<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Persuasive Speech Anaysis by Ms. Nina Cassandra</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/ninsandra25/23ryy5hli998</link>
      <description>Please submit your group work analysis on persuasive speech</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2017-05-31 06:04:09 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2026-02-12 16:51:03 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Persuasive Speech Analysis</title>
         <author>diszkapj</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ninsandra25/23ryy5hli998/wish/175047818</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Persuasive Speech<br>Caroline D<br>Dian Wahyu L<br>Diszka Putri J<br>Indah Syafitri<br><br><br>1.What did each speaker claim on his speech?<br><br>Speaker 1: The greedy dictactor who despise yet enslave people.<br><br>Speaker 2: The lack of driving national policy.<br>The problem associated with teenange driving, the major causes of the problems, and a plan that will go a long way toward solving the problems.<br><br>Speaker 3: The speaker is talking about&nbsp; the environmental conditions on earth.<br><br>2.What are the arguments of each speaker?<br>Speaker 1:&nbsp;<br>People should use their power the create happiness and fight for liberty.<br>Fight for the new world and make the dictator to fulfill their promise.<br><br>Speaker 2:<br>There are too many motor vehicle accidents, deaths, and injuries involving teenage drivers. Evidence also shows that the younger the driver, the greater the risk.<br>The causes of teenage driving are inexperience, want to prove themselves by deliberate risk-taking and dangerous and aggresive driving behaviors, night driving, and the presence of teenage passengers in the car.<br>The solution to minimalized an accident according to the speakers are a national policy is needed, restrict nighttime driving and the last is restrict the number of teenage passengers in cars driven by younger drivers.<br><br>Speaker 3:&nbsp;<br>People should stop breaking the world.<br>People should unite as a single one world toward one single goal.<br>Don’t be afraid to share our wealth and affection to our surrounding who needed most.<br>Adult people should prove their words into actions.<br><br>3.What specific evidence did each speaker use to support her argument?<br><br>Speaker 1: The speaker mentioning some opinion, for example "Greed has poisoned men's souls, has barricaded the world with hate, has goose-stepped us into misery and bloodshed"<br><br>Speaker 2: Using some resources, for example:<br>The data of the number of automobile accidents from the National Highway Traffic Administrator<br>The evidence that shows the younger the driver, the greater the risk according to the insurance for Highway Safety<br><br>Speaker 3: The speaker told the audience fact in Vancouver that she found a fish full of cancer and based on her interaction experience with some street children in Brazil.<br><br>4.How did each speaker develop her argument? What ideas did each speaker expand or extend over the course of the speech?<br><br>Speaker 1: State directly how dictator tortured them.<br><br>Speaker 2: The speaker states some evidences of accidents caused by teenage drivers, the causes and the solutions.<br><br>Speaker 3: The speaker uses her own experiences about the environmental conditions that she finds in her daily life.<br><br>5.What methods of organization were employed to persuade?<br><br>Speaker 1: Question of value. In "The Great Dictator", the speaker claimed herelf that she was there to help and trying to inspire the audience, then she starts to tell her arguments as the evidence. In the middle of the speech she told the audience how they should be, then she provide her speech with many pursuading statements how the audience can change this world to get better. In conclusion, the speaker organize the speech by problem solution.<br><br>Speaker 2: Question of policy. The speaker put the speaker into cause-effect. In the beginning, the speaker stating an events that ever happened then relate it to some facts then slowly put it into her arguments. She was convincing the audience. In the end, the speaker persuading the audience to follow her action.<br><br>Speaker 3: Question of fact. In the beginning the speaker introduce herself and it reflects the audience as the older person but wasn't as critical as her. She stating many problems in this world then reflects them to our behaviour in this world. In the end, she challenge the audience to put their action acording to their words. So, this is problem-solution.<br><br>6.What methods of persuasion were employed?<br><br>Speaker 1: Create a deeper sense of enthusiasm to rise audience/readers spirit.<br><br>Speaker 2: Create an emphaty to the audience by telling her nephew's accident and stated from one father whose 17-year-old son died in an accident three years ago.&nbsp;<br><br>Speaker 3: Create an emotional atmosphere by describing the case or evidence specifically.<br><br>7.What types of rhetorical devices were employed?<br><br>Speaker 1: In "The Great Dictator" speaker was employing the Hyperbole as its rhetorical devices. The speaker exaggerating her speech by making the audience on fire of provoking words.<br><br>Speaker 2: The speaker was employing her speech with some evidence of facts. Then keep convincing the audience by provides some policies. In "Putting The Brakes on Teenage Driving", the speaker employed her speech with confirming that something might happened because of some reasons.&nbsp;<br><br>Speaker 3: In "The Girl Who Silenced the World for Five Minutes", the speaker relating her personal experience and quoting a common statements in order to make the world better then reflects it into the audience's behaves. She employed exaggerating words, Hyperbole in order to build the audience's emotions.<br><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-06-03 06:05:03 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ninsandra25/23ryy5hli998/wish/175047818</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Persuasive Speech Analysis</title>
