Thank you for spending time with us this morning to help our young researchers! You may consider giving feedback to projects based on their presentation delivery and on the following points:

1. Mastery of subject knowledge

- Does the project demonstrate extensive knowledge of subject?

- Is there convincing evidence to support ideas and conclusions?

- Are all questions answered with clear elaboration?

2. Organisation of presentation

- Is the organisation of the argument clear and logical?

3. Significance of project

- Is the project relevant or important to the field?

- Will it make a significant contribution?

~ HSSRP Organising Committee. 

They could develop more on the idea of how workplace interaction works

Small typo: 'Gestual' instead of 'Gestural' in one of the slides

Aventis Learning Group – maybe not the best source?

For the presentation - maybe show a sample of what the survey questions and interview questions look like (just 1 or 2 for reference)? Also, show some relevant responses from the respondents.

In addition to industry, the role probably matters as well (but I can understand that people won't want to go into specifics about their roles)

“Communication CULTURE” (online vs F2F) - would it be more appropriate to use 'modality'?

Typo: Insight slide – “Singish”

The introduction of the project and problem of the views of accents was clearly presented through the theories, history and media. The topic is also very easy to understand with the different categories of impacts and source of stereotypes.

The data and research was very good but maybe less slides with more elaboration on each slide may be better for future presentations.

The presentation was coherent and succinct. The explanation of the Social Identity Theory allowed us to understand the background of the whole research better. The explanation of the factors of how stereotypes came into youth lives was clear. The way of presenting the methodology was easy to follow. The reseach was extensive and through. Great use of visuals in the slides.

One way to improve is to be more careful in the assumption that person's accent is directly affected by their enthicity, and not the "Singaporean" accent that mostly everyone grows up with. They could also be clearer on what is meant by "warmth" (friendliness?). Secondly, we think that the background of the responders might help better understand the whole reseach. Lastly, maybe the explanation could be more about the current world's India (how most of Singapore's foreign workers in IT and such have Indian nationalities) rather than basing off historical events that may not be that relavent in today's context.

Could hardly see Torris's face!

Very good coverage of respondents

Pace of slides a bit too fast

Again, I think it would be good to show some samples of the questions used and responses given