<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Cycles of Conflict and Cooperation caused the secession of Southern states by making them feel alienated and restricted. by Stephanie Valtierra</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/svaltierra9512/1vsv9ig5ra0auiep</link>
      <description>Briana, Jamie, Alvin and Stephanie </description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2020-11-18 16:42:30 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2025-12-03 23:23:39 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Missouri Compromise</title>
         <author>azheng1901</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/svaltierra9512/1vsv9ig5ra0auiep/wish/937647807</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Happened on March 3rd, 1820.<br>It stated that Missouri could be admitted into the Union as a slave state as long as the rest of the Louisiana Territory north of the 36th parallel forever prohibited slavery. Maine was also admitted into the Union as a free state in order for the ratio of free to slave states in Congress to remain balanced. <br><br>Reasoning:<br>Overall, I would say that this was part of a cycle of conflict even though it did have a trickle of cooperation within it since it was a compromise. The conflict for the South lied within the fact that slavery would be prohibited in the rest of the Louisiana Territory, against the South's want to expand slavery. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-11-18 16:51:15 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/svaltierra9512/1vsv9ig5ra0auiep/wish/937647807</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Mexican American War</title>
         <author>azheng1901</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/svaltierra9512/1vsv9ig5ra0auiep/wish/937649722</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1846-1848 <br>Due to "manifest destiny" and expansionist beliefs, America wanted Mexican land, and waged war for it. America eventually won, but issues were brought up concerning the new land and whether they would become slave states or not. This lead to rising tensions and complicated the balance of power between free and slave states. <br><br>Reasoning:<br>This was part of a cycle of conflict because the territory that came from winning the war caused the sectionalist tensions between the North and South to grow. The new territory place pressure on the balance that Congress had between slave and free states. The South became more defensive over their institution with growing tensions. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-11-18 16:51:36 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/svaltierra9512/1vsv9ig5ra0auiep/wish/937649722</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Compromise of 1850</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/svaltierra9512/1vsv9ig5ra0auiep/wish/937654103</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In September of the year, 1850, The Compromise of 1850 diminished the dispute among the slave and free states. This compromise created California a free state while permitting slavery in Washington, D.C., but banning slave trade. The Fugitive Slave Act was introduced, prohibiting enslaved people the right to trial by jury, however obliged citizens to help with runaway slaves. <br><br>Reasoning:<br>This Compromise was a cycle of cooperation with the intention to resolve the issue of the unbalanced power between the states. However, the Fugitive Slave Act created tension between the North and South due to the North not wanting to enforce it.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-11-18 16:52:24 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/svaltierra9512/1vsv9ig5ra0auiep/wish/937654103</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Bleeding Kansas</title>
         <author>azheng1901</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/svaltierra9512/1vsv9ig5ra0auiep/wish/937654937</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>From 1855-1861<br>Battle in the Kansas Territory between Anti-slavery group and Pro-slavery group. This battle occurred for control of the new territory of Kansas and whether it would be a slave holding territory or a free territory.<br><br>Reasoning: <br>This event was part of the cycle of conflict because it aggravated the tensions between anti and pro slavery groups from the North and the South. Many consider these battles as the first of the Civil War. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-11-18 16:52:33 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/svaltierra9512/1vsv9ig5ra0auiep/wish/937654937</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Election of Abraham Lincoln </title>
         <author>brianasotelo123</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/svaltierra9512/1vsv9ig5ra0auiep/wish/937655458</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>November 6, 1860<br>Lincoln had political platform opposed to the expansion of slavery.  His election lead to the start of the outbreak of the Civil War. His win lead to the secession of seven southern states. He never accepted any decision to the Southern withdrawing from the Union.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-11-18 16:52:38 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/svaltierra9512/1vsv9ig5ra0auiep/wish/937655458</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Reasoning</title>
         <author>brianasotelo123</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/svaltierra9512/1vsv9ig5ra0auiep/wish/939366689</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>This event was a cycle of conflict for the South because Lincoln was against the expansion of slavery, which didn't appeal the South. The southern states wanted slavery and Lincoln was restricting them. Lincoln contributed to the secession of the southern states by having the same views as the North and not supporting the South</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-11-19 00:33:37 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/svaltierra9512/1vsv9ig5ra0auiep/wish/939366689</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>pfurlano4</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/svaltierra9512/1vsv9ig5ra0auiep/wish/969129607</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Love your claim! It's clear and concise and responding directly to the prompt. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-11-29 18:38:45 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/svaltierra9512/1vsv9ig5ra0auiep/wish/969129607</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>pfurlano4</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/svaltierra9512/1vsv9ig5ra0auiep/wish/969132185</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>This was perfectly set up, with a brief description of the event (evidence) and then your reasoning. <br><br>Remember that nothing is black and white, so a cycle is going to rarely be only conflict or only cooperation. Don't be afraid to say it's a cycle of conflict and cooperation, because you're most likely going to see evidence of both, even if one is more common than the other.<br><br>Continue to work on differentiating between a cycle and an event. Each of these is an event that is part of one large cycle of conflict and cooperation that brought us to the secession. There are certainly other ways to look at it, but the prompt is creating the understanding that there is one cycle that is both conflict AND cooperation. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-11-29 18:40:10 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/svaltierra9512/1vsv9ig5ra0auiep/wish/969132185</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