         <author>nhabelladintya</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ninsandra25/23ryy5hli998/wish/175084128</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Group: <br>Annisa Laila Alvi S.<br>Dian Saraswaty<br>Fadhilah Citra R.<br>Mayang Sekar N. K.<br>Nhabella Adintya P<br><br>1.       What did each speaker claim on his speech?</div><div>In the first speech, the speaker wants people and soldiers to fight the greedy, vile, and dictative leaders by freeing the world from dictators in the name of democracy.</div><div> </div><div>In the second speech, the speaker restricts the underage to have a driver license and only allows 18-year-old to have a driver license and drive car.</div><div> </div><div>In the third speech, the speaker wants people to be aware of the current condition of the world and make them to reach the same goal together.<br> </div><div>2.       What are the arguments of each speaker?</div><div>In the first speech, the speaker argues that there are victims of atrocity of the leader and people should not be afraid of the dictator leadership.</div><div> </div><div>In the second speech, the speaker argues the causes of car accident.</div><div> </div><div>In the third speech, the speaker argues that there are still people who are less fortunate and the natural condition of the world is concerning.<br><br></div><div>3.       What specific evidence did each speaker use to support her argument?</div><div>In the first speech, the speaker uses the development of machine.</div><div> </div><div>In the second speech, the speaker using the evidence from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, while teenagers make up 7 percent of the nation’s licensed drivers, they represent 14 percent of all motor vehicle fatalities. Last year 3.657 drivers aged 16 to 20 were killed in car accident. The total number of people killed in the accident was 8.666. Other evidences arereports and research from Highway Safety insurance, The Washington Post, Institute for Highway Safety, and National Transportation Safety Board.</div><div> </div><div>In the third speech, the speaker’s experience with her dad when they used to go fishing but now the fish are infected with cancer. She also gives evidence by telling her experience while travelling to some countries and compares them to her country, Canada.</div><div> </div><div>4.       How did each speaker develop her argument? What ideas did each speaker expand or extend over the course of the speech?</div><div>Each speaker develops and expands their arguments of the speech by giving research, report and their experience.</div><div> </div><div>5.       What methods of organization were employed to persuade?</div><div>In the first speech, the speaker using problem solution method. The problem is how leaders are still authoritative. The solution is to fight the greed of the leader and free the world.</div><div> </div><div>In the second speech,the method of organization were employed to persuade is a problem-solution. The problem is……. . the extend of the problems are the lack of experience of teenager driving, is they are able to effectively judge the risk of a given situation, the nioght driving, and the presence of teenage passanger. The solutions given are a national policy that a teenager can receive full driving privileges until age 18. Second, to restrict nighttime driving. Third, to restrict the number of teenage passengers in cars driven by younger drivers.</div><div> </div><div>In the third speech, the speaker using problem solution method. The problem is the world is indanger both socially and naturally. The solution is people should do actions in order to achieve one goal together.</div><div> </div><div>6.       What methods of persuasion were employed?</div><div>In the first speech, the speaker tries to persuade people by making the audience involve in his spirit in changing the world from dictator.</div><div> </div><div>In the second speech, the speaker tries to persuade the audience by showing his credibility with some dataof the accident that causes by teenage driver. She also showing his emotion by telling his nephew’s experience as one of the toll of car accident. She quotations the worlds from a father whose 17-year-old son died in an accident.</div><div> </div><div>In the third speech,, the speaker tries to persuade people by making the audience involve in her feeling while describing how bad our world is, in particular socially and naturally.</div><div> </div><div>7.       What types of rhetorical devices were employed?’</div><div>In the first speech, the type of rhetorical device employed in this speech is using hyperbole because the speaker exaggerates his words.</div><div> </div><div>In the second speech, the speaker doesn’t use any kind of rhetorical devices. The speaker is stating the point directly.</div><div> </div><div>In the third speech, the speaker uses metaphor to deliver her speech by comparing countries she has visited and her country. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-06-03 22:21:01 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ninsandra25/23ryy5hli998/wish/175084128</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Persusaive Speech Analysis</title>
