# data[].attributes.body
" our decision is a reaffirmation of the principles of freedom and inclusiveness that the flag best reflects, and of the conviction that are toleration of criticism such as Johnson's is a sign and source of our strength"

(formal)This reaffirms the principles of the freedoms in the nation and the critism has been taken as a sign of strength)

# data[].attributes.body
" forbidding criminal punishment for conduct such as Johnson's will not endanger the special role played by our flag or the feelings it inspires."

(Formal talk)(In the court they came to the conclusion that that one gesture will not change the opinion of everybody and it will continue to inspire the people"

# data[].attributes.body
"We decline, therefore, to create for the flag an exception to the joust of principles protected by the First Amendment.... To say that the government has an interest in encouraging the proper treatment of the flag, however, however it is not to say that it may criminally punish a person for burning a flag"

(very formal)(this is saying that the government does not support burning the flag but you cannot get in trouble for burning flag because of the First Amendment)

# data[].attributes.body
"The flag stands for tolerance" by Ronald J Allen and "Texas v. Johnson"  Johnson by William J Brennan are two distinct texts that have different tones fitting their respective context. In Allen's text the tone is persuasive and informative aiming to convey the importance of Tolerance in the symbolism of the flag. On the other hand Brennan's text has a more legal and authoritative tone as it presents the arguments and Analysis surrounding the Texas v. Johnson case. The tone of each text aligns with the purpose of conveying their messages effectively

# data[].attributes.body
"The Texas v.Johnson" is considered a Seminal document because it played a crucial role in shaping the interpretation and the understanding of the First Amendment and the freedom of speech in the United States. It set a precedent for protecting symbolic speech and Sparked discussions about the balance between individual expression and social interest.

# data[].attributes.headline
Line 72 in  "The flag stands for tolerance"

# data[].attributes.subject
Line 72 in  "The flag stands for tolerance"

# data[].attributes.body
"With controversy comes debate, Enlightenment and renewed commitment. Perhaps,then, we are in the Court's debt for not treating the flag burning case like the simple case it is. Let the controversy rage, after all, it is in a robust debate that we are the most true to ourselves."

(OPINION)

# data[].attributes.headline
Line 52 in  "The flag stands for tolerance"

# data[].attributes.subject
Line 52 in  "The flag stands for tolerance"

# data[].attributes.body
"the controversy will raise precisely because burning the flag is such a powerful form of communication. Were it not, who would care? Thus were we to Embrace a prohibitation on such communication we would be saying that the first amendment protects expression only when no one is offended"

(OPINION)

# data[].attributes.headline
Line 15 in "The flag stands for tolerance"

# data[].attributes.subject
Line 15 in "The flag stands for tolerance"

# data[].attributes.body
"After all, no one can seriously equate a prohibition on flag burning with the imposition of governmental orthodoxy in political speech."

(OPINION)

# data[].attributes.headline
Why is the tone of the document so opinionated?

# data[].attributes.subject
Why is the tone of the document so opinionated?

# data[].attributes.body
"The flag stands for tolerance" is an editorial document so it gives the author the ability to talk freely and express their feelings. This document can be seen as editorial by the authors use of persuasive language,the presentation of their own opinions and interpretations,and the inclusion of arguments and Analysis to support their viewpoint.