sort of do their own thing.

liamscott5 — 2024-01-26 18:00:07 UTC

make states and each one can rule over themselves so if there's a war, the whole country does not go into war

2024-01-26 18:00:15 UTC

I think we should and it should be led by the choice of our many leaders in case england try's to attack and steal our land

kianlord — 2024-01-26 18:00:20 UTC

The people will vote on leader and will only rule for one decade

2024-01-26 18:00:23 UTC

By having a government with representatives from every state and making sure that no one person is in control. Also if there is an issue we should address it before it gets out of hand

Sydney

audreywhite6 — 2024-01-26 18:00:54 UTC

We should not select a new ruler. THe reason we became a country was because we didn't like the way we were being treated by our single ruler(King George) If we went through an entire war just to have the same rules as Britain did then we shouldn't have fought the war. We should change things until we are all happy with them not just one leader.

2024-01-26 18:01:05 UTC

No because then the person that we would elect would have a hire rate at making bad ideas and eventually becoming corrupt.

2024-01-26 18:01:14 UTC

by letting citizens have a part in choosing who should lead the nation to a better future.

evanmcintyre1 — 2024-01-26 18:01:19 UTC

we should because it is our protection and it is other desicions to join the army and serve for our country and a country would be strong if they didn't have a military.

jonahcowles — 2024-01-26 18:02:14 UTC

We should elect a leader because what if someday we are stuck with an insane king

evanmcintyre1 — 2024-01-26 18:02:20 UTC

it depends because there are different weathers in diffrent states so it could depend on like what the weather is in that state

2024-01-26 18:02:22 UTC

Yes, because if people travel or need to go to a different state they don't have to change their money. Also if we have one money system then that makes buying things from other parts of the country easier.

Sydney

francescatassis — 2024-01-26 18:02:30 UTC

Everyone should get a chance to speak up. Their could be someone in Virginia with a great idea for a problem. You never know. The colonists just have to work together to figure and make solutions to any of their problems. Its simple but it will help the country.

liamscott5 — 2024-01-26 18:02:32 UTC

i think every citizen should have even more rights and can vote to choose which ones can be in place and then make them more general because others can like them to

2024-01-26 18:02:33 UTC

everyone should be able to have freedom and be able to have the right to vote.

2024-01-26 18:02:59 UTC

no because then if would be harder to collect funds for that state and if it was just all one nation it would be easier to split it.

liamscott5 — 2024-01-26 18:03:06 UTC

they should choose to pay a tax, but if they don't want to, they can always raise the price of stuff

evanmcintyre1 — 2024-01-26 18:03:14 UTC

we could give people freedom of speech and the unailienable rights that they are born with and rights to vote since there cant be one leader.

2024-01-26 18:03:22 UTC

No because they are called the 13 colonies so they should stay as one and not have different laws for other states

2024-01-26 18:03:42 UTC

People should be 21 because that is how old you are when you are officially an adult and everyone no matter their race or gender should be able to vote.

Sydney

audreywhite6 — 2024-01-26 18:03:53 UTC

It depends. Although some laws are important and everyone should have to follow them, others can be argued with. I think that some laws should be required in every state but every state should get to have their own freedom and figure out what best works for them.

2024-01-26 18:04:13 UTC

By keeping a independent country and dont start any problems with any other countries

liamscott5 — 2024-01-26 18:04:41 UTC

i think there should be a short test you should take and if you pass you can qualify to vote but if you don't pass then you either don't vote or wait another year and take it again

2024-01-26 18:04:49 UTC

No we should not elect a king or ruler because it is too much pressure and we don't want to end up in war/battle because people don't like the laws.

Veronica Haney

2024-01-26 18:04:57 UTC

A way to prevent another revolution from happening again is by making everything equal for all citizens.

2024-01-26 18:05:01 UTC

Yes, because the state still needs money but when taxes go up it should be by a little and each state should get a say in if it goes up, by how much, and where it goes up.

