# data[].attributes.body
JACOB SALAZAR - This article is objective because it states facts. It provides evidence from accredited professors and scientists.

# data[].attributes.body
This article does not express opinions  it only shows statistics. It also shows the causes and effects of global warming.
Patrick Thompson

# data[].attributes.body
This article is showing different parts of the world and how there has been so many changes.
Erika Ramos

# data[].attributes.body
The article gives facts about the climate and the different changes that has happened over time.- Ana Cabrera

# data[].attributes.body
This

# data[].attributes.body
This articles talks bout howthe facts show that by 2050 the world's climate will not exceed by 2'C and the green house effect will soon overtake the effects and systems in the world.

# data[].attributes.body
The article above talks about the results from Global Warming but doesn't state a personal belief.

# data[].attributes.body
https://news.stanford.edu/pr/00/000223schneiderAAAS.html
Emily Cruz- This article is subjective because it talks about debates. The debates talk about scientist and political leaders having their own opinion.

# data[].attributes.body
In this article, Nasa scientifically explains what is causing the Earth to have global warming. -Cindy Ballesteros

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Global Warming

Throughout its long history, Earth has warmed and cooled time and again. Climate has changed when the planet received more or less sunlight due to subtle shifts in its orbit, as the atmosphere or surface changed, or when the Sun's energy varied. But in the past century, another force has started to influence Earth's climate: humanity

How does this warming compare to previous changes in Earth's climate? How can we be certain that human-released greenhouse gases are causing the warming? How much more will the Earth warm? How will Earth respond? Answering these questions is perhaps the most significant scientific challenge of our time.

What is Global Warming?

Global warming is the unusually rapid increase in Earth's average surface temperature over the past century primarily due to the greenhouse gases released as people burn fossil fuels. The global average surface temperature rose 0.6 to 0.9 degrees Celsius (1.1 to 1.6° F) between 1906 and 2005, and the rate of temperature increase has nearly doubled in the last 50 years. Temperatures are certain to go up further.

Earth's natural greenhouse effect

Earth's temperature begins with the Sun. Roughly 30 percent of incoming sunlight is reflected back into space by bright surfaces like clouds and ice. Of the remaining 70 percent, most is absorbed by the land and ocean, and the rest is absorbed by the atmosphere. The absorbed solar energy heats our planet.

As the rocks, the air, and the seas warm, they radiate "heat" energy (thermal infrared radiation). From the surface, this energy travels into the atmosphere where much of it is absorbed by water vapor and long-lived greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide and methane.

When they absorb the energy radiating from Earth's surface, microscopic water or greenhouse gas molecules turn into tiny heaters- like the bricks in a fireplace, they radiate heat even after the fire goes out. They radiate in all directions. The energy that radiates back toward Earth heats both the lower atmosphere and the surface, enhancing the heating they get from direct sunlight.

This absorption and radiation of heat by the atmosphere-the natural greenhouse effect-is beneficial for life on Earth. If there were no greenhouse effect, the Earth's average surface temperature would be a very chilly -18°C (0°F) instead of the comfortable 15°C (59°F) that it is today.

See Climate and Earth's Energy Budget to read more about how sunlight fuels Earth's climate.

The enhanced greenhouse effect

What has scientists concerned now is that over the past 250 years, humans have been artificially raising the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere at an ever-increasing rate, mostly by burning fossil fuels, but also from cutting down carbon-absorbing forests. Since the Industrial Revolution began in about 1750, carbon dioxide levels have increased nearly 38 percent as of 2009 and methane levels have increased 148 percent.

The atmosphere today contains more greenhouse gas molecules, so more of the infrared energy emitted by the surface ends up being absorbed by the atmosphere. Since some of the extra energy from a warmer atmosphere radiates back down to the surface, Earth's surface temperature rises. By increasing the concentration of greenhouse gases, we are making Earth's atmosphere a more efficient greenhouse.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Global warming is happening now, and scientists are confident that greenhouse gases are responsible. To understand what this means for humanity, it is necessary to understand what global warming is, how scientists know it's happening, and how they predict future climate.

