B1: Shared Inquiry: Impact of Colonization on North America by Paul Laedke

Anthony T

2019-05-20 17:24:57 UTC

anna need to slow down

Grayson Coyman First Inquiry

2019-05-20 17:25:08 UTC

Good Start from Anna stepping up when no one else wanted to.

Josh is doing a Good Job but needs to not say um and like.

I like how Meghan used evidence and explained why she picked it.

Anna needs to slow down. I cant understand most of her words.

People are getting distracted by the wind and papers blowing.

Alexa did a good job at projecting her voice.

I could not hear sean

Meghan is very good at tone and proving her point. She also does not stumble.

I cant hear Anna.

Maya is citing her sources. Very well done.

Josh is using "Um" he keeps stumbling.

Alexa is not stumbling and speaking clearly.

Jake uses "um" twice
But he uses very good and clear evidence.

Maya and Josh are using amazing eye contact right now.

Sean is doing good at proving his point and starting up a new talking point.

Anna is using good diction. Anna is also citing all her sources and proves her point.

Maya is proving her point by using evidence and citing her source.

When people are saying " Do you have anything to say" This slows down the talking point.

There is a short pause.

I cant hear Jake.

Alexander

2019-05-20 17:25:08 UTC

Speak louder

Josh uses evidence but pauses a lot

Anna needs to speak clearer

People that haven't talked should now

I can't hear Maya

Everyone is saying like and um and stops and stuters a lot

Megan uses evidence and speaks clear

Antony uses evidence

Josh needs more eye contact

Jake uses evidence

Most people look like they didn't practice or prepare

Anna needs to change her tone

Antony makes a inference

Shared inquiry #2

Bella started off with a good claim and speaked loud and clear

Courtney uses evidence and explains it well

Everyone is citing their evidence and they are explaining it

Some people are infering instead of explaining what really happened

Skye asks a good question and this lets Greg jump in

Sarah reads off the ipad most of the time instead of looking up at the group but she makes a good inference

Shelbly supports her opioin with evidence and reasoning

Courtney explains her evidence well
and Greg asked a good question to her

Most people are saying like and um a lot

Sarah builds off of Courtney

Sarah says like A LOT

Only a few people are particapating

Long pause

Joe

2019-05-20 17:25:08 UTC

First Inquiry

Anna starts off with a strong claim, but could be more powerful with a change in tone.

Jake and Josh can add on to Anna's claim strongly.

It seems most people agree with Anna.

Many people such as Megan, Aleksa, and Josh are using good sentence starters.

Jake has a good tone when he speaks.

Anthony is building off of what other people are saying.

Josh asked a question that leaves me thinking.

Lots of people have evidence but don't have good reasoning behind why.

Anthony asks if Aleksa has anything else to say, noticing she might not have of talked as much as she'd like to.

Second Inquiry

Very long pause after Bella's strong claim.

Good evidence is being stated, along with reasoning that supports it.

Lots of filler words are being used and they are talking too fast, slow down so we can listen and so it sounds more fluent.

Skye has a really good question that sparks attention and has me thinking.

Lack of eye contact lots of ummms are being said, slow it down and make it clear, I have no clue what is trying to be said.

There is no, "I agree" or any "I disagree" which I think is a good thing because after a long period of time of people just saying "I agree" or "I disagree" it gets boring and very repetitive. Here and there it is fine, but it isn't being used too frequently which I think is a good thing.

bella bicelli

2019-05-20 17:25:27 UTC

Anna's volume is good and her claim is strong.

Josh provides evidence.

Maya needs to be louder. She tells everyone where her information came from.

Aleska gives evidence and reasoning and her volume is good.

Anthony has good volume and states where he is getting his info from. I also agree with Anthony.

I like how Jake included others.

Everyone seems to be agreeing with Anna.

Aleska had evidence but no reasoning.

April started off with a good claim and stated where she got her information from.

Kylie stated her source.

They are disagreeing and agreeing.

Kylie

2019-05-20 17:25:36 UTC

FIRST ONE

Anna has a good claim and she stepped up when no one else wanted to so that's really good.

Josh uses good evidence that relates back to Anna's claim.

Megan shows a good point about them being friends in the beginning.

