Criteria | 15 | 10 | 5 | 0
Provides researched material on the topic in the video & clearly states the names of the team members. | Presents researched information and findings clearly, concisely and logically and names the team members clearly | Presents researched information and findings that is not always clear, concise and logical & does not name the team members. | Presents researched information and findings that is not clear, concise and logical, speaks too softly to be understood, and does not name the team members. | Research omitted

 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 0
Shows the product being made by the student(s) and the end product, in the video. | Video of the product being made is clear, the sound is clear, & the end product is clearly shown. The student(s) making the product is evident in the video.  | Video of the product being made is not very clear, the end product is not clearly shown and the student(s) making the product is not evident in the video. | Video of the product being made is disorganized, the end product is not shown and it is not evident that the student(s) is making the product. | No video of the product being made,  and no video of the end product.

 | 20 | 15 | 10 | 0
Explains the outcome of the experiment or the outcome of the final product, and talks about any problems encountered, in the video. | Presents a clear, concise and logical explanation/conclusion of the outcome of the final product and discusses, clearly, any problems encountered. | The explanation/conclusion of the outcome of the final product is not always clear & problems encountered are not clearly defined.  | Speaks too softly for the explanation/conclusion of the outcome of the final product or the problems encountered to be understood. | Missing explanation of the outcome of the experiment or the outcome of the final product, and discussion of any problems encountered.
Total  | 50 | 
 | 
 |