# data[].attributes.body
Please submit a 500-1000 words self-reflection on IC aspects that you feel most resonant and also the aspects that you want to develop for a better diffusion in a globalised world.

# data[].attributes.body
Throughout my study of Intercultural Communication, I have had the opportunity to absorb numerous facets of culture and the issues and differences that arise when cultures intersect or when individuals from distinct cultural backgrounds encounter one another. This knowledge has provided me with meaningful and valuable insights, particularly regarding the Concept of Self, which falls under Building Block 1 of Craig Storti's 4 Building Blocks of Culture. As someone immersed in a Collectivist culture, I find these elements to be profoundly accurate, and they reinforce my cultural pride. Notably, it addresses the perception of success: "The survival and success of the group ensures the well-being of the individual, so that by considering the needs and feelings of others, one protects oneself" - a perspective I find particularly resonant.

Nevertheless, the concept of Individualism has enabled me to develop an objective perspective on that cultural framework. This understanding has motivated me to foster greater harmony when communicating or collaborating with individuals from individualistic cultures. For instance, the characteristic "Independence and self-reliance are stressed and greatly valued, and personal freedom is highly desired" in Individualist cultures has inspired me to become more self-sufficient and autonomous in problem-solving, thereby strengthening and refining my personal development.

Finally, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Lecturer Ta Kim Hoang for providing such invaluable perspectives and knowledge throughout the teaching process.

# data[].attributes.body
As I reflect on the six aspects of intercultural communication, I find the concept of Individualism vs. Collectivism the most affiliated with my personal experience and aspirations. This aspect represents the way people view themselves as independent individuals or members of cohesive groups. I felt like it has played a significant role in shaping my worldview. I have gained a more balanced understanding of both perspectives, and I hope to navigate our increasingly interconnected world with greater empathy and adaptability after learning about it.

Growing up in a mostly individualistic culture, I have come to value personal autonomy, self-reliance, and the pursuit of individual goals. These values have planted in me a strong seed of independence, ambition, and a clear understanding of my personal aspirations. However, I often have difficulties working within group settings, especially with people from more collectivistic backgrounds. However, since I learned about Individualism-Collectivism in university, it has enlightened me to see how collectivist cultures emphasize community well-being, shared responsibilities, and harmonious relationships. The concept of prioritizing group goals over personal interests has helped me a lot with university group projects and it’s also clear to me how valuable this mindset can be in achieving shared success.

A specific moment that shifted my perspective on collectivism occurred when I participated in a group project in my Intercultural Communications subject at university, where I worked closely with team members from cultures that value collaboration and mutual support. I was struck by their commitment to group cohesion, which sometimes required individuals to set aside personal preferences for the team’s success. While I initially found this approach restrictive, I eventually realized how it fostered a strong sense of belonging and responsibility that led to more cohesive teamwork and collective achievement later on.

In today’s globalized world, cultivating a more balanced perspective between individualism and collectivism is crucial. The interconnected nature of our societies demands the flexibility to collaborate effectively with people from various cultural backgrounds. And I aim to work on blending my self-reliant nature with an appreciation for interdependence. Developing this aspect within myself will not only make me a better team member but also prepare me to engage with diverse cultural perspectives.

Looking forward, I intend to embrace a more collectivist approach in group settings by being more focused on the needs of others, practicing active listening, and focusing on building long-term relationships. I also plan to seek out opportunities for intercultural engagement, whether through travel, collaboration, or learning from people around me with different cultural orientations. By nurturing both individualistic and collectivistic points of view, I hope to contribute to a more inclusive, understanding, and unified global community.

# data[].attributes.body
As I reflect on the six aspects of intercultural communication, I find the concept of Individualism vs. Collectivism the most affiliated with my personal experience and aspirations. This aspect represents the way people view themselves as independent individuals or members of cohesive groups. I felt like it has played a significant role in shaping my worldview. I have gained a more balanced understanding of both perspectives, and I hope to navigate our increasingly interconnected world with greater empathy and adaptability after learning about it.