# data[].attributes.body
This article uses facts and a persuasive format to try and explain their side.
Patrick Thompson

# data[].attributes.body
Cesar Gutierrez- Written by the very famous news critic article, the New York Times take this subject into a very substantial environmental cause when it comes to the dangers of such a catastrophe.

# data[].attributes.body
JACOB SALAZAR - This article is subjective because it is all about the public's opinion. It is not persuasive.

# data[].attributes.body
Cesar- Written by researchers at Stanford, this shows how at practical times this will affect us in a way where it's not physical to us, but mental.

# data[].attributes.body
https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/GlobalWarming/page2.php
This article includes the risks and causes for global warming. There is graphs and they explain what happens and what forms.

# data[].attributes.body
The artile staes his personal beliefs about what science thinks Global warming my be doing to the Earth.

# data[].attributes.body
The objective article in the New York Times talks about how global warming impacts us. It includes the causes of global warming and how they all tie together

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Flooding along a highway near Grand Isle, La., in August. Scientists have now documented a record number of "nuisance flooding" events during high tides. Credit... William Widmer for The New York Times

The same, only worse.

Global warming is affecting the United States more than ever, and the impacts - on communities, regions, infrastructure and sectors of the economy - are expected to increase.

That's the gist of Volume II of the National Climate Assessment, a draft report made public on Friday that focuses on the current and future impacts of climate change. The draft will eventually accompany a report on the science of climate change that was unveiled by 13 federal agencies in its final form on the same day.

In addition to comments by members of the public, Volume II is being reviewed by an expert committee of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. After revisions by the agencies involved it is expected to be published in December 2018.

Like the scientific report, the draft of Volume II contains many of the same findings cited in the previous National Climate Assessment, published in 2014. But reflecting some of the impacts that have been felt across the country in the past three years, some of the emphasis has changed.

Here's a look at some of what's new in the draft assessment.

More and more of the predicted impacts of global warming are now becoming a reality.

For instance, the 2014 assessment forecast that coastal cities would see more flooding in the coming years as sea levels rose. That's no longer theoretical: Scientists have now documented a record number of "nuisance flooding" events during high tides. In 2014, nearly half of residents in Hampton Roads, Va., could not get out of their neighborhoods at least once because of tidal flooding.

Meanwhile, as the oceans have warmed, disruptions in United States fisheries, long predicted, are now underway. In 2012, record ocean temperatures caused lobster catches in Maine to peak a month earlier than usual - and the distribution chain was unprepared.

While much of the discussion of climate change looks at the role of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in warming the planet, the draft report puts a renewed emphasis on the impacts of other atmospheric p ollutants like ozone and smoke, which can cause respiratory problems and lead to premature death.

The draft notes with "high confidence" that climate change will increase ozone levels, as rising temperatures and changes in atmospheric circulation affect local weather conditions. But the increases will not be uniform; by near the end of the century the worst ozone levels will be found across a wide expanse of the Midwest and Northern Great Plains, while levels are expected to improve, at least somewhat, in parts of the Southeast.

The report reiterates what residents of the West have learned from hard experience: that warmer springs, longer dry seasons in the summer and other impacts are lengthening the fire season. The smoke from fires affects not only health, the report says, but visibility.

Since 2014, more detailed economic research has estimated that climate change could cause hundreds of billions of dollars in annual damage, as deadly heat waves, coastal flooding, and an increase in extreme weather take their toll. Unless, that is, communities take steps to prepare beforehand.

The previous assessment warned that few states and cities were taking steps to adapt to the impacts of climate change. That's slowly changing, the new draft finds. More and more communities are taking measures such as preserving wetlands along the coasts to act as buffers against storms.