Maya has an amazing piece of evidence that goes directly with the claim but there just isn't enough reasoning.

Anna's evidence was good but it was really long so people might not have been listening the entire time.

Aleska has evidence but no reasoning so we don't know how it connects to the initial claim.

Jake does a good job included other people.

Many people have evidence but NO reasoning.

Megan does an amazing job saying her evidence and her reasoning.

Josh has a really good question that got me and probably other people thinking.

Maya does a good job stating her source.

A lot of people are saying "I agree" maybe they should change it up.

SECOND ONE

Bella had a good claim but it wasn't easy to talk about so no one did.

Courtney has a good piece of evidence but Shelby disagrees respectfully which is really good.

Courtney uses her source but not many other people have been saying their source even when they say a piece of evidence.

Sarah has good reasoning, that connects to the claim but instead of just a small amount of reasoning she repeats the same thought but in different ways.

Now more people, Bella/Sarah, are saying their sources.

Everybody is responding to each other even if it is disagreeing they are still going off of other people's claim/statements.

Skye has a good question that has people in the group thinking but the question doesn't have much to do with the sources so it might be hard for them to have evidence.

Shelby has a good point even though I thought of it differently she gets me thinking in a different way.

Greg asks good questions but he doesn't say any of his points which doesn't help us understand his opinion.

Courtney does a good job answering Greg's question.

Shelby does a good job changing the topic because nobody was talking about the other topic.

Gill didn't speak at all.

Greg

2019-05-20 17:25:43 UTC

Great start from Anna. Lots of information given!

Josh gives strong info to prove a point.

Maya gives strong evidence.

Great job, Anna... giving great points as the conversation goes on.

I think Anna should make sure she watches when she says the word, "like"... it takes away the great conversation tone.

Meagan great job proving points.

Aleska agreeing with three different people... sounds great.

It's nice to hear Anthony chiming in talking about his side of the point... Meagan agrees with a strong point.

Anna should make sure to be a little more slower so people can hear and agree.

-- The "um" and "like" doesn't sound too good with the conversation altogether. --

Anna has been making great points this whole time of the inquiry. I like how she gives the information very detailed. Just make sure the "um" and "like" doesn't get used a lot more.

April Smith

2019-05-20 17:25:53 UTC

I think Anna needs a bit more tone variety so that we can hear her better.

Anna seems like she knows what she is doing and it seems like she practiced.

Jake started off strong with his voice but then kind of got quiet as he went along.

I like how Meagan got right to the point and stated her source immediately before even starting.

Josh seems like he is just repeating others.

Anna and Maya are making good eye contact with each other.

I think Sean should pay a bit more attention instead of watching the back channeling so that he can know if it is a good time to jump in.

I notice that the girls are saying things like "um" or "like" multiple times when they speak.

Sean is using strong words that contribute towards his point.

Good eye contact, look less at the computer.

Anthony has good voice projection.

Maybe start using other sentence starters that aren't "I agree" or "I disagree"

Anna should maybe let others speak because she has said a lot.

I liked how Anna was talking about the relationship between the Settlers and the Natives

Aleksa didn't give anybody a chance to answer Josh's question, but rather just went on to her own. Jake did the same thing; maybe let people take a second to think about the question and see if anybody has an answer.

Maya speak up I can't hear what you are saying

Sean should speak up as well

Some people aren't really answering the question on how colonization changed life; they are kind of just explaining what had happened.

Josh is just reading off of his computer and not really giving his reasoning.

I like how Anthony filled up the space by moving on to something else.

Josh is just saying evidence and not explaining why he said it

Anna needs to be more organized

I like how Jake is making inferences

Aleksa only spoke once w/o evidence

SECOND SHARED INQUIRY

Bella did have a good claim, but she didn't back it up with evidence or reasoning.

I like how Courtney started off strong with a clear claim and also explained why

I like how Shelby used "I see what you're saying, but..."

I like how lots of people are paying attention so that they know if it is a good time to jump in or not.

I like how Sarah is connecting her reasoning with not just one, but many sources.

I like how Sarah is not just reading off of her paper, but kind of just speaking her mind

I like how Shelby made an inference

I like how, unlike the first group, this group is expanding on each others ideas instead of moving on to something completely different.

