# data[].attributes.body
kebakaran ruma
A. Ramai orang merokok di tempa sembarangan
B.batang rokok bolel membakar tempta itu
C. seseiapa yang suka merokok akan senang jatu sakit
D. di tempat awan

# data[].attributes.body
Pengetahuan:
A:nyamuk zika boleh kasih kita demam,ruam,sakit sendi dan mata merah
B:nyamuk zika boleh peyebaran bila-bila masa
C:sesiapa yang pakai pakaian yang pendek
D:Dimana-mana
BA:Nyamuk gigat
M:untuk kasi darah kita kepada anaknya.

Impak
Kebaikan:mereka dapat kasih darah kepada anaknya
Keburukan:kita boleh  rasa penyakit zika.

Cara-cara:
Individu:kita boleh menjaga diri sendiri
Sekolah:guru-guru boleh menajar kita tentang zika virus.
Masyarakat:Boleh membuat campaign tentang ini.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Zika virus spreads to Singapore and South East Asia

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
CNN's Kristie Lu Stout speaks to Dr. Peter Piot, who co discovered Ebola, on the spread of Zika in Asia.

# data[].attributes.headline
Balqis & Aisyah    Pengetahuan:                               A:Mereka tidak mengunakan lampu trafik yang harus diikuti.                                B:Bila-bila                                    C:Orang dewasa,orang tua,remaja                              D:Di lampu trafik    BA:Meneguh mereka atau memberi nasihat.           M:Hati-hati apabila hendak melintas jalan raya.  Impak:Ramai akan mencederaka diri. Ramai akan kesesakan jalan raya dan akan lambat untuk sekolah dan kerja                                             .Cara-cara:Pekara yang boleh dilakukan oleh individu untuk mengani kemalangan ialah mematuhi arahan lalu lintas.                                             Masyarakat:Mereka boleh membuat iklan bahawa orang boleh lagi faham agar mereka tidak boleh pe

# data[].attributes.subject
Balqis & Aisyah    Pengetahuan:                               A:Mereka tidak mengunakan lampu trafik yang harus diikuti.                                B:Bila-bila                                    C:Orang dewasa,orang tua,remaja                              D:Di lampu trafik    BA:Meneguh mereka atau memberi nasihat.           M:Hati-hati apabila hendak melintas jalan raya.  Impak:Ramai akan mencederaka diri. Ramai akan kesesakan jalan raya dan akan lambat untuk sekolah dan kerja                                             .Cara-cara:Pekara yang boleh dilakukan oleh individu untuk mengani kemalangan ialah mematuhi arahan lalu lintas.                                             Masyarakat:Mereka boleh membuat iklan bahawa orang boleh lagi faham agar mereka tidak boleh pe

# data[].attributes.body
Sekolah: Guru-guru boleh mengajar  murid - murid atau murid -murid boleh membuat iklan tentang melintas jalan .  https://www.aa.co.za/services/technical-services/legal-advice/legal-questions/what-is-defined-as-jaywalking-in-south-africaij-when-are-pedestrians-allowed-to-walk-on-a-roadij.html

# data[].attributes.body
Pengetahuan:
A:Mereka tidak mengikut langkah yang berikut.(Membuang sampah)
B: Bila-bila
C:Penduduk di kolong blok atau penduduk di Singapura.
D: Dimana-mana
BA: Mereka mengikut sikap orang yang buruk.
M: Sikap orang yang pemalas, dan pembersih di Singapura yang rajin untuk membersih sampah sekeliling kita.

Impak: Pelancong di luar negara akan fikir Singapura tidak menjaga negara yang sikap yang buruk.

Cara-cara:
■Individu: Kita harus bekerjasama untuk membersih sampah di Singapura dan di mana-mana tempat.
■Sekolah: Sekolah-sekolah harus melakukan ativiti mengutip sampah di pantai.
■Masyarakat: Menyiapkan program-program mengitar semula dengan murid-murid

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Follow Us: Twitter : http://twitter.com/Mulialeb Google Plus : http://plus.google.com/+AlmaTVAlueMangkiTV/posts Youtube : http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCCoTQ-DXDlCyZBC6t0Ppgvw?sub_confirmation=1 facebook: http://www.facebook.com/muliarahmat1234 Blog Video: http://tvaluemangki.blogspot.com jangan buang sampah sembarangan dampak negatif buang sampah sembarangan artikel dampak membuang sampah sembarangan terhadap lingkungan dampak membuang sampah sembarangan di sekolah dampak membuang sampah sembarangan di sungai akibat membuang sampah sembarangan di lingkungan sekolah cara mengatasi membuang sampah sembarangan solusi membuang sampah sembarangan