But outside of a few places in Louisiana and Alaska, few coastal communities are rethinking their development patterns in order to avoid the impacts from rising seas and severe weather that the report says are surely coming.

The United States military has long taken climate change seriously, both for its potential impacts on troops and infrastructure around the world and for its potential to cause political instability in other countries.

The draft report cites these international concerns, but goes far beyond the military. Climate change is already affecting American companies' overseas operations and supply chains, it says, and as these impacts worsen it will take a toll on trade and the economy.

Global warming and natural disasters are also affecting development in less affluent countries. That, the draft says, puts additional burdens on the United States for humanitarian assistance and disaster aid.

The draft report suggests a different approach to assessing the effects of climate change, by considering how various impacts - on food supplies, water and electricity generation, for example - interact with each other.

"It is not possible to understand the full extent of climate-related impacts in the United States without considering these interactions," the report says.

It gives several examples, including recent droughts in California and elsewhere that, in combination with population changes, affects demand for water and energy. The draft also cites Hurricane Sandy, five years ago, which caused cascading impacts on interconnected systems in the New York area, some of which had not been anticipated. Flooding of subway and highway tunnels, for example, made it more difficult to repair the electrical system, which suffered widespread damage.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
What the Climate Report Says About the Impact of Global Warming

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The same, only worse. Global warming is affecting the United States more than ever, and the impacts - on communities, regions, infrastructure and sectors of the economy - are expected to increase. That's the gist of Volume II of the National Climate Assessment, a draft report made public on Friday that focuses on the current and future impacts of climate change.

# data[].attributes.body
This article talks about how Trumps secretary,  Rex Tillerson, has believed about the atmosphere and climate are "very limited" and how the green house gases have not caused most of the damage

# data[].attributes.body
https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/
This article shows a graph illustrating data temperature from four different science institutions. You can see from the graph that the weather has been warming very fast in the past few decades

# data[].attributes.body
Christopher Saucedo- objective because it shows facts

# data[].attributes.body
This article is about how climatologist and scientist do not see global warming the same.
Erika Ramos

# data[].attributes.body
This is objective because of the statistics that the article has about global warming. They are actually given proved statements and backing it up with data charts and stats. - CRISTIAN LIMON

# data[].attributes.body
This article is objective because it states only facts about global warming without choosing a side. The article shows statistics about the greenhouse effect.

Stephanie Cardenas

# data[].attributes.body
http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/climate-change-2/
Emily Cruz- This article is objective because it talks about facts and the impacts of global warming. It states that changing weather, sea levels, and weather events are caused by global warming.

# data[].attributes.body
The article is Subjective and it talkes about how bad global warming is.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Nine scientists analyzed the article and estimate its overall scientific credibility to be 'very low'. more about the credibility rating
A majority of reviewers tagged the article as: Flawed reasoning, Inaccurate, Misleading.

SUMMARY

The scientists unanimously qualify this article as misleading and flawed in its reasoning. The author asserts that "many scientists are predicting the onset of two or three centuries of cooler weather-which would mean bigger glaciers." As the scientists point out, however, glaciologists have collected "crystal clear" evidence for accelerating glacier melt and retreat, which scientists overwhelmingly attribute to human-induced global warming, and scientific consensus warns that a continued rise in atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations will produce further global warming.

See all the scientists' annotations in context

GUEST COMMENTS
Martin Truffer, Professor of Physics, University of Alaska Fairbanks
This article seems to proclaim that because there is natural variability in climate, there can't possibly be human-caused climate change. This is like saying that sea-level change cannot be due to ice loss, because sea level goes up and down every day with the tides, without ice melting.

The fact is that global temperatures keep rising, and the carbon dioxide content of the atmosphere has reached a level that is unsurpassed during the time human civilization has existed. We are in the middle of conducting the greatest climate experiment. Uncertainties in models mean that we don't know exact outcomes, but the forcing of greenhouse gases is understood sufficiently well that the risk of large changes in climate is very high.

