# data[].attributes.headline
Positive side did not know there debate by heart like the other team

# data[].attributes.subject
Positive side did not know there debate by heart like the other team

# data[].attributes.body
The negative side was respecting the positive side

# data[].attributes.headline
Strong evidence that a hallucination wouldn’t affect the move,ent of objects

# data[].attributes.subject
Strong evidence that a hallucination wouldn’t affect the move,ent of objects

# data[].attributes.headline
For reason one on the positive side, he just misses him. He thinks about him often. Which is why he is just seeing things.

# data[].attributes.subject
For reason one on the positive side, he just misses him. He thinks about him often. Which is why he is just seeing things.

# data[].attributes.headline
The positive team is not as strong. Not as confident.

# data[].attributes.subject
The positive team is not as strong. Not as confident.

# data[].attributes.body
The positive side was very quiet

# data[].attributes.headline
Both teams were very respectful of each other

# data[].attributes.subject
Both teams were very respectful of each other

# data[].attributes.headline
From the first debate the positive side clearly won

# data[].attributes.subject
From the first debate the positive side clearly won

# data[].attributes.body
Jude needs to speak up a little

# data[].attributes.body
There was quite a bit of mumbling

# data[].attributes.body
Kevin had good evidence and broad range of resources

# data[].attributes.body
The conversing and huddling involved a bit of dance

# data[].attributes.headline
Why would he feel stress if he is getting more money, and doesn’t have to support a family

# data[].attributes.subject
Why would he feel stress if he is getting more money, and doesn’t have to support a family

# data[].attributes.body
The negative side did very well. They had a very strong thesis witch I believe is leading them to victory. Even tho we have not heard the positive side as of now. The negative side is in the lead, because they had evidence from the text and a very good thesis. One thing about the thesis was they never mentioned the name or author of the book. Other than that they did very well as of now .

# data[].attributes.body
Stress. Seems like they did a lot of strong research.

# data[].attributes.body
Luke the One and Only used a good reason which I agree with

# data[].attributes.body
He is depressed and wonts money? What?

# data[].attributes.body
The language and wording was a bit dry

# data[].attributes.body
Luke did a nice job including an example with his reasoning

# data[].attributes.body
The negative side had good reasonings

# data[].attributes.body
Negative side has some great reasonings! Awesome job Luke!

# data[].attributes.body
Good thesis very strong

# data[].attributes.body
Issac threw the metal item with good dexterity

# data[].attributes.body
Alex has literally eradicated his foes.

# data[].attributes.body
The positive side has a little more reasoning but the negatives have good points

# data[].attributes.headline
They have great resons and the negative side is doing well with resons 

# data[].attributes.subject
They have great resons and the negative side is doing well with resons 

# data[].attributes.body
The negative sides conclusion had false information😔

# data[].attributes.body
Team 1 ; being bad listeners to other teAm

# data[].attributes.body
The one reasons for the positives wasn’t the best because it could have been just imagining he didn’t choose to imagine it, as Niah said.

# data[].attributes.body
Boe has a point

# data[].attributes.headline
They are both doing a great job on the argument and great resons 

# data[].attributes.subject
They are both doing a great job on the argument and great resons 

# data[].attributes.headline
What you did well.... affirmative group 1

# data[].attributes.subject
What you did well.... affirmative group 1

# data[].attributes.body
Great rebuttal, amazing reasons, quite the fight, well thought out reasons,

# data[].attributes.body
I was positive but the negative side’s reasons aren’t bad

# data[].attributes.body
Pros:
Good speaking
Nice evidence
Alex is on Fire!
Cons:
Weird conversing

# data[].attributes.body
Strong thesis, fantastic reasons, they did well working together,

# data[].attributes.body
They both are doing great they just need more text evidence. I also like how negative side is being quiet and writing to the info to attack while posititve are not writing and just telling them all they know.

# data[].attributes.body
Cons: The postitive team said “thing”. Not a supported thesis statement
Pros: good evidence

# data[].attributes.body
The posi