# data[].attributes.body
Pengetahuan:
a:pengguna basikal yang cuai.
b: bila bila masa
C:penunggang basikal remaja dan warga tua
D:di tempat sibuk yang ramai perjalan kaki .
BA: memberi penerangan tentang undang-undang jalan raya.
M: mereka hendak cepat pergi ke mana-mana

impak: tidak fokus di jalan raya boleh menyebabkan kemalangan

cara-cara:
individu: harus lebih berhati-hati dengan keadaan sekeliling.
Sekolah:harus memberi contoh yang baik dan memberi penerangan tentang keselamatan jalan raya.
masyarakat: ikut undang-undang yang telah disediakan.http://www.bhsi.org/crashes.htm

# data[].attributes.body
Pengetahuan:
A:nyamuk zika boleh kasih kita demam,ruam,sakit sendi dan mata merah
B:nyamuk zika boleh peyebaran bila-bila masa
C:sesiapa

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Zika virus spreads to Singapore and South East Asia

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
CNN's Kristie Lu Stout speaks to Dr. Peter Piot, who co discovered Ebola, on the spread of Zika in Asia.

# data[].attributes.body
Pengetahuan
A:Pemandu kereta di dalam video itu langgapemandu van.
B:bila-bila masa
C:Pemandu kereta di trafik
D:Di trafik
BA:pemandu itu memecut dan langga van
M:Mereka mahu pergi kerja dengan pantas saya rasa
Impak
Positive:Dia tidak dapat cedera diri
Negative:Kita boleh di saman dan pergi penjara
Cara-cara: berhati-hati dan lihat mana kita pergi

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Horrible Accident In Singapore SLE Expressway

# data[].attributes.body
Pengetahuan:
A: Kebakaran di Singaura.
B: Pada (17/3/2016).
C: SCDF monlong orang yang di dalam hotel itu.
D: Di(Hotel Mandarin Orchard)
BA: SCDF datang kerana ada orang menelefon mereka.
M: Sebab kebakaran .

Impak: Ia akan cederakan orang.

Cara-Cara: Saya kene berhati-hati apabila handal api.Saya kena beritahu kawan saya  berhati-hati apanila handal api.Buat brosur untuk masyarakat kita tahu.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
SINGAPURA - Sebanyak 350 tamu dievakuasi ketika api membakar dapur di lantai enam Hotel Mandarin Orchard, Singapura. Kebakaran itu terjadi pada Selasa 15 Maret 2016 malam waktu setempat.

Sebagaimana dilansir The Star, Kamis (17/3/2016), Garda Pertahanan Sipil Singapura (SCDF) menyatakan langsung mendapat laporan terjadi kebakaran tepat di hari kejadian sekira pukul 23.40.

Dikabarkan, SCDF bersama tim pemadam kebakaran (damkar) langsung mengirim dua mobil pemadam, dua kendaraan Red Rhino, dua ambulans, dan dua kendaraan bantuan.

Api yang membakar berbagai peralatan di dapur hotel tersebut berhasil dijinakkan dalam kurun 30 menit.

Pihak SCDF menuturkan, ada lima orang yang terluka akibat kebakaran tersebut, namun hanya satu yang dilarikan ke rumah sakit. Seorang pria berusia 69 tahun dibawa ke Singapore General Hospital karena mengalami luka di lengan kiri dan luka ringan di kepala.

Empat tamu yang juga terluka menolak dirawat di rumah sakit dan hanya mendapat perawatan ringan oleh tim medis di lokasi. Dikabarkan, pihak berwajib Singapura masih menyelidiki penyebab kebakaran ini.
(emj)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Hotel di Singapura Terbakar, 350 Tamu Dievakuasi : Okezone News

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
SINGAPURA - Sebanyak 350 tamu dievakuasi ketika api membakar dapur di lantai enam Hotel Mandarin Orchard, Singapura. Kebakaran itu terjadi pada Selasa 15 Maret 2016 malam waktu setempat. Sebagaimana dilansir The Star , Kamis (17/3/2016), Garda Pertahanan Sipil Singapura (SCDF) menyatakan langsung mendapat laporan terjadi kebakaran tepat di hari kejadian sekira pukul 23.40.