Undoubtedly, natural variability means that there will be cooler trends that interrupt the general warming, but it also means that there will be times with unusually high rates of warming. Scientists who proclaim to know that we are heading into decades of cooling stand on very thin ground.
Stephan Harrison, Associate Professor in Quaternary Science, University of Exeter
This article is highly misleading and biased. It fails to recognise that scientists have good understanding of the ways in which climate change occurs and the ways in which we can differentiate between natural variability in the climate and climate change produced by human greenhouse gas emissions.
Obama was also correct in using Exit Glacier as an example of how contemporary climate change is leading to the retreat of glaciers. This pattern of glacier melt is seen in all of the world's glaciated mountain regions. Arguing whether one glacier started its recession slightly earlier or slightly later than others is to miss the point.
The article also tries to suggest that Arctic warming is not new. What it fails to reveal though is that the recent warming covers the whole of the Arctic region; previous warming was much more regional.

Finally, the article claims that scientists are predicting a long period of global cooling. While climate change does not mean that all regions of the world will warm uniformly, the overwhelming scientific consensus is clear that a continued rise in atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations will produce continued global warming. This view is supported by all the world's major academies of science and by the recent reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
David Bahr, Associate Professor, Department of Physics, Regis University and Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado
Betsy McCaughey incorrectly confuses the historically slow retreat of the Exit Glacier with its vastly more rapid retreat over the last 25 years. Manmade climate change is directly related to the historically unprecedented and rapid melt of Alaskan glaciers. Scientific study after study shows that most of the world's glaciers are melting at an ever-increasing rate that cannot be explained by natural cycles alone. Only human activities could generate the speed-up in melt that we have observed over the last 25 years in Alaska and around the world. Glaciologists have collected tens of thousands of measurements from glaciers, dating back over 120 years, and the evidence of accelerating glacier melt and retreat in response to manmade warming is crystal clear. Any other conclusion is willfully ignoring the data, the facts, and the conclusions of the entire glaciological community. Ignoring this level of certainty about the human causes of melting of glaciers is analogous to believing that the Earth is flat, all evidence to the contrary.
Mauri Pelto, Professor of Environmental Science, Nichols College
Alpine glaciers did retreat rapidly during the first half of the century, but not from 1950-1980 when many alpine glaciers including several in Glacier Bay, Alaska did advance. The volume of Greenland and Antarctic Ice Sheets was also stable during this period. Today, it is the ubiquitous and rapid volume loss on glaciers that is remarkable, and one of the many different lines of evidence that have convinced the vast majority of scientists that the current warming is caused by man. Glaciers in equatorial and arctic latitudes, wet and arid climates, large and small, ending in lakes or the ocean are almost all retreating. Out of the 250 glaciers I have worked on, at present 242 are retreating, six have disappeared and one is stationary.

REVIEWERS' OVERALL FEEDBACK
These comments are the overall opinion of scientists on the article, they are substantiated by their knowledge in the field and by the content of the analysis in the annotations on the article.
Alexis Berg, Associate Research Scholar, Princeton University:
This article rehashes a tired old argument that because natural forces have caused climate change in the past, current climate change is no big deal. In fact, every line of evidence now points to man-made greenhouse gas emissions as the primary driver of ongoing (and projected) climate change.
The article also tries to pin the "global warming theory" on president Obama, while the reality is that it reflects the consensus diagnosis of the climate science community.

Jan Lenaerts, Assistant Professor, University of Colorado, Boulder:
An extremely subjective, unsubstantiated article. It includes several misleading and flawed statements and cites irrelevant experts.

Andreas Schmittner, Associate Professor, Oregon State University:
Contrary to overwhelming scientific evidence and conclusions of the vast majority of climate scientists, the article claims that climate will be cooling in the future and that the recently observed warming is not caused by humans. It is misleading in suggesting uncertainty and doubt about human causes of climate change, whereas in reality there is very little uncertainty and doubt on that point.

