# data[].attributes.body
Pg. 7-12:
Throughout Greece's ancient history, the ordinary person did not have power. What evidence from the text supports this idea?

# data[].attributes.body
Preview and Predict:
After skimming through our text, pictures, and headings, come up with one question you have about government in ancient times.

# data[].attributes.body
We will use this Padlet every day of guided reading. (12:30-12:45)

1. Find the correct date of our meeting.
2. Answer the guided question asked from your Benchmark reading. ALWAYS use text evidence to support your thinking.
3. Read others' posts to compare thoughts!

# data[].attributes.body
How did they decided who there Government was and did something happen if they did not get it.

# data[].attributes.body
my question is did they have the three types of government
democracy, monarchy,dictatorship

# data[].attributes.body
back in the ancient time could the people protest? for example like do the people vote orrr and if they didn't get the right governor or president/leader etc would they protest if they do what would happen?

# data[].attributes.body
how did the arcatectures form?? and how did they choose who would be part of the government?

# data[].attributes.body
How many years were allowed to be government and how did the people pick?

# data[].attributes.body
One piece of evidence that supports this idea is from page 11: ¨These rich landowners were called aristocrats. In many city states,the aristocrats took power over the basileus. They became the rulers.¨ That is a piece of evidence to support the idea that the ordinary people did not have power.

# data[].attributes.body
¨These rich landowners were called aristocrats.In many city states,the aristocrats took power over he basileus .They became the rulers.This text evidence supports why ordinary people in Greece.

# data[].attributes.body
"These rich landowners are called aristocrats. In many city states, the aristocrats took power over the basileus. They became ruler." This text evidence supports that they had no power

# data[].attributes.body
one piece of evidence is "These rich landowners are called aristocrats. In many city states, the aristocrats took power over the basileus. They became ruler."this shows how they had no power

# data[].attributes.body
The evidence that I found was in paragraph 11 it said '' The Landowner became rich and powerful''. Also in paragraph 11 '' Landowner became known as Aristocrats''.

# data[].attributes.body
Pg. 7-12:
After reading chapter 1, what can the reader infer about early Greek settlements? Use text evidence to support your inference.

# data[].attributes.body
i can infer that Greeks settled in Greece and the Mycenaean made Greece there home and they made rules and homes out of what they had

# data[].attributes.body
I found that the Mycenaean settlers settle in Greece around 1900 B.C.E.

# data[].attributes.body
i can infer that the Greek settlers settled in Greece 1900 B.C.E. they also Mycenaean settled in Greece

# data[].attributes.body
I can infer that the greek settlers like made their own city. In the text it states "By 750s the settlements in Greeces formed into city states

# data[].attributes.body
I can tell that Greeks settled in Greece and the Mycenaean made it like home. They made rules and used natural things to survive.

# data[].attributes.body
Pg. 14-15:
What were two direct effects of electing Solon? Use text evidence to support your answer.

-ANSWER: List the effects
-EVIDENCE: Direct quotes/examples
-INTERPRET: Add your own thoughts

# data[].attributes.body
Two direct effects by electing Solon were:
1. It stopped the revolution..
2. It paved a way for democracy
I know/ think this because pg 15- ¨Electing Solon did 2 important things: one it stopped the revolution, two it paved a way for democracy, or rule by the people.¨ These are the two effects that happend by electing solon.

# data[].attributes.body
Two direct effects by electing solon. The good things he did and really never did anything bad. I know that they are all good things by in the text it states Electing solon did two important things. First it stopped a revolution. Second,it paved the way for democracy, or rules to people.

# data[].attributes.body
Electing Solon did good things. The good things were that it stopped the revolution and it paved the way for democracy.

# data[].attributes.body
two direct effects by selection solon is that he "stopped a revolution and paved the way for democracy" and "all men rich or poor had a say in there government ".

# data[].attributes.body
Pg. 15-22
How did Athens and Sparta differ? Use text evidence to support your answer.

USE A FORMAT SIMILAR TO AEIEIO!
-Answer
-Evidence about Athens
-Interpret evidence
-Evidence about Sparta
-Interpret evidence
-Conclusion

# data[].attributes.body
The two places were different in many ways. Athens was a nice and pretty city and most of the people wanted to live there. In the text it states ¨Athens was a beautiful marble temples and teaming market places. That is showing you that they had nice places and those also had very nice places to live. Also Sparta was village on like a hillside but no one really wanted to live in Sparae. In the text it states ¨Sparta was nothing more but several village thrown on a hillside.¨ That why no one wanted to live there. That sad that people wanted to live in a place that looks rich and not like a normal place. Using all of this evidence from the text I can tell the difference between Athens and Sparta.