         <author>desyarat</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ninsandra25/23ryy5hli998/wish/175092260</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Anugerahaning&nbsp; Meidy Arianto<br>Fadilla Amini<br>Rima Ratu Rahmadina<br>Tita Desyara</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padletuploads.blob.core.windows.net/prod/202637107/b207717680c9a62fea793b9c9bcc2236/PERSUASSIVE_SPEECH_ANALYSIS.pdf" />
         <pubDate>2017-06-04 05:25:28 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ninsandra25/23ryy5hli998/wish/175092260</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Persuasive Speech Analysis</title>
         <author>rimaratu23</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ninsandra25/23ryy5hli998/wish/175146888</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>15 Dik A<br>- Diana Dwi Lestari<br>- Nizmah Fadhilah Utami<br>- Ratih Mu'thiya Illahi<br>- Siti Nur Azizah</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padletuploads.blob.core.windows.net/prod/203215429/dccee7b322c3c4dcd661c5f772cca53d/PUBLIC_SPEAKING_PERSUASIVE_SPEECH.docx" />
         <pubDate>2017-06-05 00:49:51 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ninsandra25/23ryy5hli998/wish/175146888</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Persuasive Speech Analysis</title>
         <author>NenengHalimatu</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ninsandra25/23ryy5hli998/wish/175510845</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padletuploads.blob.core.windows.net/prod/203265913/05306d6630f676014be7b1e27f6fa130/Persuasive_Speech_Analysis.docx" />
         <pubDate>2017-06-07 07:34:48 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ninsandra25/23ryy5hli998/wish/175510845</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Persuasive Speech Analysis (The Boys of 15DA) Aldzi, M. Bahrul, Riefky &amp; Seno.</title>
         <author>aldzifariszarendiawan</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ninsandra25/23ryy5hli998/wish/175970791</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Questions<br><br>1. What did each speaker claim on his speech?<br>2. What are the arguments of each speaker?<br>3. What specific evidence did each speaker use to support her argument?<br>4. How did each speaker develop her argument? What ideas did each speaker expand or extend over the course of the speech?<br>5. What methods of organization were employed to persuade?<br>6. What methods of persuasion were employed?<br>7. What types of rhetorical devices were employed?<br><br>Answers Speech 1<br>1. On speaker 1: the speaker talks about his opinion regarding the beautiful democracy rather than conquering anyone in a government (dictator)<br>2. On speaker 1: the speaker feels that he is not the kind of person who likes to govern or conquer people cruelly and selfishly as a dictator does but rather helps those who are in trouble. The speaker also affirms to all soldiers in a region that they do not have to obey what a dictator says, do not just obey machine-like rules. The soldiers also have their own freedom.<br>3. The speaker's argument can be proved by In the 17th Chapter of St Luke it is written: "the Kingdom of God is within man" - not one man nor a group of men, but in all men! In you! You, the people have the power - the power to create machines. The power to create happiness! You, the people, have the power to make this life a wonderful adventure. In other words, all human beings have the same position in achieving a happiness despite having a different position in a government.<br>4. There is the phrase "The airplane and the radio have brought us closer together." In other words, through today's communication tools, the speaker can pour what he wants to say to thousands of people who have been enslaved by a dictator. The idea of ​​a developed idea is to invite the dictatorial victims to achieve democracy where it strives to liberate the world to get rid of greed, with hatred and intolerance.<br>5. Question of value. From the first speech it appears that the speaker becomes a mover in a change in a territory controlled by a dictator and tries to combine the power of the dictator's victim to achieve a freedom.<br>6. The persuasive method used is the method of Identification which is the effort of someone who rhetorically puts herself as part of suffering, misery, poverty, desire, hope, etc. to the reader or listener<br>7. The type of rhetoric used is hyperbola because it can be seen from the speech of exaggerated speakers related to the dictator with the aim to provoke the victim of the dictator to achieve a freedom.