Growing up in a mostly individualistic culture, I have come to value personal autonomy, self-reliance, and the pursuit of individual goals. These values have planted in me a strong seed of independence, ambition, and a clear understanding of my personal aspirations. However, I often have difficulties working within group settings, especially with people from more collectivistic backgrounds. However, since I learned about Individualism-Collectivism in university, it has enlightened me to see how collectivist cultures emphasize community well-being, shared responsibilities, and harmonious relationships. The concept of prioritizing group goals over personal interests has helped me a lot with university group projects and it’s also clear to me how valuable this mindset can be in achieving shared success.

A specific moment that shifted my perspective on collectivism occurred when I participated in a group project in my Intercultural Communications subject at university, where I worked closely with team members from cultures that value collaboration and mutual support. I was struck by their commitment to group cohesion, which sometimes required individuals to set aside personal preferences for the team’s success. While I initially found this approach restrictive, I eventually realized how it fostered a strong sense of belonging and responsibility that led to more cohesive teamwork and collective achievement later on.

In today’s globalized world, cultivating a more balanced perspective between individualism and collectivism is crucial. The interconnected nature of our societies demands the flexibility to collaborate effectively with people from various cultural backgrounds. And I aim to work on blending my self-reliant nature with an appreciation for interdependence. Developing this aspect within myself will not only make me a better team member but also prepare me to engage with diverse cultural perspectives.

Looking forward, I intend to embrace a more collectivist approach in group settings by being more focused on the needs of others, practicing active listening, and focusing on building long-term relationships. I also plan to seek out opportunities for intercultural engagement, whether through travel, collaboration, or learning from people around me with different cultural orientations. By nurturing both individualistic and collectivistic points of view, I hope to contribute to a more inclusive, understanding, and unified global community.

# data[].attributes.body
Nowadays, globalization is rapidly increasing in every country. Therefore, intercultural communication plays an important role in interactions between people from different cultures or living in different countries. Reflecting on my experiences, I find that the building blocks of culture are the most relevant aspect of communication for me.

First of all, the building blocks of culture include several dimensions that I can use to analyze communication, such as collectivist vs. individualist, societal particularist vs. universalist, monochronic vs. polychronic, and internal vs. external. Depending on the situation, I can recognize the atmosphere of the conversation and determine how to adapt to that environment. For example, in discussions about teamwork and collaboration, understanding that some cultures prioritize collective achievement over individual recognition helps me tailor my communication approach. This awareness allows me to express appreciation for group efforts, making my interactions more meaningful and effective.

Reflecting on my own experiences, I realize that there have been times when I overlooked these cultural building blocks, leading to misunderstandings or strained interactions. Not understanding the other culture or the meaning behind what is being said can lead to ineffective communication, steering the conversation in a different direction, or resulting in both parties failing to understand each other. For instance, during a group project with international teammates, I initially assumed that everyone shared my communication style. However, I soon learned that some team members were more reserved in expressing disagreement, which I misinterpreted as a lack of engagement. By recognizing and valuing these cultural differences, I was able to create an environment where everyone felt comfortable sharing their ideas and opinions.

As I continue to develop my communication skills, I understand that enhancing my awareness of the building blocks of culture is essential for fostering meaningful connections. It requires ongoing effort to learn about and appreciate the diverse backgrounds of those I interact with. When I fully comprehend the context of a conversation, I am less hesitant to engage because I won’t fear making mistakes or inadvertently mentioning taboo topics. Additionally, speaking with people from diverse cultures allows me to gain more experience and knowledge about their lifestyles, habits, and values. I actively seek opportunities to broaden my understanding through these interactions.

In today’s world, effective communication is essential. To fully understand interactions between people, we need to listen carefully and analyze the various elements present in a conversation to grasp any underlying meanings. The building blocks of culture help us dissect these layers of meaning and implications. Different cultures have distinct ways of thinking, so we cannot simply interpret words at face value. Effective communication depends on understanding the cultural context and nuances, ensuring that our interactions are meaningful and productive. By appreciating these cultural differences, we can enhance our ability to connect with others.

In conclusion, the building blocks of culture are essential for effective communication in our globalized world. By focusing on understanding values and beliefs, enhancing language skills, embracing customs and traditions, and fostering awareness of cultural identity, I can improve my ability to engage meaningfully with others. This development will not only enrich my personal experiences but also contribute to creating a more inclusive and harmonious global community. As I commit to this journey of growth, I believe I can facilitate better diffusion of ideas and foster understanding across cultures.