I like how people aren't afraid to disagree with each other.

Sarah, Shelby and Courtney have strong voices that show that they know what they are doing.

Sarah has good reasoning but is kind of rambling on a little bit.

I like how people use terms like "adding on" or "from the texts, I can infer...."

Most people have strong evidence to back their claim up, and they also have strong reasoning. May need to say "like" or "um" a bit less.

I like how people are asking questions as well as expanding on other peoples words

I like that when people disagree, they aren't mean, but they may ask a question so they can fully understand their words.

I like that Shelby switched up the topic instead of staying on one the whole time.

I like how some people are for both positive and negative because then they get more chances to speak and they also can understand where everybody else is coming from.

Gil needs to speak

I like how Courtney gave her conclusion with and overall statement.

I like how they are summing up the conversation with something like "so basically what we learned was..."

Sarah Bollacke

2019-05-20 17:26:37 UTC

Can josh speak a bit louder because behind him it’s hard to hear
Megan did a good job with her reasoning it really showed her point.
Using filler words disturbs the great evidence and claims that you all make. If you stand behind you’re claim, you are less likely to use them.
Good claim, and build off Aleksa
Can we focus on some people who haven’t talked because maybe they have something to say.
I can’t really understand Anna’s point because I think she needs a bit more tone, and to speak clearer
Does anyone have something to disagree with?
You can word “I agree with them because” differently to make it sound better.
I like jake’s point, and I think he had good projection, tone, and diction
Megan,jake and aleksa use good eye contact
How does Anna know this, was it from a source, because she didn’t cite it, did she infer? Because then what she said could be unreliable
What jake said didn’t exactly make sense because the pilgrims were runaways and they came with very little things, and they could barely survive.
Anthony didn’t cite where he got his evidence from Columbus
Josh didn’t cite his evidence, and it was more of just reasoning.

Nick

2019-05-20 17:26:53 UTC

Josh has nice evidence

most people who have spoken do not have good volume

Megan has good reasoning

Anthony has good volume and eye contact

Anna is not clear

good sentence starter Jake

more eye contact

good evidence Maya

Shelby

2019-05-20 17:27:45 UTC

Anna should try to make more eye contact

Josh didn't seem very prepared when he was talking because he kept trailing off of his sentences and had to look at his computer a lot

Maya did a good job of stating her source but might need to project her voice a little bit more

Anna is doing a good job of talking loudly so everyone can hear her, but she says "um" and "like" a lot when she speaks

Josh didn't have a source when he spoke and didn't have any evidence or reasoning

Megan did a good job of projecting her voice at the beginning of her sentence but then she quieted down

Aleksa should try to talk slower and make more eye contact

Josh needs more eye contact and he stuttered on his words a lot

Anthony didn't have any reasoning to go with his evidence

I like how Aleksa had a question but she needs more eye contact

Jake says "um" a lot when he needs to gather his thoughts

Josh has good volume

Maya needs to speak louder because I couldn't hear her clearly

Anna didn't seem prepared with her evidence and her sources because she took some time to figure out which source she got the evidence from

Anthony didn't have a lot of reasoning along with his evidence

THIRD SHARED INQUIRY

April starts off with a good claim because she includes a source with evidence and reasoning

Kylie has good eye contact when she says her reasoning

Grayson has great volume, but he doesn't have reasoning to go along with his evidence

Joe added on to Grayson's statement, but he didn't support it with a source or evidence

April did a good job of supporting her reasoning with evidence

Alex had a good sentence starter: "Adding on to what Grayson said," and he had evidence from Newsela instead of just saying "I agree"

Kylie didn't have reasoning with her evidence

April has really good eye contact, but she might want to try to slow down her talking because sometimes it's hard to understand her when she talks really fast

Joe supports his evidence with strong reasoning, but he says "like" when he talks pretty often and his voice projection faded as he finished talking

Anthony did a good job of explaining the evidence he found, but he should try to speak a little bit louder

Kylie gave good reasoning when she talked about law/rule #6

Anthony has good eye contact

April should try to be more prepared with her sources because she said "in one of the sources..." She didn't know which one her evidence was from

Alex didn't include a source when he said his evidence

Nick might want to speak louder because it's a little hard to hear him, and he also didn't have a source or evidence to support what he said

Joe and April did a good job of encouraging others into the conversation

April did a good job of changing the subject because everyone was kind of saying the same things over and over again but in different ways

Alex says "like" a lot when he talks

Skye Rodriguez

2019-05-20 17:27:52 UTC

Great start, Anna, strong voice, however I think she needs more tone. Her voice stays the same throughout her explanation.