# data[].attributes.body
The two places were different in many ways. Athens was a pretty city and many wanted to live there because of its beautiful temples made of marble and their structures. As stated in the text: ¨Athens was a beautiful city with marble temples and teaming market places.¨ But Sparta on the other hand was just like a few villages thrown on a hill side. ¨Sparta was nothing more but several villages on a hill side.¨ Everyone wanted to live in Athens, and barley any wanted to live in Sparta. Using these pieces of evidence, I know the differences between Sparta and Athens.

# data[].attributes.body
the two places are different because "Athens was a beautiful city full of marble temples and teeming marketplaces  how ever Sparta was nothing more than several villages on a hill.  And while Athenian culture thrived, Spartans were not interested in wealth and instead focused on the military and warfare" this shows the differences between Sparta and Athens .

# data[].attributes.body
The places were very diffrenet.The Athens city was very beautiful the city had marble temples and teeming markets and many people wanted to live their because it was so beautiful

# data[].attributes.body
Athens is a place were democracy is. On Athens the people decided all of the government decision. People would want to live in Athens because they have freedom and other fun and happy things. there are meeting and somethings that have to do with meetings. The people don't just vote and make some rules, they also have some other things to do.
Sparta was an country with several villages under over an hill. Sparta wasn't interested in wealth it was interested in Military and Warfare. Sparta was the only city that was ruled by a monarchy.

# data[].attributes.body
The two places are different because in the text it Said that that  Athens had many riches and marbles but Sparta are just villages on a hill.It they also had two kings in Sparta but Athens doesn't Athens women didn't have rights, they were not aloud to read or do stuff men does:( they could only cook and clean. but in Sparta according to the text women are aloud to read write and protect themselves unlike athens.

# data[].attributes.body
FOCUS ON TEXT FEATURES: Why did the author include the historical perspective sidebar on page 20?

# data[].attributes.body
The author include the historical perspective sidebar because it help the reader better understand about the historical part of what they are trying to say. And it also show you the jury now and then

# data[].attributes.body
The author includes a sidebar on page 20 saying how americans  now deal with cases because he/ she wants to compare what they did in Ancient Greece with juries and lawyers, and what they do today.

# data[].attributes.body
A reason the athour put the sidebar so they can learn more about the history

# data[].attributes.body
On the Juries Historical perspective it is trying to show some key detail that we didn't find in the paragraphs. Also it is comparing now and then of court orders. The author through in some interesting fact like then i the courts people yell out if they don't like the accused person's answer. But now they give the accused person a chance to speak and then decide if the person is guilty.

# data[].attributes.body
the author included the side bar to show how the early Greece people did there courts rather then us Americans now

# data[].attributes.body
The author pot the historical perspectives because the author wants show whats the difference between then and now.

# data[].attributes.body
After reading the section called “Daily Government in Sparta,” on pg. 21, what can the reader infer?

# data[].attributes.body
The reader (me) can infer that the gorvernment in Sparta was very strict on their rules, and no ordinary person could have power.

# data[].attributes.body
The reader can infer that the government was very hash and in Sparta they had rules that they had to follow and if not they would get in trouble or something. And like none of the people had power in that place only the government really had the power on all of them.

# data[].attributes.body
in Sparta There were very strict rules because it said '' this way no one or group had absolute power. In Sparta there was only one ruler (monarch). The ruler was mean and not kind at all.

# data[].attributes.body
i can infer that the goverment in sapra was not fair to every so if they said or did something wrong the would be punished

# data[].attributes.body
i can infer that Sparta was very had a lot of power strict when it came to its rules like " they made sure that the kings did not do anything that went against the cite-state" this shows that they were strict on their rules

# data[].attributes.body
Pages 27-31

# data[].attributes.body
Write a short summary for pages 30 and 31 in ONE SENTENCE.

# data[].attributes.body
Plebelans has no voice at all they were all mad at it and they went on strike a lot because they wanted more power and also they never were allowed to vote or do anything at all.

# data[].attributes.body
The Plebleans were mostly poor and owed the patritions money, they went on strike and refused to do things.

# data[].attributes.body
there always has been a struggle between rich and poor citizens

# data[].attributes.body
Plebleans were mostly poor but owed the patrition they all wanted more power so they went on strike and refues to do things.

# data[].attributes.body
The patrician's held all the power to the government, many people even owed money to the patricians, the patrician were living like slaves, The tribunes represented the pleblens in the government and looked after their Welfare.

# data[].attributes.body
Pg. 37-40:
What is the central idea of page 40?

# data[].attributes.body
The empire of different cultures and there different practices they do

# data[].attributes.body
the central idea is that the roman empire split into two ( the east and the West) and both practiced different beliefs and cultures

# data[].attributes.body
Central Idea: The roman empire expanded and practiced different cultures. Later on, the empire was divided into 4 sections. Each one had different cultures and beliefs.

# data[].attributes.body
The central Idea of page 40 was that the emperor divided roman into two groups and then the western and eastern roman frighted for along time witch made Roman very weak. In 476 B.C.E western Roman fell.

# data[].attributes.body
The central idea of