# data[].attributes.body
Pengetahuan:
A:Penduduk Singapura telah membuang sampah sarap sembarangan.
B: Bila-bila sahaja.
C: Penduduk-penduduk Singapura, juga pelancong, kerana terikut sikap yang dilakukan.
D: Dimana-mana sahaja.
BA :Ia diikuti sikap manusia yang kurang beradab kerana melanggar undang-undang.
M: Ini berlaku kerana sikap pemalas, dan tidak mempunyai kasihan kepada orang-orang yang mengutip sampah, itu adalah kerja mereka kerana tidak mempunyai pelajaran yang tinggi. Juga, mereka amat letih akan bekerja untuk mencari duit.

Impak: Ini boleh menjejaskan nama baik Singapura kerana pelancong tidak suka akan negera yang kotor.

Cara-Cara:
Induvidu: Kita harus bekerjasama supaya negera kita bersih dan cantik.
Sekolah: Melakukan akitivti mengitar semula barang yang boleh dikitar, seperti, botol, surat khabar, plastik dan banyak lagi.
Masyarakat: Menyiapkan program yang bermakna buat semua dengan mengitar semula bersama.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
"What do you think happens to the rubbish when you throw it out into the street?" asks the Mighty Boosh's great realist Howard Moon.

"I don't know, does it dissolve in the rain like a giant Berocca?" replies Shoreditch everyman Vince Noir.

Inconveniently, however, those black bags endure. In the UK half of all household waste, tens of millions of tonnes ends up on the tip face. Waste management processes, such as recycling, have been developed to cut down on landfill and the EU's recycling targets mean that countries that do not meet their reduction targets may be punished. In order to meet these ambitions many countries (especially in northern Europe) have clambered just one rung above landfill by burning instead of burying.

But technological developments and behavioural changes are bringing us to the brink of a world in which we not only stop burying our everyday gremlins, but dig up those of yesterday and turn them into useful stuff. Where methane-belching landfill sites are replaced by high-tech processing plants that turn trash into building materials, electricity and gas. It seems impossible but a waste-free society could be just around the corner.

The end of incineration?

There are a number of reasons why incineration is one of the least preferred measures of waste disposal, not least because it is inefficient. Typical waste incinerators are 5-10% less efficient than fossil fuel power stations. Incinerators also create their own problematic waste by-products.

British company Advanced Plasma Power (APP) claim to have a solution that is clean, efficient and creates almost no by-products. Their demonstration plant in Swindon is trialling a process that could eventually transform landfill and incineration into memories of a wasteful past.

The APP plant sorts recyclables from general waste, then shreds the leftovers and dries them in an oven. The dehydrated pellets are then put into a cylinder called a fluid bed gasifier, which sounds like something I just made up, but they assure me it is real. There is a bed of sand in the chamber that, when hit by jets of steam and oxygen becomes "fluidised". The highly energetic sand breaks apart the molecular bonds in the rubbish, leaving behind a gas which is mostly hydrogen and carbon monoxide, but also contains ash and other complicated organic materials. This gas is then fed into a compartment where it is essentially hit with a lightning bolt. The massive electrical charge turns it into plasma. This separates out the impurities creating a clean stream of gas as well as a stable, vitrified substance that holds all the potentially nasty heavy metals, APP call it Plasmarok. The UK Environment Agency has approved Plasmarok as a safe material for use as a building aggregate.

A typical plant will process up to 170,000 tonnes of rubbish each year, which is about the same amount collected by Manchester city council in 2012. This would create enough gas to generate 20MW of electricity. The process will use 5MW. The net gain of electricity means a plant could power 6750-9000 homes. Around 20,000 tonnes of aggregate will also be created.

Electricity generation is only one potential use for the end products. The gas could also be fed directly into the national grid. Or used to create hydrogen, which may well be the gas of the future if hydrogen cars become an everyday reality.

But the company has so far failed to get rid of waste entirely. Around 1,000 tonnes of ash that is currently untreatable is produced and will have to go into a sealed landfill site. The company says it is working on uses for this as well.

