Play back your conversation with the AI carefully.

Step 2. Grammar Accuracy

• Identify grammar issues in your speech (e.g., verb tense mistakes, missing articles, subject–verb agreement, word order).

• For each issue:

  1. Write the sentence as you said it.

  2. Correct it in the right form.

  3. Explain briefly what the mistake was.

Step 3. Vocabulary Use

• Identify vocabulary issues (e.g., wrong word choice, limited variety, repetition, missing technical terms).

• For each issue:

1. Write the word/phrase you used.

2. Suggest a better or more precise word/phrase.

3. Explain why the new option works better.

Step 4. Reflection

Write a short paragraph (5–6 sentences) summarizing what you learned about:

• the topic of future and technology, and

• your own strengths and weaknesses in speaking.

• Grammar: "in everything we done" should have said, "in everything we do"

used the wrong type of time tense, "Do" for future "done" for past or present continous.

• Grammar: "the art made by AI its a real-is really art" I retracted the sentence I was creating and corrected the word I started with, initially saying 'it's real art' but ended up saying 'it's really art', wich suits better.

• Vocabulary: "the future of technology and AI Will be in every field of humanity" doesnt really sounds good or logical the use of the word field. should have said:

  "that, in the future, technology and AI Will be in every aspect of human life".

• grammar: "we will use AI for medicine" should have used "we could used AI for medicine" Could is better when proposing a future possibility.

• vocabulary: "for me at least, it would be a very much that AI cannot be doing things that are artistical, you know what I mean, they should not be doing something that humans do for entertaiment" I did an awkward pause in the middle of the sentence, used "be" instead of "been" the idea is logical but when said sounds extrange, could have used: "well, as I see it, AI should not do things that humans do for art or amusement" this would also reduce the sentence and make it more easy to understand.

• also it is clear that I talk in a very cut way, thinking to much of each word, with a not so good intonation and vocalization for each word. Finally I stuter sometimes when speaking, it happens to me from a long time ago so is a problem I should overcome.

Reflection.

first, regarding the ideas discussed with artificial intelligence about the future of it and technology in areas of human interest, I only reinforce my pre-established ideas, I believe that well-directed technology can be of great utility for humanity to prosper in terms of health and living conditions for all people, also that it can be used for undesirable tasks, so we can have more time, in addition to considering that AIs should not be included in mediums that are meant for entertainment or human expression, such as art, cinema, or music, they are tools, not replacements. Regarding the mistakes I could recognize in my way of speaking, there are many, I notice that I have some difficulty when pronouncing certain words when speaking continuously, prioritizing rhythm over intonation or pronunciation of connecting words between sentences, I also tend to stammer, a problem I have had for a long time and that I strive to improve, but that in casual contexts it is often noticeable in my speech. It is also clear that I need to improve my vocabulary, find and use a greater variety of words and terms, not always repeating the same ones. Stepping out of my comfort zone makes conversations more interesting with a variation of terms, explaining the same thing in different ways. I believe I also have several strengths; I can maintain long conversations with people (in this case, AIs), and despite the problems, I manage to convey the message I want to explain. In general, I think that like any student, I still have plenty of room to improve a lot in my speech.

1.My sentence: Do you think AI could be dangerous if the man doesn’t know how to manage it?

Sentence correction: Do you think AI could be dangerous if humans don't know how to manage it?

I made a mistake of wrong word choice with the word “man”, I should have said “humans” and in effect of this I should have said “humans don’t know”

2. I said, “on artificial intelligent” to highlight the specific theme about the future that I wanted the IA discussed with me, but I should have said “about artificial intelligence”.

3.Do you think AI can replace the humans in the works?

I made a mistake of word choice, I must use “at work” or “in the workplace”

Sentence correction: Do you think AI can replace humans at work?

4.I want to talk you about the probably advances that will have the technology in the future.

I should have said “I want you to tell me about the probably advances that will have the technology in the future.” Because my purpose was that the AI give information to me.

 Overall feedback

• Most of my issues are with:

Word choice (works → workforce).

Prepositions (on artificial intelligent → about artificial intelligence).

Spelling/word form (intelligent → intelligence)

Articles/subjects (the humans → humans).