# data[].attributes.body
Intercultural Communication has provided me with comprehensive knowledge of multiple facets in relation to communication between different cultures, interaction between different cultural identities, and navigation of cultural differences. In particular, cultural awareness and nonverbal communication are the two aspects of significant concern, in accordance with my personal experiences.

Cultural awareness refers to the understanding of, knowledge about, sympathy for, and acceptance of other cultures and others' cultural identities. Different individuals may identify themselves with one of four different levels of cultural awareness developed by William Howell—(1) unconscious incompetence, (2) conscious incompetence, (3) conscious competence, and (4) unconscious incompetence. Having completed the theoretical studies of Intercultural Communication, I would place my position on the cultural adjustment journey between conscious incompetence and conscious competence. I have realised that cultural differences exist between all cultures, and that I should calibrate my behaviour accordingly. However, such decisions are reached at a conscious level, wherein I am continually cognizant of how my behaviour may appear to individuals of such cultures. More specifically, rather than switching from one behaviour to another without any intermediate stages, I have to erase the instincts of my cultural identity first, and adopt the instincts of the cultures I am acclimating to second, essentially turning myself into a blank slate before familiarising myself with other cultural identities. Additionally, I recognise that to achieve unconscious incompetence, one must have considerable experience and dynamic interaction with the culture, and that culturally appropriate behaviour is second nature, without any conscious effort. In conclusion, unconscious competence is what I strive towards in my journey towards cultural competence.

In addition to cultural awareness, nonverbal communication was another aspect of intercultural communication of particular interest to my integration into an inclusive and inclusionary humankind. Nonverbal communication refers to the imparting of information without using words or speech. Nonverbal communication comprises many different subcategories—kinesics (body language), haptics (touch), proxemics (social distance), chronemics (time), vocalics (volume, pitch, intonation, prosody), etc. The qualities of such subcategories may differ according to the cultural identities of those engaging in conversation. With respect to personal preferences in professional settings, I have found myself naturally positioning myself further from people than how a person typically would position themselves, adjusting my voice to be composed and considerate, and refraining from physical touch. I recognise that a culture may require the characteristics of my nonverbal communication to adjust in correspondence, in both formal and informal situations. In practice, when I am engaging in conversation with a person of different cultural identities, I make a sustained effort to adapt my nonverbal communication for effective and meaningful communication.

# data[].attributes.body
The Intercultural Communication course has provided me with fundamental knowledge of how culture affects people in many ways, from language to behavior. Having an opportunity to explore 6-dimensional aspects of culture presented by Hofstede, the aspects that I found most resonant are Individualism and Collectivism. I found that learning about Individualism and Collectivism has been eye-opening, especially considering how these cultural patterns shape people’s identities, relationships, and values as presented in all groups’ presentations. As a Vietnamese, and coming from a collectivist culture, I find it is necessary to prioritize group harmony and mutual support. This approach of Collectivism has helped me build a deeper connection and reinforced my sense of belonging and duty within my community. However, studying Individualism has shown me that it is also necessary to value independence, self-expression, and personal goals, which can lead to personal success. Reflecting on both perspectives, I feel I’ve become more conscious of how my background influences my interactions and how I could balance these influences for better communication in diverse settings.

To achieve a more globalized approach to communication, I think it is essential to foster flexibility in navigating between Individualism and Collectivism. Rather than viewing them as opposing forces, I want to adopt a mindset that appreciates each value in context. For example, in situations that need teamwork, I can lean on my collectivist instincts to build harmonious relationships and encourage collaboration. On the contrary, when independence is valued, I can embrace individualistic qualities, allowing myself to explore new ideas and express creativity. This adaptability will enable me to bridge cultural gaps between me and others, especially foreigners, creating connections that honor both my background and the diversity I encounter. I believe that embracing this dynamic approach will be a crucial skill in an increasingly interconnected world.

# data[].attributes.body
My studies of Intercultural Communication have given me the chance to learn about many aspects of culture as well as the problems and distinctions that occur when people from different cultural backgrounds come into contact with one another. The aspect that resonates most with me and that I wish to develop for better diffusion in a globalized society is masculinity and femininity. This dimension also allows me to see the cultural lens through whereby social expectations, behaviors, or even attitudes are shaped. According to Hofstede’s dimensions model, masculinity and femininity are also essential in understanding the relations between societies and cultures.

