# data[].attributes.body
These are actually tagged (!!) with different categories – so much nicer for navigational purposes. However, the previews of the images from before worked well and would have been a nice addition for this image cloud as well such that they were visible even before moving the cursor over the category

# data[].attributes.body
Gives a great overview and its a nice detail with a feeling of using a loop to search through the images. It is sad that you are redirected to a new page to read information about the image - it takes away the sense of "flowing" through the images

# data[].attributes.body
It is like an army of pictures which can be quite overwhelming but it has a search function and all of the images have descriptions which is really nice!

# data[].attributes.headline
The image cloud from T NM in Norway seem to invite you in a different way to explore the images in the clusters… On the other hand, there are no specific clusters or groupings that you are able to 'search' for or pin out. It is much more fluid, but also more confusing. 

# data[].attributes.subject
The image cloud from T NM in Norway seem to invite you in a different way to explore the images in the clusters… On the other hand, there are no specific clusters or groupings that you are able to 'search' for or pin out. It is much more fluid, but also more confusing. 

# data[].attributes.body
This is a lot more heavy for the computer to pull off and it takes a bit time for it to load the pictures. Further, it is more tricky to navigate in and does not have as many different navigation options which makes it hard to navigate in.

# data[].attributes.headline
It look much more manageable - it seems that there is a higher/better and more divided categorization 

# data[].attributes.subject
It look much more manageable - it seems that there is a higher/better and more divided categorization 

# data[].attributes.body
Found it a bit hard to find different themes, but once you picked one, it was very easy to navigate through. And there's a lot of information for each photo.

# data[].attributes.body
easier navigation, very nice and fast visualization, great resolution

# data[].attributes.headline
The Vikus viewer is arranged on a 2D-plane with text-oriented navigating that lets you find artefacts associated with each different key-word. It appears more comprehensible and easier to navigate

# data[].attributes.subject
The Vikus viewer is arranged on a 2D-plane with text-oriented navigating that lets you find artefacts associated with each different key-word. It appears more comprehensible and easier to navigate

# data[].attributes.body
In this cloud there are no colored images which makes it harder to distinguish between characteristics e.g. "women in grey" and "women in white"

# data[].attributes.body
There are many images on the page, which is very overwhelming to look at. You can click somewhere and it will zoom in on that image, but if you want to return to the big grid, tou have to scroll manually. It's just difficult. Takes a while to load the images so that you can actually see them.

# data[].attributes.body
must note that the collections included here are a lot more limited and thematic, therefore it is no surprise that their visualization is easier

# data[].attributes.body
The search function is such a nice addition for navigational purposes and exploration

# data[].attributes.body
The naming of the different 'categories' makes it easier to navigate throughout the cloud, but given that all the images are in black/white, it makes it difficult to distinguish between the images within the clusters. Especially when there are a lot of them.

# data[].attributes.body
Instead of being based in photos it is based in what appears in the photos.
When adding more tags to a search, the photos become less specific and less relevant to the individual tag.

# data[].attributes.body
A lot more text and categorization - easier to get an overview and understand why the images are in the same "cluster"

# data[].attributes.headline
The Categories are bunched up and grouped based on their context this time, with the labels and descriptions on each picture giving the AI categories it should prioritise. 

# data[].attributes.subject
The Categories are bunched up and grouped based on their context this time, with the labels and descriptions on each picture giving the AI categories it should prioritise. 

# data[].attributes.body
This also leads to images being in the same category that aren't visually similar at all

# data[].attributes.body
You can search for an artist and you can see a selection of artworks done by that artist, a timeline over the art and the different pieces devided into color.

# data[].attributes.body
Cool animations when clicking - perhaps a bit too cool? Takes the focus away from the actual image clusters. Worked better in the SMK one

# data[].attributes.body
It is interesting how it defines gender, and how it will cluster images of several people together. I wasnt able to find any false negatives either.

# data[].attributes.headline
The images are also placed in sections based on their colors, which makes it a bit more easier to navigate in compared to the other one.  

# data[].attributes.subject
The images are also placed in sections based on their colors, which makes it a bit more easier to navigate in compared to the other one.  

# data[].attributes.body
I prefer this cloud, over the one from exercise 1, since you can use the cluster to navigate, and then choice an area inside the cloud, which will then give you a normal overview of the images (see attached screenshots), portrayed with useful basic information.

# data[].attributes.body
It does not seem to be possible to click on one specific image and see it, you can only zoom in, but that makes the quality of the images poorer

# data[].attributes.headline
Easy navigation, but strictly chronological – makes you think chronologically and less explorative. Would be nice if you could decide for yourself if you wanted it by year, material, country, 'surprise me organisation' or others.

# data[].attributes.subject
Easy navigation, but strictly chronological – makes you think chronologically and less explorative. Would be nice if you could decide for yourself if you wanted it by year, material, country, 'surprise me organisation' or others.

# data[].attributes.body
For example, pictures of "launch" and "space station crew" are closely linked here without there being any real visual similarities between images

# data[].attributes.body
It is nice that is has information about the images but I still think image clouds like these seem messy and overwhelming

# data[].attributes.body
Gradual filtering, making it possible to create a more precise search premise and altering it as you go along

# data[].attributes.headline
Try to search for "milk" and see what comes up

# data[].attributes.subject
Try to search for "milk" and see what comes up

# data[].attributes.body
It is nice that when you search for something there are different options as "timeline", "color" and "grid" which it can cluster the search results in.

# data[].attributes.body
I like the circle tool for navigation in the cloud as well, since you can then specify where to go, and get the better "overview".

# data[].attributes.body
Didn't find many false negatives (only a few)

# data[].attributes.headline
Google Arts Experiment 1A VS The map Pixplot visualization. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Google Arts Experiment 1A VS The map Pixplot visualization. 

# data[].attributes.body
A field (landscape) of images (Google Arts Experiment 1A) VS a world map looking vizualization (Pixplot visualization).

The images are somewhat standing in Google Arts Experiment 1A, whereas they are laying down in the Pixplot visualization.

When standing they overlap like the Pixplot visualization when in the non-grid function (this is frustrating for the viewer).

Looks like the they have been clustered in the same way Google Arts Experiment 1A and in the Pixplot visualization using the function “represent UMAP clusters on a grid”.