Compare two sources by Kimberly Grotewold https://padlet.com/ksgrotew/two_sources_COMM101 Which of these is the better information source? How did you decide? en-us 2017-09-19 20:19:21 UTC 2017-09-20 15:33:18 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/icons/Thunder.png Source 1: ksgrotew https://padlet.com/ksgrotew/two_sources_COMM101/wish/189092778 Energy Drinks Europe, Top 10 Facts Page
http://www.energydrinkseurope.org/facts/

]]> 2017-09-19 20:21:52 UTC https://padlet.com/ksgrotew/two_sources_COMM101/wish/189092778 Source 2: ksgrotew https://padlet.com/ksgrotew/two_sources_COMM101/wish/189096263 The Benefits & Risks of Energy Drinks in Young Adults and Military Service Members
https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.hacc.edu/central/docview/1917823506/fulltextPDF/6736D5750129478EPQ/1?accountid=11302]]> 2017-09-19 20:34:41 UTC https://padlet.com/ksgrotew/two_sources_COMM101/wish/189096263 Definitely source 2 it has credible sources listed on ever page. Also source two has links leading back to where the author found this credible information and page numbers. https://padlet.com/ksgrotew/two_sources_COMM101/wish/189383128 Source one only had flashy pictures that would be suitable for a 3rd grade presentation but not for college level ]]> 2017-09-20 15:28:33 UTC https://padlet.com/ksgrotew/two_sources_COMM101/wish/189383128 Source 2 was the more informative and credible of the two. Source one is an energy drink company looking to get you to buy into their product. Source two has actual research behind it . https://padlet.com/ksgrotew/two_sources_COMM101/wish/189383179 2017-09-20 15:28:39 UTC https://padlet.com/ksgrotew/two_sources_COMM101/wish/189383179 source 2 https://padlet.com/ksgrotew/two_sources_COMM101/wish/189383275 its from a database

]]> 2017-09-20 15:28:49 UTC https://padlet.com/ksgrotew/two_sources_COMM101/wish/189383275 Source 2 by far research data not biased https://padlet.com/ksgrotew/two_sources_COMM101/wish/189383399 2017-09-20 15:29:01 UTC https://padlet.com/ksgrotew/two_sources_COMM101/wish/189383399 source 2 https://padlet.com/ksgrotew/two_sources_COMM101/wish/189383406 It is from a data base and it has an author who wrote it and a date that it was published. 

]]> 2017-09-20 15:29:01 UTC https://padlet.com/ksgrotew/two_sources_COMM101/wish/189383406 The first source was produced by a trade organization, which could mean it has a persuasive agenda. No credit to any particular author was obvious. https://padlet.com/ksgrotew/two_sources_COMM101/wish/189383534
The second was an article in an academic journal with a credited author. The article was detailed and written professionally. Furthermore, as a research article, it would be more reliable as content to cite than the first.]]> 2017-09-20 15:29:10 UTC https://padlet.com/ksgrotew/two_sources_COMM101/wish/189383534 Source 2 https://padlet.com/ksgrotew/two_sources_COMM101/wish/189383596
They give credit to their facts. ]]> 2017-09-20 15:29:15 UTC https://padlet.com/ksgrotew/two_sources_COMM101/wish/189383596 Source 2 https://padlet.com/ksgrotew/two_sources_COMM101/wish/189383597 more credible and academically sound

]]> 2017-09-20 15:29:15 UTC https://padlet.com/ksgrotew/two_sources_COMM101/wish/189383597 Source 2 seems more credible. Its based on a study & its been worked on by professionals (PhD, MA, MD) https://padlet.com/ksgrotew/two_sources_COMM101/wish/189383610 2017-09-20 15:29:17 UTC https://padlet.com/ksgrotew/two_sources_COMM101/wish/189383610 https://padlet.com/ksgrotew/two_sources_COMM101/wish/189383807 Source 2 for sure is the more credible option. There is also more information, and it is much more specific then the first source]]> 2017-09-20 15:29:41 UTC https://padlet.com/ksgrotew/two_sources_COMM101/wish/189383807 Source 2 https://padlet.com/ksgrotew/two_sources_COMM101/wish/189383826 Source 2 is written by someone with a PhD.

Clinical trials have been done for source 2.]]> 2017-09-20 15:29:43 UTC https://padlet.com/ksgrotew/two_sources_COMM101/wish/189383826 source 1 https://padlet.com/ksgrotew/two_sources_COMM101/wish/189383853 It does not go into detail about what is in energy drinks]]> 2017-09-20 15:29:46 UTC https://padlet.com/ksgrotew/two_sources_COMM101/wish/189383853 Source 2 https://padlet.com/ksgrotew/two_sources_COMM101/wish/189383863 Source 2 is more credible because it provides a substantial amount of information on the topic. Source 1 was more of a fun facts page. ]]> 2017-09-20 15:29:47 UTC https://padlet.com/ksgrotew/two_sources_COMM101/wish/189383863 https://padlet.com/ksgrotew/two_sources_COMM101/wish/189383929 Sour]]> 2017-09-20 15:29:54 UTC https://padlet.com/ksgrotew/two_sources_COMM101/wish/189383929 Source 2 was more credible to me. There was history involved and many references to support information. https://padlet.com/ksgrotew/two_sources_COMM101/wish/189383937 2017-09-20 15:29:55 UTC https://padlet.com/ksgrotew/two_sources_COMM101/wish/189383937 source 2 was more informative and used a database https://padlet.com/ksgrotew/two_sources_COMM101/wish/189384272 2017-09-20 15:30:28 UTC https://padlet.com/ksgrotew/two_sources_COMM101/wish/189384272 Source 2 https://padlet.com/ksgrotew/two_sources_COMM101/wish/189384311 It was set up in a professional manor, it had credible sources and had tons of information.]]> 2017-09-20 15:30:32 UTC https://padlet.com/ksgrotew/two_sources_COMM101/wish/189384311 Source 2 https://padlet.com/ksgrotew/two_sources_COMM101/wish/189384331 The statements are supported by facts and studies]]> 2017-09-20 15:30:35 UTC https://padlet.com/ksgrotew/two_sources_COMM101/wish/189384331 Source 2 https://padlet.com/ksgrotew/two_sources_COMM101/wish/189384543 Looking at each article in black and white, Source 2 is more credible than that of Source 1 due to the lack of detail and proper presentation of facts. Although Source 1 is not wrong on its claims.

]]> 2017-09-20 15:30:55 UTC https://padlet.com/ksgrotew/two_sources_COMM101/wish/189384543 https://padlet.com/ksgrotew/two_sources_COMM101/wish/189384619 coffee> energy drinks

]]> 2017-09-20 15:31:04 UTC https://padlet.com/ksgrotew/two_sources_COMM101/wish/189384619 source 1 was a lot more information based on the ingredence https://padlet.com/ksgrotew/two_sources_COMM101/wish/189384861 2017-09-20 15:31:28 UTC https://padlet.com/ksgrotew/two_sources_COMM101/wish/189384861