Good Josh, using evidence and saying "I agree with.." however he needs to speak a bit louder. however, maybe don't say "uhm.." and "Like.."

Maya, same thing as Josh.

Anna knows what she's doing, however, she might not want to say "like" as much as she does next time.

Long pause of silence.

Maya, could definitely speak louder, but she's using good evidence.

Aleksa used "I agree.." (which is good) and had a great amount of volume.

Jake also used good volume when speaking.

Good use of sources, Megan.

Long pause of silence again.

Anna, good job speaking up, however she needs to speak a bit louder.

Jake made good use of, "Going back to what Anthony said a while ago.."

Maybe one of them should use a different start when talking about what someone previously said.

Sean C

2019-05-21 12:11:17 UTC

FIRST INQUIRY:
PRESENTING
SECOND INQUIRY

That was a pretty quick start. good job

there is little pauses between the speakings but still a good pace

Agreeing AND disagreeing is really good for the discussion taking sides

When I am listening I hear a lot of stuttering ( um, uh)

There is a lot of siting evidence which is good if you want to go back to find the info

There are some big pauses but I like how Shelby broke one of the silences

I like how some of them are siting dates for some of their evidence to show when it happened

THIRD INQUIRY

good job Joe at starting off with something other that I agree.

There is lots of people starting off with different startings which is creating a sort of difference

good job Alex countering with another question

good point about the musket but what if they had bayonets
(sharp spikes if they couldn't reload or if they were out of ammo)

Maya (Shared inquiry #2)

2019-05-21 12:11:48 UTC

- Bella started with a strong claim and stated the question

- courtney disagrees with bella's claim and supports her disagreement with evidence and reasoning not sure if she included a source

- shelby builds off of courtney shares evidence and cites the source while stating her reasoning

- sarah clarifies what shelby stated and shares a inference with evidence and a source. sarah also shares brief information from another source

- greg clarifies what source sarah used

- shelby shares how she found both positive and negative reasoning with evidence
- bella also shares negs and pos.

- courtney uses primary sources to share a negative reasoning

- sarah shares a piece of evidence with a source and what she believes/reasoning about evidence

- skye asks a question about specific reasons why the pilgrims and the natives might have started to go against each other

- does skye have any thoughts or ideas about her own question or maybe even an inference or theory

- greg, courtney, and sarah give feed back and thoughts to skyes question

- everyone seems to have a great volume and voice projection

- shelby shares a new idea and reasoning while going back to others thoughts

- skye builds off of sarah's idea with evidence and a source

- courtney shares a new piece of evidence with sources and hr thoughts/reasoning on that evidence

- greg clarifies what courtney said and asks question about her thought

- courtney give a better explanation and elaborate on what she stated

- sarah build off of courtneys idea and shares what was maybe a piece of evidence?

- bella shares a new piece of evidence with a source and reasoning

- greg asks several questions about bella's thoughts

- jillian is invited in wit nothing to say

- shelby jumps in with kind of a new topic and evidence that was cited

- sarah adds on to shelby's idea with lots of reasoning

- courtney agrees with shelby and sarah by confirming their thought and using evidence from a chart in the primary sources

- skye changes the topic with a piece of evidence without a source

- greg shares a thought but I could not hear that thought

- jillian once again is invited in without anything to share

- courtney gives her final thoughts about the current topic

- sarah greg and skye add on to the final thought

GRAYSON COYMAN Second Shared Inquiry

2019-05-21 12:12:53 UTC

Bella Started off with a claim. Long pause after her claim

Courtney uses evidence that is cited.

Shelby is proving her point using strong evidence.

Sarah is doing very good at projecting her voice. But she is saying "Um" and "Like".

Shelby uses I agree as a transition to end the silence.

Bella is not stumbling and projecting her voice well.

Courtney is citing her sources.

Skye is asking a good question.

Courtney is proving her point using evidence.