Joseph Shea, Glacier Hydrologist, International Centre For Integrated Mountain Development:
The article contains many misleading and simply false statements about climate and glacier change.

Ilissa Ocko, Climate Scientist, Environmental Defense Fund:
This article is plagued with inaccurate information, flawed logic, and quotes from individuals who lack climate science merit.

Notes:
[1] See the rating guidelines used for article evaluations.
[2] Each evaluation is independent. Scientists' comments are all published at the same time.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Analysis of "Wake up, Obama, climate change has been happening forever"

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Nine scientists analyzed the article and estimate its overall scientific credibility to be 'very low'. more about the credibility rating A majority of reviewers tagged the article as: Flawed reasoning, Inaccurate, Misleading. SUMMARY The scientists unanimously qualify this article as misleading and flawed in its reasoning.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/prediction-of-climate-change-impacts-not-as-limited-as-tillerson-suggests/
This article talked about the opinions that Rex Tillerson had about global warming and his perspective on the whole situation. Many people can disagree with some of his opinions and it even says it in the article that it can be taken as subjective.

# data[].attributes.body
Cadee Massey- This article has straight facts and calculations to reduce global warming.

# data[].attributes.body
Trey Williams- This article is objective because the it has facts for both sides and sources the writers.

# data[].attributes.body
Jason Garcia - This article is objective because it shows evidence from scientist about global warming. Strictly facts.

# data[].attributes.body
This is subjective because what they are saying is what they believe not whats the truth. They do not have proof or facts they are saying "its not an exact science, but its science all the same" They are just saying not proving - CRISTIAN LIMON

# data[].attributes.body
Alexis Pule: This article is objective because it gives facts from different scientist.

# data[].attributes.body
It gives opinions of what people think about and their thoughts about global warming.- Ana Cabrera

# data[].attributes.body
Joe Salazar- this article has good facts and then later on tries to persuade us to change and help the earth.

# data[].attributes.body
Jason Garcia - This is a pdf where it shows "myths" of global warming also states facts to persuade you.

# data[].attributes.body
Neyzaret Hernandez
This article is objective because it only states facts about global Warming.

# data[].attributes.body
Alexis Pule: This article is subjective because it shows the person's opinion instead of stating true facts about global warming.

# data[].attributes.body
Joe Salazar- this article is stating the causes and effect of global warming and then it states facts about it. There is not really any persuading being done.

# data[].attributes.body
Christopher Saucedo- subjective because shows opinions.

# data[].attributes.body
This is subjective because it is opinionated and you can tell that it is just one sided.

# data[].attributes.headline
Commentary: Reporting on Global Warming: A study in headlines

# data[].attributes.subject
Commentary: Reporting on Global Warming: A study in headlines

# data[].attributes.body
http://physicstoday.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/PT.3.3310

In this article, it talks about how global warming does not effect the Earth, and heat increase would occur without global warming. -Cindy Ballesteros

# data[].attributes.headline
This article is subjective because it talks about Global Warming being a dangerous issue that needs immediate solution. 

# data[].attributes.subject
This article is subjective because it talks about Global Warming being a dangerous issue that needs immediate solution. 

# data[].attributes.body
Neyzaret Hernandez
https://www.ucsusa.org/global-warming#.Wp6pHejwbIV

# data[].attributes.body
Claire Holguin- This article is objective because it states facts only. It includes no personal feelings or opinions.

# data[].attributes.body
Daniella Varela- This article is an objective article because it talks about actual facts about  global warming rather than expressing the company's own thoughts and opinions of the topic.

# data[].attributes.body
https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/GlobalWarming/page2.php
This article is objective, because it is on a trusted website and also it provides facts about why global warming is occurring.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/04/opinion/vegas-gun-control-debate.html - This article is objective because it states fact, about situations that have happened due to having less gun control.

