PSYC 213: Primary Article Review by Allyson Valentine

Is this a primary research article? Why or why not?

afvalent1 — 2026-02-26 16:41:09 UTC

2026-02-26 19:23:20 UTC

This is not a primary article because it does not have methods nor results.

2026-02-26 19:24:56 UTC

I think this is not a primary article since it is just commentary on previously discovered statistics and lacks an actual experiment/study.

2026-02-26 19:25:01 UTC

This is not a primary research article as it only analyzes previous studies rather than presenting original information

2026-02-26 19:25:03 UTC

2026-02-26 19:26:00 UTC

I think it isn't because it uses outside information that it didn't gather itself.

2026-02-26 19:26:21 UTC

2026-02-26 19:26:29 UTC

This is not a primary research article because it uses information from other sources

2026-02-26 19:26:47 UTC

It looks more like a review article rather than a primary research article

2026-02-26 19:27:33 UTC

It's a good informative article that lists references and sources, but doesn't seem to be the primary research article due to lack of results.

2026-02-26 19:27:35 UTC

I do not believe it is a primary article as it does not conduct it's own experiments.