The challenge for this type of technology is to become self-sustaining. APP's chief executive officer Rolf Stein says the potential income streams are "endless". He says the process "already offers better returns to investors than conventional technologies [ie incinerators] and this will only increase as the downstream processing options and relevant markets are further developed". The economic case is aided by the payments for which plants would be eligible for diverting waste from landfill.

But William Neale, a member of the European Commission's (EC) environment cabinet, says one of the problems for incinerators has been that they bind countries into burning waste rather than developing new ways to recycle.

"Once you build incinerators, they are there for 50 years or so and you have to feed the monster." Zero Waste Europe's associate director Mariel Vilella says this technology is no different, describing it as a red herring. "Even if this was safe, would it be sensible to spend so much money in destroying resources that ought to be shared with future generations?" A project in Belgium, where old rubbish is actually being dug up, may provide a way for this waste to energy to coexist with recycling.

Digging up the old

Historic landfill is full of useful rubbish, buried before we had the ability or inclination to recycle it. At the Remo landfill site in Flanders, trials have been successfully conducted to show the potential for digging up old waste and separating out material we can use. Around 45% of the buried material is estimated to be reusable. Millions of tonnes of glass, ceramics, ferrous and non-ferrous metals, plastics, paper, wood and textiles lie below, awaiting resurrection. The left overs can be used to generate energy.

Neale says the process is close to being economically viable. "Waste is becoming, in certain circumstances, so valuable that you could actually consider going in to old landfill."

Last month, the European commission granted permission for APP to build a plant at the Remo site. The Enhanced Landfill Mining Consortium (ELMC), a cooperate initiative between APP and other companies, is now seeking investment of €50m-55m (£40m-£44m) for the project. They expect to be operating by 2016.

The big advantage of landfill mining for the energy making process is that it scales it up hugely, enhancing the economic potential. The amount of waste coming in from local municipal and industrial rubbish is nothing compared to how much of it is already under our feet. There are an estimated 150,000-500,000 landfill sites in Europe, holding billions of tonnes of rubbish. The Remo site alone holds 16.5 million tonnes. The ELMC say this would make a plant viable for around 30 years. After this the site could be regenerated. If the process was installed across Britain, APP says it could supply 20% of the country's gas.

Divide and conquer

Also being trialled at the Remo site is the separation and temporary storage of rubbish. Tom Jones from the ELMC says "this is basically a way to store certain fractions [of waste] which are not yet recoverable today, but we do not want to incinerate them today, so we want to keep them in such a way that we can recover them in the near future". One example is the storage of asbestos, which can be vitrified in an APP plant, turning the old hazard into a safe building material. This only way to make this process cost-effective, however, is to have a large amount of asbestos stored up.

Again, the issue is cost. But Jones says building up large caches of homogenous waste that can be easily dug up will eventually make these approaches possible. Although the approach makes sense in theory, Neale says the EC has concerns about it expanding. "The difficulty that we have legally is that we don't want to create loopholes. Because although the organisations that are doing it now have got very good reasons for wanting to develop this temporary storage idea, it might be used by others as a loophole to get around the targets for reducing landfill, if they can say 'oh it isn't landfill, it's temporary storage'."

Technology good, people better

In the end though, people's behaviour is by far the biggest factor governing how much waste we produce, says Vilella. "To reach waste prevention targets, you need to think of social innovation, not technology innovation." Reduce, reuse, recycle is a familiar adage. But there are very few places in the world that actually do it well.

Primarily, people must be encouraged to reduce how much they throw away, either through smarter consumption or reuse. The impact of correct recycling processes can also be enormous. But Vilella says people must be motivated to be involved.
In the Italian town of Capannori, this motivation came from a threat. In 2005, 60% of the town's trash was going to landfill. Residents were told an incinerator would be built in order to burn the excess for energy. Knowing incinerators can produce harmful emissions, locals mobilised against the development. By educating the public and providing a rigid schedule for separate waste collection the town managed significantly reduce total levels of collected rubbish and now operates a recycling rate of 80-90%.

"The successful results of zero waste towns in southern Europe can be reproduced in any municipality across Europe," says Vilella. "The key is to set up a new direction away from landfills and incinerators and invest in flexible systems that allow to continuously reduce the waste that cannot be recycled or composted."

Zero waste?

A society with almost no waste is coming. But can we get to zero waste? Joe Ross, director of the Biorenewables Development Centre in York, says we are heading in the right direction and a world of very little waste is conceivable. But zero might be a stretch. "It's a journey we are all on. When it will happen and to what degree it will happen is very difficult to know. Whether we can get down to zero, that's a very challenging target."