Sarah is proving her point and using good diction.

Gillan needs to speak.

Shelby is using sources to defend her point.

Skye is supporting her claim with evidence.

Courtney is citing sources and projecting her voice.

Sarah is doing good at proving her point.

Bella needs to speak up a little.

Greg is asking good questions.

Shelby uses "Um". Shelby needs to be more dominant.

Sarah uses "Like".

Gillan needs to speak.

There is a long pause.

Gillan was invited in but has nothing to say.

Skye has good eye contact when talking to people.

I cant hear anyone.

Aleksa (First and Second Shared Inquiry)

2019-05-21 12:12:57 UTC

Courtney has very good voice projection, and has good evidence equipped with reasoning.

Shelby had a very good reason with evidence and voice projection, and i liked how she said "I understand what your saying but i disagree..."

Sarah has very good voice projection, and lots of evidence.

I like how Greg made sure that the source was heard.

A little more voice projection, but good evidence.

I liked Bella's evidence and reasoning, however she needs to speak up a little bit more.

I like Courtney's voice projection, and how she explained her evidence by showing the negative affects.

Sarah has really good voice projection and eye contact. She also makes a clear point and backs up her evidence with reasoning.

I liked how Skye asked questions to makes sure that some people got the chance to talk.

I like how Courtney brought her ideas and her evidence together.

There was a lot of eye contact.

I liked how Sarah used a lot of our vocabulary from this year.

I think that maybe at some point the "two before me" rule should be considered.

I like how Shelby persevered through words she didn't really know. I also liked her eye contact.

I like how Skye used good eye contact, and voice projection. She had good evidence, but didn't really back it up with reasoning.

I liked Courtney's voice projection, and eye contact.

I liked how Greg asked Courtney questions about her evidence and reasoning, for better understanding.

I liked how Sarah kind of clarified what Courtney was saying, but also included evidence and reasoning for herself.

I think maybe instead of ignoring Greg's question, it should have been answered.

I liked Shelby's voice projection and how she also used negative like Courtney earlier.

I loved how Courtney used dates and the words "drastically declined" instead of saying "the numbers went down quickly."

I liked Skye's eye contact, and she had evidence backed up with reasoning, but she needs a little bit more voice projection.

I loved how Courtney started her final thought with "Overall," instead of just saying some random evidence with reasoning.

I liked how there was a lot of encouragement for people to talk if they didn't talk too much.

**THIRD GROUP!!!**
I liked April's voice projection, and her evidence with reasoning included.

Kylie has very good voice projection, eye contact, evidence, and reasoning.

Grayson has very good voice projection and eye contact.

Kylie and April both had really good eye contact, and voice projection. They had good evidence and reasoning.

I like how Alex connected with Grayson.

I like how Grayson went directly to the question and used TTQA.

Kylie and April have very good voice projection and eye contact. Their evidence was very good with reasoning, however i didn't hear any sources.

I like how Joe used a source and evidence with reasoning and opinion. He had really good voice projection, and eye contact. He stuttered a little, but overall it was really good.

I like how Alex used "I see what your saying..."

Anthony kind of used TTQA, with evidence and some reasoning, however he need to speak up a little bit more, and use a little more eye contact.

Grayson has lots of eye contact and really good voice projection. He also had a good amount of evidence connected to reasoning.

I like how there's a lot of our vocabulary being used.

I liked Joe's evidence and reasoning, however, he needs to speak up a little bit more, however he had a good amount of eye contact.

I like how April kinda broke it up a little and explained that she was confused on a section of the text.

Everyone has really good voice projection, eye contact, and evidence with reasoning. I also liked how everyone was encouraging some of the students who haven't talked that much.

I think Nick needs to speak up a little bit more, and needs better evidence and reasoning. However, he had good eye contact.

I like how April referred to everyone in the group before she went on to saying her evidence and reasoning.

I like how Nick asked questions about what April was saying.

I like how no one is really reading right from their screens.

Joe had really good voice projection, and eye contact. He had good evidence to build off of Grayson.

I don't really hear any sources, just evidence with reasoning.

Kylie has really good voice projection, eye contact, evidence and reasoning complete with a source.