During the conversation, I understood that artificial intelligence is inevitable in the future and that, although it has risks such as misuse, bias, or lack of supervision, it can also bring great benefits in fields such as medicine or climate change. AI explained to me that it will probably not replace humans, but rather transform the type of work we do, eliminating some jobs and creating new ones. In the case of teaching, it acknowledged that AI can support repetitive tasks such as grading, but that it will never be able to replace the most important aspects of a teacher's role: providing guidance, fostering critical thinking, and attending to the individual needs of students. And about my skills my weaknesses are mainly minor grammatical and word choice issues, such as using the wrong form (intelligent → intelligence), awkward phrases (in the works → in the workforce), or overusing articles (the humans instead of humans).

Original sentence:
I want to discuss a topic about the technology in the future and what do you think about it and what do you think will happen in the future for us as humanity and you as an AI.

Corrected sentence:
I want to discuss a topic about technology in the future and ask what you think about it, and what will happen in the future for us as humanity and for you as an AI.

Explanation of mistakes:

• “the technology” → “technology”: “Technology” is a general concept, so the article “the” is unnecessary.

• “and what do you think about it” → “and ask what you think about it”: In indirect speech, the auxiliary “do” is removed. You don’t use the question form after “and” in a declarative sentence.

Original sentence:
and do you think we will be more independent in the future of you, we will be more independent of you or we will be dependent on you, we will need you to solve our lives

Corrected sentence:
Do you think we will be more independent of you in the future, or will we be dependent on you, needing you to solve our problems?

Explanation of mistakes:

·Capitalization at the beginning: “and” → “Do” because it starts a new question.

·Run-on sentence: The original sentence is long and needs commas or restructuring to separate ideas.

Vocabulary Issues

Original phrase: “solve our lives”

Alternative: “solve our problems”

Explanation:

· “Solve our lives” is not standard English. “Problems” is the appropriate word to describe challenges or tasks that need solutions.

“more independent in the future of you”

· Problem: Incorrect preposition use and word order.

·Better option: “more independent of you in the future”

·Explanation: “Independent of” is the standard English structure for expressing autonomy from someone or something.

-make you a couple of questions = ask you a couple questions (just incorrect phrasing)

-base our conversation in AI = base our conversation on AI (wrong preposition)

-which changes is = what changes is

(Awkward structure)

-over the world = in the world (better idiom, says AI)

-have made = have accumulated (for more clarity)

-on the search = in the search (wrong preposition)

-base a search of it in the DNA = base a search of it on the DNA (preposition again)

-I just reached the five minutes for my homework = I've just reached the five minutes limit for my homework (it was just awkward)

For vocabulary issues there were not any other issues that were not repetition, because I used to repeat words again and again while I was thinking what to say (that's, that's that's and so on)

I learned, at least for the future that AI's are interested when it's related to several areas of knowledge, as medicine which was the topic that we choosed at least for this AI. I noticed that AI was only able to work based on the knowledge that we as humans gave him, but it's able to analyze it and improve what we've done over the years. The time lapse that AI proposes is way to short in comparison to what reality might be. In terms of my speaking, there were several mistakes, most of them related to cohesion, because it was difficult for me to make sentences, but they had enough information as the be coherent. There were two errors that were repeated the most, repetition and prepositional ones, because I repeated several words just to make time and prepare what I was going to say, and prepositional because it's still difficult for me to see the difference between in and on. I've never noticed this errors, but now I'm taking them into account for these next exercises. But I was still able to make structures as solid that AI was able to understand my ideas even when I was struggling to make it understand me, and also I was fast enough at talking that I gave AI several information for it to process in just one PROMPT.

I said "how do you think the future is gonna be like?"

Correction: how do you think the future is going to be like?

Although is acceptable, I didn't saw much more grammar mistakes

Vocabulary

I use the word "like" a lot

I also repeated the last exact same thing the AI said to do questions

I stutter

Reflection

It was kind of uncanny to speak with such an advanced AI voice, it sounded really natural as if I was talking to a real person, it simulated the hesitation, repeated words; to think that far into the future you won't be able to tell wether you're speaking with a real person or not, it is scary if you think about it.

Now as of my speaking, I think it's not that bad, I feel comfortable speaking to native people, at least I try to make myself be understood