💥💢💯Oliver's Gun Control Padlet☠️🔥⚡ by Oliver Ghembesalu https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql Made with fortitude en-us 2021-10-18 15:16:16 UTC 2025-10-05 16:32:30 UTC hello@padlet.com High rates of gun murder and injury are often cited as a primary problem for gun control policies. A 2004 National Research Council critical review found that while some strong conclusions are warranted from current research, the state of our knowledge is generally poor.The result of the scarcity of relevant data is that gun control is one of the most fraught topics in American politics and scholars remain deadlocked on a variety of issues.Notably, since 1996, when the Dickey Amendment was first inserted into the federal spending bill, the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has been prohibited from using its federal funding "to advocate or promote gun control," thwarting gun violence research at the agency at the time. The funding provision's author has said that this was an over-interpretation, but the amendment still had a chilling effect, effectively halting federally funded firearm-related research.Since the amendment, the CDC has continued to research gun violence and publish studies about it,although their funding for such research has fallen by 96% since 1996, according to Mayors Against Illegal Guns. 1992871 https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1836284606 2021-10-22 13:30:16 UTC https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1836284606 1992871 https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1836294373
A 1998 review found that suicide rates generally declined after gun control laws were enacted, and concluded that "The findings support gun control measures as a strategy for reducing suicide rates."[31] A 2016 review found that laws banning people under restraining orders due to domestic violence convictions from accessing guns were associated with "reductions in intimate partner homicide".Another 2016 review identified 130 studies regarding restrictive gun laws and found that the implementation of multiple such laws simultaneously was associated with a decrease in gun-related deaths.


According to a 2011 UN study, after identifying a number of methodological problems, it stated "notwithstanding such challenges, a significant body of literature tends to suggest that firearm availability predominantly represents a risk factor rather than a protective factor for homicide. In particular, a number of quantitative studies tend towards demonstrating a firearm prevalence–homicide association.

]]> 2021-10-22 13:33:55 UTC https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1836294373 Rifles and shotguns are relatively easy to obtain, while handguns and some semi-automatic rifles are restricted.With respect to the Criminal Law Amendment Act, a gun control law passed in Canada in 1977, some studies have found that it was ineffective at reducing homicide or robbery rates.One study even found that the law may have actually increased robberies involving firearms. A 1993 study found that after this law was passed, gun suicides decreased significantly, as did the proportion of suicides committed in the country with guns. A 2003 study found that this law "may have had an impact on suicide rates, even after controls for social variables,"[80] while a 2001 study by the same research team concluded that the law "may have had an impact on homicide rates, at least for older victims."A 1994 study found that after this law came into force in 1978, suicide rates decreased over time in Ontario, and that there was no evidence of method substitution. The same study found that "These decreases may be only partly due to the legislation." 1992871 https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1836298246 2021-10-22 13:35:14 UTC https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1836298246 1992871 https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1836311564 A 2006 study by gun lobby-affiliated researchers Jeanine Baker and Samara McPhedran found that after Australia enacted the National Firearms Agreement (NFA), a gun control law, in 1996, gun-related suicides may have been affected, but no other parameter appeared to have been.[96] Another 2006 study, led by Simon Chapman, found that after this law was enacted in 1996 in Australia, the country went more than a decade without any mass shootings, and gun-related deaths (especially suicides) declined dramatically.[97] The latter of these studies also criticized the former for using a time-series analysis despite the fact that, according to Chapman et al., "calculating mortality rates and then treating them as a number in a time series ignores the natural variability inherent in the counts that make up the numerator of the rate." Chapman et al. also said that Baker and McPhedran used the Box–Jenkins model inappropriately.[97]]]> 2021-10-22 13:40:05 UTC https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1836311564 1992871 https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1836312670
A 2010 study looking at the effect of the NFA on gun-related deaths found that the law "did not have any large effects on reducing firearm homicide or suicide rates,"[although David Hemenway has criticized this study for using a structural break test despite the fact that such tests can miss the effects of policies in the presence of lags, or when the effect occurs over several years. Another study, published the same year, found that Australia's gun buyback program reduced gun-related suicide rates by almost 80%, while non-gun death rates were not significantly affected. Other research has argued that although gun suicide rates fell after the NFA was enacted, the NFA may not have been responsible for this decrease and "a change in social and cultural attitudes" may have instead been at least partly responsible.In 2016, Chapman co-authored another study that found that after the NFA was passed, there were no mass shootings in the country (as of May 2016), and that gun-related death rates declined more quickly after the NFA than they did before it. The study also found, however, that non-gun suicide and homicide rates declined even more quickly after the NFA, leading the authors to conclude that "it is not possible to determine whether the change in firearm deaths can be attributed to the gun law reforms."


