# data[].attributes.body
Document 7 is based on the ways that people self consciously know is wrong.

# data[].attributes.body
In the post-classical era, Feudal Europe and Japanese Shogunates had similar ideals and features, in which contribution to the community, fulfilling martial expectations, and upholding honor bestowed upon them by their lords.

# data[].attributes.body
.Because Mototada is a samurai, he would naturally stress the importance of ethical behavior since Samurai's were expected to conform to a strict code of honor as part of their position.

# data[].attributes.body
Feudal Japan and feudal Europe were similar in that the warrior is a person who defends a society from its enemies and that the warrior has a code it must adhere to. These eras also shared the idea of punishment after failing to uphold any part of the code.

# data[].attributes.body
Both European and Japanese feudalism show similar attributes on regulations of rules and values of people and the set expectations of the military class. The importance of warrior codes is an important comparison between Feudal Europe and Japanese Shogunate.

# data[].attributes.body
Feudalism in Japan and Europe have a similar system of devotion and discipline, both upheld by a code of conduct and laws from the religious and political header. A way that Japanese shogunate differentiate from Feudal Europe is that Japan leaned towards moral codes over the European religious statements or laws.

# data[].attributes.body
What a warrior is (1,2)
Feudal Europe and Feudal Japan have a similar definition of a warrior (that a warrior protects something of value to the society). A notable difference lies in what they are to protect. Feudal Europe emphasized the protection of the church while Japan emphasized the protection of the warrior's master.
Warrior's code (3, 4)
These eras had similar attitudes in the code of a warrior in which that the warrior must always be brave, courteous, loyal, and resilient, and ready to defend at a moment's notice. However, Japan also wanted its warriors to contribute to the society, while Europe put its focus to the king.
Societal Regulation (5, 6, 7)

# data[].attributes.body
1) Doc 1 and Doc 2 both go under the same category of community, where both societies have jobs that contribute to the welfare of the overall community.
2) Doc 3 and Doc 4 both go under expectations, as both societies have a set of expectations that knights and samurai they must follow.
3) Doc 6 and Doc 7 both relate to the main idea of honor, in which both societies have an honor code that punishes those who lack competence to follow those codes and fulfill them.

# data[].attributes.body
In the post-classical Era, Feudal Europe and Japanese Shogunates both had a system of feudalism in which different classes worked to contribute to the society while having a set of rules that maintained loyalty that the people have to agree within society. Additionally, in both post-classical Era civilizations, the protectors had to be defend and stay loyal to their masters while remaining honorable through the Code of Chivalry and the Way of the Samurai.

# data[].attributes.body
Naturally, as document 4 is primarily based on the French and English legends of King Arthur, it is evident that the document may not be completely trustworthy since legends are generally passed on orally based on local's beliefs, which sometimes are inaccurate or limited in understanding.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Different social classes in Feudalism
2.Set of Rules in Europe and Japanese society
3. The Protectors (Knights/Samurais)

# data[].attributes.headline
Be sure to use signal words such as "in both" or "they shared features of . . ."

# data[].attributes.subject
Be sure to use signal words such as "in both" or "they shared features of . . ."

# data[].attributes.body
Feudalism was essentially created to maintain a power structure. In Japan, there was a clear distinction between a warrior and his master; a samurai's duty was to serve his master until death and if he failed, the samurai must commit suicide. In Europe, knights served the king and were required to be loyal to the crown. However, knights were not tied to the king for they could gain land and manage their own wealth without fear of death

# data[].attributes.body
- rules and expectation (5, 7)
- warrior codes (3, 4, 6)
- unification of people using ethical values (1, 2)

# data[].attributes.body
1. Both Japanese and European Feudalism had a code of honor. According to Document Three, Solo described the Way of the Samurai, which requires loyalty and devotion. In document four, Malory described what true knighthood is. Motada, in document six, describe his failure and why he is committing suicide. Japanese requires loyalty to a master, but Japan is more militarized. Although, knights follow a code of honor, they benefit from the land they own, compared to the samurai where restricted to only their master and own no property.
2. Social structure (Doc 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7); both had social classes that were significant to a functioning society, but one has knights and the other has samurais
3. Power Struggle (Doc 5,6); Both had loyalty to one ruler; but European had decreed people in power like the pope, but Japan fights for power

# data[].attributes.headline
Brian, Ethan C., Josh, Pierre Document 6

# data[].attributes.subject
Brian, Ethan C., Josh, Pierre Document 6

# data[].attributes.body
Because of the warrior code of Bushido, Mototada most likely believed that he was dishonored after failing to protect his master's castle and thus explains his tone of regret and subsequent suicide.

# data[].attributes.body
Devotion (3, 4, 6)
Discipline (1, 2)
Laws (5, 7)