In masculine cultures such as the United States, Mexico, China and Japan, success and materialism are highly valued, and therefore competitiveness and achievement-oriented people are preferred. Those cultures encourage individuals to appreciate ambition, drive as well as personal successes and social and career achievements are common indicators of success. In contrast, feminine cultures, such as those in Sweden, the Netherlands, Costa Rica and Norway, focus on care, compassion and the well-being of people. Such societies prioritize relationships, care for people, the community, and the ecosystem. Work-life balance and gender equity are in principle core values defining such socio-economic institutions.

We can see how masculinity and femininity influence the various dimensions of life. Masculine cultures may emphasize performance and competition in the workplace, whereas feminine cultures may favor collaborative and consensual approaches. This results in different norms about how to handle conflict, how decisions should be made, and how leadership operates in the firm. In this regard, considering these aspects has made me appreciate how it is important to respect and appreciate cultural diversity when dealing with people from different cultures in several instances. There may be direct and aggressive communicators and there may be people who are more inclined towards maintaining peace and harmony. In addition, as I recall moments in my own culture learning experience, I also recognize that these variables are determinants of gender roles and ideology. In masculine cultures, gender division of labor is quite common with clearly defined roles for men and women. While this is done in feminine cultures too, the inequality is not nearly as pronounced for a woman is allowed to have many more roles than just that of mother and housewife.

Schemes of these differences are important in resolving disputes that may emerge due to language and cultural diversities. By learning the differences, one tries to respect each other’s beliefs and values and communicate appropriately. Based on Hofstede, the dimensions are not only useful in analyzing a culture; they can also be used in developing cross-cultural skills, which is essential in today's globalized world. By recognizing and valuing these differences, people can foster more harmonious and constructive relations in different situations.

As a final word, I would like to express my gratitude to lecturer Ta Kim Hoang for his course materials and views offered during the lessons that allowed further comprehension of the unit.

# data[].attributes.body
Throughout my intercultural communication course, I have listened to insightful sharing from my lecturer and watched amazing presentations from my friends. These newfound knowledge not only deepened my understanding of intercultural dynamics but have also inspired me to improve certain skills necessary for thriving in a multicultural environment. This essay reflects on my personal experiences, the concepts I have learned in my intercultural communication course, and the areas I wish to develop further.

In our increasingly interconnected world, the ability to communicate effectively across cultures is vital, as I think some day in the future all of us will need to work and collaborate with people from all over the world: a public relations executive must understand a country’s cultural landscape to devise a market entrance strategy; a translator must be well-aware of cultural nuances to deliver the message or localize a copy; a teacher must find ways to work with students coming from various cultural background in a classroom. It is not an exaggeration to say that intercultural communication skills are an indispensable part of our professional toolbox in this highly globalized world.

One of the most significant aspects of intercultural communication that I have come to appreciate is the importance of empathy and non-judgementalism. At my university, I interacted with several Korean students. Initially, I assumed they would be overly serious, distant, or even mean due to their rigorous education system and the fact that they come from a more individualistic society than my own. However, during a cultural exchange event, I saw them in a new light, and I suppose it is a more authentic one: they are not at all distant for rigid – they enjoy karaoke, hangouts, barbecues, drinking; they are willing to make new friends and adapt to new cultures; they are creative, endearing, and do not hold a patronizing attitude as I had previously assumed. I also noticed many of my Korean classmates smoke frequently, which was initially surprising to me, as in my culture, smoking is often viewed very negatively. However I soon realized that it serves as a social bonding experience for them. Smoking while sharing meals and stories help them get to know each other and show people that they are comfortable enough to share personal stories with others.