# data[].attributes.body
Daniella Varela- This Stanford article is subjective because even though it does talk about global warming, it includes a lot of the author's personal opinion as well as other people's.

# data[].attributes.body
Claire Holguin- This article is subjective because it contains opinions of the author, and their opinions on how we can prevent global warming.

# data[].attributes.body
Devontae Lacasse I think this is objective because they just state facts to raise awareness about global warming,

# data[].attributes.body
Gaby Macias- This article is objective because it mostly states facts other than picking a side

# data[].attributes.body
Karla Herrera- This article is subjective because it states facts from different scientists and explains in full detail.

# data[].attributes.body
https://climate.nasa.gov/blog/2684/what-climate-change-means-for-glaciers-storms-fires-clouds-and-more/

-
This  article is objective because it states scientific facts about global warming. It tells us how the green house is effected.

# data[].attributes.body
Ashley Nguyen: This articles talks about what might be causing global warming. This is objective because it's just stating facts about global warming and it's also showing charts about it.

# data[].attributes.body
Gaby Macias- This is subjective because it gives the opinions of what others think about global warming

# data[].attributes.body
Arnoldo Caraveo - This articles talks about things that cause global warming. This is objective because it states facts and doesn't express the persons opinion.

# data[].attributes.body
Ashley Nguyen: This article talks about this girl expressing her opinion about global warming and how it's colder in Europe than the North Pole. This is subjective because it shows that she is expressing her opinion on there.

# data[].attributes.body
Devontae Lacasse this article is subjective because it uses a lot of oponions

# data[].attributes.body
Alex Lozano- This article talks about the factual side of global warming. The article states the amount of CO2 that has accumulated in the past 70 years.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.cnn.com/2015/01/22/opinion/bachiochi-abortion-roe-v-wade/index.html - This is subjective, because it states the opinion of the author. It states that thinking abortion is not alright, isn't an anti feminist opinion. That one can be feminist and feel abortion is wrong.

# data[].attributes.body
https://insideclimatenews.org/news/03102017/infographic-ocean-heat-powerful-climate-change-evidence-global-warming
This article is subjective, because is includes a lot of human causes that have affected or speed up the process of global warming.

# data[].attributes.body
Arnoldo Caraveo - This article talks about " Everything you wanted to know about our changing climate but were too afraid to ask." This is subjective because even though it gives facts, it express the writers opinion greatly through the article.

# data[].attributes.body
http://climatecommunication.yale.edu/publications/can-people-detect-changes-in-their-local-climate/

undefined
-
This article is subjective because gives up a straight up opinion over global warming.

# data[].attributes.body
Rodrigo -This article is objective because it only gives facts.

# data[].attributes.body
https://climate.nasa.gov/
This website leads to a bunch of articles and links that explain what global warming can do and what signs there is to detect it.

# data[].attributes.body
https://climatefeedback.org/evaluation/betsy-mccaughey-wake-up-obama-climate-change-has-been-happening-forever/
this article talks about how global warming is near and not good

# data[].attributes.body
Eric Valdez- This articles talks about the facts and why global warming is not caused by carbon dioxide emmsions

# data[].attributes.body
This article is objective because it goes against animal testing and does so by stating facts and is stating them open minded.

# data[].attributes.body
Alex Lozano- This article is subjective because the person that has created this article puts their opinion in it. They state that global warming is a hoax and isn't as dangerous as the media describes it.

# data[].attributes.body
Jesus Blanco - This article is objective because it is talking about Global Warming and what is causing it to happen.

# data[].attributes.body
https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/GlobalWarming/page2.php

This article is objective because it states facts that gives an understanding about what is global warming, it also provides a graph that shows how global warming has been increasing throughout the years.