Other countries have also had gun related problems.
]]> 2021-10-22 13:40:31 UTC https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1836312670 1992871 https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1836341386
A 1998 review found that suicide rates generally declined after gun control laws were enacted, and concluded that "The findings support gun control measures as a strategy for reducing suicide rates."A 2016 review found that laws banning people under restraining orders due to domestic violence convictions from accessing guns were associated with "reductions in intimate partner homicide".Another 2016 review identified 130 studies regarding restrictive gun laws and found that the implementation of multiple such laws simultaneously was associated with a decrease in gun-related deaths.[



]]> 2021-10-22 13:50:06 UTC https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1836341386 According to a 2011 UN study, after identifying a number of methodological problems, it stated "notwithstanding such challenges, a significant body of literature tends to suggest that firearm availability predominantly represents a risk factor rather than a protective factor for homicide. In particular, a number of quantitative studies tend towards demonstrating a firearm prevalence–homicide association." 1992871 https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1836341674 2021-10-22 13:50:13 UTC https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1836341674 1992871 https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1836472283 In the United States, mass murders committed with guns are so frequent that the vast majority of them are not even mentioned in mainstream media outlets. Those that happen to be massive or heinous enough to gain national attention—including the murder of 49 people in an Orlando nightclub in 2016 and the massacre of 20 children and six adults at an elementary school in Newtown, Connecticut, in 2012—typically spark a short-lived and fruitless debate about the need for stricter gun control. Politicians of both major parties, fearful of retaliation from the National Rifle Association (NRA), solemnly offer their “thoughts and prayers” while refusing to enact reasonable and constitutional measures now favored by a majority of Americans, such as expanded background checks for gun purchases and the reinstatement of a federal ban on assault weapons, which Congress allowed to lapse in 2004.]]> 2021-10-22 14:39:20 UTC https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1836472283 1992871 https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1836473413 When Britons vote in a national referendum on June 23, 2016, on whether to leave the European Union (EU), they will be considering the biggest British departure from Europe since World War II’s Dunkirk evacuation. “Brexit,” the portmanteau coined as shorthand for “British exit,” has been in international headlines for years, owing to the rippling ramifications the exit promises not only for the United Kingdom and its 27 partners in the European Union but also for the world economy. In the run-up to the referendum, voters were fairly evenly split on both sides of the issue, at least according to opinion polls (which had been spectacularly off the mark in their forecasting of the last British parliamentary election, in 2015).]]> 2021-10-22 14:39:46 UTC https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1836473413 1992871 https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1845211772
In 1988 and 1996, gun control laws were enacted in the Australian state of Victoria, both times following mass shootings. A 2004 study found that in the context of these laws, overall firearm-related deaths, especially suicides, declined dramatically.A 1995 study found preliminary evidence that gun control legislation enacted in Queensland, Australia reduced suicide rates there.


A 2006 study by gun lobby-affiliated researchers Jeanine Baker and Samara McPhedran found that after Australia enacted the National Firearms Agreement (NFA), a gun control law, in 1996, gun-related suicides may have been affected, but no other parameter appeared to have been.Another 2006 study, led by Simon Chapman, found that after this law was enacted in 1996 in Australia, the country went more than a decade without any mass shootings, and gun-related deaths (especially suicides) declined dramatically.The latter of these studies also criticized the former for using a time-series analysis despite the fact that, according to Chapman et al., "calculating mortality rates and then treating them as a number in a time series ignores the natural variability inherent in the counts that make up the numerator of the rate." Chapman et al. also said that Baker and McPhedran used the Box–Jenkins model inappropriately.

