# data[].attributes.body
i think he was a good leader of Rome he lead it to the better and he helped with taxes and restored peace for a good while

# data[].attributes.body
I think Augustus was a good leader for Rome. He gave people things from his own supply, he helped with taxes, he shared emperor with the senate and he did not become dictator.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Octavian Augustus was a good leader. He did not accept dictatorship. And he restored peace to the sea from pirates. He made peace restored. Also, Validity was restored to the laws.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that Augustus was a good leader for the most part. I believe this because he gave people things from his own supply.

# data[].attributes.body
i think augustus is a good leader cause when the taxs fell he gave money to people

# data[].attributes.body
I believe Augustus was one of Romes best leaders. he gave resources money men to those in need. he lead many successful military campaigns. did not accept the role of dictator. and established pax romana.

# data[].attributes.body
Augustus was a good leader. He fit the role for a good emperor. He shared the senate, extended land in Rome, helped with taxes, and he followed his own rules.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Octavian Augustus is a good leader for Rome. Everyone loved him and they kept voting for him to stay. He shared emperor with the senate and he did the more dangerous jobs. He also paid the town for fields and gave out money from his own supply.

# data[].attributes.body
Octavian Augustus was a TERRIBLE LEADER. He was good at fighting, and all of that stuff. And he did good stuff for Rome and improved Rome, BUT AT WHAT COST!?!?!?!?!
That is the real question here. Like for example, He took over Egypt, most likly slaughtering a ton of people there, and I just do not like him

# data[].attributes.body
Augustus was a good leader for Rome. He provided resources to his people and he punished the men who slaughtered his father.

# data[].attributes.body
Augustus was a good leader of Rome. He appealed to Roman citizens by claiming that he led a frugal and modest life. Augustus reorganized Roman life throughout the empire. Augustus helped facilitate many reforms, including new buildings, the Praetorian Guard, a police force, and fire brigade.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that overall, Augustus was a good leader for Rome. Augustus got revenge on the people who killed his father, he never accepted dictatorship, he gave out contributions of grain and money, he preserved the nations he conquered, he added Egypt to the rule of the Roman people, he restored peace to the seas, and paid for the fields and farms. These are all things a good leader would do for people.

# data[].attributes.body
Augustus was a good leader he gave the citizens what they needed in the times they needed it and helped out a lot of things in Rome he was nice and generous but also strict and controlling enough to actually Rule over Rome

# data[].attributes.body
I think he was a good leader. Augustus had exiled that murders of his dad. He also restored peace and the senate liked him because he was nice to them.

# data[].attributes.body
i think Augustus is a mix of both good and bad because while he does bad things he then does good to make up for the bad

# data[].attributes.body
He was a bad leader because some people might go into a serious revolt. On the back of the coin it means egypt captured. He forbids people to use such flattering terms even among themselves.

# data[].attributes.body
He was not a good leader. Even though have gave resources to people, he was controlling and took over the republic.

# data[].attributes.body
he was a good leader because When he got offered dictatorship he did not take it When taxes fell he gave out money from his own supply sometimes to 100,000 men or more, He restored peace Validly was also restored Dignity to the senate, His people must have loved him because he was elected 5 times, He was so nice to his people and the senate by greeting everyone and calling them by their names He also convinced Gallus cerinnus not to commit suicide

# data[].attributes.body
I think he was a good leader because he shared the Empire with the Senate, he was not selfish most of his accomplishments were for the people of Rome. Augustus brought Peace, respect and loyalty to Rome.

# data[].attributes.body
Octavian Augustus was a good leader for Rome. He was able to be strict with his people, and had the ego to believe in himself to rule. Also, he seems like a good person in some ways, even though some of what he did was a bit too controlling.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that in general, Augustus was a good leader. He gave the people resources from his own supply, he refused the role as dictator, and he made sure that people's different religions and opinions were respected and protected.

# data[].attributes.headline
James Albright: Augustus was a bad leader

# data[].attributes.subject
James Albright: Augustus was a bad leader

# data[].attributes.body
He gave the Senate control of the weaker provinces, he kept voting for more terms to continue his rule, He conquered many lands just to expand the empire, a coin reads on the back side “Egypt Captured”.