But Iain Gulland, the director of Zero Waste Scotland, says the idea of zero waste is not so much about how much ends up in landfill, as how much is unnecessarily wasted. "Zero waste is fundamentally about a change of mindset. It's about seeing all the materials circulating in our economies as resources, not waste, and keeping them in a high-value state for as long as possible. Based on that understanding, zero waste is absolutely achievable.

The end of waste is not a story about technology riding in on a white horse to save us from drowning in our own unavoidable filth. It is remarkable that in the UK, where landfill space is rapidly running out, the municipal recycling rate was just 43.2% last year. With clever social projects, towns such as Capannori have doubled this in less than a decade. As it turns out, the best technology is already available to us.
Interested in finding out more about how you can live better? Take a look at this month's Live Better Challenge here. The Live Better Challenge is funded by Unilever; its focus is sustainable living. All content is editorially independent except for pieces labelled advertisement feature. Find out more here.
* This article was amended on 13 June 2014 to remove an incorrect reference to "the EU's landfill tax"; there are EU recycling targets but the landfill tax is a UK tax. The earlier version of the article also erred in describing William Neale as a British MEP.
Topics

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Rubbish futures: can technology help us reach zero waste?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
"What do you think happens to the rubbish when you throw it out into the street?" asks the Mighty Boosh's great realist Howard Moon. "I don't know, does it dissolve in the rain like a giant Berocca?" replies Shoreditch everyman Vince Noir. Inconveniently, however, those black bags endure.

# data[].attributes.body
Pengetahuan:
A: Meningkatkan budaya kerja yang lebih baik, serta menerapkan kesedaran tentang betapa pentingnya amalan keselamatan semasa melakukan kerja amali di dalam bengkel. ii. Memberikan sumbangan kepada tenaga pengajar yang terlibat sebagai garis panduan dalam mempertingkatkan lagi peraturan-peraturan dan amalan keselamatan sedia ada dan seterusnya membimbing pelajar mengamalkan budaya kerja yang selamat. iii. Memberikan sumbangan dan panduan kepada pihak Institut Kemahiran Belia Negara  dalam proses penambahbaikkan strategi pengendalian, penyelanggaran bengkel serta perancangan yang selamat.
B: Kemalangan boleh berlaku bila-bila masa sahaja.
C:Cara-cara untuk mengelakkan kemalangan kita harus berhati-hati di jalan raya.
D:Kita tidak harus membawak kenderaan dengan laju.
BA:Untuk memberkan pekerja lebih banyak insentif untuk mengamalkan langkah-langkah keselamatan yang betul di tempat kerja, kkita telaah kumpulkan ini 7 sebab-sebab biasa untuk memberikan contoh yang lebih baik mengenai punca kemalangan di tempat kerja adalah.
M:Kita harus mengikut peraturan jalan raya

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Kemalangan bas-treler, pemandu direman 4 hari

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Pemandu bas ekpress yang terbabit dalam kemalangan dengan trailer semasa menuruni bukit di batu 14, Jalan Jeli-Gerik awal pagi Jumaat direman empat hari. Menurut Ketua Polis Daerah Jeli, Deputi Superintendan Mohd Yusof Jaafar yang dihubungi Astro AWANI, ujian air kencing pemandu berusia 26 tahun itu positif dadah jenis meth.

# data[].attributes.body
Pengetahuan: Banyak orang yang tinggal di singapura telah membuang sampah sembarangan.
Impak: Boleh cedera udara kita dan lain.
Cara-cara: Buang sampah kami di tong sampah atau tong sampak kitar semula.

# data[].attributes.body
Pengetahuan:
A:Orang yang tidak mengunakan lampu isyarat bila menyeberang.
B:remaja dan dewasa.
C:penunggang basikal remaja dan warga emas.
D.berdekatan jalan raya.
BA:memberi nasihat untuk menolong mereka.
M:mereka tidak suka tunggu.

