# data[].attributes.body
Processfolio is including three Journal Articles which are related with each others. The writer try to show how progress in the topic of Gender equality at workplace. The result seems like this issue quite hard to make a change. Maybe it is because of the culture, the tradition, and education. In my aspect, if the men in general respect to women, I think some situation we need the man to be leader. However, from I just said, we need the respect from every gender and also should be gentle as well.

# data[].attributes.body
To finish task 3, I used a lot of materials to help and finish it.

# data[].attributes.body
http://www.uefap.com/writing/writfram.htm

http://www.uefap.com/writing/feature/intro.htm

# data[].attributes.body
Take note

# data[].attributes.body
Using the reading matrix.

# data[].attributes.body
Writing Draft

# data[].attributes.body
Respond feedback

# data[].attributes.body
Peer review

# data[].attributes.body
Re-draft

# data[].attributes.body
Re-Check

# data[].attributes.body
Personal Reflection

About this task, I quite confident. I think I will get a higher mark. But no, I still get some problems and my mark is lower than the first task. I am feeling disappointed.

Feedback from Lucy

Strengths:

- A good effort made to summarise, evaluation and link to article 1.

- The summary details some of the key points and there is evaluation present with the use of some adverbs/adjectives to show critical language.

Areas to improve:

- Structure requires attention, paragraph 2 is quite small and could be pushed together with paragraph 3. Remember each paragraphs need a topic and concluding sentence.

- At times, sentences and statements were under-developed and required more explanation which you had the word count to do.

When I get feedback from Lucy

First, the organization in each paragraph are not good. At first I decided to not separate but when Peer review, My friend suggested me to separate. So, How I know that what my friend said will correct? It's not my mistake ( In my opinion ).

Second, about putting the title, I misunderstood about this and next time, I will paraphrase the title in my summary.

Third, the sentence in evaluation is not clear. I think it is about the limit of word count. Next time, It will be more amount of word count. I will write clearly to explain my summary.

When Lucy explained about Marking Criteria Writing, I feel better. Because the real problem is quite not serious and I can improve it. I like to talk with Lucy to improve my writing.

# data[].attributes.body
Personal Reflection

About the task, I don't know how to write Evaluation part. For my reflection is so so. I do agree with my mistakes.

Feedback from Lucy

Strengths:
- Use of citations with appropriate reporting verbs are evident and the writing is largely academic and formal.
- The summary is largely informative and includes some of the key points of the book chapter.

Areas to Improve:
- Some verb form errors. Please review this in your self-study, you could use this resource https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammar/verbtenses
- More critical evaluation could be offered. This could be achieved through critical adjectives/adverbs. See Lesson 2.1 in the Reading and Writing book.

Please use academic journal articles for Task 2 and 3 rather than a book chapter.