Another important aspect of intercultural communication is non-verbal communication. I learned in my course about the nuances of non-verbal communication, that gestures, facial expressions, and body language can vary widely between cultures, and what means yes in one culture may mean no in another. This understanding is highly relevant to my experiences, particularly during my time as a volunteer teaching assistant in an international school in Kathmandu, Nepal, in February 2024. During my volunteer trip, I met students from diverse cultural backgrounds, including Nepalese, Newari, Indian, and also some fellow volunteers from Western cultures like Switzerland and Germany. This diversity presented a unique opportunity to observe the variations in non-verbal communication firsthand. For example, while maintaining eye contact is seen as a casual and respectful gesture in Germany, it may be considered disrespectful in Nepal: my German peer was told that he should not make and hold direct eye contact with strangers on the streets or when speaking to a person, which was really confusing to him since this was not a problem in his home country. Another thing I noticed is that here in Nepal, people wobble their heads to show agreement, not doubt, sarcasm, or flat out disagreement with someone. As a result of this realization, I have become more mindful of my own body language and how it might be perceived by individuals from other cultural backgrounds.

While I have strengths in intercultural communication, I recognize that there are several areas where I want to improve.

One area for development is my ability to navigate cultural differences more effectively. Although I strive to be empathetic and open-minded, I sometimes feel uncomfortable when I need to pick up practices that differ significantly from my own beliefs. For instance, during my summer  program in Japan, I noticed that people often bowed as a greeting instead of shaking hands, or they bow and shake hands simultaneously. At first, I felt very unsure about how to respond and ended up awkwardly mimicking their gestures. This situation highlights the need for cultural adaptation, a concept emphasized in my course. I want to learn how to adapt more easily to diverse situations and cultural practices without feeling out of place or awkward, so that I can make sure that my message does not get lost in translation (this case in cultural immersion) and show respect for others’ values and traditions.

Conflict resolution skills are another area I wish to improve. Misunderstandings are common when communicating across cultures, and how we handle these conflicts can significantly impact our relationships. I recall a situation where I had a disagreement with a classmate from a different culture about a group project. Instead of addressing our differences openly, we both ended up frustrated and avoided discussing the issue altogether. We were afraid to bring up the subject, because neither of us want to deal with unexpectedness – that being unexpected slanders, unexpected negative outcome, and unexpected hurt. I want to be less fearful of the uncertainty and learn conflict resolution techniques to handle future issues more effectively, both in my personal and professional life. By approaching conflicts with a mindset focused on open communication and collaboration, I can foster a more positive environment for myself and those around me.

Finally, I aim to enhance my cultural intelligence (CQ), which is all about understanding and adapting to different cultural contexts. To thrive in a globalized world, I need to improve my cognitive (knowledge), emotional (empathy), and behavioral (adaptability) skills. I plan to read more about cultural practices and engage with diverse groups to increase my knowledge and authentic communicating experiences. By enhancing my cultural intelligence, I can improve my interactions with people from various backgrounds.

In conclusion, my journey in understanding intercultural communication has highlighted several aspects that resonate with me, such as empathy, non-verbal communication, and understanding cultural values. At the same time, I recognize the areas I need to develop, including navigating cultural differences, expanding my cultural knowledge, improving conflict resolution skills, and enhancing my cultural intelligence. By working on these areas, I hope to become a global citizen, a part of a more understanding and inclusive community in a globalized world.

# data[].attributes.body
My studies of Intercultural Communication have given me the chance to learn about many aspects of culture and the problems and distinctions that occur when people from different cultural backgrounds come into contact with one another. To me, the aspect that resonates most with me and that I wish to develop for better diffusion in a globalized society is masculinity and femininity. This dimension also allows me to see the cultural lens through whereby social expectations, behaviors, or even attitudes are shaped. According to Hofstede’s dimensions model, masculinity and femininity are also essential in understanding the relations between societies and cultures.

In masculine cultures such as the United States and Japan, success and materialism are highly valued, and therefore competitiveness and achievement-oriented people are preferred. Such cultures encourage individuals to appreciate ambition, drive as well as personal successes and social and career achievements are common indicators of success. In contrast, feminine cultures, such as those in Sweden and Norway, focus on care, compassion and the well-being of people. Such societies prioritize relationships, care for people, community, and the ecosystem. Work-life balance and gender equity are in principle core values defining such socio-economic institutions.