]]> 2021-10-26 14:37:06 UTC https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1845211772 1992871 https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1845214481
A 2010 study looking at the effect of the NFA on gun-related deaths found that the law "did not have any large effects on reducing firearm homicide or suicide rates,"although David Hemenway has criticized this study for using a structural break test despite the fact that such tests can miss the effects of policies in the presence of lags, or when the effect occurs over several years. Another study, published the same year, found that Australia's gun buyback program reduced gun-related suicide rates by almost 80%, while non-gun death rates were not significantly affected. Other research has argued that although gun suicide rates fell after the NFA was enacted, the NFA may not have been responsible for this decrease and "a change in social and cultural attitudes" may have instead been at least partly responsible. In 2016, Chapman co-authored another study that found that after the NFA was passed, there were no mass shootings in the country (as of May 2016), and that gun-related death rates declined more quickly after the NFA than they did before it. The study also found, however, that non-gun suicide and homicide rates declined even more quickly after the NFA, leading the authors to conclude that "it is not possible to determine whether the change in firearm deaths can be attributed to the gun law reforms."

]]> 2021-10-26 14:37:51 UTC https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1845214481 1992871 https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1845222665 In the United States, mass murders committed with guns are so frequent that the vast majority of them are not even mentioned in mainstream media outlets. Those that happen to be massive or heinous enough to gain national attention—including the murder of 49 people in an Orlando nightclub in 2016 and the massacre of 20 children and six adults at an elementary school in Newtown, Connecticut, in 2012—typically spark a short-lived and fruitless debate about the need for stricter gun control. Politicians of both major parties, fearful of retaliation from the National Rifle Association (NRA), solemnly offer their “thoughts and prayers” while refusing to enact reasonable and constitutional measures now favored by a majority of Americans, such as expanded background checks for gun purchases and the reinstatement of a federal ban on assault weapons, which Congress allowed to lapse in 2004.]]> 2021-10-26 14:40:02 UTC https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1845222665 1992871 https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1845304013 Some states have enacted red flag laws that enable a judge to issue an order to temporarily confiscate the firearms of a person who presents an imminent threat to others or to themselves.Some states and localities require that a person obtain a license or permit in order to purchase or possess firearms.Some states and localities require that individual firearms be registered with the police or with another law enforcement agency.All states allow some form of concealed carry, the carrying of a concealed firearm in public.Many states allow some form of open carry, the carrying of an unconcealed firearm in public on one's person or in a vehicle.Some states have state preemption for some or all gun laws, which means that only the state can legally regulate firearms. In other states, local governments can pass their own gun laws more restrictive than those of the state.Some states and localities place additional restrictions on certain semi-automatic firearms that they have defined as assault weapons, or on magazines that can hold more than a certain number of rounds of ammunition.NFA weapons are weapons that are heavily restricted at a federal level by the National Firearms Act of 1934 and the Firearm Owners Protection Act of 1986. These include automatic firearms (such as machine guns), short-barreled shotguns, and short-barreled rifles. Some states and localities place additional restrictions on such weapons.Some states have enacted castle doctrine or stand-your-ground laws, which provide a legal basis for individuals to use deadly force in self-defense in certain situations, without a duty to flee or retreat if possible.In some states, peaceable journey laws give additional leeway for the possession of firearms by travelers who are passing through to another destination.Some states require a background check of the buyer when a firearm is sold by a private party. (Federal law requires background checks for sales by licensed gun dealers, and for any interstate sales.)

]]> 2021-10-26 15:02:22 UTC https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1845304013 1992871 https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1845317360
Gun laws in the United States regulate the sale, possession, and use of firearms and ammunition. State laws (and the laws of the District of Columbia and of the U.S. territories) vary considerably, and are independent of existing federal firearms laws, although they are sometimes broader or more limited in scope than the federal laws.


Forty-four states have a provision in their state constitutions similar to the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which protects the right to keep and bear arms. The exceptions are California, Iowa, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, and New York. In New York, however, the statutory civil rights laws contain a provision virtually identical to the Second Amendment.Additionally, the U.S. Supreme Court held in McDonald v. Chicago that the protections of the Second Amendment to keep and bear arms for self-defense in one's home apply against state governments and their political subdivisions.