Sydney

jonahcowles — 2024-01-26 18:05:28 UTC

Yes and no because a state should be able to make some little laws but big laws should be made by the country as a whole.

2024-01-26 18:05:33 UTC

By holding elections and getting who people want as our leader

jonahcowles — 2024-01-26 18:05:56 UTC

By listening to more ideas and not being as forceful.

liamscott5 — 2024-01-26 18:05:59 UTC

i think every state should have the same money system because it could get confusing switching between them everytime you move, but in some places the price could be different

2024-01-26 18:06:04 UTC

I think that all citizens should all have unalienable right such as... The right to speak, the right to choose right or wrong and so forth

audreywhite6 — 2024-01-26 18:06:09 UTC

If each state considers how they are doing and create rules and laws as a whole, a revolution can be prevented if meeting are constantly happening so the states can talk about the troubles they are having and how they can fix them

2024-01-26 18:06:28 UTC

Everyone should be entitled to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness alongside the ability to vote at the legal age.

Sydney

2024-01-26 18:06:36 UTC

I say everyone gets to vote but just at an age of 17 or 18

liamscott5 — 2024-01-26 18:06:48 UTC

we should start training more people and let women be able to do much more because they proved to be good in the war against GB

2024-01-26 18:07:35 UTC

No, all the states should have the same rules/laws because when you travel you are used to certain rules/laws and you are going to need to know them. It will be very confusing.

Veronica Haney

2024-01-26 18:07:38 UTC

We should in case of more war or if people such as mother countries or Natives try to settle on or steal our land.

Sydney

2024-01-26 18:07:39 UTC

If one citizen should pay a tax then all citizens should. That's just right.

liamscott5 — 2024-01-26 18:08:07 UTC

we could have many people to make votes and decisions so its not just one opinion and then let the citizens have a say on the ideas

audreywhite6 — 2024-01-26 18:08:43 UTC

Obviously everyone should have the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. But there are other things that have to be included. Such as the right to freedom of speech.

2024-01-26 18:08:56 UTC

By not having on person in charge of everything and if there is someone in charge of everything have people above them that can stop them from hurting the country

Sydney

2024-01-26 18:10:20 UTC

I think that we should not elect just one ruler because that one ruler would get to make all of the decisions and might not listen to his or her people. This is what we are trying to avoid. We can have a government, but also let everyone have a say in our government.

2024-01-26 18:37:10 UTC

No Because if we make a king or ruler then the people may get angry with the decisions and rebel against us.

nicholassizer — 2024-01-26 18:37:29 UTC

I think we should not because then we would not choose our ruler

2024-01-26 18:37:56 UTC

WE SHOULD HAVE 50 PEOPLE THAT WORK TOGETHER TO MAKE LAWS FOR AMERICA

2024-01-26 18:38:49 UTC

I think that each state should make their own laws inside of laws made for the entire country.

2024-01-26 18:38:55 UTC

i think each state should so they can make laws to apply tot here state

nicholassizer — 2024-01-26 18:39:02 UTC

no because it would be easier when you travel because if the laws are different you might break a law on accident

2024-01-26 18:39:26 UTC

We will let the people speak and listen to what they have to say and act of that.

2024-01-26 18:39:27 UTC

make the people of the country have a say in what they want

nicholassizer — 2024-01-26 18:40:07 UTC

we can create a government were the citizens have a say in the laws that we enforce

nicholassizer — 2024-01-26 18:40:42 UTC

the right to live

the right to be free

and the ring to have free speech

2024-01-26 18:40:51 UTC

Each citizen should have the freedom of speech, the right to own guns, the right to make decisions on their own, the decision to do things by themselves and make stores freely.

2024-01-26 18:41:06 UTC

yes but it is a small tax that everyone has to pay. If there was no tax then the government would have no money.

