# data[].attributes.body
The deliberate and excessive use of acronyms and abbreviations to appear more knowledgeable in the subject or confuse others.

# data[].attributes.body
The absence of a reason, but saying that history or tradition is the reason.

# data[].attributes.body
When an attempt is made to apply a general rule to all situations when clearly there are exceptions to the rule.

# data[].attributes.body
Which a passage is removed from its surrounding matter in such a way as to distort its intended meaning.

# data[].attributes.body
When the argument is self-contradictory and cannot possibly be true.

# data[].attributes.body
You said that if we allow A to happen, then Z will eventually happen too, therefore A should not happen.

# data[].attributes.body
Misrepresenting someone's argument to make it easier to attack.

# data[].attributes.body
Avoiding countering an opposing argument directly by introducing a non-issue to the argument

# data[].attributes.body
When representing one thing, when in the actually case the character is representing another.

# data[].attributes.body
Distracting your audience from the main point by bringing up something else unconnected with the logic of the argument.

# data[].attributes.body
If the truth or falsity of the premise has no bearing whatsoever on the question of whether or not the conclusion is true.

# data[].attributes.body
Conclusion is not justified by sufficient or unbiased evidence

# data[].attributes.body
You appealed to popularity or the fact that many people do something as an attempted form of validation.

# data[].attributes.body
When the source is viewed negatively because of its association with another person or group who is already viewed negatively.

# data[].attributes.body
When an analogy is used to prove or disprove an argument, but the analogy is too dissimilar to be effective, that is, it is unlike the argument more than it is like the argument.

# data[].attributes.body
When only two choices are presented yet more exist, or a spectrum of possible choices exists between two extremes.

# data[].attributes.body
When only select evidence is presented in order to persuade the audience to accept a position, and evidence that would go against the position is withheld.

# data[].attributes.body
A claim where the persuader promises more than they can deliver.

# data[].attributes.body
You presented a circular argument in which the conclusion was included in the premise.

# data[].attributes.body
You attacked your opponent's character or personal traits in an attempt to undermine their argument.

# data[].attributes.body
You used a double meaning or ambiguity of language to mislead or misrepresent the truth.