We can see how masculinity and femininity influence the various dimensions of life. Masculine cultures may emphasize performance and competition in the workplace, whereas feminine cultures may favor collaborative and consensual approaches. This results in different norms about how to handle conflict, how decisions should be made, and how leadership operates in the firm. In this regard, considering these aspects has made me appreciate how it is important to respect and appreciate cultural diversity when dealing with people from different cultures in several instances. There may be direct and aggressive communicators and there may be people who are more inclined towards maintaining peace and harmony. In addition, as I recall moments in my own culture learning experience, I also recognize that these variables are determinants of gender roles and ideology. In masculine cultures, gender division of labor is quite common with clearly defined roles for men and women. While this is done in feminine cultures too, the inequality is not nearly as pronounced for a woman is allowed to have many more roles than just that of mother and housewife.

Schemes of these differences are important in resolving disputes that may emerge due to language and cultural diversities. By learning the differences, one tries to respect each other’s beliefs and values and communicate appropriately. Based on Hofstede, the dimensions are not only useful in analyzing a culture; they can also be used in developing cross-cultural skills, which is essential in today's globalized world. By recognizing and valuing these differences, people can foster more harmonious and constructive relations in different situations. As a final word, I would like to express my gratitude to lecturer Ta Kim Hoang for his course materials and views offered during the lessons that allowed further comprehension of the unit.

# data[].attributes.body
My studies of Intercultural Communication have given me the chance to learn about many aspects of culture and the problems and distinctions that occur when people from different cultural backgrounds come into contact with one another. The aspect that resonates most with me and that I wish to develop for better diffusion in a globalized society is masculinity and femininity. This dimension also allows me to see the cultural lens through whereby social expectations, behaviors, or even attitudes are shaped. According to Hofstede’s dimensions model, masculinity and femininity are also essential in understanding the relations between societies and cultures.

In masculine cultures such as the United States, Mexico, China, and Japan, success and materialism are highly valued, and therefore competitiveness and achievement-oriented people are preferred. Those cultures encourage individuals to appreciate ambition, and drive as well as personal successes, and social and career achievements are common indicators of success. In contrast, feminine cultures, such as those in Sweden, the Netherlands, Costa Rica, and Norway, focus on care, compassion, and the well-being of people. Such societies prioritize relationships, care for people, the community, and the ecosystem. Work-life balance and gender equity are in principle core values defining such socio-economic institutions.

We can see how masculinity and femininity influence the various dimensions of life. Masculine cultures may emphasize performance and competition in the workplace, whereas feminine cultures may favor collaborative and consensual approaches. This results in different norms about how to handle conflict, how decisions should be made, and how leadership operates in the firm. In this regard, considering these aspects has made me appreciate how it is important to respect and appreciate cultural diversity when dealing with people from different cultures in several instances. There may be direct and aggressive communicators and there may be people who are more inclined towards maintaining peace and harmony. In addition, as I recall moments in my own culture learning experience, I also recognize that these variables are determinants of gender roles and ideology. In masculine cultures, gender division of labor is quite common with clearly defined roles for men and women. While this is done in feminine cultures too, the inequality is not nearly as pronounced for a woman is allowed to have many more roles than just that of mother and housewife.

Schemes of these differences are important in resolving disputes that may emerge due to language and cultural diversities. By learning the differences, one tries to respect each other’s beliefs and values and communicate appropriately. Based on Hofstede, the dimensions are not only useful in analyzing a culture; they can also be used in developing cross-cultural skills, which is essential in today's globalized world. By recognizing and valuing these differences, people can foster more harmonious and constructive relations in different situations.

Last but not least, I would like to express my gratitude to lecturer Ta Kim Hoang for his course materials and views offered during the lessons that allowed further comprehension of the unit.

# data[].attributes.body
Intercultural communication is increasingly essential in our interconnected world. As global communities continue to overlap, understanding the dynamics of intercultural communication is crucial for enhancing both personal and professional relationships, increasing respect, and bridging cultural divides. Reflecting on my study of Intercultural Communication, I found the concept of high-context and low-context communication styles especially resonant.

Coming from a high-context culture, I am accustomed to communication that relies heavily on implicit meaning, shared understanding, and nonverbal cues. This approach has made me more attentive to the unspoken aspects of communication, encouraging me to consider others’ feelings and perspectives before I speak. For example, in group settings, I tend to focus on preserving harmony and choose words carefully, especially when discussing sensitive issues. This way of communicating has helped me foster close relationships built on mutual respect.