Impak:ramai orang akan cedera dan akan menjadi lambat untuk kereta lain untuk pergi ke destinasi mereka.
Cara-Cara
Induvidu:harus memakai peraturan Negara.
Sekolah:harus menajar murid-murid tentang pekara ini.
Masyarakat: mereka boleh membuka campaign untuk menajar orang

# data[].attributes.body
Pengetahuan:
a:pengguna basikal yang cuai.
b: bila bila masa
C:penunggang basikal remaja dan warga tua
D:di tempat sibuk yang ramai perjalan kaki .
BA: memberi penerangan tentang undang-undang jalan raya.
M: mereka hendak cepat pergi ke mana-mana

impak: tidak fokus di jalan raya boleh menyebabkan kemalangan

cara-cara:
individu: harus lebih berhati-hati dengan keadaan sekeliling.
Sekolah:harus memberi contoh yang baik dan memberi penerangan tentang keselamatan jalan raya.
masyarakat: ikut undang-undang yang telah disediakan.

# data[].attributes.body
Pengetahuan:
A:Orang yang tidak mengunakan lampu isyarat bila menyeberang.
B:bila-bila masa.
C:remaja dan dewasa.
D:berdekatan jalan raya.
BA:Memberi mereka nasihat untuk menolong mereka.
M:mereka malas untuk tunggu lampu isyarat.
Impak:ramai orang akan cereda dan akan menjadi lambat untuk kereta lain untuk pergi ke destinasi mereka.
Cara-cara
Individu:kita  harus memakai lampu isyarat.
Sekolah:guru-guru akan menasihatkan kami untuk menyeberang jalan raya.
Masyarakat:mereka boleh buat program untuk lampu isyarat

# data[].attributes.body
Pengetahuan:
A:Mereka tidak mengunakan lamou isyarat bila mereka mahu  menyeberang.
B:Bila bila masa.
C:Orang tua, dewasa, remaja.
D:Di lampu trafik.
BA:Menasihati mereka yang menyeberang sembarangan.
M:Ia berlaku kerana mereka tidak mahu tunggu lama lama untuk menyeberang.
Impak:Ramai orang akan cedera kerana dilanggar oleh kereta.
Cara cara:
I:Kita boleh menasihati satu sama lain untuk mengunakan lampu isyarat.
S:Sekola boleh mengajar kita untuk jadi lebih berselamat di jalan raya.
M:Masyarakat boleh menolong membuat berita untuk akibat orang tidak mengunakkan lampu isyarat.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
SINGAPORE - A 21-year-old navy personnel was killed in a car accident along Changi Coast Road on Friday (July 29) morning.

Five others in their 20s to 30s, who are from the Navy, were injured in the accident. They were admitted to Changi General Hospital, and two of them remained unconscious.

The Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) said it was alerted to the accident, which occurred near the Changi Airbase and Changi Naval Base, at 6.35am.

Mr Yukio Matsuo, 21, who was killed in the accident, was the driver of the Subaru SUV which crashed into a tree, according to evening daily Lianhe Wanbao. He was trapped in the vehicle and had to be extricated using hydraulic rescue tools. He was pronounced dead at the scene by paramedics.

Mr Matsuo, whose father is Japanese and mother, a Singaporean, had apparently been driving his mother's car.

The family's domestic helper described Mr Matsuo as calm and someone who enjoyed spending time at home with his family, said the Lianhe Wanbao report.

According to Mr Matsuo's Facebook profile, he was a student of St Joseph's Institution and had studied marine and offshore technology at Ngee Ann Polytechnic. He started working at the Republic of Singapore Navy last year.

SCDF said it dispatched one fire engine, one red rhino, five ambulances and two support vehicles to the accident scene. Police investigations are ongoing.

A video of the accident was uploaded by Facebook user Noor Iskhandear, showing the scene as he was travelling on an SBS bus.

Multiple road traffic accidents have occurred along Changi Coast Road towards Nicoll Drive over the years, several of which have been fatal.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Navy personnel killed, 5 others injured in accident on Changi Coast Road

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
SINGAPORE - A 21-year-old navy personnel was killed in a car accident along Changi Coast Road on Friday (July 29) morning. Five others in their 20s to 30s, who are from the Navy, were injured in the accident. They were admitted to Changi General Hospital, and two of them remained unconscious.

# data[].attributes.body
Pengetahuan:
A:Mereka tidak mengikut langkah yang berikut.(Membuang sampah)
B: Bila-bila
C:Penduduk di kolong blok atau penduduk di Singapura.
D: Dimana-mana
BA: Mereka mengikut sikap orang yang buruk.
M: Sikap orang yang pemalas, dan pembersih di Singapura yang rajin untuk membersih sampah sekeliling kita.

