# data[].attributes.body
- We think that there is not really a clear idea of what the AVID/Student Support currently is so we do not feel like we can accurately answer this question.

# data[].attributes.body
If this support system is working as planned, then yes this is adequate support. However, is there any evidence that shows this has benefited students? We need to field test this a few more weeks and then revisit the idea.

# data[].attributes.body
If students do not turn in work for a while, they were reach a point of failing no matter what. What if the late work policy involved something like: If an assignment is turned in late (as deemed by the school policy) the student cannot receive a passing grade, but they can earn something higher than a 0.

# data[].attributes.body
AVID/ Student Support is sufficient, and students need to be held accountable. We have not effectively allowed students to fail, so they are not resilient.

# data[].attributes.body
Angry stakeholders and failure; upholding Dual Credit agreement

# data[].attributes.body
- Concerned that this policy might prevent students from learning the content and/or it may result in students not being prepared for the EOC
- Students may have trouble prioritizing  which assignments to complete. Once possible solution might be that students are given 20 assignments, but only 5 will be graded and students will not know ahead of time which ones will be graded. Maybe this would encourage students to complete ALL of the assignments instead of just trying to complete the "most important" assignments or the ones that impact their grade the most.
-Our failure rate is going to be much higher. If our failure rate is higher because of this policy will teachers be expected to provide students with "magical packets" or "extra credit" because if so, this kind of defeats the purpose and does not help students learn the content.

# data[].attributes.body
No new supports; promote more student accountability and initiative

# data[].attributes.body
- not allowing late work might actually be removing a support
-

# data[].attributes.body
-AVID/student support restructuring is sufficient. currently all working together to chase students, would be less chasing if late work was not accepted.

# data[].attributes.body
-students will inevitably fail courses-> need to have candid conversations with parents
-there may be district push back (pressure for pass rates/school performance)

# data[].attributes.body
-putting it in the Weekly Update (communicate with parents)
-start at a new quarter/semester
-post info in syllabus
-repetition
-list of due dates on daily slide

# data[].attributes.body
We already offer a lot of support. The Freshmen house uses the ECHS Agenda and AVID follows up. This missing piece is consistency and a written policy. Build in a mandatory time during homeroom to check powerschool and assignments?

# data[].attributes.body
After school tutoring for students who cannot keep up in class.
Some students get behind in their college class and high school and work and after school work.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Communication of the new policy, students not knowing about the new policy.-Communicate
2. Assignments should be completed and students may or may not do it if its past the deadline and that may cause certain students to not grow.
3. What type of population would this impact? Low or high?- Avid and Student support: After 3 zeros student is required to stay for after school tutoring o
4. Consistency