Another aspect I appreciate in high-context communication is the priority given to indirect feedback, which helps preserve relationships by avoiding open confrontation. Subtle feedback helps preserve relationships by avoiding direct confrontation, allowing messages to be conveyed without criticism and maintaining individual dignity.In my experience, this method reduces conflict and supports positive relationships over time.

However, while I am comfortable with the nuances of high-context communication, after attending the Intercultural Communication course, I recognize areas that I could improve to communicate more effectively. One area is adapting to the directness and explicitness valued in low-context cultures. In these environments, people often prefer straightforward communication, with a focus on clarity and efficiency. This style can sometimes feel blunt to someone from a high-context background, but I’ve come to see that directness has its advantages. For instance, it reduces ambiguity and makes it easier to understand expectations, especially in professional settings where clear communication is essential. Still, I sometimes find it challenging to shift from my preference for subtlety to a more direct approach. This adjustment will take time to nurture and perfect, but I believe that with enough practice and focus, I will be able to achieve it.

Another area I am working to improve is becoming more comfortable with giving and receiving open feedback. As I have mentioned, in high-context cultures, feedback is often given indirectly to avoid embarrassment or conflict, while in low-context settings, feedback tends to be clear and specific. I realize that my preference for indirect feedback might lead to miscommunication with those accustomed to openness when my messages seem vague. To improve, I am practicing more explicit feedback and adjusting my mindset to accept direct feedback constructively. Building this skill will help me communicate more effectively with those who value transparency, enabling more productive interactions.

In short, while I resonate with the values of subtlety and relationship-building in high-context communication, I also see the need to enhance my skills in directness and clarity to communicate more effectively. By blending both high-context and low-context approaches, I aim to become a more adaptable and empathetic communicator, fostering understanding and trust across cultures. This versatility will allow me to connect more meaningfully with people from diverse backgrounds, contributing to a more inclusive global community.

As a final word, I would like to sincerely thank Miss Hoang Ta Kim for her dedication and expertise in Intercultural Communication. Miss Kim’s lessons have greatly deepened my understanding of intercultural communication, and I am truly grateful for the impact she has had on my learning journey.

# data[].attributes.body
In our increasingly interconnected world, intercultural competence has become an essential skill. As I reflect on my own experiences and growth in this area, I find myself both resonating with certain aspects of intercultural communication and recognizing areas where I need further development. This self-reflection will explore these dimensions, focusing on how they impact my ability to navigate and thrive in our globalized society.

One of the intercultural aspects I find most resonant is the openness to cultural diversity. I've always been fascinated by different cultures, their traditions, and ways of life. This curiosity has led me to actively seek out interactions with people from various backgrounds, whether through travel, international friendships, or engaging with diverse communities in my own city.

This openness has allowed me to broaden my perspectives and challenge my own preconceptions. I've learned that there's rarely a single "right" way of doing things, and that different cultural approaches can offer valuable insights and solutions to common problems. This mindset has been particularly beneficial in professional settings, where diverse teams often produce more innovative and comprehensive results.

Another aspect that strongly resonates with me is the importance of empathy and active listening in intercultural communication. I've found that truly understanding someone from a different cultural background requires more than just hearing their words; it involves actively trying to see the world from their perspective.

This skill has been crucial in building meaningful relationships across cultural boundaries. By practicing empathy, I've been able to navigate potentially sensitive topics more gracefully and resolve misunderstandings that arise from cultural differences. It's a constant reminder that effective communication is as much about understanding as it is about being understood.

While I've made efforts to learn multiple languages, I recognize that there's still significant room for improvement in this area. Language is a key to unlocking deeper cultural understanding, and I believe that enhancing my language skills would greatly improve my ability to connect with people from different backgrounds.

My goal is to achieve fluency in at least one more language and gain basic proficiency in several others. This would not only facilitate better communication but also demonstrate respect and commitment to understanding other cultures on a more profound level.

Although I've gained insights into many other cultures, I realize I need to develop a deeper understanding of my own cultural biases and assumptions. Cultural self-awareness is crucial for genuine intercultural competence, as it allows us to recognize how our own cultural background influences our perceptions and behaviors.

By enhancing this aspect, I hope to become more conscious of my cultural lens and how it affects my interactions with others. This self-awareness would enable me to more effectively bridge cultural gaps and foster more authentic connections across cultures.