Impak: Pelancong di luar negara akan fikir Singapura tidak menjaga negara yang sikap yang buruk.

Cara-cara:
■Individu: Kita harus bekerjasama untuk membersih sampah di Singapura dan di mana-mana tempat.
■Sekolah: Sekolah-sekolah harus melakukan ativiti mengutip sampah di pantai.
■Masyarakat: Menyiapkan program-program mengitar semula dengan murid-murid

# data[].attributes.body
Pengetahuan:
A:Mereka tidak mengunakan lampu trafik yang harus diikuti.
B:Bila-bila
C:Orang dewasa,orang tua,remaja
D:Di lampu trafik
BA:Meneguh mereka atau memberi nasihat.
M:Hati-hati apabila hendak melintas jalan raya.

Impak:Ramai akan mencederaka diri. Ramai akan kesesakan jalan raya dan akan lambat untuk sekolah dan kerja.

Cara-cara:Pekara yang boleh dilakukan oleh individu untuk mengani kemalangan ialah mematuhi arahan lalu lintas.

Masyarakat:Mereka boleh membuat iklan bahawa orang boleh lagi faham agar mereka tidak boleh perkara itu

# data[].attributes.body
Pegetahuan:
•Apa: Mereka tidak gunakan langkah yang harus mereka diikuti.
•Bila:Berjuta-juta tahun.
•Siapa-Siapa:Orang India,melayu, maksaleh dan ramai lagi.
• Di mana:Di lampu trafik.
•BA: Menasihati mereka atau teguh mereka.Kalau mereka tidak mahu dengar, cakap bye-bye.
•M: Lebih baik hati-hati apabila awak di jalan raya.

▪Impak:Ramai orang telah menyebabkan kemalangan
▪Cara-cara:Jangan jadi orang yang pemalas dan ikut peraturan.
▪Sekolah:Dalam kelas kita harus bagai aur dengan tebing.
▪Masyarakat:Buat poster bahawa orang boleh mengetahui dan boleh faham agar mereka tidak buat perkara itu semula lagi.

# data[].attributes.body
7 penyebab kemalangan di kerja.

Pengetahuan:
A: Pekerja tidak mengambil langkah-langkah bekerja.
B: Bila-bila sahaja.
C: Siapa-siapa sahaja asalkan di tempat kerja.
D: Dalam mana-mana tempat kerja yang memerlukan barang dimuatkan berat.
BA: Untuk memberkan pekerja lebih banyak insentif untuk mengamalkan langkah-langkah keselamatan yang betul di tempat kerja, kkita telaah kumpulkan ini 7 sebab-sebab biasa untuk memberikan contoh yang lebih baik mengenai punca kemalangan di tempat kerja adalah.
M: Ia adalah lebih baik untuk berhati-hati 100 kali daripada untuk mendapatkan dibunuh sekali.

Impak:
80 daripada 100 kemalangan yang berlaku di tempat kerja adalah akhirnya kesalahan orang yang terlibat dalam kejadian itu.

Cara-cara:
Individu: Tidak terlalu malas dan mengikuti langkah-langkah keselamatan dan peraturan.
Sekolah: Sebagai satu kelas keseluruhan kami boleh membantu antara satu sama lain dengan mengingatkan mereka untuk mengikuti peraturan yang guru telah diberikan.
Masyarakat:
Sebagai satu masyarakat kita boleh menyumbang untuk menjaga dan membantu pada yang lain supaya seluruh masyarakat akan mengikuti dan akan menyampaikan kepada orang lain secara berterusan.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Untuk perbincangan minggu ini, secara berpasangan cari sebuah artikel, video, atau audio dan bincangkan topik yang diketengahkan dengan menggunakan kaedah P.I.C.

2. Video atau audio yang dipilih harus berunsur sopan dan tidak melebihi 5 minit.

3. Kaedah P.I.C

Pengetahuan: Apakah yang kamu lihat dalam vido klip tersebut? Terangkan.

Impak: Apakah kesan-kesan daripada isu yang cuba diketengahkan dalam video tersebut

Cara-cara: Apakah perkara yang boleh dilakukan oleh pihak Individu, Sekolah, Masyarakatuntuk menangani isu tersebut.

4. Respon kamu harus melebihi 6 potong ayat.