# data[].attributes.headline
Question 1 - Discuss the implications of the scientific issue identified in the articles.

# data[].attributes.subject
Question 1 - Discuss the implications of the scientific issue identified in the articles.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Read article 1, 2 & 3.

2. As you read, list the economic/ethical/social/environmental implications identified by the articles.

3. Make a note of the quotes you will use to support your answer.

4. You can write the quote word for word, or to save space on your notes write the article, page and line number eg: Article 1, page 2, line 4

5. Rank the implications in order from most to least - write about them in order of most common/important to least.

6. Identify where implications cause or affect other types of implication.

7. Plan your PEEL paragraphs

1. Point (what implication have you identified?)

2. Evidence (give a quote from the article to support your answer)

3. Explain (why does the scientific issue cause this implication?)

4. Link (does this implication cause or affect another type of implication?)

8. You should plan to write about each type of implication (social/environmental/ economic/ethical) AT LEAST ONCE. (4 paragraphs MINIMUM)

*Note: sometimes there will only be 3 types of implication eg. no environmental implications

# data[].attributes.headline
Question 2 - Identify the different organisations/individuals mentioned in the articles and suggest how they may have an influence on the scientific issue 

# data[].attributes.subject
Question 2 - Identify the different organisations/individuals mentioned in the articles and suggest how they may have an influence on the scientific issue 

# data[].attributes.body
1. Read article 1, 2 & 3. As you read, make a note of the different individuals and organisations mentioned in the articles.

2. Don’t forget to note which article they are mentioned in and copy a quote from the articles of what they have said/done to influence the scientific issue discussed in the articles.

*For higher marks: check whether any of the organisations/individuals mentioned in the articles have been mentioned in the references. If they have say this – they have influenced the research being written about in the article.

1. You need to write about AT LEAST ONE of each type of organisation and one individual

2. Remember: PEEL paragraphs!

1. Point (identify who organisation/individual and what they do. How/why do they have influence? Who do they influence?)

2. Explain (What did they do/say to influence the issue?)

3. Evidence (give a quote from the article to support your answer)

4. Link (can you link this organisation/individual to any others mentioned?)

*Note: sometimes there will be one type of organisation eg. No Universities/research groups not mentioned

# data[].attributes.headline
Question 3 - Discuss whether ARTICLE 3 has made valid judgements 

# data[].attributes.subject
Question 3 - Discuss whether ARTICLE 3 has made valid judgements 

# data[].attributes.body
1. Remember this article is about question 3 ONLY

2. You get marks just for defining validity and reliability!

3. Read article 3, as you read, make a note of the judgements made.

4. Who wrote the article?/Who is making the judgement?

5. Has the individual got expertise in the area they are talking about?

6. Has the article been peer-reviewed?

1. DONT FORGET to explain what peer-review is and how it affects validity/reliability

7. Is the judgement supported by scientific evidence? Give quotes from the article.

8. Is the evidenced provided from many different, up to date, sources?

1. Explain why up to date references improves validity/reliability.

2. Is the judgement supported by information in article 1 or article 2? (If yes, give quotes)

9. Is the data they have used reliable and valid?

10. Does the study actually measure what it should measure?

1. Explain why/why not.

11. Has it been tested against many different conditions/variables?

1. Explain why many repeats improves validity/reliability.

12. Do the results actually support the judgement?

1. Explain why/why not.

13. Has the study achieved consistent results over a long time or across a large, varied sample?

1. Explain why a large, varied sample improves validity/reliability.

14. Has the article provided raw data?

1. Explain why providing raw data improves validity/reliability.

15. Is there a small/large standard deviation?

1. Explain why a small standard deviation improves validity/reliability of data.

16. Do error bars on graphs overlap?

17. Have they conducted statistical tests?

18. Are the results statistically significant?

1. Explain why statistical tests improve validity/reliability of judgements made.

# data[].attributes.headline
Question 4 - Suggest potential areas for further development and/or research of the scientific issue from the three articles 

# data[].attributes.subject
Question 4 - Suggest potential areas for further development and/or research of the scientific issue from the three articles 

# data[].attributes.body
1. Read article 1, 2 and 3 wherever you identify a gap in the research or a way to improve a study make a note of it.

2. Aim to address at least 3 or 4 areas for improvement – remember to use PEEL paragraphs!

1. Point (identify an area for further research and development)

2. Evidence (give a quote from the article to support your answer)

3. Explain (how could they improve this research?/what should they research? Why?)

4. Link (link back to the issue discussed in the articles – how will this affect the issue?)

# data[].attributes.headline
Question 5 - An unseen task discussing advantages/benefits and disadvantages/limitations of the scientific issue discussed in the articles 

# data[].attributes.subject
Question 5 - An unseen task discussing advantages/benefits and disadvantages/limitations of the scientific issue discussed in the articles 

# data[].attributes.body
1. Use Google to research advantages/benefits and disadvantages/limitations of the scientific issue discussed in the articles

2. Make sure you give an introduction and a conclusion

3. Remember to use PEEL paragraphs!

1. Point (identify an advantage/benefit or disadvantage/limitation)

2. Evidence (give a quote from the article to support your answer)

3. Explain (explain why this is an advantage/benefit or disadvantage/limitation)

4. Link (link back to the task)

4. Add some reminders to your notes about using suitable language for the audience and the style of writing.

5. If you are writing for Doctors, you can use much more complicated language – if you are writing for the general public then you need to explain the science behind the scientific issue.

6. Make sure you are answering the question! If it tells you to persuade someone to do something make sure your writing is persuasive. If it tells you to write a factual report, make sure you’re unbiased.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Have you included implications from ALL THREE articles?

2. Have you included each type of implication (or as many as possible) AT LEAST ONCE? (social/environmental/economic/ethical)

3. Have you linked the implications?

4. Have you included each type of organisation (or as many as possible) AT LEAST ONCE? (Governments or Global Organisations/Non-government organisations, professional bodies and associations/Universities and research groups/ Private and multinational organisations/Voluntary pressure groups/Individuals)

5. Have you included definitions of validity and reliability?

6. Have you planned PEEL paragraphs for EVERY ANSWER?