# data[].attributes.headline
Your boxes should look something like the one below for each court case. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Your boxes should look something like the one below for each court case. 

# data[].attributes.body
1. Date

2. Constitutional issue (posed as a question)

3. Decision (answer to question)

4. Votes for majority/dissenting opinion

# data[].attributes.body
Date: 1803
Questions: Which branch of government is most powerful?
Decision: They are all equal as this cases establishes the ability of the Supreme Court to determine the Constitutionality of a law
Votes: 4 majority
2 dissenting

# data[].attributes.body
At the end of each column provide an evaluation of what has changed or what has stayed the same over time for the given category.

# data[].attributes.body
Date: 1963
Questions: Did the Pennsylvania law requiring public school students to participate in religious exercises violate the first and fourteenth amendments, freedom of religion?
Decision: Public schools cannot do religious exercises.
Votes: 8 Majority–1 Dissenting

# data[].attributes.body
Date: 1986
Questions: Can a school district discipline a student for giving an inappropriate speech at a school assembly?
Decision: Yes, a school district can punish a student for using inappropriate and offensive language.
Votes: 7 Majority–2 Dissenting

# data[].attributes.body
Date: 1962
Questions: Can a school hold an optional prayer?
Decision: No, this violates the first amendment.
Votes: 6 Majority–1 Dissenting

# data[].attributes.body
Date: 2011
Questions: Can corporations assert personal privacy interests to prevent the government from releasing documents about them?
Decision: No, corporations do not have the right to personal privacy that would protect them from the government.
Votes: 8 Majority–0 Dissenting

# data[].attributes.headline
National Aeronautics and Space Administration v. Nelson

# data[].attributes.subject
National Aeronautics and Space Administration v. Nelson

# data[].attributes.body
Date: 2010-2011
Questions: Does the government violate a federal employee's right to privacy by asking questions about illegal drug usage in order to see if she is fit to work for a federal facility?
Decision: The government can continue asking these questions for federal jobs.
Votes: 8 Majority–0 Dissenting

# data[].attributes.body
Date: 1964
Questions: Does Alabamas libel law infringe on freedom of speech and press?
Decision: Yes, the person that the statement is about has to acknowledge its falsity in order for it to be an issue.
Votes: 9 Majority–0 Dissenting

# data[].attributes.body
Date: 1971-1973
Questions: Can a women terminate her baby by abortion?
Decision: Yes, except during the third trimester of pregnancy.
Votes: 7 Majority–2 Dissenting

# data[].attributes.body
Date: 2000
Questions: Can schools allow student led and initiated prayer?
Decision: No, schools can't allow public prayer even if it is led by students.
Votes: 6 Majority–3 Dissenting

# data[].attributes.body
Date: 1919
Questions: Did Schenck's conviction for criticizing the draft violate his right to free speech?
Decision: No, because the draft was exercising Congress' wartime authority.
Votes: 9 Majority–0 Dissenting

# data[].attributes.body
Date: 1993
Question: Did the Texas capital sentencing unconstitutionally prelude the jury from considering the petitioners young age in the punishment for the crime?
Decision: No, because the jury was asked to consider the probability that the convict would be a further threat to society.
Votes: 5 Majority–4 Dissenting

# data[].attributes.body
Date: 1968-1969
Questions: Does the prohibition of wearing armbands in a school as a sign of protest violate freedom of speech?
Decision: Yes, unless it interferes with the school day, students can wear items that represent their free speech.
Votes: 7 Majority–2 Dissenting

# data[].attributes.body
Date: 1997
Questions: Does banning assisted suicide violate the fourteenth amendment?
Decision: No, banning assisted suicide was meant to prevent the encouragement of suicide to terminally-ill patients.
Votes: 9 Majority–0 Dissenting

# data[].attributes.body
Over time, the defining characteristics of free speech have changed. Originally, free speech was just "you can say whatever you want as long as it's not illegal". But over time, this has changed. Now free speech is that you can't publicly disobey Congress during wartime. That you can publicly state false information about someone, as long as they don't say anything about it. As for public expression in schools, you can wear clothing as a sign of expression. But, you can't give inappropriate speeches or allow student-led prayer. In conclusion, freedom of speech hasn't necessarily changed over time, but more rules have been written surrounding it. Many of these rules seem pretty obvious, and like there should've never of had to have a court case for them. But, through these court cases, you can better see what is legal and illegal in the terms of free speech.

# data[].attributes.body
Privacy is a term that we all feel we deserve. Whether we are the worst of criminals, or the best of role models. Privacy is an unalienable right that ever human being deserves. Since the creation of the United States, the term "privacy" has greatly changed. Privacy seems like a simple term, as in "I can do what I want without being questioned". But, it's not all that simple. Privacy is a matter of whether you decide to have a child or not, if the government can question your usage of illegal drugs, the privacy of companies, and so much more. Privacy has always been there, but in the last century in particular, stricter rules and enforcements have been placed to allow citizens of the United States to have even greater privacy.

# data[].attributes.body
The United States was a country formed of religious freedom, and it only makes sense for it to be a country where you can choose your religion, or if you even have a religion. Particularly in schools, people were often forced to partake in a particular religion, whether they wanted to or not. Now, people are granted the freedom of being able to go to school as a member of any religion.

# data[].attributes.body
Civil Rights have been enforced and around for a long time. Although primarily the same, some important cases, such as Washington v. Glucksburg, occurred to clear up specific unalienable rights.

# data[].attributes.body
The Rights of the Accused have mostly remained the same. Accused people have always been treated pretty fairly and have been judged on whether they will be a further threat to society or not. Overall, the Rights of the Accused have always allowed them a fair and just trial.