Megan Hughes

2019-05-21 12:13:33 UTC

I like how Bella and Courtney jumped right into the conversation. Using strong evidence that supported their claim.

Shelby is using relevent evidence that supports her claim.

I like how Greg asked where Sarah go her evidence from.

Courtney is using good volume when talking to the group. She also used more evidence from a cited source.

Everybody is using good eye contact when talking to each other.

I like how Skye introduced a new question or talking point.

More people should try to jump into the conversation.

I like how courtney is always citing a source when giving evidence.

Also Greg is doing good asking for clairifaction on evidence.

Shelby is doing good making infrences on the time period. I got this from her saying "I think."

Good infrence Skye on how the Indians clothing could have influenced the naming of "Savages"

I like how Courtney spoke up and made a good concluding statement. In witch she added on to an infrence.

I like how there was incourgment to get people in the conversation.

Anthony t

2019-05-21 12:14:58 UTC

i like how if there is a long pause than Sara will jump in and talk

Shelby needs to talk louder

i agree with Courtney

there are to many pauses

Anna (Shared Inquiry #2)

anna_martinez4 — 2019-05-21 12:15:34 UTC

I think Bella started with an amazing claim. Although the silence after was a little weird

Good debate between Courtney and Shelby

I'm hearing extremely good evidence being said

Need to name the source of evidence because I don't know where the evidence is coming from

Shelby may need to speak up a little bit

The speakers are remaining the same. Give other people a chance to explain their thinking

Sarah is backing up her reasoning with strong evidence

Gillian and Skye are keeping quiet. Let them speak up

Everyone who's spoken has very good reasoning and is being backed up with good hard evidence.

People are letting some other people talk before they speak again, they're putting space between each other's speaking

Some tones and diction may need to be improved

I really like how Skye invited Gillian into the conversation, although there was some weird silence again

There aren't as many pauses as the last Shared Inquiry

Greg may need to speak up a little because there are some words that I don't catch due to surrounding noises

Same goes for Skye a bit

Gillian basically didn't say anything

Anthony C

2019-05-21 12:15:40 UTC

Bella started off with a good claim

Courtney does a good job stating her source

Shelby disagreed in a good way

Courtney does a good job showing evidence and reasoning

Skye had a good question that also changed the topic

Courtney has good voice projection

I like how instead of saying ¨I agree¨ or ¨I disagree¨ they show how they feel through their evidence and reasoning

Courtney did a good job starting the ending of the shared inquiry

3rd inquiry

April did a good job starting and citing her source with her own reasoning

Good question asked by Nick and Grayson did a good job answering it

Joe did a good job inferring

Alex disagreed in a good way

Grayson did a good job finding the bias articles

April did a good job changing the subject

Jake hopkins

2019-05-21 12:16:11 UTC

Bella started off with a good claim and starting off the question with saying the pilgrims and natives were positive.

Courtney did a good job countering Bella's claim and with good evidence with backing her up.

good job Sarah with good information and citing but people should try not to say um.

Bella did good job with saying her evidence on what she thinks but she did not cite where she got it from.

only 4 people have spoken they should give the other people a chance to talk and give evidence.

sky had a good question and getting people to think.

Courtney and Greg did a good job with answering sky's question but next time they should use evidence to back them up.

Sarah did a good job changing the subject.

they should ask other people if they have anything to say.

sjy did good by backing up Sarah and even citing where she got the evidence from.

Greg gave Courtney a good question to give him a better understanding what she said.

Shelby did a good job by observing the picture and saying good reasoning to back her evidence up

people need to project there volume and stop saying like and um.

Greg did really good by adding where sky gt here evidence from.

Courtney final thought was very good. and it got every body thinking.

Josh Melendez

2019-05-21 12:16:32 UTC

nick shared inquiry 2

2019-05-21 12:16:35 UTC

good volume

good question from Greg. nice questioning from greg to Courtney

good statement from Courtney

lots of pauses

good evidence from shelby

Josh Melendez group 2

2019-05-21 12:18:23 UTC

Bella stared of with a good claim proving that Squanto helped them.

Good backfire by Courtney and mice job citing your evidence.

Shelby also cited her evidence which was agreeing with Bella.

Sarah has a good point and she has good evidence to back up her point.

Skye had a good question. Good job Greg and Courtney answering that question.

