# data[].attributes.body
Fails to demonstrate proper evaluation of online sources. Shows little to no understanding of credibility indicators. Unable to effectively use digital tools for investigation. Lacks ethical awareness regarding information verification and sharing responsibilities.

# data[].attributes.body
Shows limited ability to evaluate online sources with significant gaps in verification process. Demonstrates minimal understanding of credibility indicators. Uses digital tools with frequent issues or limited functionality. Shows superficial ethical awareness with little consideration of verification responsibilities.

# data[].attributes.body
Demonstrates basic ability to evaluate online sources but may miss some important verification steps. Shows adequate understanding of credibility indicators. Uses digital tools appropriately but with limited sophistication. Displays basic ethical awareness with some consideration of verification responsibilities.

# data[].attributes.body
Shows strong ability to evaluate online sources with minor gaps. Demonstrates good understanding of most credibility indicators. Uses digital tools effectively with occasional technical issues. Shows clear ethical awareness with thoughtful consideration of information sharing responsibilities.

# data[].attributes.body
Demonstrates exceptional ability to evaluate online sources using multiple verification methods. Shows sophisticated understanding of source credibility indicators (author expertise, publication date, references). Exhibits advanced technical skills in using digital tools for investigation. Displays comprehensive ethical awareness regarding information sharing and verification responsibilities.

# data[].attributes.body
Fails to demonstrate analytical thinking or evaluation skills. Shows no ability to identify biases, logical fallacies, or evaluate evidence. Makes no meaningful inferences or connections. Lacks reflective insights and self-awareness of thinking processes.

# data[].attributes.body
Shows limited analytical skills with superficial evaluation of arguments and evidence. Demonstrates minimal ability to identify biases or logical issues. Makes weak or unclear inferences with poor reasoning. Provides shallow reflective insights with little self-awareness.

# data[].attributes.body
Demonstrates adequate analytical skills with basic evaluation of arguments and evidence. Shows some ability to identify obvious biases or logical issues. Makes reasonable inferences though reasoning may be unclear at times. Provides basic reflective insights with limited self-awareness.

# data[].attributes.body
Shows strong analytical skills with thorough evaluation of arguments and evidence. Demonstrates good ability to identify most biases and logical issues. Makes sound logical inferences with clear reasoning. Provides thoughtful reflective insights with good self-awareness of thinking processes.

# data[].attributes.body
Demonstrates exceptional depth of analysis with sophisticated evaluation of arguments and evidence. Shows advanced ability to identify biases, logical fallacies, and underlying assumptions. Makes insightful logical inferences and connections. Provides profound reflective insights that demonstrate metacognitive awareness of thinking processes.

# data[].attributes.body
Lacks creativity and fails to effectively use chosen format. Shows no competency in presentation medium with major technical or design flaws. Information is poorly presented, unclear, or disorganized. No effective use of visuals or multimedia elements.

# data[].attributes.body
Shows limited creativity with minimal innovation in chosen format. Demonstrates poor use of presentation medium with weak design or technical issues. Information presentation lacks clarity or engagement. Minimal or ineffective use of visuals or multimedia elements.

# data[].attributes.body
Demonstrates adequate creativity in chosen format. Shows basic competency in presentation medium with acceptable design and execution. Information is presented clearly but may lack engagement or have some organizational issues. Basic use of visuals or multimedia elements.

# data[].attributes.body
Shows strong creativity and good use of chosen format. Demonstrates proficient use of presentation medium with good design and technical execution. Information is presented clearly and engagingly with minor areas for improvement. Good use of visuals or multimedia elements that support understanding.

# data[].attributes.body
Demonstrates exceptional creativity and innovation in chosen format. Shows mastery of presentation medium with sophisticated design, layout, and technical execution. Information is presented in a highly engaging, clear, and professional manner. Excellent use of visuals, multimedia, or interactive elements that enhance understanding.

# data[].attributes.body
Fails to provide meaningful reflection on perspective changes. Shows no self-awareness of learning and growth. Demonstrates no understanding of skill development. Makes no connections between investigation process and personal learning.

# data[].attributes.body
Provides limited reflection with superficial insights on perspective changes. Demonstrates minimal self-awareness of learning and growth. Shows little understanding of skill development. Makes weak or unclear connections between process and learning.

# data[].attributes.body
Provides adequate reflection on 'before and after' perspectives with basic insights. Demonstrates some self-awareness of learning and growth. Shows basic understanding of skill development. Makes simple connections between investigation process and learning outcomes.

# data[].attributes.body
Provides thoughtful reflection on 'before and after' perspectives with clear insights. Demonstrates good self-awareness of learning and growth. Shows solid understanding of skill development in digital literacy and critical thinking. Makes clear connections between investigation process and personal learning.

# data[].attributes.body
Provides profound and insightful reflection on 'before and after' perspectives. Demonstrates exceptional self-awareness of learning and growth throughout the project. Shows deep understanding of how digital literacy and critical thinking skills have evolved. Articulates meaningful connections between the investigation process and personal development.