Firearm owners are subject to the firearm laws of the state they are in, and not exclusively their state of residence. Reciprocity between states exists in certain situations, such as with regard to concealed carry permits. These are recognized on a state-by-state basis. For example, Idaho recognizes an Oregon permit, but Oregon does not recognize an Idaho permit. Florida issues a license to carry both concealed weapons and firearms, but others license only the concealed carry of firearms. Some states do not recognize out-of-state permits to carry a firearm at all, so it is important to understand the laws of each state when traveling with a handgun.


In many cases, state firearms laws can be considerably less restrictive than federal firearms laws. This does not confer any de jure immunity against prosecution for violations of the federal laws. However, state and local police departments are not legally obligated to enforce federal gun law as per the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Printz v. United States.
]]> 2021-10-26 15:05:59 UTC https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1845317360 1992871 https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1845319696 Gun control (or firearms regulation)[1][2] is the set of laws or policies that regulate the manufacture, sale, transfer, possession, modification, or use of firearms by civilians.

Most countries have a restrictive firearm guiding policy, with only a few legislations being categorized as permissive.[a] Jurisdictions that regulate access to firearms typically restrict access to only certain categories of firearms and then to restrict the categories of persons who will be granted a license to have access to a firearm. In some countries such as the United States, gun control may be legislated at either a federal level or a local state level

]]> 2021-10-26 15:06:37 UTC https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1845319696 1992871 https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1845321068 Gun control refers to domestic regulation of firearm manufacture, trade, possession, use, and transport, specifically with regard to the class of weapons referred to as small arms (revolvers and self-loading pistols, rifles and carbines, assault rifles, submachine guns and light machine guns).[4][5]

Usage of the term gun control is sometimes politicized.[6] Some of those in favor of legislation instead prefer to use terms such as "gun-violence prevention", "gun safety", "firearms regulation", "illegal guns", or "criminal access to guns".[7]

]]> 2021-10-26 15:07:00 UTC https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1845321068 1992871 https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1845321818 In 2007, it was estimated that there were, globally, about 875 million small arms in the hands of civilians, law enforcement agencies, and armed forces.[b][8] Of these firearms 650 million, or 75%, are held by civilians.[8] U.S. civilians account for 270 million of this total.[8] A further 200 million are controlled by state military forces.[9] Law enforcement agencies have some 26 million small arms.[9] Non-state armed groups[c] have about 1.4 million firearms.[d][9] Finally, gang members hold between 2 and 10 million small arms.[9] Together, the small arms arsenals of non-state armed groups and gangs account for, at most, 1.4% of the global total.[10]


]]> 2021-10-26 15:07:13 UTC https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1845321818 1992871 https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1845323017 Barring a few exceptions,[e] most countries in the world allow civilians to purchase firearms subject to certain restrictions.[13] A 2011 survey of 28 countries over five continents[f] found that a major distinction between different national regimes of firearm regulation is whether civilian gun ownership is seen as a right or a privilege.[16] The study concluded that both the United States and Yemen were distinct from the other countries surveyed in viewing firearm ownership as a basic right of civilians and in having more permissive regimes of civilian gun ownership.[16] In the remaining countries included in the sample, civilian firearm ownership is considered a privilege and the legislation governing possession of firearms is correspondingly more restrictive.[16]


]]> 2021-10-26 15:07:30 UTC https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1845323017 1992871 https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1845323821 At the international and regional level, diplomatic attention has tended to focus on the cross-border illegal trade in small arms as an area of particular concern rather than the regulation of civilian-held firearms.[17] During the mid-1990s, however, the United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) adopted a series of resolutions relating to the civilian ownership of small arms.[17] These called for an exchange of data on national systems of firearm regulation and for the initiation of an international study of the issue.[17] In July 1997, ECOSOC issued a resolution that underlined the responsibility of UN member states to competently regulate civilian ownership of small arms and which urged them to ensure that their regulatory frameworks encompassed the following aspects: firearm safety and storage; penalties for the unlawful possession and misuse of firearms; a licensing system to prevent undesirable persons from owning firearms; exemption from criminal liability to promote the surrender by citizens of illegal, unsafe or unwanted guns; and, a record-keeping system to track civilian firearms.[17]]]> 2021-10-26 15:07:44 UTC https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1845323821 1992871 https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1845324621 In 1997, the UN published a study based on member state survey data titled the United Nations International Study on Firearm Regulation which was updated in 1999.[g][17] This study was meant to initiate the establishment of a database on civilian firearm regulations which would be run by the Centre for International Crime Prevention, located in Vienna. who were to report on national systems of civilian firearm regulation every two years.[17] These plans never reached fruition and further UN-led efforts to establish international norms for the regulation of civilian-held firearms were stymied.[18] Responding to pressure from the U.S. government,[h][20] any mention of the regulation of civilian ownership of small arms was removed from the draft proposals for the 2001 UN Programme of Action on Small Arms.[17]


