# data[].attributes.body
Pros-

1)  You can use animal products to aid yourself and society. For example, milk from cows and eggs from hens.

2) If you are motivated, you can be extremely healthy as you will be having organic products with no induced hormones and live a healthy and better life

3)  The farms are far away from the city in most places which results in cleaner air with less toxins and pollutants

Cons

1) Away from cities which could lead to less job offers and work offers

2) No stable way of earning if the land dries up

3) A lot of money spent on things like insecticides and everything could be spoilt if harmful pests like locusts destroy the crop

4)  The animals could revolutionize and kick you from your farm

# data[].attributes.headline
Aarushi- Pros and cons of running the animal farm

# data[].attributes.subject
Aarushi- Pros and cons of running the animal farm

# data[].attributes.body
Pros- The animals did attain the life that they desired and envisioned. It was a utopian life they acquired where they were an independent mass, under the control of nobody and their life saw no absence of liberty and freedom.

Cons- Though the animals got what they wanted, they may undergo struggles in adapting to their new life. Now that they were an independent mass, They were in check and control of themselves. Given to the fact that this was new to them, it could have been hard for them to encounter. A struggle in adapting could have led to the animals not cooperating with each other, thus igniting conflicts, which would eventually lead to chaos.

# data[].attributes.body
te proswould be that animals would live in their version of an utopia and would not be mistreated. the cons are that they wold soon take advantage of their power and the humans that have not done any offence to the animals would suffer eventually.

# data[].attributes.body
the pros of the animals running the farm is that no animal would be mistreated, all animals can work for and with someone who THEY chose as a leader or the one who guides them,  they got the work done faster, and were more efficient than they were under Mr Jones and his men. The eggs from the hens, and the milk from the cows, could now be used for the animals themselves and not for Mr Jones to take it all away and sell it for his own good. There also wouldn't be any disagreements between the animals as, without any humans interfering, they can cooperate with each other easily, and get work done, the way they want to.
-Parth

# data[].attributes.body
They were far more enthusiastic about doing their work which helped them get better yields. They felt happy doing theri work and there were some tasks that the animlas did far bettr than the humans. The animal in this situation got to keep their pride as well as their happiness.
- Divya T.

# data[].attributes.body
Should animals choose to run the farm, they would be able to reap what they sow without having to suffer for their hard work. In the presence of a farmer, the animals would have to till land, harvest crops, and provide milk and eggs, all while being yoked, whipped and spurred by the farmer. This abuse is highly unnecessary in order to yield their produce. On their own, the animals would be able to accomplish what they could with a farmer, but could do so without his reprimands. For instance, in 'Animal Farm', Boxer the workhorse would be spurred unnecessarily by Farmer Jones while tilling the fields. However, without his supervision, Boxer was motivated to do more work than he usually did, and reap profits for the farm.

# data[].attributes.headline
Aashravi - Pros of animals running the farm

# data[].attributes.subject
Aashravi - Pros of animals running the farm

# data[].attributes.body
If animals were to run a farm, there is more of a chance for them to understands the needs and wants other livestock. They may also run on a democratic system where the top power listens to the requirements of the other animals. A major reason for the rebellion was based on this factor.

# data[].attributes.body
If animals run the farm, it can cause a lot of conflicts in terms of responsibility and collaboration. For example the continuous conflicts between Snowball and Napoleon are a great way of portraying the idea that all animals may not be able to collaborate with each other and may have disagreements. Without having Mr. Jones to keep all the animals in check, they might not survive as long as they had envisioned as they had become so dependent on the humans.

# data[].attributes.body
Should animals choose to run a farm, they might not be capable of collaborating with other kinds of livestock. The swine, for example, have a greater intelligence quotient as compared to that of equines, which may tip the scales of harmony and balance in their favour. Drawing an example from 'Animal Farm', the pigs are the first to learn how to read and write, however, the horses experience difficulty in trying to do the same. In the end, Napoleon abuses this advantage which he has over other the other animals and therefore, eradicates the equality which Old Major had envisioned for the farm.