Good job Sarah talking about the disease.

Good job Skye backing up Sarah.

Greg had a good question[ for Courtney.

Courtney has a good point saying that the English men went up with more men. She said something similar to what I said.

Courtney Weir

2019-05-22 17:20:56 UTC

FIRST INQUIRY: Absent
SECOND INQUIRY: Participating
THIRD INQUIRY:

April started off with a really strong claim and good evidence

Kylie uses I agree, a good transition word

Grayson didn't cite his source

Joe used a good inference and he didn't just use I agree

Nick asked a question when he didn't understand something and he didn't just let the conversation keep going

April did a good job answering nicks question

Alex used evidence but didn't  cite his source

Nick keeps asking questions and isn't giving any evidence or reasoning

Kylie is using her research document to read her evidence pieces

Good volume from Kylie and April

Anthony hasn't said anything

joe uses his source and cites it with names and dates

Kylie is adding on to others ideas

Anthony has pretty good volume and used evidence but he didn't cite the text

April is citing sources for her evidence and reasoning. good eye contact

everyone is not just reading straight from their computers

Kylie is adding on to Aril

April is clarifying her confusion very well

Grayson is repeating what he said before

Anthony needs to speak up a bit but he used good eye contact

People were using great sentence starters

Nick is talking really quietly

April tried to find an overall thought of the group. using good words

April did well clarifying her thoughts

Joe and Grayson are just inferring

Anthony is going back to add onto others ideas and he is using background knowlege

April is changing the subject and not keeping it the same the whole time

Greg (3rd)

2019-05-22 17:22:19 UTC

- Great start from April. Makes great point stating the claim.

- Kylie making great point.

- Grayson agrees with good reasoning

- Nick dosen't understand the point by Joe's statement.

- Nick isn't even using a PC and still asking questions to Joe.

- Grayson makes good points from different sources.

- Kylie clarifies the sources.

Anna (Shared Inquiry #3)

anna_martinez4 — 2019-05-22 17:22:22 UTC

April stated her claim and backed it up with evidence right away

I can hear everyone talking loud and clear

I particurally don't like how everyone argued about who would go first in the beginning

Grayson could probably do better if he didn't stutter

I like how everyone is speaking evenly and giving other people a chance to talk, although, Anthony could speak up a little

I like how people are stating where their evidence came from

They're pronouncing Wampanog wrong

Anthony could speak a bit louder

I think everyone except Anthony, Alex and Nick have really good volume

An excellent question to think about from Joe

Everyone is using extremely good evidence and explaining their thinking with very good reasoning

I really like how Joe has invited Nick into the discussion. Same goes for April who did the same

Nick needs to speak up

I like how Anthony got and invitation into the discussion and immediately took it and started a new chain in the conversation

Skye R. (3rd Group)

2019-05-22 17:23:03 UTC

Great start, April! good use of text evidence and using sources.

Kylie, good use of 'I agree.'

Same thing with Grayson, good use of 'I agree.'

Nick says "I don't quite understand how that relates to the question" and Grayson immediately responds to him.

Good use of saying what source you used, Grayson.

'Adding onto Grayson..' I like that Alex added onto what Grayson said.

Nice use of text evidence, Kylie.

Brief moment of two people trying to speak at once, however whoever the other person talking was let April speak over them.

I like how Alex said "I see what your saying but.." and asks a good question.

Joe did a great job of asking Anthony if he had anything he needed to say, since Anthony hadn't spoken yet. However maybe he should have raised his voice a little bit more.

April needs to not pause as much when she speaks, however she had a good response.

Very long pause.

Josh m 3rd group.

2019-05-22 17:25:37 UTC

April has a good start and good evidence backing up her claim.

Kylle also has a good claim and Grayson does a good job backing up Kyle.
good job grayson with backfire on Nick although nick had a good question.

Good job alex backing up nick.

Joe did a good job with his evidence without studering.

This hole group is doing a good job not studering.
Alex just had a great question.

Grayson is doing a great job so is Kyle.

Good efort anthony.

Alex and Anthony have a good point about the weapons.

Over all everybody did a great job.

Jake Hopkins 3rd group

2019-05-22 17:26:39 UTC

April starts off with a very good claim with evidence and a good source to back her up.