]]> 2021-10-26 15:07:58 UTC https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1845324621 1992871 https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1845325675 Although the issue is no longer part of the UN policy debate, since 1991 there have been eight regional agreements involving 110 countries concerning aspects of civilian firearm possession.[17] The Bamako Declaration,[i] was adopted in Bamako, Mali, on 1 December 2000 by the representatives of the member states of the Organisation of African Unity (OAU).[21] The provisions of this declaration recommend that the signatories would establish the illegal possession of small arms and light weapons as a criminal offence under national law in their respective countries.[22]]]> 2021-10-26 15:08:14 UTC https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1845325675 1992871 https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1845327961 High rates of gun mortality and injury are often cited as a primary impetus for gun control policies.[23] A 2004 National Research Council critical review found that while some strong conclusions are warranted from current research, the state of our knowledge is generally poor.[24] The result of the scarcity of relevant data is that gun control is one of the most fraught topics in American politics[25] and scholars remain deadlocked on a variety of issues.[25] Notably, since 1996, when the Dickey Amendment was first inserted into the federal spending bill, the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has been prohibited from using its federal funding "to advocate or promote gun control," thwarting gun violence research at the agency at the time. The funding provision's author has said that this was an over-interpretation,[26] but the amendment still had a chilling effect, effectively halting federally funded firearm-related research.[27] ]]> 2021-10-26 15:08:49 UTC https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1845327961 1992871 https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1845329295 A 1998 review found that suicide rates generally declined after gun control laws were enacted, and concluded that "The findings support gun control measures as a strategy for reducing suicide rates."[31] A 2016 review found that laws banning people under restraining orders due to domestic violence convictions from accessing guns were associated with "reductions in intimate partner homicide".[32] Another 2016 review identified 130 studies regarding restrictive gun laws and found that the implementation of multiple such laws simultaneously was associated with a decrease in gun-related deaths.[33]]]> 2021-10-26 15:09:12 UTC https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1845329295 1992871 https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1845330712 Cross-sectional studies
In 1983, a cross-sectional study of all 50 U.S. states found that the six states with the strictest gun laws (according to the National Rifle Association) had suicide rates that were approximately 3/100,000 people lower than in other states, and that these states' suicide rates were 4/100,000 people lower than those of states with the least restrictive gun laws.[35] A 2003 study published in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine looked at the restrictiveness of gun laws and suicide rates in men and women in all 50 U.S. states and found that states whose gun laws were more restrictive had lower suicide rates among both sexes.[36] In 2004, another study found that the effect of state gun laws on gun-related homicides was "limited".[37] A 2005 study looked at all 50 states in the U.S. and the District of Columbia, and found that no gun laws were associated with reductions in firearm homicide or suicide, but that a "shall-issue" concealed carry law may be associated with increased firearm homicide rates.[38] A 2011 study found that firearm regulation laws in the United States have "a significant deterrent effect on male suicide".[39]