Ryan Leece

2024-01-26 18:41:06 UTC

i think everyone should each egt the same amount of rights so no ones above the law

nicholassizer — 2024-01-26 18:41:28 UTC

yes because the government needs money for repairs and other stuff

2024-01-26 18:41:44 UTC

they should to help this new country but we will only tax hem on some items and not evryone item or make them pay little tax for evyr item

dylandumond1 — 2024-01-26 18:41:58 UTC

No because it is a lot of work for one person and it would be easier if 2 or more people helped.

nicholassizer — 2024-01-26 18:42:19 UTC

I think only people who were born in the us and 16 and up

nicholassizer — 2024-01-26 18:43:11 UTC

yes so there in no complications

nicholassizer — 2024-01-26 18:43:32 UTC

yes so we can protect ourselves

2024-01-26 18:43:49 UTC

i think poeple should vote when thy know a good amout of politics THERES NO REASON WHY NOT

dylandumond1 — 2024-01-26 18:43:52 UTC

I don't think so because there is not that much States at this time and it would be easier if it was the same laws for everyone

2024-01-26 18:44:06 UTC

yes so no one get mixed up

nicholassizer — 2024-01-26 18:44:41 UTC

we can protest and rally not to and convince george washington not to

2024-01-26 18:44:41 UTC

yes who knows what new wars will happen

2024-01-26 18:44:56 UTC

we let the pople vote against 2 popele

dylandumond1 — 2024-01-26 18:44:59 UTC

To prevent another revolution from happening I think that the ruler/rulers of America doesn't tax people that much money

ninaarnone — 2024-01-26 18:45:06 UTC

I think we shouldn't have a singular ruler because that is a lot of pressure to be put on one person and also they could be indecisive and they would have no one to ask so I think that it would be better to have multiple rulers.

2024-01-26 18:45:28 UTC

A single ruler would be nice and it has many benefits but since it is a new country it would be a lot of work for just one person to work for the country it would be better if there was multiple people running the country because it would just be a lot less complicated

2024-01-26 18:46:04 UTC

No, because then I think we would be like king George. Instead we should have multiple opinions.

2024-01-26 18:46:18 UTC

I think we should elect a few single rules because there is more chances of success rather than with just one king especially with how bad of a king that king george was

dylandumond1 — 2024-01-26 18:47:05 UTC

I think everyone should have the unalienable rights and have freedom because that is what they fought for.

dylandumond1 — 2024-01-26 18:48:20 UTC

Yes they should because if they want to keep moving west they would have to have more money.

ninaarnone — 2024-01-26 18:48:26 UTC

I think that they should because if one person decides for everyone then there would be a lot of conflict between all 50 states.

2024-01-26 18:49:12 UTC

No, Because If you like traveling you would have to memorize each states laws if you didn't want to break one on accident

kaylabieniek — 2024-01-26 18:49:19 UTC

I think every state should have the same laws because it would be less confusing for everyone like if you went to a state that had different laws than yours, you can break a law without knowing and end up getting in trouble

2024-01-26 18:49:21 UTC

No because the whole point of the war was to fight for independance.

ninaarnone — 2024-01-26 18:49:46 UTC

I think that they should listen to the people and what they want so they wont rebel and everyone gets what they want and if they don't like it then they could tell the ruler.

2024-01-26 18:50:16 UTC

No because having there be only one person would be a lot of work and then every thing would just get messed up and out of order.

