<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>LA Constitutional Poster by Seohyun You</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/sunbaccareturns/1wmhipzx02x0</link>
      <description>Topic: 4th amendment</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2019-10-11 16:51:10 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2026-01-23 20:00:20 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Check security and constitutional rights at northern border</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/sunbaccareturns/1wmhipzx02x0/wish/396790144</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>-Citation:Higgins, Mark. "Check security, and constitutional rights, at northern border." <br>     <em>The Seattle Times</em>, national ed., 26 Aug. 2019, Editorital sec. <em>The </em><br>     <em>Seattle Times</em>, www.seattletimes.com/opinion/editorials/ <br>     check-security-and-constitutional-rights-at-northern-border/. Accessed 11 <br>     Oct. 2019. <br>Headline - Check security, and constitutional rights, at northern border Argument - Interior immigration checkpoints could have possible violations of Fourth Amendment rights. <br>Ethos, Pathos, and Logos - Ethos can be seen when the article credits Washington Senator Patty Murray as the government official credited with starting the investigations on border security officials. Logos can be seen when the article states that Border Patrol agents had apprehended more than 200 people at the Spokane Greyhound bus station. The article also goes on to talk about how the country has an extensive 100-mile border zone, which includes the country's 10 biggest cities. Pathos can be observed when the article persuades the viewers to feel empathy for the immigrates that are apprehended at the border. Because the author says that their 4th amendment rights have been violated due to officials searching their belongings within the 100 mile border, it makes the viewers feel as if their rights have been violated. <br>Propaganda - My article implies a "plain folks" technique because the author makes it seem like the people being violated are average people who just happen to be immigrates. "Lesser of two evils" can be seen when the author contrasts border security with constitutional rights. He mentions that while immigration enforcement is important, those same immigrants also have the  same constitutional rights as listed. The way the author ends the article shows foreshadowing when he ends with, "Time to find out."</div><div><br></div><div><br><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-11 17:00:36 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/sunbaccareturns/1wmhipzx02x0/wish/396790144</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>FBI Practices Editorial</title>
         <author>sunbaccareturns</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/sunbaccareturns/1wmhipzx02x0/wish/396791125</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Savage, Charlie. "F.B.I. Practices for Intercepted Emails Violated 4th </div><div>     Amendment, Judge Ruled." New York Times [New York], National ed., 8 Oct. </div><div>     2019. New York Times, www.nytimes.com/2019/10/08/us/politics/ </div><div>     fbi-fisa-court.html. Accessed 11 Oct. 2019. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-11 17:02:33 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/sunbaccareturns/1wmhipzx02x0/wish/396791125</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Argument</title>
         <author>sunbaccareturns</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/sunbaccareturns/1wmhipzx02x0/wish/396795668</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The FBI’s Procedures for searching emails without a warrant was unconstitutional.<br><br>The secret and also right rule from a judge stated that the FBI’s Procedures for searching emails without a warrant was unconstitutional.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-11 17:11:42 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/sunbaccareturns/1wmhipzx02x0/wish/396795668</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Ethos</title>
         <author>sunbaccareturns</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/sunbaccareturns/1wmhipzx02x0/wish/396798916</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Ethos was used by presenting on a professional website and tone. The author also talked about many professional people and positions</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-11 17:18:06 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/sunbaccareturns/1wmhipzx02x0/wish/396798916</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Dora&#39;s Citations</title>
         <author>dooy_2005</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/sunbaccareturns/1wmhipzx02x0/wish/396799771</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>"Another Hit to the Amendment." <em>New York Times</em>, www.nytimes.com/2016/06/21/opinion/another-hit-to-the-fourth-amendment.html. Accessed 11 Oct. 2019. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-11 17:20:14 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/sunbaccareturns/1wmhipzx02x0/wish/396799771</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Pathos</title>
         <author>sunbaccareturns</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/sunbaccareturns/1wmhipzx02x0/wish/396800329</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Pathos is shown through the ideas that the FBI can just see the emails and one loses his/her privacy and can feel vulnerable, weak, and exposed</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-11 17:21:35 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/sunbaccareturns/1wmhipzx02x0/wish/396800329</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Logos</title>
         <author>sunbaccareturns</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/sunbaccareturns/1wmhipzx02x0/wish/396802674</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Logos is shown when the editorial states that the searching of the emails go against the 4th amendment. The searching of emails would be the same as searching someone’s privacy.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-11 17:26:32 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/sunbaccareturns/1wmhipzx02x0/wish/396802674</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Most effective appeal</title>
         <author>sunbaccareturns</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/sunbaccareturns/1wmhipzx02x0/wish/396803538</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Logos is the most effective appeal due to the fact that the constitution and how things do not match</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-11 17:28:17 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/sunbaccareturns/1wmhipzx02x0/wish/396803538</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