Grayson did a very good job by answering nicks question and backing his evidence up.

Alex did good on backing up Grayson and giving a source and even explaining what he meant.

Grayson is doing a very good job with saying were he got all his evidence from.

Joe very good on when he explained what he thought and he also did good when he gave more reasoning to back up the main claim.

i think that people are doing a good job on how they are letting other people talk.

Anthony and Alex did good job on explaining what they think what happened.

Alex did good on countering on what somebody thought because he used his reasoning and evidence to back him up.

nick should of talked a little more and went off of the people.

Megan Hughes (THIRD)

2019-05-22 17:26:41 UTC

April used a strong claim that was supported with evidence from a good source.

Joe had a good infrence on how things affected the outcome.

Nick had a good question that was also answerd well by Grayson.

Grayson and Kylie are using good evidence that is supporting their claim.

I like how Alex jumped in once Joe was done and asked a good question.

Joe keeps using good evidence to add on to what people are saying.

I like how April brought he confusion into the conversation.

Also I like how Joe keeps bring people back into the conversation so they have a chance to share their thoughts. this goes for Grayson too.

April and Joe are using good eye contact when somebody is speaking.

I like how some people are respectfully disagreeing with others.

I like how everyone is making relevent infrences.

I like how people are explaining by using the word "because."

I like how April just changed the idea of the conversation to probally make everyone more intrested in talking and getting involved.

I like hoe April kind of started to close the conversation by asking the group for final thoughts.

Maya Shared Inquiry #3

2019-05-22 17:29:22 UTC

April starts off with a strong claim, states evidence adn cites it, also includes natives

kyle agres with april and shares her resoning for that

grayson agrees with both kylie and april with a peice of evidence

joe agrees with grayson

nicks asks how this evidence relates to the original question

grayson confirms how that evidece connects back to the question

kylie

alex

everyone seems to have a good volume

april shares a peice of evidence and her reasoning

grayson agrees with april and shares evidence

joe shares evidence with a source and his reasoning

kylie

joe invites in anthony to speak

anthony share a peice of evidence but does not share a source or cite that evidence

grayson

april

hoes states a pice of evidence and cites where he got it from and his questions/reasoning about it

grayson shaers that he agrees but also shares a peice of evidence and his reasoning/thoughts

kylie

april shares confusion in source 3

Sarah Bollacke (3rd)

2019-05-22 17:31:22 UTC

Good volume April
Grayson that’s really only one source that doesn’t make sense to me
I really don’t understand what grayson is saying, because he doesn’t give the clearest source
Good eye contact April
I like how you all aren’t just reading off your paper, but you are speaking your mind.
Good job Alex, giving a respectful disagreement
Good point Kyle about them being friendly when it wasn’t disingenuous.
What does the idea of the English bringing slaves into the country have to do with your point Grayson, you didn’t connect it.
Good connection April to the transatlantic slave trade
Good question joe
Wait, how do you agree with a question with two choices Grayson?
It’s one sided because of the different views and because they are only one person, Grayson.
Good question April, it’s good that you have a question that can provoke thoughts
We know that the English didn’t give their land back, so why is it an opinion
April points out that Columbus was greedy
What method, Grayson? Because she cited evidence not a method.
Good point nick
Good job for clarifying
It’s a little hard to hear everyone, the volume is declining
The English did not bring guns because they were basically run away from England, so that’s not right. It doesn’t add up what you’re saying Grayson.the war didn’t just happen, I think there was definitely a conflict before the war because war doesn’t just happen.
Kylie made a good point by showing how they encouraged peace and not conflict, but how they saw things differently which made things hard on both things
Why are you assuming the worst of the natives Anthony?
Yes Alex, it was not one sided with the leaving weapons behind to meet.
Kylie that’s good showing that they were both afraid of each other.
Grayson...you just cut April off and it was a little rude
Yes Kylie, they needed each other, because the natives helped them through the winter and the English helped the natives in other ways.
Thank you Alex for asking to clarified
Yes Alex they were immune.
Yes Kylie I don’t think either of them were comfortable with each other towards the war.
Thank you April for asking for an overview of the discussion
Good point joe.

2019-05-23 12:14:17 UTC