2024-01-26 18:50:22 UTC

They can make laws but only if the whole state agrees and it doesn't lead to fighting.

braedonroderick — 2024-01-26 18:50:23 UTC

I don't think we should we should have at least 5 people make the desisions and not one person saying the final ruler and we should learn from are mistake (king goerge)

dylandumond1 — 2024-01-26 18:50:41 UTC

I think everyone should vote over the age of 18 because if your younger you might not know what your talking about

kaylabieniek — 2024-01-26 18:50:43 UTC

We can make laws that are fair for everyone and laws that everyone agrees with so no one disagrees

ninaarnone — 2024-01-26 18:50:50 UTC

I think that everyone should have their unalienable rights but also everyone should have to right to protect themselves and speak up for themselves. Everyone should also have the right to vote for a ruler.

dylandumond1 — 2024-01-26 18:51:08 UTC

Yes because all the states are in one country

braedonroderick — 2024-01-26 18:51:22 UTC

I think we should all have the same laws but depending on the area they should have more rules

2024-01-26 18:51:42 UTC

We should make sure that before we make a law to ask if everyone agrees and feels it is necessary.

2024-01-26 18:52:10 UTC

Yes to see what is best for each country.

dylandumond1 — 2024-01-26 18:52:10 UTC

Yes because just in case of a potential war with Natives we need an Army.

2024-01-26 18:52:10 UTC

i dont think so since well have another king george incident and if one is bad it can ruin the country

anitaosmani — 2024-01-26 18:52:22 UTC

i think we should so our country has even more protection

braedonroderick — 2024-01-26 18:52:26 UTC

we will not be selfish but we can have self defense to sertent levels

kaylabieniek — 2024-01-26 18:52:49 UTC

Everyone should have a right to speak and talk about what they agree and disagree with to help make decisions all together

2024-01-26 18:53:11 UTC

yes since different people have different opinions and the type of things happening can be different in different states

anitaosmani — 2024-01-26 18:53:21 UTC

we could let people vote every 2 years or so if we should have the same ruler

2024-01-26 18:53:21 UTC

Everyone should be able to have an opinion, be able to vote and go to school/work because these three things are important and play a big role in people's life.

dylandumond1 — 2024-01-26 18:53:49 UTC

By not fighting over everything and by electing a new ruler every few years.

2024-01-26 18:53:59 UTC

working together and being fare

2024-01-26 18:54:01 UTC

Only the ones who can afford it or the ones who don't do much to support the state.

kaelwestendor — 2024-01-26 18:54:12 UTC

We could include the people and let them vote and make suggestions for new laws

kaylabieniek — 2024-01-26 18:54:21 UTC

I think every citizen should be taxed and not just some so it's fair and I think the taxes should be small so there's not another war

2024-01-26 18:54:27 UTC

21 because ur brain is fully developed then.

2024-01-26 18:54:36 UTC

stuff like rights to live and have kids

2024-01-26 18:54:51 UTC

Because now we have our rights and we get to pick the laws that we want

2024-01-26 18:55:15 UTC

yes but only enough t keep the state running

2024-01-26 18:55:15 UTC

Yes because there is no reason not to and it would make life a lot easier when traveling.

2024-01-26 18:55:28 UTC

anyone over 18

2024-01-26 18:55:37 UTC

Yes just in case we need it it is important to be safe.

2024-01-26 18:56:05 UTC

Making sure everyone agrees before making a law.

adriannacolwell — 2024-01-26 19:29:49 UTC

No, I think that there should be multiple people in charge so there's many different opinions and multiple minds go into it. If one person isn't able to make a decision there should be back up.

2024-01-26 19:30:40 UTC

yes because there would be people to help them and they would make all the decisons but it would not be just them doing it thereselfs

2024-01-26 19:32:29 UTC

I think we should elect a single ruler because we need a leader that we can pick and just one so there is not any arguments.

2024-01-26 19:32:42 UTC

yes because there are differents conditions in some states

juliahallak — 2024-01-26 19:32:50 UTC

Neither. It would be better to pick multiple people to rule, so there is opinions and the best can be done for the US.

johndeluca1 — 2024-01-26 19:32:55 UTC

I think that everyone should be able to vote.Also you should have to be over 21.This is because this the age your brain fully develops.

2024-01-26 19:33:34 UTC

Yes because there is lots of land and different environments.

marlensjoseph — 2024-01-26 19:33:39 UTC

I think the citizens should pay tax towards money lost after the war, but I don't think it should be overly expensive or unfair to the citizens.