]]> 2021-10-26 15:09:36 UTC https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1845330712 1992871 https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1845331521 A 2013 study found that in the United States, "A higher number of firearm laws in a state are associated with a lower rate of firearm fatalities in the state."[40] A 2016 study published in The Lancet found that of 25 laws studied, and in the time period examined (2008–2010), nine were associated with reduced firearm mortality (including both homicide and suicide), nine were associated with increased mortality, and seven had an inconclusive association. The three laws most strongly associated with reduced firearm mortality were laws requiring universal background checks, background checks for ammunition sales, and identification for guns.[41] In an accompanying commentary, David Hemenway noted that this study had multiple limitations, such as not controlling for all factors that may influence gun-related deaths aside from gun control laws, and the use of 29 explanatory variables in the analysis.[42]]]> 2021-10-26 15:09:51 UTC https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1845331521 1992871 https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1845334032 Other studies comparing gun control laws in different U.S. states include a 2015 study which found that in the United States, "stricter state firearm legislation is associated with lower discharge rates" for nonfatal gun injuries.[43] A 2014 study that also looked at the United States found that children living in states with stricter gun laws were safer.[44] Another study looking specifically at suicide rates in the United States found that the four handgun laws examined (waiting periods, universal background checks, gun locks, and open carrying regulations) were associated with "significantly lower firearm suicide rates and the proportion of suicides resulting from firearms." The study also found that all four of these laws (except the waiting-period one) were associated with reductions in the overall suicide rate.[45]]]> 2021-10-26 15:10:31 UTC https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1845334032 1992871 https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1845334677 Another study, published the same year, found that states with permit to purchase, registration, and/or license laws for handguns had lower overall suicide rates, as well as lower firearm suicide rates.[46] A 2014 study found that states that required licensing and inspections of gun dealers tended to have lower rates of gun homicides.[47] Another study published the same year, analyzing panel data from all 50 states, found that stricter gun laws may modestly reduce gun deaths.[48] A 2016 study found that U.S. military veterans tend to commit suicide with guns more often than the general population, thereby possibly increasing state suicide rates, and that "the tendency for veterans to live in states without handgun legislation may exacerbate this phenomenon."[49] California has exceptionally strict gun sales laws, and a 2015 study found that it also had the oldest guns recovered in crimes of any states in the U.S. The same study concluded that "These findings suggest that more restrictive gun sales laws and gun dealer regulations do make it more difficult for criminals to acquire new guns first purchased at retail outlets."[50]]]> 2021-10-26 15:10:44 UTC https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1845334677 Fact 1992871 https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1845335793 Another 2016 study found that stricter state gun laws in the United States reduced suicide rates.[51] Another 2016 study found that U.S. states with lenient gun control laws had more gun-related child injury hospital admissions than did states with stricter gun control laws.[52] A 2017 study found that suicide rates declined more in states with universal background check and mandatory waiting period laws than in states without these laws.[53] Another 2017 study found that states without universal background check and/or waiting period laws had steeper increases in their suicide rates than did states with these laws.[54]]]> 2021-10-26 15:11:02 UTC https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1845335793 Mini-Description 1992871 https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1845336495 A third 2017 study found that "waiting period laws that delay the purchase of firearms by a few days reduce gun homicides by roughly 17%."[55] A 2017 study in the Economic Journal found that mandatory handgun purchase delays reduced "firearm related suicides by between 2 to 5 percent with no statistically significant increase in non-firearm suicides," and were "not associated with statistically significant changes in homicide rates."[56] Another 2017 study showed that laws banning gun possession by people subject to intimate partner violence restraining orders, and requiring such people to give up any guns they have, were associated with lower intimate partner homicide rates.[57] A 2021 study found that firearm purchase delay laws reduced homicide – the authors suggested that it was driven by reductions in gun purchases by impulsive customers.[58]


]]> 2021-10-26 15:11:15 UTC https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1845336495 Gun Control Image 1992871 https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1845361307 Here are some protesters against guns. The sign says, "Don't protect guns, protect people." This shows how important this issue is in America.I think that personally Guns should be banned in order to save lives.]]> 2021-10-26 15:18:22 UTC https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1845361307 Bring Back Gun Ban! 1992871 https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1851535004 The woman in the caricature above is holding a sign that says "Bring Back Assault Weapon Ban" and is standing in front of a graveyard and A man with guns and bullets who is saying "Overkill!" and multiple people were shot and killed]]> 2021-10-28 14:36:48 UTC https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1851535004 Cartoon Revolver. 1992871 https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1851545665 This is A Cartoon Revolver]]> 2021-10-28 14:40:04 UTC https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1851545665 Peter van Uhm: Why I chose a gun 1992871 https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1851658346 2021-10-28 15:13:40 UTC https://padlet.com/1992871/170nz8i2h8lzgwql/wish/1851658346