<br><br>Answers Speech 2<br>1. The speaker was claimed about teenage driving policy and the speaker explained arguments with facts and evidences. So the speaker wants audience to think again when they are giving permission to their teenager. The speaker wants the audience to save another teenager from a possibility of traffic accident.<br>2. 1. The younger the driver, the greater the risk. The driver didn’t have enough experiences and driving skills and caused the highest percentage of traffic accidents. In USA as the USA Today reports, the younger the driver are three times more likely to be involved in fatal crashes than are older drivers. 2. Brain research. Dr. Jay Giedd from the National Institute of Mental Health and Steven Lowstein from University of Colorado was found the result of their research after 5 years. They said the younger age of the driver will be more emotionally unstable and tent to be aggressive on the road. 3. Night driving. Night time driving is less safe for everyone, but it becomes particularly dangerous when combined with young driver’s inexperience and reduced ability to gauge risk. 4. Presence of teenage passengers in the car. The teenage passengers create distractions that often result in traffic accidents. The younger driver will be more focus on the passengers when the passengers are doing something funny. The younger driver will split his/her focus between driving and doing something with the passengers just because they are young, wild, and free.&nbsp; &nbsp;<br>3. The speaker did research for his/her speech. He/she mentioned a government institution (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) and brought data about teenager traffic accident percentage, news report from USA Today Reports and The Washington Post, brain research from the National Institute of Mental Health and Steven Lowstein from University of Colorado.<br>4. The speaker give each of his/her arguments with evidences. The evidences were taken from many resources to prove the speaker arguments. The speaker tends to invite audience to open up their mind about teenage driving policy that could save another teenager. The speaker expands and extents each of the speaker main ideas with elaborations for making bold arguments in each of main ideas.<br>5. The speaker uses the arguments from the first phase/grade of teenage driving accident causes and summed up the causes with the solutions and made closing statement for saving another teenager from the traffic accident.<br>6. The speaker tries to changing people’s beliefs or actions about teenage driving policy in USA. The speaker wants the audience to action and convincing the government of each state in USA to increase the limitation of age driving for avoiding another teenage driving accident.<br>7.&nbsp; The speaker was using the speaker nephew traffic accident and mentioned that people can save their teenager.<br><br>Answers Speech 3<br><br>The speaker claim about fighting for future. In order fight against people who ruin everything.<br>The speaker said “You don’t know how to fix the holes in our ozone layer. You don’t know how to bring back an animal now extinct. And you can’t bring back the forest that once grew where there is now a desert. If you don’t know how to fix it, please stop break it.” It means we ruin everything and we must stop it now.<br>The speaker use the fact from media as the source of evidence and she repeated the order that adult give to them and she counter it<br>By making the listener thinking about the future for the young generations as well as make them realized if they still treat earth like this then everything will be gone.<br>The methods of organization were employed to persuade are Order of Importance and Inductive. The speaker talk on behalf of starving children around the world, and then the speaker tells what happenned to the environment. Then the speaker asked the audience about their feelings and besides their job, they’re also a parent as well. The speaker then talked about humanity that given by adults or parents to their children, but the parents were forgot about them, so the speaker asked the audience don’t forget about humanity.<br>The methods of persuasion were employed are pathos and logos. The speaker put the audience to see a problem from a different perspective, and the speaker also share the facts about what happened to the world and the environment.<br>Types of rhetorical devices were employed are amplification, metaphor, metonymy, and epithet.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-06-10 23:23:17 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ninsandra25/23ryy5hli998/wish/175970791</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ninsandra25/23ryy5hli998/wish/300261905</link>
         <description><![CDATA[brought data about teenager traffic accident percentage, ]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-11-04 22:45:04 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ninsandra25/23ryy5hli998/wish/300261905</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Persuasive Speech Analysis</title>