2024-01-26 19:33:56 UTC

don't make the same mistakes you did before

2024-01-26 19:34:29 UTC

the unalienable rights

2024-01-26 19:34:32 UTC

By all agreeing on everything and listening to ideas.

johndeluca1 — 2024-01-26 19:34:52 UTC

We should elect multiple rulers not just one so it can be a group decision.

2024-01-26 19:35:16 UTC

Everyone should have freedom because we should be able to make our own decisions.

2024-01-26 19:35:33 UTC

There should be multiple people in charge so we can make decisions as a group to help the new country.

2024-01-26 19:35:44 UTC

yes but not like how much the british taxed them but just enough so that the goverment makes enough money to keep the country going

juliahallak — 2024-01-26 19:35:48 UTC

It depends. I think that we should let the people decide that, because if we don't let them have a say then they may decide we aren't fit to rule the US.

hayleyfriar — 2024-01-26 19:36:04 UTC

No because one person means one side of the story, and one opinion. Look what happened to King George. Multiple people means there's multiple opinions and they won't be biased to one side.

2024-01-26 19:36:10 UTC

No because we are already paying for stuff with our own money and should not be paying extra.

2024-01-26 19:36:24 UTC

Every state should have the same laws because they are all in the same country so all the laws are fair and apply to everyone.

johndeluca1 — 2024-01-26 19:36:38 UTC

yes because if the state creates its own laws then those laws will only apply to them.

adriannacolwell — 2024-01-26 19:36:46 UTC

I think the states and the people in charge just have to work together. Just like in the American Revolution, they states have to unite to be one country. As a whole, our country can do great things.

alyssaflugrad — 2024-01-26 19:38:36 UTC

I think that all states should have general laws but at the same time I think each state should create their own laws because each state lives in different areas and different conditions will happen. In the south, they could be growing crops but in the north, they could have snow! With general laws that all states CAN follow, making laws for each state would be easier with the guidelines.

johndeluca1 — 2024-01-26 19:38:56 UTC

we should make group decisions and work together when needed to get things done.

adriannacolwell — 2024-01-26 19:39:09 UTC

I think people should be at least an adult in order to vote. Which is 18 but I feel that 18 is still too young. I feel that at the age of 18, you can still be immature and you should be really mature to make big decisions that will change our country.

2024-01-26 19:39:12 UTC

We can prevent one by not doing what britain did and not have such high taxes.

juliahallak — 2024-01-26 19:40:30 UTC

We shouldn't select a king, because you guys saw what happened last time!

marisagagnon — 2024-01-26 19:41:28 UTC

I do not think we should because there are a lot of responsibilities and rules for being a leader.Also there should be more then one person in power

2024-01-26 19:45:00 UTC

no because having a king or single ruler leads to disaster and no rights

2025-01-13 21:13:21 UTC

I do not think we should elect a single ruler because everyone saw what happens with king George, also it is just curl to put so much pressure on one person.

2025-01-13 21:15:01 UTC

No because that would cause mini wars between the states if they disagree. Also we are now one nation and if each state has different laws we would not all be one nation

2025-01-13 21:16:48 UTC

We can take into account different views and make compromises so everyone will be happy. Also making everything affordable and freedom of every person in the states.

2025-01-13 21:17:25 UTC

Free speech, there own land and businesses, and the right to happyness

2025-01-13 21:18:02 UTC

Because that is what started the last war.

2025-01-13 21:18:57 UTC

I think 20 as you would be properly educated and a legal adult.

2025-01-13 21:19:52 UTC

Yes as it would be confusing for someone who travels or works in another state to have to have two types of money in there waltet.

2025-01-13 21:20:12 UTC

Yes as you never know what will happen and it is good to be prepaperd

2025-01-13 21:21:44 UTC

Have everyone agree before making the law and have the citizens have there voices heard on the matter.