In conclusion, this self-reflection has not only highlighted my strengths and areas for improvement but also reinforced my commitment to lifelong intercultural learning. In our rapidly changing world, the ability to bridge cultural divides and foster mutual understanding is more crucial than ever. By continually working on these intercultural aspects, I aim to contribute to a more inclusive and harmonious global society.

# data[].attributes.body
One of Hofstede’s dimensions that resonates deeply with me is the individualism versus collectivism spectrum. Growing up in a predominantly individualistic culture, I have always valued personal autonomy and self-expression. I appreciate the emphasis on individual achievement and the importance of personal rights. This perspective has shaped my communication style, often leading me to prioritize directness and clarity in expressing my thoughts and opinions. However, I recognize that this individualistic approach can sometimes clash with collectivist cultures, where group harmony and consensus are prioritized. My experiences working with colleagues from collectivist backgrounds have highlighted the importance of understanding the value they place on relationships and group cohesion. This realization has encouraged me to adapt my communication style, focusing more on collaborative dialogue and showing regard for collective interests.

Another dimension that resonates with me is power distance, which reflects how different cultures perceive and respond to inequalities in power and authority. In cultures with high power distance, hierarchical structures are prevalent, and authority figures are respected and rarely questioned. Conversely, low power distance cultures tend to promote egalitarianism and encourage open dialogue. In my own experiences, I have navigated both high and low power distance environments. I have found that being aware of these dynamics is crucial for effective communication. For instance, in high power distance settings, I have learned to approach authority figures with respect and deference, while in low power distance contexts, I feel more comfortable engaging in open discussions with colleagues at all levels. This adaptability has improved my ability to communicate effectively across diverse cultural settings.

While I feel confident in my understanding of certain dimensions of intercultural communication, there are several areas I’d like to develop further to enhance my effectiveness in a globalized world. One such area is uncertainty avoidance, which refers to how cultures handle ambiguity and uncertainty. In high uncertainty avoidance cultures, people often prefer structured environments and clear rules, while those from low uncertainty avoidance cultures may be more comfortable with risk and ambiguity. I tend to find myself in low uncertainty avoidance contexts, where flexibility and adaptability are valued. To navigate high uncertainty avoidance cultures more effectively, I want to focus on providing clarity and structure in my communication. This includes being more explicit in my explanations and offering detailed plans or guidelines when necessary. By doing so, I can help reduce anxiety and build trust with individuals who may feel uncomfortable with ambiguity, leading to more productive interactions.

Another aspect I wish to develop is the masculinity versus femininity dimension, which describes how cultures value competitiveness versus collaboration. In masculine cultures, assertiveness and achievement are emphasized, while feminine cultures prioritize nurturing and cooperation. While I appreciate both traits, I recognize that I often lean toward assertiveness, especially in competitive environments. To enhance my intercultural communication, I want to strike a better balance by incorporating more collaboration and empathy. This means actively listening to others, valuing their input, and fostering a supportive atmosphere. By embracing the more nurturing aspects of communication, I can create an inclusive environment that appreciates diverse perspectives and encourages teamwork.

Lastly, the long-term versus short-term orientation dimension reflects how cultures view time and success. Cultures with a long-term orientation emphasize perseverance, planning, and future rewards, while those with a short-term orientation focus on immediate results and traditions. Personally, I often seek immediate outcomes, so I recognize the need to cultivate a long-term perspective in my interactions. To develop this area of my intercultural communication, I aim to practice patience and focus on building relationships over time. This involves investing time in understanding others’ values and aspirations and aligning my communication to reflect a shared vision for the future. By adopting a long-term orientation, I can foster deeper connections and enhance collaboration in intercultural settings.

In conclusion, intercultural communication is a multifaceted skill that requires ongoing reflection and adaptation. Through Hofstede’s cultural dimensions, I’ve gained valuable insights into the aspects of intercultural communication that resonate with me, such as individualism versus collectivism and power distance. At the same time, I recognize the importance of developing my skills in uncertainty avoidance, balancing masculinity and femininity, and embracing a long-term orientation. By focusing on these areas for growth, I hope to enhance my ability to communicate effectively in a globalized world. Ultimately, fostering intercultural communication not only enriches my personal experiences but also contributes to a more inclusive and understanding global society.