6th Hour Rights of the Accused by Lauren Palmer https://padlet.com/lbouas/1718w0mwd3ct Made with the strength to succeed en-us 2017-03-29 14:59:26 UTC 2017-03-29 18:23:25 UTC hello@padlet.com Hebeas Corpus wesleyr6466 https://padlet.com/lbouas/1718w0mwd3ct/wish/163507937 1.the privilage of the writ of habes corpus shall not be suspended unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.
2 . it cannot be arrested without any proper cause 
3. it protects them from being arrested in the first place 
4. it require the government to use the due process 
5.duncan vs kahamaok

]]> 2017-03-29 17:55:02 UTC https://padlet.com/lbouas/1718w0mwd3ct/wish/163507937 Habeas Corpus https://padlet.com/lbouas/1718w0mwd3ct/wish/163513172
  • Sometimes called the writ of liberty, is intended to prevent unjust arrests and imprisonments. 
  • It keeps someone from being put in jail or arrested who did not commit the crime
  • It protects the accused by saving them from not being arrested or put in jail for something they did not do 
  • It is the system's job to keep innocent people out of jail 
  • Supreme Court Cases: 
    • Boumediene v. Bush
    Al Odah v. United States
    Duncan v. Kahanamoku

    ]]>     2017-03-29 18:09:40 UTC https://padlet.com/lbouas/1718w0mwd3ct/wish/163513172     Double jeopardy Wording of the amendment? Double jeopardyDefinition in your own words- once a person has been tried for a crime he or she cannot be tried again for the same crime.How this right protect the accused? The constitution ban of double jeopardy applies against the states through the 14th amendment.Responsibilities on the judicial system- A person who breaks into stores , liquor and sells it can be tried for illegal entry theft and selling liquor without license Supreme court cases-twice held that the confinement is not punishment and also does not involve double jeopardy https://padlet.com/lbouas/1718w0mwd3ct/wish/163513544 2017-03-29 18:10:38 UTC https://padlet.com/lbouas/1718w0mwd3ct/wish/163513544 Self Incrimination 1. No person can “compelled in any criminal case to be witness against himself.”2. In a criminal case you can’t testify against yourself.3. Prevent the prosecution from shifting the burden of proof to the defendant4.they have to defend the fact that a person wouldn't want to testify against themselves 5. Malloy v. Hogan Tyree Shaiane Rolando https://padlet.com/lbouas/1718w0mwd3ct/wish/163513689

    ]]>     2017-03-29 18:11:02 UTC https://padlet.com/lbouas/1718w0mwd3ct/wish/163513689     E) Trial of jury https://padlet.com/lbouas/1718w0mwd3ct/wish/163513833 Ryan Brooks / Steven Fields / Booker Webb 


    1. Wording of the amendment-  by an impartial jury
    2. Definition- you don’t want jury that bias
    3.  How this right protects the accused- because we get a fair trial
    4. Responsibilities- to have a fair case
    5. Supreme Court- Straunder v. West Virginia 1880
    ]]>     2017-03-29 18:11:26 UTC https://padlet.com/lbouas/1718w0mwd3ct/wish/163513833     Speedy & public trial Shawn, Quenton, Chila1. In all crimes prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial2. If you’re a suspect in a case you have the right to a speedy and public trial 3. So the government or authorities cannot prolong a trial4. Make sure they look over cases to approve they go to trial 5. Barker v. Wingo, 1972 https://padlet.com/lbouas/1718w0mwd3ct/wish/163513856 2017-03-29 18:11:28 UTC https://padlet.com/lbouas/1718w0mwd3ct/wish/163513856 GRAND JURY https://padlet.com/lbouas/1718w0mwd3ct/wish/163513957
  • No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury.
  • No person is charged with anything until they are judged by the grand jury.
  • They can’t be charged with anything until they have their evidence.
  • They would have to wait until they find any time of evidence to the case, if they want to make an arrest.
  • There wasn’t any cases.

    • ]]>     2017-03-29 18:11:46 UTC https://padlet.com/lbouas/1718w0mwd3ct/wish/163513957     Adequate Defense https://padlet.com/lbouas/1718w0mwd3ct/wish/163516760
  • The sixth amendment says that a defendant has the right “ to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation, “ to be confronted with the witness against him “ and question them in open court, “ to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor “ and “ to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense” 
  • They are telling you what you are being accused of, getting to see witness and what they say, forcing a witness to come in and speak for you even if they don’t want to, have a lawyer to defend to you
  • We will make sure we have witnesses. 
  • The court is responsible to make sure the person acused has all the right things in court that they need
  • Cases, escobedo v illinois 1964, illustrates the point 



    • ]]>     2017-03-29 18:20:11 UTC https://padlet.com/lbouas/1718w0mwd3ct/wish/163516760