# data[].attributes.body
Karla Herrera- Basically it's about how we should take action and help reduce climate change.

# data[].attributes.body
Rodrigo -This is subjective because it gives opinions and thought about the issue.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.britannica.com/science/global-warming Jehiel Vazquez. This post is objective because it only shows facts.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.ucsusa.org/our-work/global-warming/science-and-impacts/global-warming-science#.Wp7B4ejwbIV
this article talks about what global warming consist of and how it going to happen also gives you alot of information about how global warming is gonna happen

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.upi.com/Models-show-global-warming-could-be-limited-to-15-degrees-Celsius/3741520276300/

This article is subjective  because it provides opinions from other scientists that gives us an understanding about the models and how the government can help.

# data[].attributes.body
Jesus Blanco - This article is subjective due to it is using facts to back their main idea.

# data[].attributes.body
http://www.people-press.org/2017/10/05/7-global-warming-and-environmental-regulation-personal-environmentalism/
Jehiel Vazquez this is a subjective article because it has peoples opinions

# data[].attributes.body
This article is subjective because it brings points and explanation but with personal information and opinions

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.ucsusa.org/our-work/global-warming/science-and-impacts/global-warming-science#.Wp7Ga-jwbIV
This article talks about the way global warming has affected our environment and ways to stop it.

# data[].attributes.body
https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/GlobalWarming/page2.php
This article is objective because it is all facts and almost no opinion.

# data[].attributes.body
Hannah Bays: This article entitled "Global Warming" is strictly objective because it only states facts or events with no opinion. It doesn't say anything near "we must stop this".

# data[].attributes.body
Gregory Garcia- This is an objective article because it has a lot of facts about global warming and not a lot of opinions.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.newscientist.com/article-topic/climate-change/
This article talks about the way global warming had impacted individual people, there experiences and how they feel about it

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.ucsusa.org/our-work/global-warming/science-and-impacts/global-warming-science#.Wp7LOujwbIU
This article is clearly subjective because throughout the article the author uses the phrase "We must stop this" and other phrases as "We are the cause of global warming"

# data[].attributes.body
Gregory Garcia- This is subjective because it is predicting the effects. Also has their own opinion of how global warming has started.

# data[].attributes.body
Angel Rosas- This article is subjective because it includes personal tastes and opinions of others as well.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/global-warmings-terrifying-new-math-20120719
This article is subjective because the writer is very passive aggressive with their opinions. He states "Not that our leaders seemed to notice." when talking about global warming and leader involvement.

# data[].attributes.body
https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/GlobalWarming/page2.php
This article states information from scientific reasearch and applys facts to support their statement, which makes it an objective article.

# data[].attributes.body
Hannah Bays- This article is subjective because it emphasizes the dangers of global warming rather than stating the facts. "threatens...efforts...dangerous..."

# data[].attributes.body
D'Vine Villa- This article is objective because it list all facts and research that has been made over the years.

# data[].attributes.body
Jocelyn sigala - this article is objective because it tells us facts and shows evidence from the impact of global warming, it is also not reaching towards a certain side.

# data[].attributes.body
Angel Rosas- This article is objective because it gives straight facts without the authors opinion or the opinion of another party.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.theguardian.com/science/brain-flapping/2014/nov/25/climate-change-is-an-obvious-myth-how-much-more-evidence-do-you-need
It basically just says how scientists are corrupt and use fear-mongering to trick people.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.livescience.com/topics/global-warming
This article is objective because it states a lot of facts . It also says all the reasons of global warming rather than hitting a specific point.

# data[].attributes.body
jocelyn sigala- this article is subjective because this article is very biased. as well as some of the "facts" not even being correct. The author has many opinions about global warming as well.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/cleaning-up-air-pollution-may-strengthen-global-warming/
This article is objective because its has facts and information that can be backed up with it .

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/30/opinion/climate-change-health-heat.html
This article has little research to support their opinion and states a one-sided idea that Global Climate is bad and something should be done.

# data[].attributes.body
D'Vine Villa- This article is subjective because it is giving their opinions on how each president is reacting to the climate change and its affects.