         <author>kazimohammadangkon</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ninsandra25/23ryy5hli998/wish/432231974</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Persuasive Speech<br>Caroline D<br>Dian Wahyu L<br>Diszka Putri J<br>Indah Syafitri<br><br><br>1.What did each speaker claim on his speech?<br><br>Speaker 1: The greedy dictactor who despise yet enslave people.<br><br>Speaker 2: The lack of driving national policy.<br>The problem associated with teenange driving, the major causes of the problems, and a plan that will go a long way toward solving the problems.<br><br>Speaker 3: The speaker is talking about&nbsp; the environmental conditions on earth.<br><br>2.What are the arguments of each speaker?<br>Speaker 1:&nbsp;<br>People should use their power the create happiness and fight for liberty.<br>Fight for the new world and make the dictator to fulfill their promise.<br><br>Speaker 2:<br>There are too many motor vehicle accidents, deaths, and injuries involving teenage drivers. Evidence also shows that the younger the driver, the greater the risk.<br>The causes of teenage driving are inexperience, want to prove themselves by deliberate risk-taking and dangerous and aggresive driving behaviors, night driving, and the presence of teenage passengers in the car.<br>The solution to minimalized an accident according to the speakers are a national policy is needed, restrict nighttime driving and the last is restrict the number of teenage passengers in cars driven by younger drivers.<br><br>Speaker 3:&nbsp;<br>People should stop breaking the world.<br>People should unite as a single one world toward one single goal.<br>Don’t be afraid to share our wealth and affection to our surrounding who needed most.<br>Adult people should prove their words into actions.<br><br>3.What specific evidence did each speaker use to support her argument?<br><br>Speaker 1: The speaker mentioning some opinion, for example "Greed has poisoned men's souls, has barricaded the world with hate, has goose-stepped us into misery and bloodshed"<br><br>Speaker 2: Using some resources, for example:<br>The data of the number of automobile accidents from the National Highway Traffic Administrator<br>The evidence that shows the younger the driver, the greater the risk according to the insurance for Highway Safety<br><br>Speaker 3: The speaker told the audience fact in Vancouver that she found a fish full of cancer and based on her interaction experience with some street children in Brazil.<br><br>4.How did each speaker develop her argument? What ideas did each speaker expand or extend over the course of the speech?<br><br>Speaker 1: State directly how dictator tortured them.<br><br>Speaker 2: The speaker states some evidences of accidents caused by teenage drivers, the causes and the solutions.<br><br>Speaker 3: The speaker uses her own experiences about the environmental conditions that she finds in her daily life.<br><br>5.What methods of organization were employed to persuade?<br><br>Speaker 1: Question of value. In "The Great Dictator", the speaker claimed herelf that she was there to help and trying to inspire the audience, then she starts to tell her arguments as the evidence. In the middle of the speech she told the audience how they should be, then she provide her speech with many pursuading statements how the audience can change this world to get better. In conclusion, the speaker organize the speech by problem solution.<br><br>Speaker 2: Question of policy. The speaker put the speaker into cause-effect. In the beginning, the speaker stating an events that ever happened then relate it to some facts then slowly put it into her arguments. She was convincing the audience. In the end, the speaker persuading the audience to follow her action.<br><br>Speaker 3: Question of fact. In the beginning the speaker introduce herself and it reflects the audience as the older person but wasn't as critical as her. She stating many problems in this world then reflects them to our behaviour in this world. In the end, she challenge the audience to put their action acording to their words. So, this is problem-solution.<br><br>6.What methods of persuasion were employed?<br><br>Speaker 1: Create a deeper sense of enthusiasm to rise audience/readers spirit.<br><br>Speaker 2: Create an emphaty to the audience by telling her nephew's accident and stated from one father whose 17-year-old son died in an accident three years ago.&nbsp;<br><br>Speaker 3: Create an emotional atmosphere by describing the case or evidence specifically.<br><br>7.What types of rhetorical devices were employed?<br><br>Speaker 1: In "The Great Dictator" speaker was employing the Hyperbole as its rhetorical devices. The speaker exaggerating her speech by making the audience on fire of provoking words.<br><br>Speaker 2: The speaker was employing her speech with some evidence of facts. Then keep convincing the audience by provides some policies. In "Putting The Brakes on Teenage Driving", the speaker employed her speech with confirming that something might happened because of some reasons.&nbsp;<br><br>Speaker 3: In "The Girl Who Silenced the World for Five Minutes", the speaker relating her personal experience and quoting a common statements in order to make the world better then reflects it into the audience's behaves. She employed exaggerating words, Hyperbole in order to build the audience's emotions.<br><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-01-16 03:17:45 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ninsandra25/23ryy5hli998/wish/432231974</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
