# data[].attributes.body
I believe nature is more important than art because nature is the inspiration of art. Nature is realistic art. It is art without trying to be art. When someone makes art they are doing with some sort of underlying inspiration or idea, majority of the time coming from nature. They try to recreate something and nature is that something.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe subjectivity than objectivity because it is important to have an opinion than being biased. People who express their opinion are more educated in their claim because they know more about their argument. It is good to have an opinion because you can discuss with people how you feel about certain things. Being biased is disrespectful because you are not listening to the other side and just agreeing with another side.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that nature is more important than art because there wouldn’t be art without nature. Without nature we wouldn’t have the necessity’s of life such as air, water, food, etc. From the beginning art has been based around nature therefore nature has a more significant purpose.

# data[].attributes.body
Most of the things on this list I can't necessarily agree or disagree with. They all have a middle ground and you can't really just pick one or the other. For example, some of life's most puzzling questions can be answered through nature, but the answers to other questions will be found elsewhere. One thing can't have the answers to all the questions so most of these should have a somewhat agree or somewhat disagree.

# data[].attributes.body
“Dare to be” is good. Fighting for what you believe in is more importing than standing on the side line. I lot of people fight for what they believe in. What’s the point in believing or knowing something if you can’t fight for it.🤷🏽‍♀️

# data[].attributes.body
I think nature is more important than art, because without nature there is no art in my opinion. Usually art come from nature so there for nature is more important than art.

# data[].attributes.body
This activity seems fine. There isn't really much that I have to say about this other than that there should of been a neutral answer than agree or disagree.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with the statement, "Nature is more important than art." Art is a universal language between people. It's a way of expressing and sharing, and without art, there wouldn't be that connection between people. Sure, nature can be a common factor shared between people, but it cant go as in-depth with emotions as art because people aren't the creator of nature.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that nature is more important than art.Because nature made the world that we live and then after,art can created.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that experimental trial and error is better because you learn more from experience and failure more then you do always being right.

# data[].attributes.body
I think nature is way more important than art. Without nature we would not have this so called art to enjoy on a daily basis. Nature is the root to everything and everyone we know today in life.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe nature is more important than art, because all art that we have is based off of or inspired by nature in some way or another. Nature is also real life with detail and real affect and art is something created but is just a mock of nature or summary. When you are in nature or looking at it, it may make you feel different in a good way which art can do to but I don’t believe in the same way.

# data[].attributes.body
I most disagreed with “nature is more important than art” I feel like in a sense we wouldn’t really have nature without art. Nature would always exist, but through art forms we describe the world around us and our perception of what nature is, was led by past arts, something similar to the Age of Enlightenment, where realistic paintings were praised.

# data[].attributes.body
I decided on this one nature is more important then art since we look at nature all the time and experience it. With art it’s just a blank canvas while nature is so big and unique. While some may disagree I feel in my opinion this would be the case for me and the majority.

# data[].attributes.headline
Miles Josephson "Nature is better than art"

# data[].attributes.subject
Miles Josephson "Nature is better than art"

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the statement that nature is better than art. With art you are getting a small percentage of the whole picture. And with nature you can go outside and explore what it has to offer.

# data[].attributes.body
I chose to go over the statement "Experimental trial and error is a better process than the conventional scientific method". I believe that trial and error is more important because you learn better from your mistakes than when someone is telling you how it's done. It motivates people more when that see themselves fail rather than someone talking them what to do.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree that nature is more important than art because I think both are important and play a role in the other. I think art often uses inspiration from nature, so art can’t exist without also having nature. I also think art comes in many forms, like music, writing, and painting, so life wouldn’t be very worthwhile without it.

# data[].attributes.body
I most agreed with the statement “Knowledge is gained through gut reactions and subjective hunches rather than level headed, objective, deductive thoughts”.  I most agreed with this statement because as a person you learn from experiences rather than just reading and retaining knowledge.  Through experiences you learn feelings and you start to understand them which allows you to gain knowledge about the actions you’re doing and what you could do better.

# data[].attributes.body
You need both imagination and rational thought to create good art. You need passion in poetry, but also need it to make sense. It cant be a good quality piece if there isnt a balance of both imagination and rationality. Obviously both are important, but they cannot be the only thing involved in thinking.

# data[].attributes.body
I mostly disagreed with the first one because it shouldn’t matter where you live for u to have more knowledge. U living the the woods don’t be u the smartest person in the world. If u well educated then u well educated .. if not then you ain’t. Just because u live in the city with no nature. Doesn’t mean u have no knowledge of life to help other people out wit they life .

# data[].attributes.body
I think that “dare to be “ is a better battle-cry than “dare to know” because I believe that if you truly believe in something, then your actions should reflect that. I think that you should stand up for what you believe in and shouldn’t just tell people about it, but show them. This helps people understand what you believe.

# data[].attributes.body
* The answers to life’s most puzzling questions can be found through discussions with a simple person who lives in the country close to nature—not with a sophisticated, well-educated person from the city.
* The answer to life’s most puzzling questions can be found through a connection with nature.
* The use of one’s imagination is more important than rational thought.
* Subjectivity is more important than objectivity.
* Knowledge is gained through gut reactions and subjective hunches rather than level-headed, objective, deductive thought.
* Nature is more important than art.
* Experimental trial and error is a better process than the conventional scientific method.
* Poetry should be spontaneous and full of emotion, not planned and straightforward.
* Sensitivity, feelings, and spontaneity are more important than intellectualism.
* “Dare to be” is a better battle-cry than “dare to know.”

# data[].attributes.body
Hey guys! Please post a 3+ sentence response to the Romanticism anticipation guide we explored in class.  You should focus on the statement with which you most agreed with or most disagreed with regarding Romanticism.  I'm looking forward to reading your responses!