# data[].attributes.body
The repetition of fillers denote the spontaneous conversation

# data[].attributes.body
there is a substantial amount of hedging used both women and men for ecample the vague 'something' implies uncertainty or in some cases potrays

# data[].attributes.body
Semantic field of another world

# data[].attributes.body
Idea of status vs support is shown. Both females support eachother  because they know more about the topic. Both seem to discourage Tom and dismiss his ideas.

# data[].attributes.body
Joan and Nina seem to know more about the topic because they use specialist lexis like "filter" and "cobalt" which are part of a semantic field of art and photography. Tom doesn't seem to share this knowledge to asserts his knowledge and ideas power about France instead to get involved in the conversation.

# data[].attributes.body
The overlapping during the conversation could be to convey the people being comfortable with each other. This could be via the shared interest/semantic field of art. They could be students as their use of terminology could denote they are educated as well as interested in art.

# data[].attributes.body
The terminology such as; 'exposure', denote that each character is attempting to challenge each other's knowledge and ideas power by bringing in more related terminoology. However, when Tom starts analysing the turrets he confuses the girls as he has gone off topic too much conveying his attempt for dominance.

# data[].attributes.body
Tom has knowledge and ideas about France.
Joan and Nina use specialist terms showing knowledge and power about art and photography.

# data[].attributes.body
This could link to the theorist Swales, as although it evidently isn't an occupation in this scene but they have a shared Lexis to an extent. They also have shared goals of having knowledge of art and also the idea of analysing the photo in depth.

# data[].attributes.body
tom aims to reindorce status by topic shifting 'well even without the caption you'd know it was france because youve got the turret' he uses specialist lexis 'turret' to imply he has knowledge and ideas power.
Good theory

# data[].attributes.body
Semantic field of artistry used suggests the 3 have shared knowledge and ideas power and are aware of artist Methods for examples "exposure", "airbrushed"' etc Good

# data[].attributes.body
'Looks like clouds doesn't it' - tag question from Nina to gain support - Tannen

# data[].attributes.body
fishman- backnelling theory concenring women, in this extract it is exemplified through the uses of 'umm' which convey agreement
Good AO2

# data[].attributes.headline
Empty adjective "lovely" - LAkoff - presents women as using vague lexis, yet befits the semantic field of the art they are looking at.

# data[].attributes.subject
Empty adjective "lovely" - LAkoff - presents women as using vague lexis, yet befits the semantic field of the art they are looking at.

# data[].attributes.body
Joan offers support when she says 'bit scary' even though she doesn't share the same opinion as Nina - Tannen

# data[].attributes.body
Nina utilises tag question; “it looks like clouds doesn’t it”, aiming for support as suggested by Tannen Why?  Is she reinforcing her ideas or lookiong for support? Looking for support from other people but by doing so her original idea will be enforced as others utilise positive face in the form of backchanneling to acknowledge Nina’s original idea